Draft 2008 California 303(d)/305(b) Integrated Report

Supporting Information

Regional Board 9 - San Diego Region

Water Body Name:	Morena Reservoir
Water Body ID:	CAL9115000020011025092811
Water Body Type:	Lake & Reservoir

DECISION ID	16328
Pollutant:	Dissolved oxygen saturation
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	New Decision
Revision Status	Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Weight of Evidence:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.2 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.2 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Four of the 17 samples exceed the Basin Plan water quality objective for dissolved oxygen. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Four of 17 samples exceeded the Basin Plan water quality objective for dissolved oxygen and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.2 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
RWQCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
SWRCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:
USEPA Decision:

Lines of Evidence (LOEs) for Decision ID 16328

LOE ID:	6164
Pollutant:	Dissolved oxygen saturation
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	17
Number of Exceedances:	4
Data and Information Type:	Fixed station physical/chemical monitoring (conventional pollutants only)
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Samples were collected by the City of San Diego for their Water Quality Monitoring Data for Drinking Source Water Reservoirs. Sampling period was from January 2005 to December 2006. Four of the 17 samples were below 5.0 mg/l objective. The mean of the 17 samples was 7.9 mg/l.
Data Reference:	Water Department, Water Quality Monitoring Data for Drinking Source Water Reservoirs. January 2005 to December 2006.
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Dissolved oxygen levels shall not be less than 5.0 mg/L in waters with designated WARM beneficial uses. The annual mean shall not be less than 7 mg/L more than 10 percent of the time.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin (9).
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	One surface water sample was collected per sampling event at Morena Reservoir at a standard location designated “Station A”.
Temporal Representation:	Samples were collected approximately once a month from January 2005 to December 2006; however, some months were not sampled.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	Samples were collected and analyzed according to the Water Quality Laboratory’s Quality Assurance Manual. Applicable field and laboratory Standard Operating Procedures were also provided by the San Diego Water Department.
QAPP Information Reference(s):	Water Quality Laboratory. Quality Assurance Manual.

DECISION ID	17639
Pollutant:	Ammonia as Nitrogen
Final Listing Decision:	List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	New Decision
Revision Status	Revised
Sources:	Agriculture-animal | Natural Sources | Unknown Nonpoint Source
Expected TMDL Completion Date:	2019
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Weight of Evidence:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Six of the six samples exceed the Basin Plan water quality objective for un-ionized ammonia (NH3). Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification in favor of placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3.Six of the six samples exceed the Basin Plan water quality objective for un-ionized ammonia (NH3) and this exceeds the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
RWQCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:
SWRCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:
USEPA Decision:

Lines of Evidence (LOEs) for Decision ID 17639

LOE ID:	6163
Pollutant:	Ammonia as Nitrogen
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	6
Number of Exceedances:	6
Data and Information Type:	Fixed station physical/chemical monitoring (conventional pollutants only)
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Data was collected by the City of San Diego Water Quality Monitoring Data for their Drinking Source Water Reservoirs report. Six samples were collected between January 2005 to December 2006. All six samples exceeded the water quality objective.
Data Reference:	Water Department, Water Quality Monitoring Data for Drinking Source Water Reservoirs. January 2005 to December 2006.
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	From the Basin Plan the WQO for un-ionized ammonia (NH3) for inland surface waters is 0.025mg/L (as N) (RWQCB, 2007).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin (9).
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	One surface water sample was collected per sampling event at Morena Reservoir at a standard location designated “Station A”.
Temporal Representation:	Samples were collected approximately once a month from January 2005 to December 2006; however, some months were not sampled.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	Samples were collected and analyzed according to the Water Quality Laboratory’s Quality Assurance Manual. Applicable field and laboratory Standard Operating Procedures were also provided by the San Diego Water Department.
QAPP Information Reference(s):	Water Quality Laboratory. Quality Assurance Manual.

DECISION ID	16329
Pollutant:	Phosphorus
Final Listing Decision:	List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	New Decision
Revision Status	Revised
Sources:	Natural Sources | Unknown Nonpoint Source | Urban Runoff/Storm Sewers
Expected TMDL Completion Date:	2021
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Weight of Evidence:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Five of the five samples exceed the Basin Plan water quality objective for phosphorus as P. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification in favor of placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Five of the five samples exceed the Basin Plan water quality objective for phosphorus as P and this exceeds the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
RWQCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are exceeded and a pollutant contributes to or causes the problem.
SWRCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:
USEPA Decision:

Lines of Evidence (LOEs) for Decision ID 16329

LOE ID:	6166
Pollutant:	Phosphorus
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	5
Number of Exceedances:	5
Data and Information Type:	Fixed station physical/chemical monitoring (conventional pollutants only)
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Samples were collected by the City of San Diego for their Water Quality Monitoring Data for Drinking Source Water Reservoirs report. Sampling period was January 2005 to December 2006. All five samples exceeded the water quality objective. Two samples were recorded as non detects but not used in the assessment because the detection limits were not low enough.
Data Reference:	Water Department, Water Quality Monitoring Data for Drinking Source Water Reservoirs. January 2005 to December 2006.
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Water bodies shall not contain biostimulatory substances in concentrations that promote aquatic growth to the extent that such growths cause nuisance or adversely affect beneficial uses. Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin Goal of 0.025 mg/L for total phosphorus in any standing body of water. (RWQCB, 2007)
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin (9).
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin (9).
Spatial Representation:	One surface water sample was collected per sampling event at Morena Reservoir at a standard location designated “Station A”.
Temporal Representation:	Samples were collected approximately once a month from January 2005 to December 2006; however, some months were not sampled.
Environmental Conditions:	The Horse Fire burned west of Morena Reservoir in the Cleveland National Forest from July 23 - 31, 2006.
QAPP Information:	Samples were collected and analyzed according to the Water Quality Laboratory’s Quality Assurance Manual. Applicable field and laboratory Standard Operating Procedures were also provided by the San Diego Water Department.
QAPP Information Reference(s):	Water Quality Laboratory. Quality Assurance Manual.

DECISION ID	5263
Pollutant:	Aluminum
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2006)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Weight of Evidence:	Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. None of the 16 samples exceeded the sediment guideline, and these do not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. The benthic community in this water body is not impacted. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
RWQCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:	No new data were assessed for 2008. The Regional Board will update this decision when new data and information become available and are assessed.
SWRCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:	.
USEPA Decision:

Lines of Evidence (LOEs) for Decision ID 5263

LOE ID:	1616
Pollutant:	Aluminum
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Total
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	16
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Data was collected at site MOA-0 by the City of San Diego Water Dept. between January 1996 and September 2000. None of the 16 samples were in exceedance.
Data Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	From the Basin Plan: For inland surface waters with a municipal beneficial use, the WQO for aluminum is 0.2 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Samples were collected at site MOA-0.
Temporal Representation:	Samples were collected on a quarterly basis from January 1996 to September 2000.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	Data used in 2002. assessment.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	5264
Pollutant:	Antimony
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2006)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Weight of Evidence:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. One line of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Zero of the six samples exceed the Basin Plan water quality objective for antimony. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Zero of the six samples exceed the Basin Plan water quality objective for antimony and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
RWQCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:	No new data were assessed for 2008. The Regional Board will update this decision when new data and information become available and are assessed.
SWRCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:
USEPA Decision:

Lines of Evidence (LOEs) for Decision ID 5264

LOE ID:	1617
Pollutant:	Antimony
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Total
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	6
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Data was collected at site MOA-0 by the City of San Diego Water Dept. between January 1996 and September 1997. None of the 6 samples were in exceedance.
Data Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	From the Basin Plan: For inland surface waters with a municipal beneficial use, the WQO for antimony is 0.006 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Samples were collected at site MOA-0.
Temporal Representation:	Samples were collected between January 1996 and September 1997. Three samples per year were collected.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	Data used in 2002 assessment.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	5265
Pollutant:	Arsenic
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2006)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Weight of Evidence:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. None of the 19 samples exceed the Basin Plan water quality objective for Arsenic. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. None of the 19 samples exceed the Basin Plan water quality objective for Arsenic and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
RWQCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:	No new data were assessed for 2008. The Regional Board will update this decision when new data and information become available and are assessed.
SWRCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:
USEPA Decision:

Lines of Evidence (LOEs) for Decision ID 5265

LOE ID:	1618
Pollutant:	Arsenic
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Total
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	19
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Data was collected at site MOA-0 by the City of San Diego Water Dept. between January 1996 and September 2000. None of the 19 samples were in exceedance.
Data Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	From the Basin Plan: For inland surface waters with a municipal beneficial use, the WQO for arsenic is 0.05 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Samples were collected at site MOA-0.
Temporal Representation:	Samples were collected on a quarterly basis from January 1996 to September 2000.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	Data used in 2002 assessment.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	5145
Pollutant:	Barium
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2006)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Weight of Evidence:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. None of the 19 samples exceed the Basin Plan water quality objective for Barium. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. None of the 19 samples exceed the Basin Plan water quality objective for Barium and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
RWQCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:	No new data were assessed for 2008. The Regional Board will update this decision when new data and information become available and are assessed.
SWRCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:
USEPA Decision:

Lines of Evidence (LOEs) for Decision ID 5145

LOE ID:	1619
Pollutant:	Barium
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Total
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	19
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Data was collected at site MOA-0 by the City of San Diego Water Dept. between January 1996 and September 2000. None of 19 samples were in exceedance.
Data Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	From the Basin Plan: For inland surface waters with a municipal beneficial use, the WQO for barium is 1.0 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Samples were collected at site MOA-0.
Temporal Representation:	Samples were collected on a quarterly basis between January 1996 and September 2000.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	Data used in 2002 assessment.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	5146
Pollutant:	Cadmium
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2006)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Weight of Evidence:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. The one sample did not exceed the Basin Plan water quality objective for Cadmium. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. The one sample did not exceed the Basin Plan water quality objective for Cadmium and this sample size is insufficient to determine with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy if standards are not met. A minimum of two samples is needed for application of table 3.1. 4. Pursuant to Section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
RWQCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:	No new data were assessed for 2008. The Regional Board will update this decision when new data and information become available and are assessed.
SWRCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:
USEPA Decision:

Lines of Evidence (LOEs) for Decision ID 5146

LOE ID:	1620
Pollutant:	Cadmium
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Total
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	1
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Data was collected at site MOA-0 by the City of San Diego Water Dept. on June 5, 1996. One sample was collected. It was not in exceedance.
Data Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	From the Basin Plan: For inland surface waters with a municipal beneficial use, the WQO for cadmium is 0.005 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	The sample was collected at site MOA-0.
Temporal Representation:	One sample was collected on 1 day, June 5, 1996.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	Data used in 2002 assessment.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	5147
Pollutant:	Chloride
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2006)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Weight of Evidence:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.2 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.2 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. None of the 20 samples exceed the Basin Plan water quality objective for chloride. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. None of the 20 samples exceed the Basin Plan water quality objective for chloride and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.2 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
RWQCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:	No new data were assessed for 2008. The Regional Board will update this decision when new data and information become available and are assessed.
SWRCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:
USEPA Decision:

Lines of Evidence (LOEs) for Decision ID 5147

LOE ID:	1621
Pollutant:	Chloride
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Total
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	20
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Data was collected at site MOA-0 by the City of San Diego Water Dept. between March 1996 and December 2000. None of the 20 samples were in exceedance.
Data Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	From the Basin Plan: For inland surface waters with a municipal beneficial use, the WQO for Chloride is 250 mg/L. This concentration is not to be exceeded more than 10% of the time during any one year period.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Samples were collected at site MOA-0.
Temporal Representation:	Samples were collected on a quarterly basis from March 1996 to December 2000.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	Data used in 2002 assessment.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	5214
Pollutant:	Chromium (total)
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2006)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Weight of Evidence:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. None of the eight samples exceed the Basin Plan water quality objective for chromium. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. None of the eight samples exceed the Basin Plan water quality objective for chromium and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
RWQCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:	No new data were assessed for 2008. The Regional Board will update this decision when new data and information become available and are assessed.
SWRCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:
USEPA Decision:

Lines of Evidence (LOEs) for Decision ID 5214

LOE ID:	1622
Pollutant:	Chromium (total)
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Total
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	8
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Data was collected at site MOA-0 by the City of San Diego Water Dept. between January 1996 and June 2000. None of the 8 samples were in exceedance (SWRCB, 2003).
Data Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	From the Basin Plan: For inland surface waters with a municipal beneficial use, the WQO for chromium is 0.05 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Samples were collected at site MOA-0.
Temporal Representation:	Samples were collected between January 1996 and June 2000. One to two samples were collected per year.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	Data used for 2002 assessment.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	5180
Pollutant:	Copper
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2006)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Weight of Evidence:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. None of the seven samples exceed the Basin Plan water quality objective for copper. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. None of the seven samples exceed the Basin Plan water quality objective for copper and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
RWQCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:	No new data were assessed for 2008. The Regional Board will update this decision when new data and information become available and are assessed.
SWRCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:
USEPA Decision:

Lines of Evidence (LOEs) for Decision ID 5180

LOE ID:	1624
Pollutant:	Copper
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Total
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	7
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Data was collected at site MOA-0 by the City of San Diego Water Dept. from January 1996 to September 2000. None of the 7 samples were in exceedance. (SWRCB, 2003).
Data Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	From the Basin Plan: For inland surface waters with a municipal beneficial use, the WQO for copper is 1.0 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Samples were collected at site MOA-0.
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected from January 1996 to September 2000. Four samples were collected in 1996, 1 in 1997, and 2 in 2000.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	Data used in 2002 assessment.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	4930
Pollutant:	Fluoride
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2006)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Weight of Evidence:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. None of the 19 samples exceed the Basin Plan water quality objective for flouride. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. None of the 19 samples exceed the Basin Plan water quality objective for flouride and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
RWQCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:	No new data were assessed for 2008. The Regional Board will update this decision when new data and information become available and are assessed.
SWRCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:
USEPA Decision:

Lines of Evidence (LOEs) for Decision ID 4930

LOE ID:	1625
Pollutant:	Fluoride
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Total
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	19
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Data was collected at site MOA-0 by the City of San Diego Water Dept. between march 1996 and September 2000. None of 19 samples were in exceedance. (SWRCB, 2003).
Data Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	From the Basin Plan: For inland surface waters with a municipal beneficial use, the WQO for Fluoride is 2.4 mg/L when Annual Average of Maximum Daily Air Temperature is <53.8F, 2.2 mg/L when Annual Average of Maximum Daily Air Temperature is 53.8F-58.3F, 2.0 mg/L when Annual Average of Maximum Daily Air Temperature is 58.4F-63.8F, 1.8 mg/L when Annual Average of Maximum Daily Air Temperature is 63.9F-70.6F, 1.6 mg/L when Annual Average of Maximum Daily Air Temperature is 70.7F-79.2F, and 1.4 mg/L when Annual Average of Maximum Daily Air Temperature is 79.3F-90.5F. For inland surface water with all other beneficial uses the WQO for fluoride is 1.0 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data was collected at site MOA-0.
Temporal Representation:	Samples were collected on a quarterly basis between March 1996 and September 2000.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	Data used in 2002 assessment.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	4931
Pollutant:	Iron
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2006)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Weight of Evidence:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. None of the five samples exceed the Basin Plan water quality objective for iron. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. None of the five samples exceed the Basin Plan water quality objective for iron and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
RWQCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:	No new data were assessed for 2008. The Regional Board will update this decision when new data and information become available and are assessed.
SWRCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:
USEPA Decision:

Lines of Evidence (LOEs) for Decision ID 4931

LOE ID:	1626
Pollutant:	Iron
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Total
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	5
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Data was collected at site MOA-0 by the City of San Diego Water Dept. between December 1998 and September 2000. None of the 5 samples were in exceedance. (SWRCB, 2003).
Data Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	From the Basin Plan: For inland surface waters with a municipal beneficial use, the WQO for iron is 0.3 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Samples were collected at site MOA-0.
Temporal Representation:	Samples were collected between December 1998 and September 2000. Two samples were collected in 1998 and 3 were collected in 2000.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	Data used in 2002 assessment.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	4932
Pollutant:	Nickel
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2006)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Weight of Evidence:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. None of the four samples exceed the Basin Plan water quality objective for nickel. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. None of the four samples exceed the Basin Plan water quality objective for nickel and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
RWQCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:	No new data were assessed for 2008. The Regional Board will update this decision when new data and information become available and are assessed.
SWRCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:
USEPA Decision:

Lines of Evidence (LOEs) for Decision ID 4932

LOE ID:	1628
Pollutant:	Nickel
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Total
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	4
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Data was collected at site MOA-0 by the City of San Diego Water Dept. from June 1996 to March 1999. None of 4 samples were in exceedance (SWRCB, 2003).
Data Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	From the Basin Plan: For inland surface waters with a municipal beneficial use the WQO for nickel is 0.1 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Samples were collected at site MOA-0.
Temporal Representation:	Samples were collected from June 1996 to March 1999. 3 samples were collected in 1996, and 1 in 1999.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	Data used in 2002 assessment.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	16326
Pollutant:	Nitrogen
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	New Decision
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Weight of Evidence:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. An unknown number of the seven samples exceed the water quality objective for ammonia. The wrong methodology was used to assess the data. The data will be re-assessed during the next listing cycle. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. An unknown number of the seven samples exceed the water quality objective for ammonia. The wrong methodology was used to assess the data. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
RWQCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded. The wrong methodology was used to assess the data. The data will be re-assessed during the next listing cycle.
SWRCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:
USEPA Decision:

Lines of Evidence (LOEs) for Decision ID 16326

LOE ID:	6165
Pollutant:	Total Nitrogen as N
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	7
Number of Exceedances:	7
Data and Information Type:	Fixed station physical/chemical monitoring (conventional pollutants only)
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Water samples were collected by the City of San Diego for their Water Quality Monitoring Data for Drinking Source Water Reservoirs. Sampling period was January 2005 to December 2006. All seven samples exceeded the water quality objective.
Data Reference:	Water Department, Water Quality Monitoring Data for Drinking Source Water Reservoirs. January 2005 to December 2006.
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Water bodies shall not contain biostimulatory substances in concentrations that promote aquatic growth to the extent that such growths cause nuisance or adversely affect beneficial uses. A desired goal in order to prevent plant nuisance in any standing body of water is 0.025 mg/L total phosphorus, P. These values are not to be exceeded more than 10% of the time unless studies of the specific water body in question clearly show that water quality objective changes are permissible and changes are approved by the Regional Board. Analogous threshold values have not been set for nitrogen compounds; however, natural ratios of nitrogen to phosphorus are to be determined by surveillance and monitoring and upheld. If data are lacking, a ratio of N:P = 10:1, on a weight to weight basis shall be used. (RWQCB, 2007)
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin (9).
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin (9).
Spatial Representation:	One surface water sample was collected per sampling event at Morena Reservoir at a standard location designated “Station A”.
Temporal Representation:	Samples were collected approximately once a month from January 2005 to December 2006; however, some months were not sampled.
Environmental Conditions:	The Horse Fire burned west of Morena Reservoir in the Cleveland National Forest from July 23 - 31, 2006.
QAPP Information:	Samples were collected and analyzed according to the Water Quality Laboratory’s Quality Assurance Manual. Applicable field and laboratory Standard Operating Procedures were also provided by the San Diego Water Department.
QAPP Information Reference(s):	Water Quality Laboratory. Quality Assurance Manual.

DECISION ID	4934
Pollutant:	Picloram
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2006)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Weight of Evidence:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. None of the three samples exceed the Basin Plan water quality objective for picloram. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. None of the three samples exceed the Basin Plan water quality objective for picloram and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
RWQCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:	No new data were assessed for 2008. The Regional Board will update this decision when new data and information become available and are assessed.
SWRCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:
USEPA Decision:

Lines of Evidence (LOEs) for Decision ID 4934

LOE ID:	1630
Pollutant:	Picloram
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Total
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	3
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Data was collected at site MOA-0 by the City of San Diego Water Dept. on December 3, 1998, September 15, 1999 and December 8, 1999. None of the 3 samples were in exceedance. (SWRCB, 2003).
Data Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	From the Basin Plan: For inland surface waters with a municipal beneficial use, the WQO for picloram is 0.5 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Samples were collected at site MOA-0.
Temporal Representation:	One sample was collected per day on December 3, 1998, September 15, 1999, and December 8, 1999.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	Data used for 2002 assessment.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	5226
Pollutant:	Selenium
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2006)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Weight of Evidence:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. None of the three samples exceed the Basin Plan water quality objective for Selenium. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. None of the three samples exceed the Basin Plan water quality objective for Selenium and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
RWQCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:	No new data were assessed for 2008. The Regional Board will update this decision when new data and information become available and are assessed.
SWRCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:
USEPA Decision:

Lines of Evidence (LOEs) for Decision ID 5226

LOE ID:	1631
Pollutant:	Selenium
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Total
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	3
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Data was collected at site MOA-0 by the City of San Diego Water Dept. from September 1996 to December 1997. None of the 3 samples were in exceedance. (SWRCB, 2003).
Data Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	From the Basin Plan: For inland surface waters with a municipal beneficial use, the WQO for selenium is 0.05 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Samples were collected at site MOA-0.
Temporal Representation:	One sample was collected each day on September 10, 1996, December 3, 1996, and December 3, 1997.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	Data used in 2002 assessment.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	5227
Pollutant:	Sulfates
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2006)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Weight of Evidence:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.2 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.2 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. None of the 20 samples exceed the Basin Plan water quality objective sulfates. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. None of the 20 samples exceed the Basin Plan water quality objective sulfates and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.2 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
RWQCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:	No new data were assessed for 2008. The Regional Board will update this decision when new data and information become available and are assessed.
SWRCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:
USEPA Decision:

Lines of Evidence (LOEs) for Decision ID 5227

LOE ID:	1632
Pollutant:	Sulfates
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Total
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	20
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Data was collected at site MOA-0 by the City of San Diego Water Dept. between March 1996 and December 2000. None of the 20 samples were in exceedance. (SWRCB, 2003).
Data Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	From the Basin Plan: For inland surface waters for all beneficial uses, the WQO for sulfate is 250 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Samples were collected at site MOA-0.
Temporal Representation:	Samples were collected on a quarterly basis between March 1996 and December 2000.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	Data used in 2002 assessment.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	4939
Pollutant:	Toluene
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2006)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Weight of Evidence:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. The one sample did not exceed the Basin Plan water quality objective for toluene. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. The one sample did not exceed the Basin Plan water quality objective for toluene and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
RWQCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:	No new data were assessed for 2008. The Regional Board will update this decision when new data and information become available and are assessed.
SWRCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:
USEPA Decision:

Lines of Evidence (LOEs) for Decision ID 4939

LOE ID:	1634
Pollutant:	Toluene
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Total
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	1
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Data was collected at site MOA-0 by the City of San Diego Water Dept. on August 4, 1999. One sample was collected. It was not in exceedance. (SWRCB, 2003).
Data Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	From the Basin Plan: For inland surface waters with a municipal beneficial use the MCL for Toluene is 0.15 mg/L (From Table 3-6 in Basin Plan). A less stringent WQO for Toluene for inland surface waters with a municipal beneficial use is 1.0 mg/L from Table 3-10 of the Basin Plan.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Samples were collected at site MOA-0.
Temporal Representation:	One sample was collected on August 4, 1999.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	Data used in 2002 assessment.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	4938
Pollutant:	Total Dissolved Solids
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2006)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Weight of Evidence:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.2 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.2 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. None of the ten samples exceed the Basin Plan water quality objective for total dissolved solids. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. None of the ten samples exceed the Basin Plan water quality objective for total dissolved solids and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.2 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
RWQCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:	No new data were assessed for 2008. The Regional Board will update this decision when new data and information become available and are assessed.
SWRCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:
USEPA Decision:

Lines of Evidence (LOEs) for Decision ID 4938

LOE ID:	1633
Pollutant:	Total Dissolved Solids
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Total
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	10
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Data was collected at site MOA-0 by the City of San Diego Water Dept. between September 1998 and December 2000. None of the 10 samples were in exceedance. (SWRCB, 2003).
Data Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	From the Basin Plan: For inland surface waters and all beneficial uses, the WQO for total dissolved solids is 500. This concentration is not to be exceeded more than 10% of the time during any one year period.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Samples were collected at site MOA-0.
Temporal Representation:	Samples were collected on a quarterly basis from September 1998 to December 2000.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	Data used in 2002 assessment.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	4940
Pollutant:	Turbidity
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2006)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Weight of Evidence:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.2 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.2 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Three of the 20 samples exceed the Basin Plan water quality objective for turbidity. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Three of the 20 samples exceed the Basin Plan water quality objective for turbidity and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.2 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
RWQCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:	No new data were assessed for 2008. The Regional Board will update this decision when new data and information become available and are assessed.
SWRCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:
USEPA Decision:

Lines of Evidence (LOEs) for Decision ID 4940

LOE ID:	1635
Pollutant:	Turbidity
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Total
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	20
Number of Exceedances:	3
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Data was collected at site MOA-0 by the City of San Diego Water Dept. between March 1996 and December 2000. Three of the 20 samples were in exceedance of the WQO for municipal waters. (SWRCB, 2003).
Data Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	From the Basin Plan: For inland surface waters with a municipal beneficial use, the WQO for turbidity is 5 units. For inland surface waters with all other beneficial uses, the WQO for turbidity is 20 ntu.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data was collected at site MOA-0.
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected on a quarterly basis from March 1996 to December 2000.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	Data used in 2002 assessment.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	4955
Pollutant:	Zinc
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2006)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Weight of Evidence:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. None of the two samples exceed the Basin Plan water quality objective for zinc. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. None of the two samples exceed the Basin Plan water quality objective for zinc and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
RWQCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:	No new data were assessed for 2008. The Regional Board will update this decision when new data and information become available and are assessed.
SWRCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:
USEPA Decision:

Lines of Evidence (LOEs) for Decision ID 4955

LOE ID:	1636
Pollutant:	Zinc
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Total
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	2
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Data was collected at site MOA-0 by the City of San Diego Water Dept. on June 5 1996 and December 3, 1996. None of the 2 samples were in exceedance. (SWRCB, 2003).
Data Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	From the Basin Plan: For inland surface waters with a municipal beneficial use, the WQO for zinc is 5.0 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data was collected at site MOA-0.
Temporal Representation:	One sample was collected each day on June 5, 1996 and December 3, 1996.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	Data used in 2002 assessment.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	5215
Pollutant:	Color
Final Listing Decision:	List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2006)
Revision Status	Original
Sources:	Agriculture | Unknown Nonpoint Source
Expected TMDL Completion Date:	2019
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Weight of Evidence:	This pollutant is being considered for removal from the section 303(d) list under section 4.2 of the Listing Policy. Under this section a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Eleven of 20 samples exceed the Basin Plan water quality objective for color. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against removing this water segment-pollutant combination from the section 303(d) list. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Eleven of 20 samples exceed the Basin Plan water quality objective for color and this exceeds the allowable frequency listed in Table 4.2 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 4.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are met.
RWQCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:	No new data were assessed for 2008. The Regional Board will update this decision when new data and information become available and are assessed.
SWRCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:
USEPA Decision:

Lines of Evidence (LOEs) for Decision ID 5215

LOE ID:	1623
Pollutant:	Color
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Nuisance
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Total
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	20
Number of Exceedances:	11
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Data was collected at site MOA-0 by the City of San Diego Water Dept. between March 19996 and December 2000. Eleven of 20 samples were in exceedance.
Data Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	From Basin Plan: For inland surface waters with a municipal beneficial use, the WQO for color is 15 units.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Samples were collected at site MOA-0.
Temporal Representation:	Samples were collected on a quarterly basis between March 1996 and December 2000.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	Data used in 2002 assessment.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	4956
Pollutant:	Manganese
Final Listing Decision:	List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2006)
Revision Status	Original
Sources:	Source Unknown
Expected TMDL Completion Date:	2019
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Weight of Evidence:	This pollutant is being considered for removal from the section 303(d) list under section 4.1 of the Listing Policy. Under this section a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess pollutant. Five of 19 samples exceed the Basin Plan water quality objective for Manganese and all five years had exceedances of 0.05 mg/L more than 10% of the time. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against removing this water segment-pollutant combination from the section 303(d) list. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Five of 19 samples exceed the Basin Plan water quality objective for Manganese and all five years had exceedances of 0.05 mg/L more than 10% of the time and this exceeds the allowable frequency listed in Table 4.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 4.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are met.
RWQCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:	No new data were assessed for 2008. The Regional Board will update this decision when new data and information become available and are assessed.
SWRCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:
USEPA Decision:

Lines of Evidence (LOEs) for Decision ID 4956

LOE ID:	1627
Pollutant:	Manganese
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Total
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	19
Number of Exceedances:	5
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Data was collected at site MOA-0 by the City of San Diego Water Dept. between January 1996 and September 2000. Five of 19 samples were in exceedance and all five years had exceedances of 0.05 mg/L more than 10% of the time.
Data Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	The water quality objective for manganese in Morena Reservoir is 0.05 milligrams/liter (mg/l) according to Basin Plan, Table 3-2 entitled, Water Quality Objectives. This concentration is not to be exceeded more than 10% of the time during any one year period.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Samples were collected at site MOA-0.
Temporal Representation:	Samples were collected on a quarterly basis between January 1996 and September 2000.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	Data used in 2002 assessment.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	4933
Pollutant:	pH
Final Listing Decision:	List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2006)
Revision Status	Original
Sources:	Source Unknown | Unknown Nonpoint Source
Expected TMDL Completion Date:	2019
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Weight of Evidence:	This pollutant is being considered for removal from the section 303(d) list under section 4.2 of the Listing Policy. Under this section a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Ten of 19 samples exceed the Basin Plan water quality objective for pH. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against removing this water segment-pollutant combination from the section 303(d) list. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Ten of 19 samples exceed the Basin Plan water quality objective for pH and this exceeds the allowable frequency listed in Table 4.2 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 4.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are met.
RWQCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:	No new data were assessed for 2008. The Regional Board will update this decision when new data and information become available and are assessed.
SWRCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:
USEPA Decision:

Lines of Evidence (LOEs) for Decision ID 4933

LOE ID:	1629
Pollutant:	pH (high)
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Total
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	19
Number of Exceedances:	10
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Data was collected at site MOA-0 by the City of San Diego Water Dept. between March 1996 and December 2000. Ten of 19 samples were in exceedance.
Data Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	From the Basin Plan: For inland surface waters with all beneficial uses, the WQO for pH is 6.5 (minimum) to 8.5 (maximum).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Samples were collected at site MOA-0.
Temporal Representation:	Samples were collected on a quarterly basis between March 1996 and December 2000.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	Data used in 2002 assessment.
QAPP Information Reference(s):