|Water Body Name:||Bear Creek and its tributaries|
|Water Body ID:||CAR4054300020170117051076|
|Water Body Type:||River & Stream|
Bear Creek and its tributaries
|Final Listing Decision:||Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)|
|Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:||New Decision|
|Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:||Pollutant|
|Regional Board Staff Conclusion:||Benthic Community Effects is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under sections 3.9 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.9, an additional line of evidence associating the Benthic Community Effects with a water or sediment concentration of pollutants is necessary to assess listing status. One line of evidence is available in the administrative record. The CSCI scores for this water body are 1.298673 and 1.075805.
Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing Benthic Community Effects in this water segment on the CWA section 303(d) List.
This conclusion is based on the staff findings that:
1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy.
2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy.
3. The CSCI scores for this water body are 1.298673 and 1.075805. Additionally, this water body passed several screening criteria and was identified as a reference water body for the purposes of developing the CSCI. The State Water Board has redefined the Integrated Reporting categories in order to make them more reflective of actual water quality conditions in the State. This revision allows for the inclusion of minimally disturbed data reference sites that were identified in the development of the California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) tool into Category 1. Reference sites are the core of the State?s statewide biological and habitat assessment program and set the benchmark for biological conditions expected when human activity in the landscape is absent or minimal. Unless there is any additional data showing that beneficial uses in a water body are not being supported, these reference water bodies along with any other bioassessment data sets showing a score of 0.92 or higher will be placed in Category 1 (all core beneficial uses are supported).
4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
|Regional Board Staff Decision Recommendation:||After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.|
|LOE Subgroup:||Population/Community Degradation|
|Beneficial Use:||Cold Freshwater Habitat|
|Number of Samples:||2|
|Number of Exceedances:||0|
|Data and Information Type:||Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys|
|Data Used to Assess Water Quality:||The CSCI scores for this water body are 1.298673 and 1.075805. This site is above the 0.79 threshold, and is therefore meeting the water quality objective for the aquatic life beneficial use. This water body passed several screening criteria and was identified as a reference water body for the purposes of developing the CSCI. Reference sites where human disturbance is absent or minimal are used to set benchmark expectations for healthy streams. A large set of nearly 600 reference sites representing the broad diversity of natural stream types found across California was used to develop the CSCI.|
|Data Reference:||The California Stream Condition Index (CSCI): A New Statewide Biological Scoring Tool for Assessing the Health of Freshwater Streams.|
|Complete data set for all CSCI reference sites for the entire State.|
|Water Quality Objective/Criterion:||All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce significant alterations in population or community ecology or receiving water biota. In addition, the health and life history characteristics of aquatic organisms in waters affected by controllable water quality factors shall not differ significantly from those for the same waters in areas unaffected by controllable water quality factors.|
|Objective/Criterion Reference:||Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region R4 Basin Plan|
|Evaluation Guideline:||The California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) is a biological scoring tool that helps aquatic resource managers translate complex data about benthic macroinvertebrates found living in a stream into an overall measure of stream health. The CSCI score is calculated by comparing the expected condition with actual (observed) results (Rhen, A.C. et al., 2015). CSCI scores range from 0 (highly degraded) to greater than 1 (equivalent to reference). CSCI scoring of biological condition are as follows (per the scientific paper supporting the development of the CSCI scoring tool): greater than or equal to 0.92 = likely intact condition, 0.91 to 0.80 = possibly altered condition, 0.79 to 0.63 = likely altered condition, less than or equal to 0.62 = very likely altered condition. Sites with scores below 0.79 are considered to have exceeded the water quality objective for the aquatic life beneficial use.|
|Guideline Reference:||A Quantitative Tool for Assessing the Integrity of Southern Coastal California Streams. Environmental Management. Volume 35, number 1 (2005): pp. 1-13|
|Spatial Representation:||Sampling was done at 405BRCAMS and R5BIO-318.|
|Temporal Representation:||Sampling was done on 6/7/2011 and 7/23/2000.|
|QAPP Information:||Samples were collected for the SWAMP RWB4 Stormwater Monitoring Council CY 2008 following SWAMP protocols and data were stored in the SWAMP database.|
|QAPP Information Reference(s):|