Draft 2008 California 303(d)/305(b) Integrated Report

Supporting Information

Regional Board 9 - San Diego Region

Water Body Name:	Sandia Creek
Water Body ID:	CAR9022200019991117132333
Water Body Type:	River & Stream

DECISION ID	5833
Pollutant:	Manganese
Final Listing Decision:	Delist from 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2006)
Revision Status	Revised
Reason for Delisting:	Flaws in original listing
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Weight of Evidence:	This pollutant is being considered for removal from the section 303(d) list under section 4.2 of the Listing Policy. Under this section a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Two of 11 samples exceed the Basin Plan water quality objective for manganese. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification for removing this water segment-pollutant combination from the section 303(d) list. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Two of 11 samples exceed the Basin Plan water quality objective for manganese and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 4.2 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 4.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
RWQCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:	No new data were assessed for 2008. The Regional Board will update this decision when new data and information become available and are assessed.
SWRCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:
USEPA Decision:

Lines of Evidence (LOEs) for Decision ID 5833

LOE ID:	3093
Pollutant:	Manganese
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Total
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	11
Number of Exceedances:	2
Data and Information Type:	Not Specified
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Data were collected by LAW Crandall from 1997 to 2000. Two of 11 samples were in exceedance. The criteria was exceeded more than 10% of the time during 2 years.
Data Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	The water quality objective for manganese in Sandia Creek is 0.05 milligrams/liter (mg/l) according to Basin Plan, Table 3-2 entitled, Water Quality Objectives. This concentration is not to be exceeded more than 10% of the time during any one year period.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Samples were collected at Sandia Creek. Exact location was not reported.
Temporal Representation:	Samples were collected on a quarterly basis from 12/1997 to 06/2000.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	Data used in 2002 assessment.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	5832
Pollutant:	Nitrogen
Final Listing Decision:	Delist from 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2006)
Revision Status	Revised
Reason for Delisting:	Flaws in original listing
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Weight of Evidence:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.2 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.2 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Two of the four samples exceed the water quality objective for nitrogen. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Two of the four samples exceed the water quality objective four nitrogen and this sample size is insufficient to determine with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy if standards are not met. A minimum of five samples is needed for application of table 3.2. 4. Pursuant to [SECTION 3.11/4.11] of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
RWQCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
SWRCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:
USEPA Decision:

Lines of Evidence (LOEs) for Decision ID 5832

LOE ID:	3092
Pollutant:	Nitrogen
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Total
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	4
Number of Exceedances:	2
Data and Information Type:	Not Specified
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Data were collected by LAW Crandall from 1997 to 2000. Although 6 samples were collected, only 4 samples were collected on the same day as phosphorus samples. From this data set, water quality was assessed using the N:P ratio from the 4 days on which both N and P samples were collected. Two of the 4 ratios were in exceedance of the 10:1 ratio.
Data Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	From the Basin Plan: For inland surface waters, enclosed bays and estuaries, coastal lagoons, and ground waters and all beneficial uses, analogous threshold values have not been set for nitrogen compounds; however, natural ratios of nitrogen to phosphorus are to be determined by surveillance and monitoring and upheld. If data are lacking, a ratio of N:P = 10:1, on a weight to weight basis shall be used.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Samples were collected at Sandia Creek. Exact sampling location was not reported.
Temporal Representation:	Samples were collected 1-2 times per year from 12/1997 to 03/2000.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	Data used in 2002 assessment.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	17910
Pollutant:	Benthic Community Effects
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	New Decision
Revision Status	Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollution
Weight of Evidence:	Benthic Community Effects is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under sections 3.9 and 3.2 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.9, an additional line of evidence associating the Benthic Community Effects with a water or sediment concentration of pollutants is necessary to assess listing status. Two lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this indicator. 4 of 21 samples exceeded the water quality objective. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing Benthic Community Effects in this water segment on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. 4 of 21 samples exceeded the Index of Biological Integrity (IBI) value of "poor" water quality for this area and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.2 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
RWQCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
SWRCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:
USEPA Decision:

Lines of Evidence (LOEs) for Decision ID 17910

LOE ID:	27025
Pollutant:	Benthic Community Effects
LOE Subgroup:	Adverse Biological Responses
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	7
Number of Exceedances:	1
Data and Information Type:	Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Seven samples of IBI data were taken from May 2004 to May 2007 at one sampling site. Of the total number of samples, one of the samples exceeded the IBI impairment threshold.
Data Reference:	Stream Bioassessment Data. Co-permitee Data. Collected 2002-2007.
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	From the San Diego Basin Plan the objective is: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. Compliance with this objective will be determined by use of indicator organisms, analyses of species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, bioassays of appropriate duration, or other appropriate methods as specified by the Regional Board.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin (9).
Evaluation Guideline:	The Index of Biological Integrity (IBI) is an analytical tool that can be used to assess the biological and physical condition of streams and rivers within a zero to one hundred scoring range: Very Poor 0-19, Poor 20-39, Fair 40-59, Good 60- 79, Very Good 80-100. The IBI score of 39 was set as an impairment threshold because it is a statistical criterion of two standard deviations below the mean reference site score which defines the boundary between 'fair' and 'poor' IBI creek conditions. (Ode, p. 9)
Guideline Reference:	"A Quantitative Tool for Assessing the Integrity of Southern Coastal California Streams". Environmental Management. Volume 35, number 1 (2005): 1-13.
Spatial Representation:	Samples were collected at one site: REF-SC2 on Sandia Creek.
Temporal Representation:	Sampling occurred during May and October annually over a three year period from May 2004 to October 2006 and during May in 2007.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	Quality Control for collection and identification was conducted in accordance with the Quality Assurance Manual for Freshwater Bioassessment.
QAPP Information Reference(s):	QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL FOR FRESHWATER BIOASSESSMENT Revision 0
LOE ID:	26461
Pollutant:	Benthic Community Effects
LOE Subgroup:	Adverse Biological Responses
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	14
Number of Exceedances:	3
Data and Information Type:	Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Fourteen samples of IBI data were taken from May 1998 to October 2003 at three sampling sites. Of the total number of samples, three of the samples exceeded the IBI impairment threshold.
Data Reference:	Fish and Game IBI Data
	2007 SDRWQCB Bioassessment Data
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	From the San Diego Basin Plan the objective is: All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. Compliance with this objective will be determined by use of indicator organisms, analyses of species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, bioassays of appropriate duration, or other appropriate methods as specified by the Regional Board. (SDRWQCB, 1995)
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin (9).
Evaluation Guideline:	The Index of Biological Integrity (IBI) is an analytical tool that can be used to assess the biological and physical condition of streams and rivers within a zero to one hundred scoring range: Very Poor 0-19, Poor 20-39, Fair 40-59, Good 60- 79, Very Good 80-100. The IBI score of 39 was set as an impairment threshold because it is a statistical criterion of two standard deviations below the mean reference site score which defines the boundary between 'fair' and 'poor' IBI creek conditions. (Ode, p. 9)
Guideline Reference:	"A Quantitative Tool for Assessing the Integrity of Southern Coastal California Streams". Environmental Management. Volume 35, number 1 (2005): 1-13.
Spatial Representation:	Samples were collected at three sites: 902SCSCRx, 902SCDLRx, 902SMSND3 on Sandia Creek.
Temporal Representation:	Sampling occurred during one to three events annually from May 1998 to October 2003.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	Quality Control for collection and identification was conducted in accordance with the Quality Assurance Project Plan for the California Stream Bioassessment Procedure and the State of California, California Monitoring an Assessment Program: "CMAP", Quality Assurance Project Plan.
QAPP Information Reference(s):	State of California, California Monitoring and Assessment Program: "CMAP".
	Quality Assurance Project Plan for the California Stream Bioassessment Procedure
	The San Diego Stream Team Quality Assurance Project Plan

DECISION ID	5553
Pollutant:	Total Dissolved Solids
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not Delist from 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not Delist from 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2006)
Revision Status	Original
Sources:	Flow Regulation/Modification | Natural Sources | Unknown Nonpoint Source | Unknown Point Source | Urban Runoff/Storm Sewers
Expected TMDL Completion Date:	2019
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Weight of Evidence:	This pollutant is being considered for removal from the section 303(d) list under section 4.2 of the Listing Policy. Under this section a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Two lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Twelve of the 12 samples exceed the Basin Plan water quality objective for total dissolved solids. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against removing this water segment-pollutant combination from the section 303(d) list. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Twelve of the 12 samples exceed the Basin Plan water quality objective for total dissolved solids and this exceeds the allowable frequency listed in Table 4.2 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 4.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are met.
RWQCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:	No new data were assessed for 2008. The Regional Board will update this decision when new data and information become available and are assessed.
SWRCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:
USEPA Decision:

Lines of Evidence (LOEs) for Decision ID 5553

LOE ID:	3069
Pollutant:	Total Dissolved Solids
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Total
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	1
Number of Exceedances:	1
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Data were collected by RWQCB9 in 1998. One sample was collected, it was in exceedance.
Data Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	From the Basin Plan: For inland surface waters in HSA 902.22, and all beneficial uses, the WQO for TDS is 750 mg/L. This concentration is not to be exceeded more than 10% of the time during any one year period.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Sample was collected at Sandia Creek at Sandia Creek Rd., 0.5-1.0 mile above the confluence.
Temporal Representation:	One sample was collected on 06/09/1998.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	Data used in 2002 assessment.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
LOE ID:	3070
Pollutant:	Total Dissolved Solids
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Total
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	11
Number of Exceedances:	11
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Data were collected by LAW Crandall from 1997 to 2000. Eleven of 11 samples were in exceedance.
Data Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	From the Basin Plan: For inland surface waters in HSA 902.22, and all beneficial uses, the WQO for TDS is 750 mg/L. This concentration is not to be exceeded more than 10% of the time during any one year period.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Samples were collected at Sandia Creek. Exact sample location was not reported.
Temporal Representation:	Samples were collected on a quarterly basis from 12/1997 to 06/2000.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	Data used in 2002 assessment.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	5839
Pollutant:	Aluminum
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2006)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Weight of Evidence:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.2 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.2 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. A single sample was collected and it did not exceed the Basin Plan water quality objective for aluminum. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. A single sample was collected and it did not exceed the Basin Plan water quality objective for aluminum and this sample size is insufficient to determine with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy if standards are not met. A minimum of five samples is needed for application of table 3.2. 4. Pursuant to [SECTION 3.11/4.11] of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
RWQCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:	No new data were assessed for 2008. The Regional Board will update this decision when new data and information become available and are assessed.
SWRCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:
USEPA Decision:

Lines of Evidence (LOEs) for Decision ID 5839

LOE ID:	3099
Pollutant:	Aluminum
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Total
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	1
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	Not Specified
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Data were collected by LAW Crandall in 1999. One sample was collected, it's Aluminum level was equal to the WQO. (SWRCB, 2003).
Data Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	From the Basin Plan: For inland surface waters with a municipal beneficial uses, the WQO for aluminum is 0.2 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Samples were collected at Sandia Creek. Exact location was not reported.
Temporal Representation:	One sample was collected on 12/06/1999.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	Data used in 2002 assessment.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	5554
Pollutant:	Antimony
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2006)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Weight of Evidence:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. A single sample was collected and it did not exceed the Basin Plan water quality objective for antimony. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. A single sample was collected and it did not exceed the Basin Plan water quality objective for antimony and this sample size is insufficient to determine with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy if standards are not met. A minimum of two samples is needed for application of table 3.1. 4. Pursuant to [SECTION 3.11/4.11] of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
RWQCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:	No new data were assessed for 2008. The Regional Board will update this decision when new data and information become available and are assessed.
SWRCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:
USEPA Decision:

Lines of Evidence (LOEs) for Decision ID 5554

LOE ID:	3071
Pollutant:	Antimony
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Total
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	1
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	Not Specified
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Data were collected by RWQCB9 in 1998. One sample was collected an was not in exceedance. (SWRCB, 2003).
Data Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	From the Basin Plan: For all waters with a municipal beneficial use, the WQO for Antimony is 0.006 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Samples were collected at Sandia Creek at Sandia Creek Rd, 0.5-1.0 mile above the confluence.
Temporal Representation:	The sample was collected on 06/09/1998.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	Data used in 2002 assessment.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	5555
Pollutant:	Arsenic
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2006)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Weight of Evidence:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Two lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. One of the 11 samples exceed the Basin Plan water quality objective for arsenic. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. One of the 11 samples exceed the Basin Plan water quality objective for arsenic and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
RWQCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:	No new data were assessed for 2008. The Regional Board will update this decision when new data and information become available and are assessed.
SWRCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:
USEPA Decision:

Lines of Evidence (LOEs) for Decision ID 5555

LOE ID:	3073
Pollutant:	Arsenic
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Total
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	10
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	Not Specified
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Data were collected by LAW Crandall from 1997 to 2000. None of the 10 samples were in exceedance. (SWRCB, 2003).
Data Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	From the Basin Plan: For all waters with a municipal beneficial use, the WQO for arsenic is 0.05 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Samples were collected at Sandia Creek. Exact sampling location was not reported.
Temporal Representation:	Samples were collected on a quarterly basis from 12/1997 to 06/2000.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	Data used in 2002 assessment.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
LOE ID:	3072
Pollutant:	Arsenic
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Total
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	1
Number of Exceedances:	1
Data and Information Type:	Not Specified
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Data were collected by RWQCB9 in 1998. One sample was collected and was in exceedance. (SWRCB, 2003).
Data Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	From the Basin Plan: For all waters with a municipal beneficial use, the WQO for arsenic is 0.05 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Sample was collected at Sandia Creek at Sandia Creek Rd., 0.5-1.0 mile above confluence.
Temporal Representation:	One sample was collected in 06/09/1998.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	Data used in 2002 assessment.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	5840
Pollutant:	Benthic-Macroinvertebrate Bioassessments
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2006)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollution
Weight of Evidence:	Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that the single line of evidence in the record to assess this pollutant consists of bioassessment data. This information on its own is insufficient to determine with the confidence and power required by the Listing Policy since this data is not associated with water or sediment concentrations of pollutants (Policy Section 3.9).
RWQCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:	No new data were assessed for 2008. The Regional Board will update this decision when new data and information become available and are assessed.
SWRCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:
USEPA Decision:

Lines of Evidence (LOEs) for Decision ID 5840

LOE ID:	3100
Pollutant:	Benthic-Macroinvertebrate Bioassessments
LOE Subgroup:	Adverse Biological Responses
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Total
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	0
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Data were collected by the "Stream Team" in 2001. Taxa richness was 13.0, the EPT index was 88, and tolerance value was 3.8. The majority of macroinvertebrates were collectors and filterers. (Stream Team, 2001).
Data Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:
Objective/Criterion Reference:
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Samples were collected at Sandia Creek. Exact location was not given.
Temporal Representation:	Samples were collected in Spring of 2001.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	QA Info Missing
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	5556
Pollutant:	Beryllium
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2006)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Weight of Evidence:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. A single sample was collected and it did not exceed the Basin Plan water quality objective for beryllium. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. A single sample was collected and it did not exceed the Basin Plan water quality objective for beryllium and this sample size is insufficient to determine with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy if standards are not met. A minimum of two samples is needed for application of table 3.1. 4. Pursuant to [SECTION 3.11/4.11] of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
RWQCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:	No new data were assessed for 2008. The Regional Board will update this decision when new data and information become available and are assessed.
SWRCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:
USEPA Decision:

Lines of Evidence (LOEs) for Decision ID 5556

LOE ID:	3074
Pollutant:	Beryllium
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Total
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	1
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	Not Specified
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Data were collected by RWQCB9 in 1998. One sample was collected, it was not in exceedance. (SWRCB, 2003).
Data Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	From the Basin Plan: For all waters with a municipal beneficial use, the WQO for beryllium is 0.004 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Samples were collected at Sandia Creek at Sandia Creek Rd., 0.5-1.0 mile above confluence.
Temporal Representation:	One sample was collected on 06/09/1998.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	Data used in 2002 assessment.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	5671
Pollutant:	Boron
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2006)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Weight of Evidence:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.2 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.2 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. None of the 11 samples exceed the Basin Plan water quality objective for boron. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. None of the 11 samples exceed the Basin Plan water quality objective for boron and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.2 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
RWQCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:	No new data were assessed for 2008. The Regional Board will update this decision when new data and information become available and are assessed.
SWRCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:
USEPA Decision:

Lines of Evidence (LOEs) for Decision ID 5671

LOE ID:	3098
Pollutant:	Boron
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Total
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	11
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Data were collected by LAW Crandall from 1997 to 2000. None of the 11 samples were in exceedance. (SWRCB, 2003).
Data Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	From the Basin Plan: For inland surface waters and all beneficial uses, the WQO for Boron is 0.75 mg/L. This concentration is not to be exceeded more than 10% of the time during any one year period.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Samples were collected at Sandia Creek. Exact location was not reported.
Temporal Representation:	Samples were collected on a quarterly basis from 12/1997 to 06/2000.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	Data used in 2002 assessment.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	5557
Pollutant:	Cadmium
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2006)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Weight of Evidence:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. A single sample was collected and it did not exceed the Basin Plan water quality objective for cadmium. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. A single sample was collected and it did not exceed the Basin Plan water quality objective for cadmium and this sample size is insufficient to determine with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy if standards are not met. A minimum of two samples is needed for application of table 3.1. 4. Pursuant to [SECTION 3.11/4.11] of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
RWQCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:	No new data were assessed for 2008. The Regional Board will update this decision when new data and information become available and are assessed.
SWRCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:
USEPA Decision:

Lines of Evidence (LOEs) for Decision ID 5557

LOE ID:	3075
Pollutant:	Cadmium
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Total
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	1
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Data were collected by RWQCB9 in 1998. One sample was collected, it was not in exceedance. (SWRCB, 2003).
Data Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	From the Basin Plan: For all waters with a municipal beneficial use, the WQO for Cadmium is 0.005 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Samples were collected at Sandia Creek at Sandia Creek Rd., 0.5-1.0 mile above confluence.
Temporal Representation:	One sample was collected on 06/09/1998.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	Data used in 2002 assessment.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	5670
Pollutant:	Chloride
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2006)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Weight of Evidence:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.2 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.2 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. One of the 15 samples exceed the Basin Plan water quality objective for chloride. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. One of the 15 samples exceed the Basin Plan water quality objective for chloride and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.2 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
RWQCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:	No new data were assessed for 2008. The Regional Board will update this decision when new data and information become available and are assessed.
SWRCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:
USEPA Decision:

Lines of Evidence (LOEs) for Decision ID 5670

LOE ID:	3097
Pollutant:	Chloride
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Total
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	15
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Data were collected by LAW Crandall from 1997 to 2000. One of 15 samples was in exceedance. (SWRCB, 2003).
Data Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	From the Basin Plan: For inland surface waters and all beneficial uses, the WQO for chloride is 250 mg/L. This concentration is not to be exceeded more than 10% of the time during any one year period.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Samples were collected at Sandia Creek. Exact location was not reported.
Temporal Representation:	Samples were collected on a quarterly basis from 12/1997 to 06/2000.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	Data used in 2002 assessment.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	5558
Pollutant:	Chromium (total)
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2006)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Weight of Evidence:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. A single sample was collected and it exceeded the Basin Plan water quality objective for chromium. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. A single sample was collected and it exceeded the Basin Plan water quality objective for chromium and this sample size is insufficient to determine with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy if standards are not met. A minimum of two samples is needed for application of table 3.1. 4. Pursuant to [SECTION 3.11/4.11] of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
RWQCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:	No new data were assessed for 2008. The Regional Board will update this decision when new data and information become available and are assessed.
SWRCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:
USEPA Decision:

Lines of Evidence (LOEs) for Decision ID 5558

LOE ID:	3076
Pollutant:	Chromium (total)
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Total
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	1
Number of Exceedances:	1
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Data were collected by RWQCB9 in 1998. One sample was collected, it was in exceedance. (SWRCB, 2003).
Data Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	From the Basin Plan: For all waters with a municipal beneficial use, the WQO for total chromium is 0.05 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Samples were collected at Sandia Creek at Sandia Creek Rd., 0.5-1.0 mile above confluence.
Temporal Representation:	One sample was collected on 06/09/1998.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	Data used in 2002 assessment.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	5582
Pollutant:	Copper
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2006)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Weight of Evidence:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Two lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. One of 12 samples exceed the Basin Plan water quality objective for copper. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. One of 12 samples exceed the Basin Plan water quality objective for copper and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
RWQCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:	No new data were assessed for 2008. The Regional Board will update this decision when new data and information become available and are assessed.
SWRCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:
USEPA Decision:

Lines of Evidence (LOEs) for Decision ID 5582

LOE ID:	3077
Pollutant:	Copper
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Total
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	1
Number of Exceedances:	1
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Data were collected by RWQCB9 in 1998. One sample was collected and was in exceedance. (SWRCB, 2003).
Data Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	From the Basin Plan: For inland surface waters with a municipal beneficial use, the WQO for copper is 1.0 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Sample was collected at Sandia Creek at Sandia Creek Rd., 0.5-1.0 mile above confluence.
Temporal Representation:	One sample was collected on 06/09/1998.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	Data used in 2002 assessment.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
LOE ID:	3078
Pollutant:	Copper
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Total
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	11
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Data were collected by LAW Crandall from 1997 to 2000. None of the 11 samples were in exceedance. (SWRCB, 2003).
Data Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	From the Basin Plan: For inland surface waters with a municipal beneficial use, the WQO for copper is 1.0 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Samples were collected at Sandia Creek. Exact sample location was not reported.
Temporal Representation:	Samples were collected on a quarterly basis form 12/1997 to 06/2000.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	Data used in 2002 assessment.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	5669
Pollutant:	Cyanide
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2006)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Weight of Evidence:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. None of the 6 samples exceed the Basin Plan water quality objective for cyanide. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. None of the 6 samples exceed the Basin Plan water quality objective for cyanide and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
RWQCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:	No new data were assessed for 2008. The Regional Board will update this decision when new data and information become available and are assessed.
SWRCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:
USEPA Decision:

Lines of Evidence (LOEs) for Decision ID 5669

LOE ID:	3096
Pollutant:	Cyanide
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Total
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	6
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Data were collected by LAW Crandall from 1997-2000. None of the 6 samples were in exceedance. (SWRCB, 2003).
Data Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	From the Basin Plan: For all waters with a municipal beneficial use, the WQO for cyanide is 0.2 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Samples were collected at Sandia Creek. Exact location was not reported.
Temporal Representation:	Samples were collected 1-2 times per year from 12/1997 to 03/2000.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	Data used in 2002 assessment.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	5668
Pollutant:	Fluoride
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2006)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Weight of Evidence:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. None of the 11 samples exceed the Basin Plan water quality objective for flouride. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. None of the 11 samples exceed the Basin Plan water quality objective for flouride and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
RWQCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:	No new data were assessed for 2008. The Regional Board will update this decision when new data and information become available and are assessed.
SWRCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:
USEPA Decision:

Lines of Evidence (LOEs) for Decision ID 5668

LOE ID:	3095
Pollutant:	Fluoride
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Total
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	11
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	Not Specified
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Data were collected by LAW Crandall from 1997 to 2000. None of the 11 samples were in exceedance. (SWRCB, 2003).
Data Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	From the Basin Plan: For inland surface waters and all beneficial uses, the WQO for Fluoride is 1.0 mg/L. This concentration is not to be exceeded more than 10% of the time during any one year period.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Samples were collected at Sandia Creek. Exact location was not reported.
Temporal Representation:	Samples were collected on a quarterly basis from 12/1997 to 06/2000.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	Data used in 2002 assessment.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	5583
Pollutant:	Mercury
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2006)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Weight of Evidence:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Two lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. None of the 7 samples exceed the Basin Plan water quality objective for mercury. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. None of the 7 samples exceed the Basin Plan water quality objective for mercury and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
RWQCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:	No new data were assessed for 2008. The Regional Board will update this decision when new data and information become available and are assessed.
SWRCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:
USEPA Decision:

Lines of Evidence (LOEs) for Decision ID 5583

LOE ID:	3080
Pollutant:	Mercury
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Total
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	6
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Data were collected by LAW Crandall from 1997 to 2000. None of the 6 samples were in exceedance. (SWRCB, 2003).
Data Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	From the Basin Plan: For all waters with a municipal beneficial use, the WQO for mercury is 0.002 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Samples were collected at Sandia Creek. Exact sampling location was not reported.
Temporal Representation:	Samples were collected 1-2 times per year from 12/1997 to 03/2000.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	Data used in 2002 assessment.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
LOE ID:	3079
Pollutant:	Mercury
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Total
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	1
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Data were collected by RWQCB9 in 1998. One sample was collected and was not in exceedance. (SWRCB, 2003).
Data Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	From the Basin Plan: For all waters with a municipal beneficial use, the WQO for mercury is 0.002 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Sample was collected at Sandia Creek at Sandia Creek Rd., 0.5-1.0 mile above confluence.
Temporal Representation:	One sample was collected on 06/09/1998.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	Data used in 2002 assessment.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	5584
Pollutant:	Nickel
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2006)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Weight of Evidence:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. A single sample was collected and it did exceed the Basin Plan water quality objective for nickel. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. A single sample was collected and it did exceed the Basin Plan water quality objective for nickel and this sample size is insufficient to determine with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy if standards are not met. A minimum of two samples is needed for application of table 3.1. 4. Pursuant to [SECTION 3.11/4.11] of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
RWQCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:	No new data were assessed for 2008. The Regional Board will update this decision when new data and information become available and are assessed.
SWRCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:
USEPA Decision:

Lines of Evidence (LOEs) for Decision ID 5584

LOE ID:	3081
Pollutant:	Nickel
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Total
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	1
Number of Exceedances:	1
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Data were collected by RWQCB9 in 1998. One sample was collected, it was in exceedance. (SWRCB, 2003).
Data Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	From the Basin Plan: For all waters with a municipal beneficial use, the WQO for Nickel is 0.1 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Sample was collected at Sandia Creek at Sandia Creek Rd., 0.5-1.0 mile above confluence.
Temporal Representation:	One sample was collected on 06/09/1998.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	Data used in 2002 assessment.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	5761
Pollutant:	Oil and Grease
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2006)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Weight of Evidence:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.2 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.2 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. None of the 14 samples exceed the Basin Plan water quality objective for oil and grease. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. None of the 14 samples exceed the Basin Plan water quality objective for oil and greaseand this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.2 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
RWQCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:	No new data were assessed for 2008. The Regional Board will update this decision when new data and information become available and are assessed.
SWRCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:
USEPA Decision:

Lines of Evidence (LOEs) for Decision ID 5761

LOE ID:	3091
Pollutant:	Oil and Grease
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Total
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	14
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	Not Specified
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Data were collected by LAW Crandall from 1997 to 2000. None of the 14 samples were in exceedance. All samples were non-detect. (SWRCB, 2003).
Data Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	From the Basin Plan: For inland surface waters and all beneficial uses, Waters shall not contain oils, greases, waxes, or other materials in concentrations which result in a visible film or coating on the surface of the water or on objects in the water, or which cause nuisance or which otherwise adversely affect beneficial uses.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Samples were collected at Sandia Creek. Exact location was not reported.
Temporal Representation:	Samples were collected on a quarterly basis from 12/1997 to 06/2000.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	Data used in 2002 assessment.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	5759
Pollutant:	Phosphorus
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2006)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Weight of Evidence:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.2 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.2 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. One of the 6 samples exceeds the Basin Plan water quality objective for phosphorus. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. One of the 6 samples exceeds the Basin Plan water quality objective for phosphorus and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.2 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
RWQCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:	No new data were assessed for 2008. The Regional Board will update this decision when new data and information become available and are assessed.
SWRCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:
USEPA Decision:

Lines of Evidence (LOEs) for Decision ID 5759

LOE ID:	3089
Pollutant:	Phosphorus
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Total
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	6
Number of Exceedances:	1
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Data were collected by LAW Crandall from 1997 to 1999. One of 6 samples was in exceedance. (SWRCB, 2003).
Data Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	From the Basin Plan: For inland surface waters - streams and other flowing waters and all beneficial uses, the WQO for total phosphorus is 0.1 mg/L. This appears to be the desired goal in order to prevent plant nuisance in streams and other flowing waters; not to be exceeded more than 10% of the time.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Samples were collected at Sandia Creek. Exact sample location was not reported.
Temporal Representation:	Samples were collected on a quarterly basis from 12/1997 to 5/1999.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	Data used in 2002 assessment.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	5602
Pollutant:	Selenium
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2006)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Weight of Evidence:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. A single sample was collected and it did not exceed the Basin Plan water quality objective for selenium. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. A single sample was collected and it did not exceed the Basin Plan water quality objective for selenium and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
RWQCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:	No new data were assessed for 2008. The Regional Board will update this decision when new data and information become available and are assessed.
SWRCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:
USEPA Decision:

Lines of Evidence (LOEs) for Decision ID 5602

LOE ID:	3082
Pollutant:	Selenium
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Total
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	1
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Data were collected by RWQCB9 in 1998. One sample was collected, and was not in exceedance. (SWRCB, 2003).
Data Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	From the Basin Plan: For all waters with a municipal beneficial use, the WQO for selenium is 0.05 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Sample was collected at Sandia Creek at Sandia Creek Rd., 0.5-1.0 mile above confluence.
Temporal Representation:	One sample was collected on 06/09/1998.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	Data used in 2002 assessment.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	5603
Pollutant:	Silver
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2006)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Weight of Evidence:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. A single sample was collected and it did not exceed the Basin Plan water quality objective for silver. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. A single sample was collected and it did not exceed the Basin Plan water quality objective for silver and this sample size is insufficient to determine with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy if standards are not met. A minimum of two samples is needed for application of table 3.1. 4. Pursuant to [SECTION 3.11/4.11] of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
RWQCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:	No new data were assessed for 2008. The Regional Board will update this decision when new data and information become available and are assessed.
SWRCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:
USEPA Decision:

Lines of Evidence (LOEs) for Decision ID 5603

LOE ID:	3083
Pollutant:	Silver
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Total
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	1
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Data were collected by RWQCB9 in 1998. One sample was collected and was not in exceedance. (SWRCB, 2003).
Data Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	From the Basin Plan: For inland surface waters with a municipal beneficial use, the WQO for silver is 0.1 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Sample was collected at Sandia Creek at Sandia Creek Rd., 0.5-1.0 mile above confluence.
Temporal Representation:	One sample was collected on 06/09/1998.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	Data used in 2002 assessment.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	5606
Pollutant:	Surfactants (MBAS)
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2006)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Weight of Evidence:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.2 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.2 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. None of the 10 samples exceed the Basin Plan water quality objective for surfactants. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. None of the 10 samples exceed the Basin Plan water quality objective for surfactants and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.2 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
RWQCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:	No new data were assessed for 2008. The Regional Board will update this decision when new data and information become available and are assessed.
SWRCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:
USEPA Decision:

Lines of Evidence (LOEs) for Decision ID 5606

LOE ID:	3087
Pollutant:	Surfactants (MBAS)
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Total
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	10
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	Not Specified
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Data were collected by LAW Crandall from 1997 to 2000. None of the 10 samples were in exceedance. (SWRCB, 2003).
Data Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	From the Basin Plan: For inland surface waters and all beneficial uses, the WQO for MBAS is 0.5 mg/L. This concentration is not to be exceeded more than 10% of the time during any one year period.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Samples were collected at Sandia Creek. Exact location was not reported.
Temporal Representation:	Samples were collected on a quarterly basis from 12/1997 to 06/2000.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	Data used in 2002 assessment.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	5604
Pollutant:	Thallium
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2006)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Weight of Evidence:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. A single sample was collected and it did not exceed the Basin Plan water quality objective for thallium. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. A single sample was collected and it did not exceed the Basin Plan water quality objective for thallium and this sample size is insufficient to determine with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy if standards are not met. A minimum of two samples is needed for application of table 3.1. 4. Pursuant to [SECTION 3.11/4.11] of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
RWQCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:	No new data were assessed for 2008. The Regional Board will update this decision when new data and information become available and are assessed.
SWRCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:
USEPA Decision:

Lines of Evidence (LOEs) for Decision ID 5604

LOE ID:	3084
Pollutant:	Thallium
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Total
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	1
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	Not Specified
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Data were collected by RWQCB9 in 1998. One sample was collected, it was not in exceedance. (SWRCB, 2003).
Data Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	From the Basin Plan: For all waters with a municipal beneficial use, the WQO for thallium is 0.002 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Sample was collected at Sandia Creek at Sandia Creek Rd., 0.5-1.0 mile above confluence.
Temporal Representation:	One sample was collected on 06/09/1998.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	Data used in 2002 assessment.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	6112
Pollutant:	Turbidity
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2006)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Weight of Evidence:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.2 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.2 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. A single sample was collected and it did not exceed the Basin Plan water quality objective for turbidity. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. A single sample was collected and it did not exceed the Basin Plan water quality objective for turbidity and this sample size is insufficient to determine with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy if standards are not met. A minimum of five samples is needed for application of table 3.2. 4. Pursuant to [SECTION 3.11/4.11] of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
RWQCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:	No new data were assessed for 2008. The Regional Board will update this decision when new data and information become available and are assessed.
SWRCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:
USEPA Decision:

Lines of Evidence (LOEs) for Decision ID 6112

LOE ID:	3068
Pollutant:	Turbidity
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Total
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	1
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Data were collected by RWQCB9 in 1998. One sample was collected, it was not in exceedance. (SWRCB, 2003).
Data Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	From the Basin Plan: For inland surface waters with a municipal beneficial use, the WQO for turbidity is 5 ntu.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Sample was collected at Sandia Creek at Sandia Creek Rd, 0.5 to 1.0 miles above confluence.
Temporal Representation:	One sample was collected on 06/09/1998.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	Data used in 2002 assessment.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	5605
Pollutant:	Zinc
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2006)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Weight of Evidence:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Two lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. One of 12 samples exceed the Basin Plan water quality objective for zinc. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. One of 12 samples exceed the Basin Plan water quality objective for zinc and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
RWQCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:	No new data were assessed for 2008. The Regional Board will update this decision when new data and information become available and are assessed.
SWRCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:
USEPA Decision:

Lines of Evidence (LOEs) for Decision ID 5605

LOE ID:	3086
Pollutant:	Zinc
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Total
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	11
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Data were collected by LAW Crandall from 1997 to 2000. None of the 11 samples were in exceedance. (SWRCB, 2003).
Data Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	From the Basin Plan: For inland surface waters with a municipal beneficial use, the WQO for Zinc is 5.0 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Samples were collected at Sandia Creek. Exact sample location was not reported.
Temporal Representation:	Samples were collected on a quarterly basis from 12/1997 to 06/2000.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	Data used in 2002 assessment.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
LOE ID:	3085
Pollutant:	Zinc
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Total
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	1
Number of Exceedances:	1
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Data were collected by RWQCB9 in 1998. One sample was collected and was in exceedance. (SWRCB, 2003).
Data Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	From the Basin Plan: For inland surface waters with a municipal beneficial use, the WQO for Zinc is 5.0 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Sample was collected at Sandia Creek at Sandia Creek Rd., 0.5-1.0 mile above confluence.
Temporal Representation:	One sample was collected on 06/09/1998.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	Data used in 2002 assessment.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	5760
Pollutant:	pH
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2006)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Weight of Evidence:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.2 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.2 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. None of the 14 samples exceed the Basin Plan water quality objective for pH. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. None of the 14 samples exceed the Basin Plan water quality objective for pH and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.2 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
RWQCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:	No new data were assessed for 2008. The Regional Board will update this decision when new data and information become available and are assessed.
SWRCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:
USEPA Decision:

Lines of Evidence (LOEs) for Decision ID 5760

LOE ID:	3090
Pollutant:	pH
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Total
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	14
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Data were collected by LAW Crandall from 1997 to 2000. None of the 14 samples were in exceedance. (SWRCB, 2003).
Data Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	From the Basin Plan: For inland surface waters and all beneficial uses, the WQO for pH is 6.5(minimum) and 8.5(maximum).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Samples were collected at Sandia Creek. Exact location was not reported.
Temporal Representation:	Samples were collected on a quarterly basis from 12/1997 to 06/2000. Samples were collected once per sampling day, except for 03/07/2000 and 06/01/2000, on which 2 samples were collected per day.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	Data used in 2002 assessment.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	5667
Pollutant:	Iron
Final Listing Decision:	List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2006)
Revision Status	Original
Sources:	Source Unknown
Expected TMDL Completion Date:	2019
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Weight of Evidence:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Four of the eleven samples exceed the Basin Plan water quality objective for iron. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification in favor of placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Four of the eleven samples exceed the Basin Plan water quality objective for iron, and this exceeds the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
RWQCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:	No new data were assessed for 2008. The Regional Board will update this decision when new data and information become available and are assessed.
SWRCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:
USEPA Decision:

Lines of Evidence (LOEs) for Decision ID 5667

LOE ID:	3094
Pollutant:	Iron
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Total
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	11
Number of Exceedances:	4
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Data were collected by LAW Crandall from 1997 to 2000. Four of 11 samples were in exceedance.
Data Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	From the Basin Plan: For inland surface waters with a municipal beneficial use, the WQO for iron is 0.3 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Samples were collected at Sandia Creek. Exact sampling location was not reported.
Temporal Representation:	Samples were collected on a quarterly basis from 12/1997 to 06/2000.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	Data used in 2002 assessment.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	5743
Pollutant:	Sulfates
Final Listing Decision:	List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2006)
Revision Status	Original
Sources:	Source Unknown | Unknown Nonpoint Source | Unknown Point Source | Urban Runoff/Storm Sewers
Expected TMDL Completion Date:	2019
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Weight of Evidence:	This pollutant is being considered for removal from the section 303(d) list under section 4.2 of the Listing Policy. Under this section a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Five of 11 samples exceeded the Basin Plan water quality objective for sulfates. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against removing this water segment-pollutant combination from the section 303(d) list. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Five of 11 samples exceeded the Basin Plan water quality objective for sulfates and this exceeds the allowable frequency listed in Table 4.2 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 4.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are met.
RWQCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:	No new data were assessed for 2008. The Regional Board will update this decision when new data and information become available and are assessed.
SWRCB Board Decision / Staff Recommendation:
USEPA Decision:

Lines of Evidence (LOEs) for Decision ID 5743

LOE ID:	3088
Pollutant:	Sulfates
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Total
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	11
Number of Exceedances:	5
Data and Information Type:	Not Specified
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Data were collected by LAW Crandall from 1997 to 2001. Five of 11 samples were in exceedance.
Data Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	From the Basin Plan: For inland surface waters and all beneficial uses, the WQO for sulfate is 250 mg/L. This concentration is not to be exceeded more than 10% of the time during any one year period.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Placeholder reference 2006 303(d)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Samples were collected at Sandia Creek. Exact sample location was not reported.
Temporal Representation:	Samples were collected on a quarterly basis from 12/1997 to 06/2000.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	Data used in 2002 assessment.
QAPP Information Reference(s):