Los Angeles Regional Water Board Performance Summary1 | Percentage of Targets Met |
||
Area: 4451 square miles | Budget: $21,108,636 | Staff: 141 | |
Permitting 80% • | Inspections 100% • | Others 67% • | |
1Regional Board performance summary statistics show the percentage of targets met. |
Total Maximum Daily Load and Basin Planning | |||||
Program Budget: $1,610,699 | Program Staff: 12.70 | ||||
Target | Actual Achieved | % of Targets Met | |||
Pollutant/Water Body Combinations Addressed | 46 | 0 | 0% • | ||
Total Maximum Daily Loads Adopted | 2 | 0 | 0% • | ||
Basin Plan Amendments Adopted | 3 | 3 | 100% • | ||
The NPDES Stormwater program also approved 12 Enhanced Watershed Management Programs pursuant to the LA County MS4 Permit, a Watershed Management Program pursuant to the City of Long Beach MS4 Permit, and 16 corresponding monitoring programs under the two MS4 permits. The NPDES Stormwater program also developed and publicly noticed for comment tentative permit provisions to implement 25 TMDLs applicable to industrial stormwater discharges in Region 4 through the Statewide Industrial General Stormwater Permit. | |||||
NPDES Wastewater | |||||
Program Budget: $2,797,094 | Program Staff: 18.90 | ||||
Target | Actual Achieved | % of Targets Met | |||
Major Individual Permits Issued or Renewed | 10 | 7 | 70% • | ||
Major Individual Facilities Inspected | 26 | 26 | 100% • | ||
Minor Individual Permits Issued or Renewed | 11 | 12 | 109% • | ||
Minor Individual Facilities Inspected | 11 | 12 | 109% • | ||
Minor General Facilities Inspected | 34 | 88 | 259% • | ||
Region 4 is awaiting State Board to adopt a statewide general permit for hydrostatic test discharge from natural gas pipeline and State Board’s permitting process has been delayed until February 2017. | |||||
NPDES Stormwater | |||||
Program Budget: $1,987,376 | Program Staff: 14.50 | ||||
Target | Actual Achieved | % of Targets Met | |||
Municipal (Phase I/II Inspections) | 7 | 6 | 86% • | ||
Construction Inspections | 330 | 396 | 120% • | ||
Industrial Inspections | 322 | 344 | 107% • | ||
No Regional Board Considerations Provided | |||||
Waste Discharge to Land - Wastewater | |||||
Program Budget: $650,333 | Program Staff: 4.50 | ||||
Target | Actual Achieved | % of Targets Met | |||
Waste Discharge to Land Inspections | 24 | 32 | 133% • | ||
Individual Waste Discharge Requirements Updated | 5 | 4 | 80% • | ||
Region 4 Groundwater Permitting Unit has accomplished and exceeded the committed performance goals as follows: - No. of Inspections: Groundwater Permitting Unit has conducted 30 inspections within Fiscal Year of 2015-2016 which is 125% over the goal (24 inspections). | |||||
Land Disposal | |||||
Program Budget: $526,869 | Program Staff: 3.50 | ||||
Target | Actual Achieved | % of Targets Met | |||
Landfill Individual Permits Updated | 3 | 8 | 267% • | ||
Landfill Inspections | 38 | 60 | 158% • | ||
All Other Individual Permits Updated | 1 | 2 | 200% • | ||
All Other Inspections | 22 | 22 | 100% • | ||
Confined Animal Facilities (WDR, NPDES, etc.) | |||||
Program Budget: $0 | Program Staff: 0.00 | ||||
Target | Actual Achieved | % of Targets Met | |||
Confined Animal Facilities Inspections | 0 | 0 | |||
No Regional Considerations Provided | |||||
Timber Harvest (Forestry) | |||||
Program Budget: $0 | Program Staff: 0.00 | ||||
Target | Actual Achieved | % of Targets Met | |||
Timber Harvest Inspections | 0 | 0 | |||
No Regional Considerations Provided | |||||
Enforcement | |||||
Program Budget: $1,009,306 | Program Staff: 7.70 | ||||
Target | Actual Achieved | % of Targets Met | |||
Class 1 Priority Violations will Result in Formal Enforcement or an Investigative Order Pursuant to Water Code Section 13267 within 18 Months of Discovery | 100% | 100% | 100% • | ||
Facilities with Over $12,000 in MMPs (4 or More Violations) Not Assessed within 18 Months of Accrual | 0 | 0 | • | ||
No Regional Board Considerations Provided | |||||
Cleanup | |||||
Program Budget: $3,739,058 | Program Staff: 21.00 | ||||
Target | Actual Achieved | % of Targets Met | |||
New Department of Defense Sites Into Active Remediation | 2 | 1 | 50% • | ||
New Cleanup Sites Into Active Remediation | 15 | 25 | 167% • | ||
Cleanup Sites Closed | 15 | 55 | 367% • | ||
New Underground Storage Tank Sites Into Active Remediation | 13 | 16 | 123% • | ||
Underground Storage Tank Sites Projected Closed | 90 | 124 | 138% • | ||
No Regional Considerations Provided | |||||