The California Water Boards' Annual Performance Report - Fiscal Year 2015-16

State Board | Region 1 | Region 2 | Region 3 | Region 4 | Region 5 | Region 6 | Region 7 | Region 8 | Region 9

TARGETS AND RESOURCES: REGION 6 LAHONTAN

GROUP: TARGETS AND RESOURCES - REGION 6

MEASURE: ALL REGIONAL TARGETS
ALL RESOURCES

Targets Achieved:
• = Less than 60% of target met
• = Target met between 60% and 80%
• = Target met at 80% or above

Lahontan Regional Water Board Performance Summary¹	Your Page Does not Support iFrames Percentage of Targets Met
Area: 32792 square miles	Budget: $11,690,523	Staff: 58.9
Permitting 50% •	Inspections 100% •	Others 100% •
¹Regional Board performance summary statistics show the percentage of targets met.

Total Maximum Daily Load and Basin Planning
Program Budget: $702,412	Program Staff: 5.50
	Target	Actual Achieved	% of Targets Met
Pollutant/Water Body Combinations Addressed	0	0
Total Maximum Daily Loads Adopted	0	0
Basin Plan Amendments Adopted	0	0
Please see Region 6's Total Maximum Daily Load and Basin Planning fact sheet for a more detailed overview of the program and accomplishments.

NPDES Wastewater
Program Budget: $179,633	Program Staff: 1.20
	Target	Actual Achieved	% of Targets Met
Major Individual Permits Issued or Renewed	0	0
Major Individual Facilities Inspected	1	2	200% •
Minor Individual Permits Issued or Renewed	2	0	0% •
Minor Individual Facilities Inspected	1	3	300% •
Minor General Facilities Inspected	0	1
Region 6 redirected or expended additional NPDES resources to address the following unscheduled/unplanned situations: Multiple NPDES mandatory minimum penalty cases. • Multiple requests for Basin Plan prohibition exemptions required to proceed under the state’s NPDES Aquatic Pesticides General Permit. • Technical complications regarding NPDES permit renewal for Grover Hot Springs State Park. • Multiple and extensive staff leave (personal and military) and vacancies. Please see Region 6's NPDES Wastewater fact sheet for a more detailed overview of the program and accomplishments.

NPDES Stormwater
Program Budget: $272,130	Program Staff: 2.00
	Target	Actual Achieved	% of Targets Met
Municipal (Phase I/II Inspections)	1	3	300% •
Construction Inspections	49	87	178% •
Industrial Inspections	16	27	169% •
Please see Region 6's NPDES Stormwater fact sheet for a more detailed overview of the program and accomplishments.

Waste Discharge to Land - Wastewater
Program Budget: $1,126,798	Program Staff: 7.70
	Target	Actual Achieved	% of Targets Met
Waste Discharge to Land Inspections	53	55	104% •
Individual Waste Discharge Requirements Updated	7	4	57% •
Water Board was unable to meet WDR target of 7 due to delays from several Dischargers in completing permit application information or environmental reviews. Please see Region 6's Waste Discharge to Land fact sheet for a more detailed overview of the program and accomplishments.

Land Disposal
Program Budget: $516,953	Program Staff: 3.20
	Target	Actual Achieved	% of Targets Met
Landfill Individual Permits Updated	3	3	100% •
Land Fill Inspections	22	29	132% •
All Other Individual Permits Updated	2	2	100% •
All Other Inspections	23	24	104% •
Please see Region 6's Land Disposal fact sheet for a more detailed overview of the program and accomplishments.

Confined Animal Facilities (WDR, NPDES, etc.)
Program Budget: $0	Program Staff: 0.00
	Target	Actual Achieved	% of Targets Met
Confined Animal Facilities Inspections	3	4	133% •
No Regional Considerations Provided

Timber Harvest
Program Budget: $470,596	Program Staff: 3.50
	Target	Actual Achieved	% of Targets Met
Timber Harvest Inspections	25	28	112% •
Please see Region 6's Timber Harvest fact sheet for a more detailed overview of the program and accomplishments.

Enforcement
Program Budget: $294,317	Program Staff: 1.90
	Target	Actual Achieved	% of Targets Met
Class 1 Priority Violations will Result in Formal Enforcement or an Investigative Order Pursuant to Water Code Section 13267 within 18 Months of Discovery	100%	100%	100% •
Facilities with Over $12,000 in MMPs (4 or More Violations) Not Assessed within 18 Months of Accrual	0	0	•
Please see Region 6's Enforcement fact sheet for a more detailed overview of the program and accomplishments.

Cleanup
Program Budget: $677,359	Program Staff: 3.80
	Target	Actual Achieved	% of Targets Met
New Department of Defense Sites Into Active Remediation	0	0
New Cleanup Sites Into Active Remediation	0	0
Cleanup Sites Closed	9	8	89% •
New Underground Storage Sites Into Active Remediation	0	6
Underground Storage Tank Sites Projected Closed	25	26	104% •
Please see Region 6's Cleanup (Site Cleanup Program and DoD) fact sheet for a more detailed overview of the program and accomplishments.

RESOURCES (INPUTS)

WHAT THE CARD IS SHOWING

Each target card provides a direct comparison of actual outputs for the fiscal year (July 1st to June 30th) to the target estimates established at the outset of the fiscal year. While budgetary and personnel information is not directly aligned with the activities being assessed, it does provide a basis for understanding the relative priority of key programs within each region and across the State. For the actual outputs presented, the Water Boards are continuing to evolve its data bases for improved accuracy. Some of the measurements reported may be different than the measurements tracked by the regions and programs. In addition, there are several targets for which outputs cannot be readily displayed without modification to the databases. This includes the number of permits revised, which should include the number of permits reviewed, revised and/or rescinded.

For the actual outputs presented, the Water Boards are continuing to evolve its data bases for improved accuracy. Some of the measurements reported may be different than the measurements tracked by the regions and programs. Notably, the data portrayed include entries completed before November 4, 2014 and may not reflect data input after that period.

WHY THIS CARD IS IMPORTANT

Beginning with FY 2009-10, performance targets were established for certain output measures. Targets are goals that establish measurable levels of performance to be achieved within a specified time period. This card demonstrates how the resources of the region are being deployed to protect water quality. In establishing the targets, the Regional Water Boards considered the unique differences and needs within their respective watersheds, their work priorities given available resources, external factors such as furloughs, and prior year outputs.

TECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS

Target circles: • = Less than 60% of target met
• = Target met between 60% and 80%
• = Target met at 80% or above.
Other Programs (budget): miscellaneous programs not included in the above.
Permits issued: Does not include rescissions, amendments or permit revisions that may have been included in the targets.

REGIONAL CONSIDERATIONS

Regional Considerations provided in tables above under each program section.

( Page last updated: 5/16/16 )

Region 6 (Lahontan)	FY 2015-16 Budget ($)	Staff (PY)	%Fees/Taxes Penalties	%Federal	%General Fund/Other	%Bonds