Santa Ana Regional Water Board Performance Summary1 | Percentage of Targets Met |
||
Area: 2798 square miles | Budget: $8,746,291 | Staff: 62.8 | |
Permitting 40% • | Inspections 78% • | Others 38% • | |
1Regional Board performance summary statistics show the percentage of targets met. |
Total Maximum Daily Load and Basin Planning | |||||
Program Budget: $1,278,718 | Program Staff: 9.00 | ||||
Target | Actual Achieved | % of Targets Met | |||
Pollutant/Water Body Combinations Addressed | 11 | 0 | 0% • | ||
Total Maximum Daily Loads Adopted | 2 | 0 | 0% • | ||
Basin Plan Amendments Adopted | 2 | 1 | 50% • | ||
Pollutant/Water Body Combination Addressed target: Board staff had planned to conduct a separate Regional Board action to delist 6 waterbody/pollutant combinations. Once it was determined that these delistings could be addressed through the accelerated 2014/2016 Integrated Report cycle, effort was shifted to writing the decisions necessary for these delistings. Anticipated Regional Board delisting action is April 2017. | |||||
NPDES Wastewater | |||||
Program Budget: $1,087,727 | Program Staff: 7.70 | ||||
Target | Actual Achieved | % of Targets Met | |||
Major Individual Permits Issued or Renewed | 5 | 5 | 100% • | ||
Major Individual Facilities Inspected | 17 | 20 | 118% • | ||
Minor Individual Permits Issued or Renewed | 1 | 1 | 100% • | ||
Minor Individual Facilities Inspected | 4 | 8 | 200% • | ||
Minor General Facilities Inspected | 0 | 0 | |||
No Regional Board Considerations Provided | |||||
NPDES Stormwater | |||||
Program Budget: $1,415,628 | Program Staff: 10.90 | ||||
Target | Actual Achieved | % of Targets Met | |||
Municipal (Phase I/II Inspections) | 6 | 33 | 550% • | ||
Construction Inspections | 365 | 714 | 196% • | ||
Industrial Inspections | 300 | 329 | 110% • | ||
No Regional Board Considerations Provided | |||||
Waste Discharge to Land - Wastewater | |||||
Program Budget: $366,514 | Program Staff: 2.90 | ||||
Target | Actual Achieved | % of Targets Met | |||
Waste Discharge to Land Inspections | 21 | 24 | 114% • | ||
Individual Waste Discharge Requirements Updated | 11 | 0 | 0% • | ||
Region 8 Wastewater Unit has 5 line staff available to perform permitting, inspection and enforcement activities at NPDES and WDR permitted facilities. Fiscal year 2015-2016 performance targets for both programs were developed based on 10.6 PYs. Despite this discrepancy, the unit achieved 100 % of its targets in renewing major and minor individual NPDES permits and exceeded NPDES and WDR inspection targets. Significant staff time was re-directed to other regional board priorities that took away from achieving the WDR permitting targets including issuance of eight individual exemptions for onsite wastewater treatment systems (OWTS) that did not meet the conditions of the General Waiver (Order No. R8 2013-0015) and the initial review of the Local Area Management Plans for the counties of San Bernardino and Riverside pursuant to the statewide OWTS policy. | |||||
Land Disposal | |||||
Program Budget: $592,469 | Program Staff: 4.00 | ||||
Target | Actual Achieved | % of Targets Met | |||
Landfill Individual Permits Updated | 2 | 1 | 50% • | ||
Landfill Inspections | 50 | 32 | 64% • | ||
All Other Individual Permits Updated | 1 | 0 | 0% • | ||
All Other Inspections | 23 | 14 | 61% • | ||
No Regional Board Considerations Provided | |||||
Confined Animal Facilities (WDR, NPDES, etc.) | |||||
Program Budget: $0 | Program Staff: 0.00 | ||||
Target | Actual Achieved | % of Targets Met | |||
Confined Animal Facilities (WDR, NPDES, etc.) | 70 | 112 | 160% • | ||
No Regional Board Considerations Provided | |||||
Timber Harvest (Forestry) | |||||
Program Budget: $0 | Program Staff: 0.00 | ||||
Target | Actual Achieved | % of Targets Met | |||
Timber Harvest Inspections | 0 | 0 | |||
No Regional Board Considerations Provided | |||||
Enforcement | |||||
Program Budget: $217,490 | Program Staff: 1.40 | ||||
Target | Actual Achieved | % of Targets Met | |||
Class 1 Priority Violations will Result in Formal Enforcement or an Investigative Order Pursuant to Water Code Section 13267 within 18 Months of Discovery | 100% | 50% | 50% • | ||
No Regional Board Considerations Provided | |||||
Cleanup | |||||
Program Budget: $570,105 | Program Staff: 3.70 | ||||
Target | Actual Achieved | % of Targets Met | |||
New Department of Defense Sites Into Active Remediation | 1 | 2 | 200% • | ||
New Cleanup Moved Sites Into Active Remediation | 6 | 5 | 83% • | ||
Cleanup Sites Closed | 5 | 5 | 100% • | ||
New Underground Storage Tank Sites Into Active Remediation | 0 | 6 | |||
Underground Storage Tank Sites Projected Closed | 30 | 20 | 67% • | ||
No Regional Board Considerations Provided | |||||