Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 149124, Indicator Bacteria
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
300248 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Escherichia coli (E. coli) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
GeoMean |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Water Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PATHOGEN MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the geomean water quality threshold for E. coli. This is a six week rolling geomean that is calculated weekly. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The bacteria water quality objective to protect the REC-1 beneficial use for waters where the salinity is equal to or less than 1 part per thousand 95 percent or more of the time applies a rolling six-week geometric mean of E. coli, not to exceed 100 cfu/100 mL (ISWEBE 2018). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): 206PET316 (Constructed channel adjacent to Petaluma River just south of Corona Rd Bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the days of 2014-04-23 and 2014-05-22 . |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 149124, Indicator Bacteria
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
300486 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Escherichia coli (E. coli) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
GeoMean |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Water Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
5 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
5 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PATHOGEN MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 5 of the 5 samples exceeded the geomean water quality threshold for E. coli. This is a six week rolling geomean that is calculated weekly. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The bacteria water quality objective to protect the REC-1 beneficial use for waters where the salinity is equal to or less than 1 part per thousand 95 percent or more of the time applies a rolling six-week geometric mean of E. coli, not to exceed 100 cfu/100 mL (ISWEBE 2018). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): 206PET260 (Petaluma River - 100m upstream of Payran St bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the days of 2014-04-24 and 2016-08-09 . |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 149124, Indicator Bacteria
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
300402 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Fecal Coliform |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
90th percentile |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Non-Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PATHOGEN MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Coliform, Fecal. The water quality threshold is based on a 30-day 90% percentile. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.1 Bacteria: Table 3-1 provides a summary of the bacterial water quality objectives and identifies the sources of those objectives. The fecal coliform objective for non-contact recreation is a 30-day 90th percentile less than 4000 MPN/100 ML. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): 206PET098 (Petaluma River - 100m downstream of confluence with Adobe Creek). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the days of 2014-04-24 and 2014-05-22 . |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 149124, Indicator Bacteria
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
300246 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Fecal Coliform |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
90th percentile |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Non-Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PATHOGEN MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Coliform, Fecal. The water quality threshold is based on a 30-day 90% percentile. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.1 Bacteria: Table 3-1 provides a summary of the bacterial water quality objectives and identifies the sources of those objectives. The fecal coliform objective for non-contact recreation is a 30-day 90th percentile less than 4000 MPN/100 ML. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): 206PET350 (Petaluma River - 715m upstream of Petaluma Blvd N bridge. Just downstream of Rainsville Rd bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the days of 2014-04-23 and 2014-05-22 . |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 149124, Indicator Bacteria
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
300487 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Fecal Coliform |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
90th percentile |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Non-Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PATHOGEN MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Coliform, Fecal. The water quality threshold is based on a 30-day 90% percentile. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.1 Bacteria: Table 3-1 provides a summary of the bacterial water quality objectives and identifies the sources of those objectives. The fecal coliform objective for non-contact recreation is a 30-day 90th percentile less than 4000 MPN/100 ML. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): 206PET316 (Constructed channel adjacent to Petaluma River just south of Corona Rd Bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the days of 2014-04-23 and 2014-05-22 . |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 149124, Indicator Bacteria
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
300474 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Fecal Coliform |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Mean |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Non-Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PATHOGEN MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the 30-day mean water quality threshold for Coliform, Fecal. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.1 Bacteria: Table 3-1 provides a summary of the bacterial water quality objectives and identifies the sources of those objectives. The fecal coliform objective for non-contact recreation is a 30-day mean less than 2000 MPN/100 ML. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): 206PET098 (Petaluma River - 100m downstream of confluence with Adobe Creek). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the days of 2014-04-24 and 2014-05-22 . |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 149124, Indicator Bacteria
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
300369 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Fecal Coliform |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
90th percentile |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Non-Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PATHOGEN MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Coliform, Fecal. The water quality threshold is based on a 30-day 90% percentile. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.1 Bacteria: Table 3-1 provides a summary of the bacterial water quality objectives and identifies the sources of those objectives. The fecal coliform objective for non-contact recreation is a 30-day 90th percentile less than 4000 MPN/100 ML. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): 206PET310 (Petaluma River - Petaluma Village Premium Outlet Mall, just downstream of bridge leading into mall). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the days of 2014-04-23 and 2014-05-22 . |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 149124, Indicator Bacteria
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
300457 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Fecal Coliform |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Mean |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Non-Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PATHOGEN MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the 30-day mean water quality threshold for Coliform, Fecal. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.1 Bacteria: Table 3-1 provides a summary of the bacterial water quality objectives and identifies the sources of those objectives. The fecal coliform objective for non-contact recreation is a 30-day mean less than 2000 MPN/100 ML. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): 206PET316 (Constructed channel adjacent to Petaluma River just south of Corona Rd Bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the days of 2014-04-23 and 2014-05-22 . |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 149124, Indicator Bacteria
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
300348 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Fecal Coliform |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Mean |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Non-Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PATHOGEN MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the 30-day mean water quality threshold for Coliform, Fecal. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.1 Bacteria: Table 3-1 provides a summary of the bacterial water quality objectives and identifies the sources of those objectives. The fecal coliform objective for non-contact recreation is a 30-day mean less than 2000 MPN/100 ML. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): 206PET350 (Petaluma River - 715m upstream of Petaluma Blvd N bridge. Just downstream of Rainsville Rd bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the days of 2014-04-23 and 2014-05-22 . |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 149124, Indicator Bacteria
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
300430 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Fecal Coliform |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Mean |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Non-Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PATHOGEN MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the 30-day mean water quality threshold for Coliform, Fecal. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.1 Bacteria: Table 3-1 provides a summary of the bacterial water quality objectives and identifies the sources of those objectives. The fecal coliform objective for non-contact recreation is a 30-day mean less than 2000 MPN/100 ML. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): 206PET310 (Petaluma River - Petaluma Village Premium Outlet Mall, just downstream of bridge leading into mall). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the days of 2014-04-23 and 2014-05-22 . |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 149124, Indicator Bacteria
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
300295 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Fecal Coliform |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
90th percentile |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Non-Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PATHOGEN MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Coliform, Fecal. The water quality threshold is based on a 30-day 90% percentile. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.1 Bacteria: Table 3-1 provides a summary of the bacterial water quality objectives and identifies the sources of those objectives. The fecal coliform objective for non-contact recreation is a 30-day 90th percentile less than 4000 MPN/100 ML. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): 206PET007 (Petaluma River - 7.2 mi upstream of Hwy 37 bridge. Papa's Taverna on Lakeville Hwy). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the days of 2014-04-23 and 2014-04-23 . |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 149124, Indicator Bacteria
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
300349 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Fecal Coliform |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
90th percentile |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Non-Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PATHOGEN MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Coliform, Fecal. The water quality threshold is based on a 30-day 90% percentile. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.1 Bacteria: Table 3-1 provides a summary of the bacterial water quality objectives and identifies the sources of those objectives. The fecal coliform objective for non-contact recreation is a 30-day 90th percentile less than 4000 MPN/100 ML. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): 206PET260 (Petaluma River - 100m upstream of Payran St bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the days of 2014-04-24 and 2014-05-01 . |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 149124, Indicator Bacteria
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
300538 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Fecal Coliform |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
90th percentile |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Non-Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PATHOGEN MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Coliform, Fecal. The water quality threshold is based on a 30-day 90% percentile. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.1 Bacteria: Table 3-1 provides a summary of the bacterial water quality objectives and identifies the sources of those objectives. The fecal coliform objective for non-contact recreation is a 30-day 90th percentile less than 4000 MPN/100 ML. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): 206PET205 (Petaluma River - Just upstream of E. Washington St bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the days of 2014-04-23 and 2014-05-22 . |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 149124, Indicator Bacteria
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
300255 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Enterococcus |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
STV |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Water Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
5 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
3 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PATHOGEN MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 3 of the 5 samples exceeded the Statistical Threshold Value (STV) water quality threshold for Enterococcus. The STV is based on a 10% exceedance rate that is calculated monthly. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The bacteria water quality objective to protect the REC-1 beneficial use where the salinity is 1 ppth or higher 95 percent or more of the time applies a Statistical Threshold Value to enterococcus of 110 cfu/100 mL, not to be exceeded by more than 10 percent of samples collected within in a calendar month. (ISWEBE 2018) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): 206PET098 (Petaluma River - 100m downstream of confluence with Adobe Creek). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the days of 2017-03-01 and 2018-03-13 . |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 149124, Indicator Bacteria
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
300516 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Enterococcus |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
GeoMean |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Water Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
2 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PATHOGEN MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 2 of the 2 samples exceeded the geomean water quality threshold for Enterococcus. This is a six week rolling geomean that is calculated weekly. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The bacteria water quality objective to protect the REC-1 beneficial use where the salinity is 1 ppth or higher 95 percent or more of the time applies a six-week rolling geomean to enterococcus, not to exceed 30 cfu/100mL. (ISWEBE 2018) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): 206PET098 (Petaluma River - 100m downstream of confluence with Adobe Creek). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the days of 2017-03-01 and 2018-03-13 . |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 149124, Indicator Bacteria
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
300297 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Enterococcus |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
STV |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Water Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
5 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
2 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PATHOGEN MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 2 of the 5 samples exceeded the Statistical Threshold Value (STV) water quality threshold for Enterococcus. The STV is based on a 10% exceedance rate that is calculated monthly. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The bacteria water quality objective to protect the REC-1 beneficial use where the salinity is 1 ppth or higher 95 percent or more of the time applies a Statistical Threshold Value to enterococcus of 110 cfu/100 mL, not to be exceeded by more than 10 percent of samples collected within in a calendar month. (ISWEBE 2018) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): 206PET007 (Petaluma River - 7.2 mi upstream of Hwy 37 bridge. Papa's Taverna on Lakeville Hwy). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the days of 2017-03-01 and 2018-03-13 . |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 149124, Indicator Bacteria
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
300401 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Enterococcus |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
GeoMean |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Water Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
2 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PATHOGEN MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 2 of the 2 samples exceeded the geomean water quality threshold for Enterococcus. This is a six week rolling geomean that is calculated weekly. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The bacteria water quality objective to protect the REC-1 beneficial use where the salinity is 1 ppth or higher 95 percent or more of the time applies a six-week rolling geomean to enterococcus, not to exceed 30 cfu/100mL. (ISWEBE 2018) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): 206PET205 (Petaluma River - Just upstream of E. Washington St bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the days of 2017-03-01 and 2018-03-13 . |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 149124, Indicator Bacteria
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
300500 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Enterococcus |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
STV |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Water Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
5 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
4 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PATHOGEN MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 4 of the 5 samples exceeded the Statistical Threshold Value (STV) water quality threshold for Enterococcus. The STV is based on a 10% exceedance rate that is calculated monthly. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The bacteria water quality objective to protect the REC-1 beneficial use where the salinity is 1 ppth or higher 95 percent or more of the time applies a Statistical Threshold Value to enterococcus of 110 cfu/100 mL, not to be exceeded by more than 10 percent of samples collected within in a calendar month. (ISWEBE 2018) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): 206PET205 (Petaluma River - Just upstream of E. Washington St bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the days of 2017-03-01 and 2018-03-13 . |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 149124, Indicator Bacteria
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
300322 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Enterococcus |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
GeoMean |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Water Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PATHOGEN MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of the 2 samples exceeded the geomean water quality threshold for Enterococcus. This is a six week rolling geomean that is calculated weekly. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The bacteria water quality objective to protect the REC-1 beneficial use where the salinity is 1 ppth or higher 95 percent or more of the time applies a six-week rolling geomean to enterococcus, not to exceed 30 cfu/100mL. (ISWEBE 2018) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): 206PET007 (Petaluma River - 7.2 mi upstream of Hwy 37 bridge. Papa's Taverna on Lakeville Hwy). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the days of 2017-03-01 and 2018-03-13 . |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 149124, Indicator Bacteria
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
3795 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Pathogens |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Water Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
Not Specified |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Unspecified--This LOE is a placeholder to support a 303(d) listing decision made prior to 2006. |
| Data Reference: |
Placeholder reference pre-2006 303(d) |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
|
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Unspecified |
| Temporal Representation: |
Unspecified |
| Environmental Conditions: |
Unspecified |
| QAPP Information: |
Unspecified |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 149124, Indicator Bacteria
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
300406 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Escherichia coli (E. coli) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
GeoMean |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Water Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
5 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
4 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PATHOGEN MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 4 of the 5 samples exceeded the geomean water quality threshold for E. coli. This is a six week rolling geomean that is calculated weekly. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The bacteria water quality objective to protect the REC-1 beneficial use for waters where the salinity is equal to or less than 1 part per thousand 95 percent or more of the time applies a rolling six-week geometric mean of E. coli, not to exceed 100 cfu/100 mL (ISWEBE 2018). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): 206PET310 (Petaluma River - Petaluma Village Premium Outlet Mall, just downstream of bridge leading into mall). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the days of 2014-04-23 and 2016-08-09 . |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 149124, Indicator Bacteria
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
300469 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Escherichia coli (E. coli) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
STV |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Water Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
12 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
7 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PATHOGEN MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 7 of the 12 samples exceeded the Statistical Threshold Value (STV) water quality threshold for E. coli. The STV is based on a 10% exceedance rate that is calculated monthly. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The bacteria water quality objective to protect the REC-1 beneficial use where the salinity is less than 1 parts per thousand 95 percent or more of the time applies a statistical threshold value to E. coli of 320 cfu/100 mL, not to be exceeded by more than 10 percent of samples within a calendar month (ISWEBE 2018). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): 206PET310 (Petaluma River - Petaluma Village Premium Outlet Mall, just downstream of bridge leading into mall). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the days of 2014-04-23 and 2016-08-09 . |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 149124, Indicator Bacteria
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
300398 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Escherichia coli (E. coli) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
STV |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Water Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
12 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
10 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PATHOGEN MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 10 of the 12 samples exceeded the Statistical Threshold Value (STV) water quality threshold for E. coli. The STV is based on a 10% exceedance rate that is calculated monthly. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The bacteria water quality objective to protect the REC-1 beneficial use where the salinity is less than 1 parts per thousand 95 percent or more of the time applies a statistical threshold value to E. coli of 320 cfu/100 mL, not to be exceeded by more than 10 percent of samples within a calendar month (ISWEBE 2018). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): 206PET260 (Petaluma River - 100m upstream of Payran St bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the days of 2014-04-24 and 2016-08-09 . |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 149124, Indicator Bacteria
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
300495 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Escherichia coli (E. coli) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
STV |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Water Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PATHOGEN MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of the 2 samples exceeded the Statistical Threshold Value (STV) water quality threshold for E. coli. The STV is based on a 10% exceedance rate that is calculated monthly. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The bacteria water quality objective to protect the REC-1 beneficial use where the salinity is less than 1 parts per thousand 95 percent or more of the time applies a statistical threshold value to E. coli of 320 cfu/100 mL, not to be exceeded by more than 10 percent of samples within a calendar month (ISWEBE 2018). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): 206PET316 (Constructed channel adjacent to Petaluma River just south of Corona Rd Bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the days of 2014-04-23 and 2014-05-22 . |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 149124, Indicator Bacteria
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
300353 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Escherichia coli (E. coli) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
STV |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Water Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
11 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
7 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PATHOGEN MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 7 of the 11 samples exceeded the Statistical Threshold Value (STV) water quality threshold for E. coli. The STV is based on a 10% exceedance rate that is calculated monthly. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The bacteria water quality objective to protect the REC-1 beneficial use where the salinity is less than 1 parts per thousand 95 percent or more of the time applies a statistical threshold value to E. coli of 320 cfu/100 mL, not to be exceeded by more than 10 percent of samples within a calendar month (ISWEBE 2018). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): 206PET350 (Petaluma River - 715m upstream of Petaluma Blvd N bridge. Just downstream of Rainsville Rd bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the days of 2014-04-23 and 2016-07-12 . |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 149124, Indicator Bacteria
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
300465 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Escherichia coli (E. coli) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
STV |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Water Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
10 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
6 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PATHOGEN MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 6 of the 10 samples exceeded the Statistical Threshold Value (STV) water quality threshold for E. coli. The STV is based on a 10% exceedance rate that is calculated monthly. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The bacteria water quality objective to protect the REC-1 beneficial use where the salinity is less than 1 parts per thousand 95 percent or more of the time applies a statistical threshold value to E. coli of 320 cfu/100 mL, not to be exceeded by more than 10 percent of samples within a calendar month (ISWEBE 2018). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): 206PET315 (Petaluma River - Just downstream of Corona Rd Bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the days of 2015-01-06 and 2016-08-09 . |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 149124, Indicator Bacteria
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
300429 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Escherichia coli (E. coli) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
GeoMean |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Water Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
5 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
4 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PATHOGEN MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 4 of the 5 samples exceeded the geomean water quality threshold for E. coli. This is a six week rolling geomean that is calculated weekly. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The bacteria water quality objective to protect the REC-1 beneficial use for waters where the salinity is equal to or less than 1 part per thousand 95 percent or more of the time applies a rolling six-week geometric mean of E. coli, not to exceed 100 cfu/100 mL (ISWEBE 2018). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): 206PET315 (Petaluma River - Just downstream of Corona Rd Bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the days of 2015-01-06 and 2016-08-09 . |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 149124, Indicator Bacteria
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
300357 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Escherichia coli (E. coli) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
GeoMean |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Water Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
7 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
4 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PATHOGEN MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 4 of the 7 samples exceeded the geomean water quality threshold for E. coli. This is a six week rolling geomean that is calculated weekly. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The bacteria water quality objective to protect the REC-1 beneficial use for waters where the salinity is equal to or less than 1 part per thousand 95 percent or more of the time applies a rolling six-week geometric mean of E. coli, not to exceed 100 cfu/100 mL (ISWEBE 2018). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): 206PET350 (Petaluma River - 715m upstream of Petaluma Blvd N bridge. Just downstream of Rainsville Rd bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the days of 2014-04-23 and 2016-07-12 . |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151059, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
278292 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
7 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 7 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206PET310 (Petaluma River - Petaluma Village Premium Outlet Mall, just downstream of bridge leading into mall). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-05-01 and 2016-06-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151059, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
278738 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
5 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206PET315 (Petaluma River - Just downstream of Corona Rd Bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-01-28 and 2016-03-22 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151059, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
278198 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206PET316 (Constructed channel adjacent to Petaluma River just south of Corona Rd Bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-05-01 and 2014-05-01 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151059, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
278709 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
6 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 6 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206PET260 (Petaluma River - 100m upstream of Payran St bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-05-01 and 2016-03-23 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151059, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
278448 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
6 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 6 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206PET260 (Petaluma River - 100m upstream of Payran St bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-05-01 and 2016-03-23 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151059, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
278666 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
6 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 6 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206PET350 (Petaluma River - 715m upstream of Petaluma Blvd N bridge. Just downstream of Rainsville Rd bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-05-01 and 2016-03-22 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151059, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
278708 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
7 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 7 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206PET310 (Petaluma River - Petaluma Village Premium Outlet Mall, just downstream of bridge leading into mall). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-05-01 and 2016-06-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151059, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
278737 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
6 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 6 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206PET350 (Petaluma River - 715m upstream of Petaluma Blvd N bridge. Just downstream of Rainsville Rd bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-05-01 and 2016-03-22 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151059, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
278744 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
5 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206PET315 (Petaluma River - Just downstream of Corona Rd Bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-01-28 and 2016-03-22 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151059, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
278747 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206PET316 (Constructed channel adjacent to Petaluma River just south of Corona Rd Bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-05-01 and 2014-05-01 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151059, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
279412 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206PET260 (Petaluma River - 100m upstream of Payran St bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-03-23 and 2016-03-23 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151059, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
280072 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206PET315 (Petaluma River - Just downstream of Corona Rd Bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-03-22 and 2016-03-22 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151059, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
279962 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206PET260 (Petaluma River - 100m upstream of Payran St bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-03-23 and 2016-03-23 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151059, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
279894 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206PET315 (Petaluma River - Just downstream of Corona Rd Bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-03-22 and 2016-03-22 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151059, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
279743 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206PET350 (Petaluma River - 715m upstream of Petaluma Blvd N bridge. Just downstream of Rainsville Rd bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-03-22 and 2016-03-22 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151059, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
280154 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206PET316 (Constructed channel adjacent to Petaluma River just south of Corona Rd Bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-05-01 and 2014-05-01 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151059, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
280250 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206PET310 (Petaluma River - Petaluma Village Premium Outlet Mall, just downstream of bridge leading into mall). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-06-15 and 2016-06-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151059, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
280162 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206PET316 (Constructed channel adjacent to Petaluma River just south of Corona Rd Bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-05-01 and 2014-05-01 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151059, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
280110 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206PET350 (Petaluma River - 715m upstream of Petaluma Blvd N bridge. Just downstream of Rainsville Rd bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-03-22 and 2016-03-22 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 151059, Ammonia
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
279695 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.20 Un-Ionized Ammonia: The discharge of wastes shall not cause receiving waters to contain concentrations of un-ionized ammonia in excess 0.025 mg/l (as N), expressed as an annual median. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206PET310 (Petaluma River - Petaluma Village Premium Outlet Mall, just downstream of bridge leading into mall). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-06-15 and 2016-06-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142223, Arsenic
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
269880 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Arsenic |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Arsenic . |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for arsenic is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 33 mg/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 206PET310 (Petaluma River - Petaluma Village Premium Outlet Mall, just downstream of bridge leading into mall). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2016-06-15 to 2016-06-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142223, Arsenic
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
279980 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Arsenic |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Arsenic. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved arsenic criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 150 ug/L. The conversion factor used to convert the total fraction criterion for arsenic to dissolved fraction criterion is 1. Therefore all data was considered to be representative of the dissolved fraction. (California Toxics Rule, 2000) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206PET310 (Petaluma River - Petaluma Village Premium Outlet Mall, just downstream of bridge leading into mall). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-06-15 and 2016-06-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142223, Arsenic
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
290474 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Arsenic |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Three samples were collected by SWAMP from a monitoring location PET310 in Petaluma River. Concentrations of arsenic, chromium, copper, lead, nickel, selenium, silver and and zinc did not exceed the water quality objectives.Concentrations of total dissolved chromium were well below the objective for chromium VI. |
| Data Reference: |
Water Quality Monitoring and Bioassessment in Four San Francisco Bay Region Watersheds in 2003-2004: Kirker Creek, Mt. Diablo Creek, Petaluma River, and San Mateo Creek. Surface Water Monitoring Program, San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board, Oakland. CA |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Table 3-4 in the Basin Plan (2007) lists freshwater water quality objectives for toxic pollutants: arsenic- 150 ug/L, chromium VI- 11 ug/L, copper - 9.0 ug/L, lead - 2.5 ug/L, nickel - 52 ug/L, selenium - 5 ug/L, silver-3.4 ug/L and zinc - 120 ug/L. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - San Francisco Bay Region (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Samples were collected from one monitoring location PET310 in the main stem of Petaluma River. |
| Temporal Representation: |
Samples were collected on: 01/20/2003, 04/21/2003 and 06/02/2003. |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
All samples were collected and analyzed using procedures comparable with the SWAMP Quality Assurance Management Plan (SWRCB 2002). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
|
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142223, Arsenic
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
280280 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Arsenic |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Arsenic. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved arsenic criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 150 ug/L. The conversion factor used to convert the total fraction criterion for arsenic to dissolved fraction criterion is 1. Therefore all data was considered to be representative of the dissolved fraction. (California Toxics Rule, 2000) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206PET310 (Petaluma River - Petaluma Village Premium Outlet Mall, just downstream of bridge leading into mall). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-06-15 and 2016-06-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142223, Arsenic
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
290454 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Arsenic |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Concentrations of arsenic, cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, mercury, nickel and zinc in one sediment sample collected in spring 2003 did not exceed the sediment quality guidelines. |
| Data Reference: |
Water Quality Monitoring and Bioassessment in Four San Francisco Bay Region Watersheds in 2003-2004: Kirker Creek, Mt. Diablo Creek, Petaluma River, and San Mateo Creek. Surface Water Monitoring Program, San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board, Oakland. CA |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - San Francisco Bay Region (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Sediment Quality Guidelines (MacDonald et al., 2000): PEC (probable effect concentration) arsenic - 33 mg/kg dw; cadmium - 4.98 mg/kg dw; chromium - 111 mg/kg dw; copper - 149 mg/kg dw; lead - 128 mg/kg dw; mercury - 1.06 mg/kg dw; nickel - 48.6 mg/kg dw; zinc - 459 mg/kg dw. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
One sediment sample was collected at PET310 on the mainstem of Petaluma River. |
| Temporal Representation: |
Sediment sample was collected in April of 2003. |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
All samples were collected and analyzed using procedures comparable with the SWAMP Quality Assurance Management Plan (SWRCB, 2002). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
|
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142223, Arsenic
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
270043 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Arsenic |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Arsenic . |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for arsenic is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 33 mg/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 206PET310 (Petaluma River - Petaluma Village Premium Outlet Mall, just downstream of bridge leading into mall). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2016-06-15 to 2016-06-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142230, Chlorophyll-a
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
283050 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Chlorophyll-a |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
4 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 4 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chlorophyll a. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
North Carolina Administrative code (NCAC), Title 15A – Environmental and Natural Resources, Subchapter 2B-Surface water and wetland standards, Rule 0211-Fresh surface water quality standards for class C waters (Class C is defined as freshwaters protected for secondary recreation, fishing, aquatic life including propagation and survival, and wildlife).Section 3(a) of Rule 0211 applies to all fresh surface waters and states that chlorophyll a is not to exceed 40 ug/L. |
| Guideline Reference: |
North Carolina standards, criteria, or toxic concentrations. Adopted per title 15A North Carolina Administrative Code subchapter 2B - Surface water and wetland standards |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206PET310 (Petaluma River - Petaluma Village Premium Outlet Mall, just downstream of bridge leading into mall). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-04-25 and 2016-08-04 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142230, Chlorophyll-a
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
282953 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Chlorophyll-a |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chlorophyll a. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
North Carolina Administrative code (NCAC), Title 15A – Environmental and Natural Resources, Subchapter 2B-Surface water and wetland standards, Rule 0211-Fresh surface water quality standards for class C waters (Class C is defined as freshwaters protected for secondary recreation, fishing, aquatic life including propagation and survival, and wildlife).Section 3(a) of Rule 0211 applies to all fresh surface waters and states that chlorophyll a is not to exceed 40 ug/L. |
| Guideline Reference: |
North Carolina standards, criteria, or toxic concentrations. Adopted per title 15A North Carolina Administrative Code subchapter 2B - Surface water and wetland standards |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206PET315 (Petaluma River - Just downstream of Corona Rd Bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-07-26 and 2016-08-02 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142230, Chlorophyll-a
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
283066 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Chlorophyll-a |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chlorophyll a. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
North Carolina Administrative code (NCAC), Title 15A – Environmental and Natural Resources, Subchapter 2B-Surface water and wetland standards, Rule 0211-Fresh surface water quality standards for class C waters (Class C is defined as freshwaters protected for secondary recreation, fishing, aquatic life including propagation and survival, and wildlife).Section 3(a) of Rule 0211 applies to all fresh surface waters and states that chlorophyll a is not to exceed 40 ug/L. |
| Guideline Reference: |
North Carolina standards, criteria, or toxic concentrations. Adopted per title 15A North Carolina Administrative Code subchapter 2B - Surface water and wetland standards |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206PET260 (Petaluma River - 100m upstream of Payran St bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-07-26 and 2016-08-02 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142230, Chlorophyll-a
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
282951 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Chlorophyll-a |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chlorophyll a. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
North Carolina Administrative code (NCAC), Title 15A – Environmental and Natural Resources, Subchapter 2B-Surface water and wetland standards, Rule 0211-Fresh surface water quality standards for class C waters (Class C is defined as freshwaters protected for secondary recreation, fishing, aquatic life including propagation and survival, and wildlife).Section 3(a) of Rule 0211 applies to all fresh surface waters and states that chlorophyll a is not to exceed 40 ug/L. |
| Guideline Reference: |
North Carolina standards, criteria, or toxic concentrations. Adopted per title 15A North Carolina Administrative Code subchapter 2B - Surface water and wetland standards |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206PET260 (Petaluma River - 100m upstream of Payran St bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-07-26 and 2016-08-02 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142230, Chlorophyll-a
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
282853 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Chlorophyll-a |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chlorophyll a. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
North Carolina Administrative code (NCAC), Title 15A – Environmental and Natural Resources, Subchapter 2B-Surface water and wetland standards, Rule 0211-Fresh surface water quality standards for class C waters (Class C is defined as freshwaters protected for secondary recreation, fishing, aquatic life including propagation and survival, and wildlife).Section 3(a) of Rule 0211 applies to all fresh surface waters and states that chlorophyll a is not to exceed 40 ug/L. |
| Guideline Reference: |
North Carolina standards, criteria, or toxic concentrations. Adopted per title 15A North Carolina Administrative Code subchapter 2B - Surface water and wetland standards |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206PET315 (Petaluma River - Just downstream of Corona Rd Bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-07-26 and 2016-08-02 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142230, Chlorophyll-a
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
282854 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Chlorophyll-a |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
4 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 4 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chlorophyll a. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
North Carolina Administrative code (NCAC), Title 15A – Environmental and Natural Resources, Subchapter 2B-Surface water and wetland standards, Rule 0211-Fresh surface water quality standards for class C waters (Class C is defined as freshwaters protected for secondary recreation, fishing, aquatic life including propagation and survival, and wildlife).Section 3(a) of Rule 0211 applies to all fresh surface waters and states that chlorophyll a is not to exceed 40 ug/L. |
| Guideline Reference: |
North Carolina standards, criteria, or toxic concentrations. Adopted per title 15A North Carolina Administrative Code subchapter 2B - Surface water and wetland standards |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206PET310 (Petaluma River - Petaluma Village Premium Outlet Mall, just downstream of bridge leading into mall). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-04-25 and 2016-08-04 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142264, Chromium
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
271036 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Chromium |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Chromium . |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for chromium is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 111 mg/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 206PET310 (Petaluma River - Petaluma Village Premium Outlet Mall, just downstream of bridge leading into mall). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2016-06-15 to 2016-06-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142264, Chromium
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
290475 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Chromium |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Three samples were collected by SWAMP from a monitoring location PET310 in Petaluma River. Concentrations of arsenic, chromium, copper, lead, nickel, selenium, silver and and zinc did not exceed the water quality objectives.Concentrations of total dissolved chromium were well below the objective for chromium VI. |
| Data Reference: |
Water Quality Monitoring and Bioassessment in Four San Francisco Bay Region Watersheds in 2003-2004: Kirker Creek, Mt. Diablo Creek, Petaluma River, and San Mateo Creek. Surface Water Monitoring Program, San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board, Oakland. CA |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Table 3-4 in the Basin Plan (2007) lists freshwater water quality objectives for toxic pollutants: arsenic- 150 ug/L, chromium VI- 11 ug/L, copper - 9.0 ug/L, lead - 2.5 ug/L, nickel - 52 ug/L, selenium - 5 ug/L, silver-3.4 ug/L and zinc - 120 ug/L. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - San Francisco Bay Region (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Samples were collected from one monitoring location PET310 in the main stem of Petaluma River. |
| Temporal Representation: |
Samples were collected on: 01/20/2003, 04/21/2003 and 06/02/2003. |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
All samples were collected and analyzed using procedures comparable with the SWAMP Quality Assurance Management Plan (SWRCB 2002). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
|
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142264, Chromium
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
282859 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Chromium |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chromium. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved chromium (III) criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is is hardness dependent as described in Table 1 of paragraph (b)(1). The value calculated when using a default hardness of 100 mg/L is 180 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206PET310 (Petaluma River - Petaluma Village Premium Outlet Mall, just downstream of bridge leading into mall). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-06-15 and 2016-06-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142264, Chromium
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
282861 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Chromium |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chromium. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved chromium (III) criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is is hardness dependent as described in Table 1 of paragraph (b)(1). The value calculated when using a default hardness of 100 mg/L is 180 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206PET310 (Petaluma River - Petaluma Village Premium Outlet Mall, just downstream of bridge leading into mall). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-06-15 and 2016-06-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142264, Chromium
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
271368 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Chromium |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Chromium . |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for chromium is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 111 mg/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 206PET310 (Petaluma River - Petaluma Village Premium Outlet Mall, just downstream of bridge leading into mall). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2016-06-15 to 2016-06-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142264, Chromium
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
290456 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Chromium |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Concentrations of arsenic, cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, mercury, nickel and zinc in one sediment sample collected in spring 2003 did not exceed the sediment quality guidelines. |
| Data Reference: |
Water Quality Monitoring and Bioassessment in Four San Francisco Bay Region Watersheds in 2003-2004: Kirker Creek, Mt. Diablo Creek, Petaluma River, and San Mateo Creek. Surface Water Monitoring Program, San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board, Oakland. CA |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - San Francisco Bay Region (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Sediment Quality Guidelines (MacDonald et al., 2000): PEC (probable effect concentration) arsenic - 33 mg/kg dw; cadmium - 4.98 mg/kg dw; chromium - 111 mg/kg dw; copper - 149 mg/kg dw; lead - 128 mg/kg dw; mercury - 1.06 mg/kg dw; nickel - 48.6 mg/kg dw; zinc - 459 mg/kg dw. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
One sediment sample was collected at PET310 on the mainstem of Petaluma River. |
| Temporal Representation: |
Sediment sample was collected in April of 2003. |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
All samples were collected and analyzed using procedures comparable with the SWAMP Quality Assurance Management Plan (SWRCB, 2002). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
|
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142233, Copper
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
283385 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Copper |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Copper. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved copper criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is hardness dependent. The criterion when calculated using a default hardness of 100 mg/L is 9 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206PET310 (Petaluma River - Petaluma Village Premium Outlet Mall, just downstream of bridge leading into mall). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-06-15 and 2016-06-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142233, Copper
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
290488 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Copper |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Three samples were collected by SWAMP from a monitoring location PET310 in Petaluma River. Concentrations of arsenic, chromium, copper, lead, nickel, selenium, silver and and zinc did not exceed the water quality objectives.Concentrations of total dissolved chromium were well below the objective for chromium VI. |
| Data Reference: |
Water Quality Monitoring and Bioassessment in Four San Francisco Bay Region Watersheds in 2003-2004: Kirker Creek, Mt. Diablo Creek, Petaluma River, and San Mateo Creek. Surface Water Monitoring Program, San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board, Oakland. CA |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Table 3-4 in the Basin Plan (2007) lists freshwater water quality objectives for toxic pollutants: arsenic- 150 ug/L, chromium VI- 11 ug/L, copper - 9.0 ug/L, lead - 2.5 ug/L, nickel - 52 ug/L, selenium - 5 ug/L, silver-3.4 ug/L and zinc - 120 ug/L. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - San Francisco Bay Region (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Samples were collected from one monitoring location PET310 in the main stem of Petaluma River. |
| Temporal Representation: |
Samples were collected on: 01/20/2003, 04/21/2003 and 06/02/2003. |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
All samples were collected and analyzed using procedures comparable with the SWAMP Quality Assurance Management Plan (SWRCB 2002). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
|
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142233, Copper
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
271470 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Copper |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Copper . |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for copper is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 149 mg/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 206PET310 (Petaluma River - Petaluma Village Premium Outlet Mall, just downstream of bridge leading into mall). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2016-06-15 to 2016-06-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142233, Copper
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
271084 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Copper |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Copper . |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for copper is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 149 mg/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 206PET310 (Petaluma River - Petaluma Village Premium Outlet Mall, just downstream of bridge leading into mall). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2016-06-15 to 2016-06-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142233, Copper
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
290457 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Copper |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Concentrations of arsenic, cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, mercury, nickel and zinc in one sediment sample collected in spring 2003 did not exceed the sediment quality guidelines. |
| Data Reference: |
Water Quality Monitoring and Bioassessment in Four San Francisco Bay Region Watersheds in 2003-2004: Kirker Creek, Mt. Diablo Creek, Petaluma River, and San Mateo Creek. Surface Water Monitoring Program, San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board, Oakland. CA |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - San Francisco Bay Region (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Sediment Quality Guidelines (MacDonald et al., 2000): PEC (probable effect concentration) arsenic - 33 mg/kg dw; cadmium - 4.98 mg/kg dw; chromium - 111 mg/kg dw; copper - 149 mg/kg dw; lead - 128 mg/kg dw; mercury - 1.06 mg/kg dw; nickel - 48.6 mg/kg dw; zinc - 459 mg/kg dw. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
One sediment sample was collected at PET310 on the mainstem of Petaluma River. |
| Temporal Representation: |
Sediment sample was collected in April of 2003. |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
All samples were collected and analyzed using procedures comparable with the SWAMP Quality Assurance Management Plan (SWRCB, 2002). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
|
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142233, Copper
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
283343 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Copper |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Copper. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved copper criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is hardness dependent. The criterion when calculated using a default hardness of 100 mg/L is 9 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206PET310 (Petaluma River - Petaluma Village Premium Outlet Mall, just downstream of bridge leading into mall). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-06-15 and 2016-06-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 148335, DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane)
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
272393 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane) . |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for the sum of DDT is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 62.9 ug/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 206PET310 (Petaluma River - Petaluma Village Premium Outlet Mall, just downstream of bridge leading into mall). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2016-06-15 to 2016-06-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 148335, DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane)
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
290652 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Concentrations of anthracene, fluorene, napthalene, phenanthrene, benz(a)anthracene, benzo(a)pyrene, chrysene, fluoranthrene, pyrene, PAH (total), PCB (total), chlordane, dieldrin, DDD/DDE/DDT, endrin, heptachlor epoxide, and HCH, gamma in one sediment sample collected in spring 2003 did not exceed the sediment quality guidelines. |
| Data Reference: |
Water Quality Monitoring and Bioassessment in Four San Francisco Bay Region Watersheds in 2003-2004: Kirker Creek, Mt. Diablo Creek, Petaluma River, and San Mateo Creek. Surface Water Monitoring Program, San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board, Oakland. CA |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - San Francisco Bay Region (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Sediment Quality Guidelines (MacDonald et al., 2000): PEC (probable effect concentration) Anthracene - 845 ug/kg; Fluorene - 536 ug/kg; Naphthalene - 561 ug/kg; Phenanthrene -1170 ug/kg; Benz(a)anthracene - 1050 ug/kg; Benzo(a)pyrene - 1450 ug/kg; Chrysene - 1290 ug/kg; Fluoranthene - 2230 ug/kg; Pyrene - 1520 ug/kg; PAH (total) - 22800 ug/kg; PCB (total) - 676 ug/kg; Chlordane - 17.6 ug/kg; Dieldrin - 61.8 ug/kg; DDD (sum op + pp) - 28 ug/kg; DDE (sum op + pp) - 31.3 ug/kg; DDT (sum op + pp) - 62.9 ug/kg; DDT (total) - 572 ug/kg; Endrin - 207 ug/kg; Heptachlor epoxide - 16 ug/kg; HCH, gamma - 4.99 ug/kg. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
One sediment sample was collected at PET310 on the mainstem of Petaluma River. |
| Temporal Representation: |
Sediment sample was collected in April of 2003. |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
All samples were collected and analyzed using procedures comparable with the SWAMP Quality Assurance Management Plan (SWRCB, 2002). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
|
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 148335, DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane)
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
272508 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane) . |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for the sum of DDT is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 62.9 ug/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 206PET310 (Petaluma River - Petaluma Village Premium Outlet Mall, just downstream of bridge leading into mall). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2016-06-15 to 2016-06-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 148335, DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane)
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
276341 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Total DDT (sum of 4,4'- and 2,4'- isomers of DDT, DDE, and DDD) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Total DDT (sum of 4,4'- and 2,4'- isomers of DDT, DDE, and DDD) . |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for total DDTs is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 572 ug/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 206PET310 (Petaluma River - Petaluma Village Premium Outlet Mall, just downstream of bridge leading into mall). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2016-06-15 to 2016-06-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 148335, DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane)
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
276303 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Total DDT (sum of 4,4'- and 2,4'- isomers of DDT, DDE, and DDD) |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Total DDT (sum of 4,4'- and 2,4'- isomers of DDT, DDE, and DDD) . |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for total DDTs is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 572 ug/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 206PET310 (Petaluma River - Petaluma Village Premium Outlet Mall, just downstream of bridge leading into mall). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2016-06-15 to 2016-06-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142240, Lead
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
290489 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Lead |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Three samples were collected by SWAMP from a monitoring location PET310 in Petaluma River. Concentrations of arsenic, chromium, copper, lead, nickel, selenium, silver and and zinc did not exceed the water quality objectives.Concentrations of total dissolved chromium were well below the objective for chromium VI. |
| Data Reference: |
Water Quality Monitoring and Bioassessment in Four San Francisco Bay Region Watersheds in 2003-2004: Kirker Creek, Mt. Diablo Creek, Petaluma River, and San Mateo Creek. Surface Water Monitoring Program, San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board, Oakland. CA |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Table 3-4 in the Basin Plan (2007) lists freshwater water quality objectives for toxic pollutants: arsenic- 150 ug/L, chromium VI- 11 ug/L, copper - 9.0 ug/L, lead - 2.5 ug/L, nickel - 52 ug/L, selenium - 5 ug/L, silver-3.4 ug/L and zinc - 120 ug/L. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - San Francisco Bay Region (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Samples were collected from one monitoring location PET310 in the main stem of Petaluma River. |
| Temporal Representation: |
Samples were collected on: 01/20/2003, 04/21/2003 and 06/02/2003. |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
All samples were collected and analyzed using procedures comparable with the SWAMP Quality Assurance Management Plan (SWRCB 2002). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
|
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142240, Lead
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
274184 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Lead |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Lead . |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for lead is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 128 mg/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 206PET310 (Petaluma River - Petaluma Village Premium Outlet Mall, just downstream of bridge leading into mall). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2016-06-15 to 2016-06-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142240, Lead
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
274076 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Lead |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Lead . |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for lead is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 128 mg/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 206PET310 (Petaluma River - Petaluma Village Premium Outlet Mall, just downstream of bridge leading into mall). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2016-06-15 to 2016-06-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142240, Lead
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
284269 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Lead |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Lead. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved lead criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is hardness dependent. The criterion when calculated using a default hardness of 100 mg/L is 2.5 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206PET310 (Petaluma River - Petaluma Village Premium Outlet Mall, just downstream of bridge leading into mall). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-06-15 and 2016-06-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142240, Lead
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
290458 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Lead |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Concentrations of arsenic, cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, mercury, nickel and zinc in one sediment sample collected in spring 2003 did not exceed the sediment quality guidelines. |
| Data Reference: |
Water Quality Monitoring and Bioassessment in Four San Francisco Bay Region Watersheds in 2003-2004: Kirker Creek, Mt. Diablo Creek, Petaluma River, and San Mateo Creek. Surface Water Monitoring Program, San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board, Oakland. CA |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - San Francisco Bay Region (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Sediment Quality Guidelines (MacDonald et al., 2000): PEC (probable effect concentration) arsenic - 33 mg/kg dw; cadmium - 4.98 mg/kg dw; chromium - 111 mg/kg dw; copper - 149 mg/kg dw; lead - 128 mg/kg dw; mercury - 1.06 mg/kg dw; nickel - 48.6 mg/kg dw; zinc - 459 mg/kg dw. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
One sediment sample was collected at PET310 on the mainstem of Petaluma River. |
| Temporal Representation: |
Sediment sample was collected in April of 2003. |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
All samples were collected and analyzed using procedures comparable with the SWAMP Quality Assurance Management Plan (SWRCB, 2002). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
|
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142240, Lead
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
284270 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Lead |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Lead. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved lead criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is hardness dependent. The criterion when calculated using a default hardness of 100 mg/L is 2.5 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206PET310 (Petaluma River - Petaluma Village Premium Outlet Mall, just downstream of bridge leading into mall). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-06-15 and 2016-06-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 149047, Microcystins
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
284617 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Microcystins |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Water Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Microcystins, Total. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Cyanobacteria and Harmful Algal Bloom (CCHAB) Network established 6 ug/L of microcystins as the water concentration protective of swimmers and other contact recreational users including water-skiing/jet-skiing, fishing, boating, sail boarding, and canoeing. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Appendix to the CCHAB preliminary changes to the statewide voluntary guidance on cyanoHABs in recreational waters, January 2016. Appendix A. Description of cyanotoxin triggers in recreational waters. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206PET315 (Petaluma River - Just downstream of Corona Rd Bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-04-07 and 2015-04-07 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 149047, Microcystins
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
284597 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Microcystins |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Water Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Microcystins, Total. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Cyanobacteria and Harmful Algal Bloom (CCHAB) Network established 6 ug/L of microcystins as the water concentration protective of swimmers and other contact recreational users including water-skiing/jet-skiing, fishing, boating, sail boarding, and canoeing. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Appendix to the CCHAB preliminary changes to the statewide voluntary guidance on cyanoHABs in recreational waters, January 2016. Appendix A. Description of cyanotoxin triggers in recreational waters. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206PET260 (Petaluma River - 100m upstream of Payran St bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-04-07 and 2015-04-07 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 149047, Microcystins
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
284725 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Microcystins |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Wildlife Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Microcystins, Total. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) established 2 ug/L of microcystins as the subchronic water concentration for dog intake/ingestion (Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment Public Health Action Level for microcystin and Human Recreational Uses (May 2012)). OEHHA Action Level for subchronic water intake, dog. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Toxicological Summary and Suggested Action Levels to Reduce Potential Adverse Health Effects of Six Cyanotoxins |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206PET315 (Petaluma River - Just downstream of Corona Rd Bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-04-07 and 2015-04-07 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 149047, Microcystins
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
284722 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Microcystins |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Wildlife Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Microcystins, Total. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) established 2 ug/L of microcystins as the subchronic water concentration for dog intake/ingestion (Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment Public Health Action Level for microcystin and Human Recreational Uses (May 2012)). OEHHA Action Level for subchronic water intake, dog. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Toxicological Summary and Suggested Action Levels to Reduce Potential Adverse Health Effects of Six Cyanotoxins |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206PET350 (Petaluma River - 715m upstream of Petaluma Blvd N bridge. Just downstream of Rainsville Rd bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-04-07 and 2015-04-07 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 149047, Microcystins
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
284660 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Microcystins |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Wildlife Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Microcystins, Total. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) established 2 ug/L of microcystins as the subchronic water concentration for dog intake/ingestion (Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment Public Health Action Level for microcystin and Human Recreational Uses (May 2012)). OEHHA Action Level for subchronic water intake, dog. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Toxicological Summary and Suggested Action Levels to Reduce Potential Adverse Health Effects of Six Cyanotoxins |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206PET260 (Petaluma River - 100m upstream of Payran St bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-04-07 and 2015-04-07 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 149047, Microcystins
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
284659 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Microcystins |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Wildlife Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Microcystins, Total. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) established 2 ug/L of microcystins as the subchronic water concentration for dog intake/ingestion (Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment Public Health Action Level for microcystin and Human Recreational Uses (May 2012)). OEHHA Action Level for subchronic water intake, dog. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Toxicological Summary and Suggested Action Levels to Reduce Potential Adverse Health Effects of Six Cyanotoxins |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206PET310 (Petaluma River - Petaluma Village Premium Outlet Mall, just downstream of bridge leading into mall). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-04-07 and 2015-04-07 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 149047, Microcystins
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
284620 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Microcystins |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Water Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Microcystins, Total. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Cyanobacteria and Harmful Algal Bloom (CCHAB) Network established 6 ug/L of microcystins as the water concentration protective of swimmers and other contact recreational users including water-skiing/jet-skiing, fishing, boating, sail boarding, and canoeing. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Appendix to the CCHAB preliminary changes to the statewide voluntary guidance on cyanoHABs in recreational waters, January 2016. Appendix A. Description of cyanotoxin triggers in recreational waters. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206PET350 (Petaluma River - 715m upstream of Petaluma Blvd N bridge. Just downstream of Rainsville Rd bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-04-07 and 2015-04-07 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 149047, Microcystins
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
284599 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Microcystins |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Water Contact Recreation |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Microcystins, Total. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Cyanobacteria and Harmful Algal Bloom (CCHAB) Network established 6 ug/L of microcystins as the water concentration protective of swimmers and other contact recreational users including water-skiing/jet-skiing, fishing, boating, sail boarding, and canoeing. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Appendix to the CCHAB preliminary changes to the statewide voluntary guidance on cyanoHABs in recreational waters, January 2016. Appendix A. Description of cyanotoxin triggers in recreational waters. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206PET310 (Petaluma River - Petaluma Village Premium Outlet Mall, just downstream of bridge leading into mall). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-04-07 and 2015-04-07 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142244, Nickel
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
284630 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Nickel |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Nickel. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved nickel criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is hardness dependent. The criterion when calculated using a default hardness of 100 mg/L is 52 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206PET310 (Petaluma River - Petaluma Village Premium Outlet Mall, just downstream of bridge leading into mall). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-06-15 and 2016-06-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142244, Nickel
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
274746 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Nickel |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Nickel . |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for nickel is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 48.6 mg/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 206PET310 (Petaluma River - Petaluma Village Premium Outlet Mall, just downstream of bridge leading into mall). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2016-06-15 to 2016-06-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142244, Nickel
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
284673 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Nickel |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Nickel. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved nickel criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is hardness dependent. The criterion when calculated using a default hardness of 100 mg/L is 52 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206PET310 (Petaluma River - Petaluma Village Premium Outlet Mall, just downstream of bridge leading into mall). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-06-15 and 2016-06-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142244, Nickel
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
274747 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Nickel |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Nickel . |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for nickel is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 48.6 mg/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 206PET310 (Petaluma River - Petaluma Village Premium Outlet Mall, just downstream of bridge leading into mall). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2016-06-15 to 2016-06-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142244, Nickel
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
290472 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Nickel |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Concentrations of arsenic, cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, mercury, nickel and zinc in one sediment sample collected in spring 2003 did not exceed the sediment quality guidelines. |
| Data Reference: |
Water Quality Monitoring and Bioassessment in Four San Francisco Bay Region Watersheds in 2003-2004: Kirker Creek, Mt. Diablo Creek, Petaluma River, and San Mateo Creek. Surface Water Monitoring Program, San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board, Oakland. CA |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - San Francisco Bay Region (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Sediment Quality Guidelines (MacDonald et al., 2000): PEC (probable effect concentration) arsenic - 33 mg/kg dw; cadmium - 4.98 mg/kg dw; chromium - 111 mg/kg dw; copper - 149 mg/kg dw; lead - 128 mg/kg dw; mercury - 1.06 mg/kg dw; nickel - 48.6 mg/kg dw; zinc - 459 mg/kg dw. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
One sediment sample was collected at PET310 on the mainstem of Petaluma River. |
| Temporal Representation: |
Sediment sample was collected in April of 2003. |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
All samples were collected and analyzed using procedures comparable with the SWAMP Quality Assurance Management Plan (SWRCB, 2002). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
|
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142244, Nickel
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
290490 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Nickel |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Three samples were collected by SWAMP from a monitoring location PET310 in Petaluma River. Concentrations of arsenic, chromium, copper, lead, nickel, selenium, silver and and zinc did not exceed the water quality objectives.Concentrations of total dissolved chromium were well below the objective for chromium VI. |
| Data Reference: |
Water Quality Monitoring and Bioassessment in Four San Francisco Bay Region Watersheds in 2003-2004: Kirker Creek, Mt. Diablo Creek, Petaluma River, and San Mateo Creek. Surface Water Monitoring Program, San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board, Oakland. CA |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Table 3-4 in the Basin Plan (2007) lists freshwater water quality objectives for toxic pollutants: arsenic- 150 ug/L, chromium VI- 11 ug/L, copper - 9.0 ug/L, lead - 2.5 ug/L, nickel - 52 ug/L, selenium - 5 ug/L, silver-3.4 ug/L and zinc - 120 ug/L. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - San Francisco Bay Region (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Samples were collected from one monitoring location PET310 in the main stem of Petaluma River. |
| Temporal Representation: |
Samples were collected on: 01/20/2003, 04/21/2003 and 06/02/2003. |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
All samples were collected and analyzed using procedures comparable with the SWAMP Quality Assurance Management Plan (SWRCB 2002). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
|
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142252, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
28266 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
14 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
5 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water quality assessment was conducted at the Petaluma watershed as part of SWAMP study in 2003 and 2004. Continuous field monitoring at 15 minute increments of temperature, dissolved oxygen, pH and specific conductance was conducted to determine temporal variability in basic water quality at four locations.
The measured temperatures ranged from 7.51 oC to 20.71 oC and varied with season and location. The 17 oC criterion for steelhead was exceeded in 5 out of 14 deployments. In 3 instances the estimated maximum 7-day mean temperature ranged from 17.41 to 17.98 °C, and the remaining 2 exceedances had temperatures of 18.36 and 19.09 °C. The highest temperatures were detected at sites draining urban areas in tributaries of Adobe and Lichau Creek |
| Data Reference: |
Water Quality Monitoring and Bioassessment in Four San Francisco Bay Region Watersheds in 2003-2004: Kirker Creek, Mt. Diablo Creek, Petaluma River, and San Mateo Creek. Surface Water Monitoring Program, San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board, Oakland. CA |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for enclosed bays and estuaries are specified in the Water Quality Control Plan for Control of Temperature in the Coastal and Interstate Waters and Enclosed Bays of California including any revisions to the plan. In addition, the following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: The natural receiving water temperature of intrastate waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Water Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses.
The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shell not be increased by more than 5 oF (2.8 oC) above natural receiving water temperature. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - San Francisco Bay Region (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Sullivan et al. (2000) reviewed a wide range of studies incorporating information from laboratory-based research, field observations, and risk assessment approaches and developed criteria for assessing temperature risk to aquatic life. The 7-day mean temperature (maximum value of the 7-day moving average of the daily mean temperature) of 14.8 oC was established as the upper threshold criterion for coho salmon and 17.0 oC for steelhead trout. The risk assessment approach used by Sullivan et al. (2000) suggests that temperatures exceeding the above thresholds will cause 10% reduction in average growth compared to optimal conditions. |
| Guideline Reference: |
An Analysis of the Effects of Temperature on Salmonids of the Pacific Northwest with Implications for Selecting Temperature Criteria |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Temperature was measured at four sites. One monitoring site is located in the main stem of Petaluma River and 3 other sites represent three east side tributaries: Adobe Creek (most downstream tributary), Lynch Creek and Lichau Creek (most upstream tributary). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Temperature was recorded at 15 minute intervals over 1 to 2 weeks period during spring (April 2003), summer (July 2003), fall September 2003), and winter wet season (January/February 2004). |
| Environmental Conditions: |
The Petaluma River watershed is heavily influenced by historic and current poultry and dairy farming, and has a substantial urban area within the city of Petaluma and adjacent communities. The tidal influences extend many miles up the slough, through highly channelized agricultural areas and tidal marshes. |
| QAPP Information: |
All samples were collected and analyzed using procedures comparable with the SWAMP Quality Assurance Management Plan (SWRCB 2002). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142252, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
288663 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
5 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: “- The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. - The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5°F (2.8°C) above natural receiving water temperature.” |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Per Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids (Carter 2008, Moyle 1976, and USEPA 1977), the lethal temperature evaluation guideline for both the steelhead adult migration and holding and the steelhead juvenile growth and rearing life stages is 24°C. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Temperature criteria for freshwater fish: protocol and procedures. Ecological
Research Series. EPA-600/3-77-061 (NTIS PB270032). Prepared by W.A. Brungs and B.R. Jones. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids. Implications for California's North Coast TMDLs. California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206PET316 (Constructed channel adjacent to Petaluma River just south of Corona Rd Bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-04-23 and 2014-05-22 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142252, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
289005 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: “- The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. - The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5°F (2.8°C) above natural receiving water temperature.” |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Per Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids (Carter 2008, Moyle 1976, and USEPA 1977), the lethal temperature evaluation guideline for both the steelhead adult migration and holding and the steelhead juvenile growth and rearing life stages is 24°C. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Temperature criteria for freshwater fish: protocol and procedures. Ecological
Research Series. EPA-600/3-77-061 (NTIS PB270032). Prepared by W.A. Brungs and B.R. Jones. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids. Implications for California's North Coast TMDLs. California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206PET315 (Petaluma River - Just downstream of Corona Rd Bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-11-16 and 2018-11-23 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142252, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
288540 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
31 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 31 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: “- The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. - The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5°F (2.8°C) above natural receiving water temperature.” |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Per Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids (Carter 2008, Moyle 1976, and USEPA 1977), the lethal temperature evaluation guideline for both the steelhead adult migration and holding and the steelhead juvenile growth and rearing life stages is 24°C. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Temperature criteria for freshwater fish: protocol and procedures. Ecological
Research Series. EPA-600/3-77-061 (NTIS PB270032). Prepared by W.A. Brungs and B.R. Jones. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids. Implications for California's North Coast TMDLs. California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206PET315 (Petaluma River - Just downstream of Corona Rd Bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-01-06 and 2016-08-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142252, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
288861 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
49 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 49 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: “- The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. - The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5°F (2.8°C) above natural receiving water temperature.” |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Per Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids (Carter 2008, Moyle 1976, and USEPA 1977), the lethal temperature evaluation guideline for both the steelhead adult migration and holding and the steelhead juvenile growth and rearing life stages is 24°C. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Temperature criteria for freshwater fish: protocol and procedures. Ecological
Research Series. EPA-600/3-77-061 (NTIS PB270032). Prepared by W.A. Brungs and B.R. Jones. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids. Implications for California's North Coast TMDLs. California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206PET310 (Petaluma River - Petaluma Village Premium Outlet Mall, just downstream of bridge leading into mall). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-04-23 and 2018-02-14 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142252, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
288449 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
31 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 31 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: “- The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. - The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5°F (2.8°C) above natural receiving water temperature.” |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Per Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids (Carter 2008, Moyle 1976, and USEPA 1977), the lethal temperature evaluation guideline for both the steelhead adult migration and holding and the steelhead juvenile growth and rearing life stages is 24°C. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Temperature criteria for freshwater fish: protocol and procedures. Ecological
Research Series. EPA-600/3-77-061 (NTIS PB270032). Prepared by W.A. Brungs and B.R. Jones. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids. Implications for California's North Coast TMDLs. California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206PET350 (Petaluma River - 715m upstream of Petaluma Blvd N bridge. Just downstream of Rainsville Rd bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-04-23 and 2016-07-12 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142252, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
288780 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
34 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
6 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 6 of 34 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: “- The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. - The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5°F (2.8°C) above natural receiving water temperature.” |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Per Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids (Carter 2008, Moyle 1976, and USEPA 1977), the lethal temperature evaluation guideline for both the steelhead adult migration and holding and the steelhead juvenile growth and rearing life stages is 24°C. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Temperature criteria for freshwater fish: protocol and procedures. Ecological
Research Series. EPA-600/3-77-061 (NTIS PB270032). Prepared by W.A. Brungs and B.R. Jones. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen/Total Dissolved Gas, Ammonia, and pH on Salmonids. Implications for California's North Coast TMDLs. California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206PET260 (Petaluma River - 100m upstream of Payran St bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-04-24 and 2017-08-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142252, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
298965 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Migration |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5 degrees F (2.8 degrees C) above natural receiving water temperature. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Scientific literature reviewed by the Washington Department of Ecology and U.S. EPA indicates that stream temperatures higher than 21C are associated with avoidance behavior and migration blockages in steelhead trout. |
| Guideline Reference: |
EPA Region 10 Guidance for Pacific Northwest State and Tribal Temperature Water Quality Standards. EPA 910-B-03-002. Region 10 Office of Water, Seattle, WA |
| Guideline Reference: |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2001. Issue Paper 1: Salmonid Behavior and Water Temperature Prepared as Part of EPA Region 10 Temperature Water Quality Criteria Guidance Development Project. Region 10, Seattle, WA. EPA-910-D-01-001 May 2001. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE). 2002. Evaluating Standards for Protecting Aquatic Life in Washington’s Surface Water Quality Standards: Temperature Criteria. Draft Discussion Paper and Literature Summary. Publication Number 00-10-070. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Beschta RL, Bilby RE, Brown GW, Holtby LB, Hofstra TD. 1987. Stream temperature and aquatic habitat: Fisheries and forestry interactions. In: Salo EO, Cundy TW, eds. Streamside management: forestry and fishery interactions. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle. Contribution No. 57. Proceedings of a Symposium held at University of Washington, February 12-14, 1986, pp. 191-231. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206PET315 (Petaluma River - Just downstream of Corona Rd Bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-11-16 and 2018-11-23 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142252, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
298983 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Migration |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
19 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 19 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5 degrees F (2.8 degrees C) above natural receiving water temperature. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Scientific literature reviewed by the Washington Department of Ecology and U.S. EPA indicates that stream temperatures higher than 21C are associated with avoidance behavior and migration blockages in steelhead trout. |
| Guideline Reference: |
EPA Region 10 Guidance for Pacific Northwest State and Tribal Temperature Water Quality Standards. EPA 910-B-03-002. Region 10 Office of Water, Seattle, WA |
| Guideline Reference: |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2001. Issue Paper 1: Salmonid Behavior and Water Temperature Prepared as Part of EPA Region 10 Temperature Water Quality Criteria Guidance Development Project. Region 10, Seattle, WA. EPA-910-D-01-001 May 2001. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE). 2002. Evaluating Standards for Protecting Aquatic Life in Washington’s Surface Water Quality Standards: Temperature Criteria. Draft Discussion Paper and Literature Summary. Publication Number 00-10-070. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Beschta RL, Bilby RE, Brown GW, Holtby LB, Hofstra TD. 1987. Stream temperature and aquatic habitat: Fisheries and forestry interactions. In: Salo EO, Cundy TW, eds. Streamside management: forestry and fishery interactions. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle. Contribution No. 57. Proceedings of a Symposium held at University of Washington, February 12-14, 1986, pp. 191-231. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206PET350 (Petaluma River - 715m upstream of Petaluma Blvd N bridge. Just downstream of Rainsville Rd bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-04-23 and 2016-07-12 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142252, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
299053 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Migration |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
19 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 19 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5 degrees F (2.8 degrees C) above natural receiving water temperature. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Scientific literature reviewed by the Washington Department of Ecology and U.S. EPA indicates that stream temperatures higher than 21C are associated with avoidance behavior and migration blockages in steelhead trout. |
| Guideline Reference: |
EPA Region 10 Guidance for Pacific Northwest State and Tribal Temperature Water Quality Standards. EPA 910-B-03-002. Region 10 Office of Water, Seattle, WA |
| Guideline Reference: |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2001. Issue Paper 1: Salmonid Behavior and Water Temperature Prepared as Part of EPA Region 10 Temperature Water Quality Criteria Guidance Development Project. Region 10, Seattle, WA. EPA-910-D-01-001 May 2001. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE). 2002. Evaluating Standards for Protecting Aquatic Life in Washington’s Surface Water Quality Standards: Temperature Criteria. Draft Discussion Paper and Literature Summary. Publication Number 00-10-070. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Beschta RL, Bilby RE, Brown GW, Holtby LB, Hofstra TD. 1987. Stream temperature and aquatic habitat: Fisheries and forestry interactions. In: Salo EO, Cundy TW, eds. Streamside management: forestry and fishery interactions. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle. Contribution No. 57. Proceedings of a Symposium held at University of Washington, February 12-14, 1986, pp. 191-231. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206PET315 (Petaluma River - Just downstream of Corona Rd Bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-01-13 and 2016-08-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142252, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
299020 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Migration |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
31 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 31 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5 degrees F (2.8 degrees C) above natural receiving water temperature. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Scientific literature reviewed by the Washington Department of Ecology and U.S. EPA indicates that stream temperatures higher than 21C are associated with avoidance behavior and migration blockages in steelhead trout. |
| Guideline Reference: |
EPA Region 10 Guidance for Pacific Northwest State and Tribal Temperature Water Quality Standards. EPA 910-B-03-002. Region 10 Office of Water, Seattle, WA |
| Guideline Reference: |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2001. Issue Paper 1: Salmonid Behavior and Water Temperature Prepared as Part of EPA Region 10 Temperature Water Quality Criteria Guidance Development Project. Region 10, Seattle, WA. EPA-910-D-01-001 May 2001. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE). 2002. Evaluating Standards for Protecting Aquatic Life in Washington’s Surface Water Quality Standards: Temperature Criteria. Draft Discussion Paper and Literature Summary. Publication Number 00-10-070. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Beschta RL, Bilby RE, Brown GW, Holtby LB, Hofstra TD. 1987. Stream temperature and aquatic habitat: Fisheries and forestry interactions. In: Salo EO, Cundy TW, eds. Streamside management: forestry and fishery interactions. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle. Contribution No. 57. Proceedings of a Symposium held at University of Washington, February 12-14, 1986, pp. 191-231. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206PET310 (Petaluma River - Petaluma Village Premium Outlet Mall, just downstream of bridge leading into mall). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-04-23 and 2018-02-14 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142252, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
298777 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Migration |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
21 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
8 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 8 of 21 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5 degrees F (2.8 degrees C) above natural receiving water temperature. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Scientific literature reviewed by the Washington Department of Ecology and U.S. EPA indicates that stream temperatures higher than 21C are associated with avoidance behavior and migration blockages in steelhead trout. |
| Guideline Reference: |
EPA Region 10 Guidance for Pacific Northwest State and Tribal Temperature Water Quality Standards. EPA 910-B-03-002. Region 10 Office of Water, Seattle, WA |
| Guideline Reference: |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2001. Issue Paper 1: Salmonid Behavior and Water Temperature Prepared as Part of EPA Region 10 Temperature Water Quality Criteria Guidance Development Project. Region 10, Seattle, WA. EPA-910-D-01-001 May 2001. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE). 2002. Evaluating Standards for Protecting Aquatic Life in Washington’s Surface Water Quality Standards: Temperature Criteria. Draft Discussion Paper and Literature Summary. Publication Number 00-10-070. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Beschta RL, Bilby RE, Brown GW, Holtby LB, Hofstra TD. 1987. Stream temperature and aquatic habitat: Fisheries and forestry interactions. In: Salo EO, Cundy TW, eds. Streamside management: forestry and fishery interactions. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle. Contribution No. 57. Proceedings of a Symposium held at University of Washington, February 12-14, 1986, pp. 191-231. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206PET260 (Petaluma River - 100m upstream of Payran St bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-05-01 and 2017-08-17 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142252, Temperature, water
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
299000 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Fish Migration |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Temperature objectives for surface waters are specified in the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Plan. The following temperature objectives apply to surface waters: The natural receiving water temperature of inland surface waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. The temperature of any cold or warm freshwater habitat shall not be increased by more than 5 degrees F (2.8 degrees C) above natural receiving water temperature. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Scientific literature reviewed by the Washington Department of Ecology and U.S. EPA indicates that stream temperatures higher than 21C are associated with avoidance behavior and migration blockages in steelhead trout. |
| Guideline Reference: |
EPA Region 10 Guidance for Pacific Northwest State and Tribal Temperature Water Quality Standards. EPA 910-B-03-002. Region 10 Office of Water, Seattle, WA |
| Guideline Reference: |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2001. Issue Paper 1: Salmonid Behavior and Water Temperature Prepared as Part of EPA Region 10 Temperature Water Quality Criteria Guidance Development Project. Region 10, Seattle, WA. EPA-910-D-01-001 May 2001. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE). 2002. Evaluating Standards for Protecting Aquatic Life in Washington’s Surface Water Quality Standards: Temperature Criteria. Draft Discussion Paper and Literature Summary. Publication Number 00-10-070. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Beschta RL, Bilby RE, Brown GW, Holtby LB, Hofstra TD. 1987. Stream temperature and aquatic habitat: Fisheries and forestry interactions. In: Salo EO, Cundy TW, eds. Streamside management: forestry and fishery interactions. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle. Contribution No. 57. Proceedings of a Symposium held at University of Washington, February 12-14, 1986, pp. 191-231. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206PET316 (Constructed channel adjacent to Petaluma River just south of Corona Rd Bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-04-23 and 2014-05-22 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142253, Toxicity
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
268979 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Estuarine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
0 of the 1 samples collected by SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring for Petaluma River exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Hyalella azteca for Growth (wt/surv indiv), Hyalella azteca for Survival. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The sample is toxic when the response of the organisms exposed to the sample is significantly different (worse) than the response of the organisms exposed to the laboratory control based on statistical hypothesis testing. An exceedance is counted when the significant effect code is “Significant; Less Similarity,” which means that the sample result is significantly different than the control result, and the percent effect is greater than the evaluation threshold. The default evaluation threshold is 20% unless otherwise stated. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 206PET310 ( Petaluma River - Petaluma Village Premium Outlet Mall, just downstream of bridge leading into mall ). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-06-15 and 2016-06-15. |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142253, Toxicity
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
30360 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
2 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Three samples were collected in 2003 to evaluate water toxicity at one monitoring location in the main stem of Petaluma River upstream from the confluence with Lynch Creek. The toxicity tests included survival and reproduction of Ceriodaphnia, survival and growth of fathead minnow, and growth of Selenastrum.
Statistically significant chronic effects on Ceriodaphnia reproduction were observed in one sample collected in winter wet season. Mortality and growth in fathead minnow was not affected. Selenastrum growth was significantly reduced (less than 40% of control) in two samples collected in spring and summer. |
| Data Reference: |
Water Quality Monitoring and Bioassessment in Four San Francisco Bay Region Watersheds in 2003-2004: Kirker Creek, Mt. Diablo Creek, Petaluma River, and San Mateo Creek. Surface Water Monitoring Program, San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board, Oakland. CA |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms.
There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - San Francisco Bay Region (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Water toxicity was evaluated according to the SWAMP methodology. The U.S.EPA whole effluent toxicity protocol (U.S.EPA 1994) was used to test the effect of water samples on three freshwater test organisms. Statistical evaluation (alpha = 0.05) and a default threshold of 80% of the control value were used to establish whether water exhibited significant toxicity adversely impacting aquatic organisms. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Short-Term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. EPA/600/4-91/002. Third Edition. July 1994 |
| Guideline Reference: |
Revised approach to toxicity test acceptability criteria using a statistical performance assessment. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, vol. 16, No. 6, pp 1322¿1329 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected at one sampling location - PET310 in the main stem of Petaluma River upstream from the confluence with Lynch Creek. |
| Temporal Representation: |
SWAMP samples were collected during winter wet season (January), spring season (April) and summer dry season (June) of 2003. |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
All samples were collected and analyzed using procedures comparable with the SWAMP Quality Assurance Management Plan (SWRCB, 2002). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
|
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142253, Toxicity
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
30362 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Sediment Toxicity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
Toxicity testing of sediments |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Data used to evaluate sediment toxicity comprise one sediment sample collected by the SWAMP in 2003. No toxicity or adverse effects were exhibited for survival of Hyallela azteca, however there was a minor effect on Hyalella growth (76% of the control) in the bulk toxicity test. |
| Data Reference: |
Water Quality Monitoring and Bioassessment in Nine San Francisco Bay Region Watersheds: Walker Creek, Lagunitas Creek, San Leandro Creek, Wildcat Creek/San Pablo Creek, Suisun Creek, Arroyo Las Positas, Pescadero Creek/Butano Creek, San Gregorio Creek, and Stevens Creek/Permanente Creek. Oakland, CA: Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program, San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms.
There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - San Francisco Bay Region (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Sediment toxicity was evaluated according to the SWAMP methodology. Sample toxicity was determined by comparing mean organism response in samples and in negative controls. Statistical evaluation (alpha = 0.05) and a default threshold of 80% of the control value were used to establish whether the sediment exhibited significant toxicity adversely impacting aquatic organisms. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Revised approach to toxicity test acceptability criteria using a statistical performance assessment. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, vol. 16, No. 6, pp 1322¿1329 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
One sediment sample was collected at PET310 on the mainstem on Petaluma River. |
| Temporal Representation: |
Sample was collected in Spring 2003. |
| Environmental Conditions: |
The Petaluma River watershed is heavily influenced by historic and current poultry and dairy farming, and has a substantial urban area within the city of Petaluma and adjacent communities. The tidal influences extend many miles up the slough, through highly channelized agricultural areas and tidal marshes. |
| QAPP Information: |
Samples were collected and analyzed using procedures comparable with the SWAMP Quality Assurance Management Plan (SWRCB 2002). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
|
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142253, Toxicity
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
269044 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
0 of the 1 samples collected by SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring for Petaluma River exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Hyalella azteca for Growth (wt/surv indiv), Hyalella azteca for Survival. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The sample is toxic when the response of the organisms exposed to the sample is significantly different (worse) than the response of the organisms exposed to the laboratory control based on statistical hypothesis testing. An exceedance is counted when the significant effect code is “Significant; Less Similarity,” which means that the sample result is significantly different than the control result, and the percent effect is greater than the evaluation threshold. The default evaluation threshold is 20% unless otherwise stated. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 206PET310 ( Petaluma River - Petaluma Village Premium Outlet Mall, just downstream of bridge leading into mall ). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-06-15 and 2016-06-15. |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142253, Toxicity
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
269072 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
0 of the 1 samples collected by SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring for Petaluma River exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day and the same location. The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Hyalella azteca for Growth (wt/surv indiv), Hyalella azteca for Survival. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Detrimental responses include, but are not limited to, decreased growth rate and decreased reproductive success of resident or indicator species. There shall be no acute toxicity in ambient waters. Acute toxicity is defined as a median of less than 90 percent survival, or less than 70 percent survival, 10 percent of the time, of test organisms in a 96-hour static or continuous flow test. There shall be no chronic toxicity in ambient waters. Chronic toxicity is a detrimental biological effect on growth rate, reproduction, fertilization success, larval development, population abundance, community composition, or any other relevant measure of the health of an organism, population, or community. Attainment of this objective will be determined by analyses of indicator organisms, species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, or toxicity tests (including those described in Chapter 4), or other methods selected by the Water Board. The Water Board will also consider other relevant information and numeric criteria and guidelines for toxic substances developed by other agencies as appropriate. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The sample is toxic when the response of the organisms exposed to the sample is significantly different (worse) than the response of the organisms exposed to the laboratory control based on statistical hypothesis testing. An exceedance is counted when the significant effect code is “Significant; Less Similarity,” which means that the sample result is significantly different than the control result, and the percent effect is greater than the evaluation threshold. The default evaluation threshold is 20% unless otherwise stated. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. Fourth Edition. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. EPA-821-R-02-013 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at monitoring site: 206PET310 ( Petaluma River - Petaluma Village Premium Outlet Mall, just downstream of bridge leading into mall ). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-06-15 and 2016-06-15. |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142254, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
302929 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
6 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 6 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Turbidities of 40 NTU or greater can cause a reduced foraging efficiency and a shift in prey selection in piscivorous fish (largemouth bass) due to interference with their ability to find prey (Shoup, D.E. and Wahl D.H., 2009). The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
The Effects of Turbidity on Prey Selection by Piscivorous Largemouth Bass |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206PET350 (Petaluma River - 715m upstream of Petaluma Blvd N bridge. Just downstream of Rainsville Rd bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-05-08 and 2016-07-12 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142254, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
302786 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
6 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 6 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Turbidities of 40 NTU or greater can cause a reduced foraging efficiency and a shift in prey selection in piscivorous fish (largemouth bass) due to interference with their ability to find prey (Shoup, D.E. and Wahl D.H., 2009). The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
The Effects of Turbidity on Prey Selection by Piscivorous Largemouth Bass |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206PET315 (Petaluma River - Just downstream of Corona Rd Bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-06-09 and 2016-08-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142254, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
289541 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
6 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 6 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Sigler et al. (1984) states that turbidities of 25 NTUs or greater caused reduction in juvenile salmonid growth due to interference with their ability to find food. The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because Coho and steelhead early life stages are present during the dry season and feeding becomes infrequent during the winter months (Moyle 2002). Additionally, runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of chronic turbidity on density and growth of steelheads and coho salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:142-150 |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206PET350 (Petaluma River - 715m upstream of Petaluma Blvd N bridge. Just downstream of Rainsville Rd bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-05-08 and 2016-07-12 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142254, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
289444 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Sigler et al. (1984) states that turbidities of 25 NTUs or greater caused reduction in juvenile salmonid growth due to interference with their ability to find food. The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because Coho and steelhead early life stages are present during the dry season and feeding becomes infrequent during the winter months (Moyle 2002). Additionally, runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of chronic turbidity on density and growth of steelheads and coho salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:142-150 |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206PET316 (Constructed channel adjacent to Petaluma River just south of Corona Rd Bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-05-08 and 2014-05-22 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142254, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
289473 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
9 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 9 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Sigler et al. (1984) states that turbidities of 25 NTUs or greater caused reduction in juvenile salmonid growth due to interference with their ability to find food. The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because Coho and steelhead early life stages are present during the dry season and feeding becomes infrequent during the winter months (Moyle 2002). Additionally, runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of chronic turbidity on density and growth of steelheads and coho salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:142-150 |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206PET310 (Petaluma River - Petaluma Village Premium Outlet Mall, just downstream of bridge leading into mall). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-05-08 and 2016-08-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142254, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
289442 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
6 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 6 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Sigler et al. (1984) states that turbidities of 25 NTUs or greater caused reduction in juvenile salmonid growth due to interference with their ability to find food. The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because Coho and steelhead early life stages are present during the dry season and feeding becomes infrequent during the winter months (Moyle 2002). Additionally, runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Effects of chronic turbidity on density and growth of steelheads and coho salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:142-150 |
| Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206PET315 (Petaluma River - Just downstream of Corona Rd Bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-06-09 and 2016-08-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142254, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
302769 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Turbidities of 40 NTU or greater can cause a reduced foraging efficiency and a shift in prey selection in piscivorous fish (largemouth bass) due to interference with their ability to find prey (Shoup, D.E. and Wahl D.H., 2009). The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
The Effects of Turbidity on Prey Selection by Piscivorous Largemouth Bass |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206PET316 (Constructed channel adjacent to Petaluma River just south of Corona Rd Bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-05-08 and 2014-05-22 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142254, Turbidity
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
302768 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
9 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 9 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Turbidities of 40 NTU or greater can cause a reduced foraging efficiency and a shift in prey selection in piscivorous fish (largemouth bass) due to interference with their ability to find prey (Shoup, D.E. and Wahl D.H., 2009). The application of this evaluation guideline was restricted to the dry season (May to October) because runoff and resuspension of fine substrate during storm events may naturally elevate turbidity compared to baseflow conditions. The magnitude and duration of these increases will vary depending on the watershed’s geology and land use and may not represent a chronic turbidity problem. Turbidity is naturally higher in tidal river systems, so sample locations with salinity regimes (i.e., Freshwater or Marine) designated as “Marine” were excluded from this analysis. |
| Guideline Reference: |
The Effects of Turbidity on Prey Selection by Piscivorous Largemouth Bass |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206PET310 (Petaluma River - Petaluma Village Premium Outlet Mall, just downstream of bridge leading into mall). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-05-08 and 2016-08-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142255, Zinc
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
276286 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Zinc |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Zinc . |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for zinc is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 459 mg/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 206PET310 (Petaluma River - Petaluma Village Premium Outlet Mall, just downstream of bridge leading into mall). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2016-06-15 to 2016-06-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142255, Zinc
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
289704 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Zinc |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Zinc. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved zinc criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is hardness dependent. The criterion when calculated using a default hardness of 100 mg/L is 120 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206PET310 (Petaluma River - Petaluma Village Premium Outlet Mall, just downstream of bridge leading into mall). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-06-15 and 2016-06-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142255, Zinc
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
290504 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Zinc |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Three samples were collected by SWAMP from a monitoring location PET310 in Petaluma River. Concentrations of arsenic, chromium, copper, lead, nickel, selenium, silver and and zinc did not exceed the water quality objectives.Concentrations of total dissolved chromium were well below the objective for chromium VI. |
| Data Reference: |
Water Quality Monitoring and Bioassessment in Four San Francisco Bay Region Watersheds in 2003-2004: Kirker Creek, Mt. Diablo Creek, Petaluma River, and San Mateo Creek. Surface Water Monitoring Program, San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board, Oakland. CA |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. Table 3-4 in the Basin Plan (2007) lists freshwater water quality objectives for toxic pollutants: arsenic- 150 ug/L, chromium VI- 11 ug/L, copper - 9.0 ug/L, lead - 2.5 ug/L, nickel - 52 ug/L, selenium - 5 ug/L, silver-3.4 ug/L and zinc - 120 ug/L. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - San Francisco Bay Region (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Samples were collected from one monitoring location PET310 in the main stem of Petaluma River. |
| Temporal Representation: |
Samples were collected on: 01/20/2003, 04/21/2003 and 06/02/2003. |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
All samples were collected and analyzed using procedures comparable with the SWAMP Quality Assurance Management Plan (SWRCB 2002). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
|
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142255, Zinc
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
276485 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Zinc |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 1 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Zinc . |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Section 3.3.18 of the San Francisco Bay Region's Basin Plan contains the narrative toxicity objective stating that all waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for zinc is the probable effect concentration (PEC) of 459 mg/kg dry weight (MacDonald et al., 2000a). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 206PET310 (Petaluma River - Petaluma Village Premium Outlet Mall, just downstream of bridge leading into mall). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2016-06-15 to 2016-06-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142255, Zinc
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
290473 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Zinc |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
| Matrix: |
Sediment |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Concentrations of arsenic, cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, mercury, nickel and zinc in one sediment sample collected in spring 2003 did not exceed the sediment quality guidelines. |
| Data Reference: |
Water Quality Monitoring and Bioassessment in Four San Francisco Bay Region Watersheds in 2003-2004: Kirker Creek, Mt. Diablo Creek, Petaluma River, and San Mateo Creek. Surface Water Monitoring Program, San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board, Oakland. CA |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances that are lethal to or that produce other detrimental responses in aquatic organisms. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - San Francisco Bay Region (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Sediment Quality Guidelines (MacDonald et al., 2000): PEC (probable effect concentration) arsenic - 33 mg/kg dw; cadmium - 4.98 mg/kg dw; chromium - 111 mg/kg dw; copper - 149 mg/kg dw; lead - 128 mg/kg dw; mercury - 1.06 mg/kg dw; nickel - 48.6 mg/kg dw; zinc - 459 mg/kg dw. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 39: 20-31 |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
One sediment sample was collected at PET310 on the mainstem of Petaluma River. |
| Temporal Representation: |
Sediment sample was collected in April of 2003. |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
All samples were collected and analyzed using procedures comparable with the SWAMP Quality Assurance Management Plan (SWRCB, 2002). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
|
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142255, Zinc
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
289832 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Zinc |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Dissolved |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Zinc. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved zinc criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 4-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is hardness dependent. The criterion when calculated using a default hardness of 100 mg/L is 120 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000). |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206PET310 (Petaluma River - Petaluma Village Premium Outlet Mall, just downstream of bridge leading into mall). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-06-15 and 2016-06-15 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142246, pH
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
30359 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
13 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water quality assessment was conducted in the Petaluma River watershed as part of SWAMP study in 2003. Continuous field monitoring at 15 minute increments of temperature, dissolved oxygen, pH and specific conductance was conducted to determine temporal variability in basic water quality at eight monitoring sites throughout the watershed. Continuous monitoring sondes were deployed at two to four locations in spring, summer, fall and winter of 2003-2004 monitoring season. The pH ranged from 6.52 (PET265) to 8.15 (PET130) and varied with season. The pH did not exceed the maximum or drop below the minimum recommended value for any deployment. |
| Data Reference: |
Water Quality Monitoring and Bioassessment in Four San Francisco Bay Region Watersheds in 2003-2004: Kirker Creek, Mt. Diablo Creek, Petaluma River, and San Mateo Creek. Surface Water Monitoring Program, San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board, Oakland. CA |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - San Francisco Bay Region (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
pH was measured at three sites in Adobe Creek, two sites in Lynch Creek, two sites in the main stem of Petaluma River and one site in Lichau Creek in the upper watershed. |
| Temporal Representation: |
SWAMP Program performed continuous monitoring of pH at 15 minute intervals lasting for 1 to 2 weeks in spring (April 2003), summer (July 2003), fall (September 2003) and winter wet season (January-February 2004). |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
All samples were collected and analyzed using procedures comparable with the SWAMP Quality Assurance Management Plan (SWRCB, 2002). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
|
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142246, pH
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
287244 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
19 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 19 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206PET315 (Petaluma River - Just downstream of Corona Rd Bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-01-13 and 2016-08-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142246, pH
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
287324 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
30 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 30 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206PET310 (Petaluma River - Petaluma Village Premium Outlet Mall, just downstream of bridge leading into mall). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-04-23 and 2018-02-14 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142246, pH
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
287323 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
3 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206PET316 (Constructed channel adjacent to Petaluma River just south of Corona Rd Bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-04-23 and 2014-05-22 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142246, pH
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
287689 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206PET315 (Petaluma River - Just downstream of Corona Rd Bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-11-16 and 2018-11-23 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142246, pH
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
287470 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
19 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 19 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206PET350 (Petaluma River - 715m upstream of Petaluma Blvd N bridge. Just downstream of Rainsville Rd bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-04-23 and 2016-07-12 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142246, pH
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
287285 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
pH |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
20 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 20 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives, Section 3.3.9 pH states: The pH shall not be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. This encompasses the pH range usually found in waters within the basin. Controllable water quality factors shall not cause changes greater than 0.5 units in normal ambient pH levels. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206PET260 (Petaluma River - 100m upstream of Payran St bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-05-01 and 2016-08-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 154146, Benthic Community Effects
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
285593 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
31 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
12 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 12 of 31 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as cold water habitat shall be of a 7.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206PET315 (Petaluma River - Just downstream of Corona Rd Bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-01-06 and 2016-08-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 154146, Benthic Community Effects
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
286253 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
49 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
30 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 30 of 49 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as cold water habitat shall be of a 7.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206PET310 (Petaluma River - Petaluma Village Premium Outlet Mall, just downstream of bridge leading into mall). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-04-23 and 2018-02-21 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 154146, Benthic Community Effects
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
306464 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Benthic-Macroinvertebrate Bioassessments |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Population/Community Degradation |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed data for 206PET360 to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the threshold. CSCI scores were from 0.29107 to 0.29107. |
| Data Reference: |
California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) Scores for the 2024 Integrated Report for Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce significant alterations in population or community ecology or receiving water biota. In addition, the health and life history characteristics of aquatic organisms in waters affected by controllable water quality factors shall not differ significantly from those for the same waters in areas unaffected by controllable water quality factors. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) is a biological scoring tool that helps aquatic resource managers translate complex data about benthic macroinvertebrates found living in a stream into an overall measure of stream health. The CSCI score is calculated by comparing the expected condition with actual (observed) results (Rehn, A.C. et al., 2015). CSCI scores range from 0 (highly degraded) to greater than 1 (equivalent to reference). CSCI scoring of biological condition are as follows (per the scientific paper supporting the development of the CSCI scoring tool): greater than or equal to 0.92 = likely intact condition, 0.91 to 0.80 = possibly altered condition, 0.79 to 0.63 = likely altered condition, less than or equal to 0.62 = very likely altered condition. Sites with scores below 0.79 are considered to have exceeded the water quality objective for the aquatic life beneficial use. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Bioassessment in complex environments: designing an
index for consistent meaning in different settings
|
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Samples were collected from station 206PET360. |
| Temporal Representation: |
Samples were collected from 4/2/2003 to 4/2/2003. |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Data were collected using Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program protocols |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 154146, Benthic Community Effects
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
306465 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Benthic-Macroinvertebrate Bioassessments |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Population/Community Degradation |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed data for 206PET310 to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the threshold. CSCI scores were from 0.42876059 to 0.42876059. |
| Data Reference: |
California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) Scores for the 2024 Integrated Report for Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce significant alterations in population or community ecology or receiving water biota. In addition, the health and life history characteristics of aquatic organisms in waters affected by controllable water quality factors shall not differ significantly from those for the same waters in areas unaffected by controllable water quality factors. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) is a biological scoring tool that helps aquatic resource managers translate complex data about benthic macroinvertebrates found living in a stream into an overall measure of stream health. The CSCI score is calculated by comparing the expected condition with actual (observed) results (Rehn, A.C. et al., 2015). CSCI scores range from 0 (highly degraded) to greater than 1 (equivalent to reference). CSCI scoring of biological condition are as follows (per the scientific paper supporting the development of the CSCI scoring tool): greater than or equal to 0.92 = likely intact condition, 0.91 to 0.80 = possibly altered condition, 0.79 to 0.63 = likely altered condition, less than or equal to 0.62 = very likely altered condition. Sites with scores below 0.79 are considered to have exceeded the water quality objective for the aquatic life beneficial use. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Bioassessment in complex environments: designing an
index for consistent meaning in different settings
|
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Samples were collected from station 206PET310. |
| Temporal Representation: |
Samples were collected from 4/3/2003 to 4/3/2003. |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Data were collected using Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program protocols |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 154146, Benthic Community Effects
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
306475 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Benthic-Macroinvertebrate Bioassessments |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Population/Community Degradation |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed data for 206PET350 to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the threshold. CSCI scores were from 0.299343 to 0.299343. |
| Data Reference: |
California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) Scores for the 2024 Integrated Report for Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce significant alterations in population or community ecology or receiving water biota. In addition, the health and life history characteristics of aquatic organisms in waters affected by controllable water quality factors shall not differ significantly from those for the same waters in areas unaffected by controllable water quality factors. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) is a biological scoring tool that helps aquatic resource managers translate complex data about benthic macroinvertebrates found living in a stream into an overall measure of stream health. The CSCI score is calculated by comparing the expected condition with actual (observed) results (Rehn, A.C. et al., 2015). CSCI scores range from 0 (highly degraded) to greater than 1 (equivalent to reference). CSCI scoring of biological condition are as follows (per the scientific paper supporting the development of the CSCI scoring tool): greater than or equal to 0.92 = likely intact condition, 0.91 to 0.80 = possibly altered condition, 0.79 to 0.63 = likely altered condition, less than or equal to 0.62 = very likely altered condition. Sites with scores below 0.79 are considered to have exceeded the water quality objective for the aquatic life beneficial use. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Bioassessment in complex environments: designing an
index for consistent meaning in different settings
|
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Samples were collected from station 206PET350. |
| Temporal Representation: |
Samples were collected from 4/3/2003 to 4/3/2003. |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Data were collected using Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program protocols |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 154146, Benthic Community Effects
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
283977 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Fipronil |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
2 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Fipronil. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin: Controllable water quality factors shall not cause a detrimental increase in concentrations of toxic substances found in bottom sediments or aquatic life. Effects on aquatic organisms, wildlife, and human health will be considered. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
UC Davis Aquatic Life Criteria: Aquatic life should not be affected unacceptably if the four-day average concentration of fipronil does not exceed 0.0032 ug/L (3.2 ng/L) in the water column more than once every three years on average (Bower, et al. 2017). |
| Guideline Reference: |
Water and Sediment Quality Criteria Report for Fipronil. Phase III: Application of the pesticide water and sediment quality criteria methodologies. Department of Environmental Toxicology, University of California, Davis. |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206PET315 (Petaluma River - Just downstream of Corona Rd Bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-11-16 and 2018-11-23 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 154146, Benthic Community Effects
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
3794 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Nutrients |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
0 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
Not Specified |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Unspecified--This LOE is a placeholder to support a 303(d) listing decision made prior to 2006. |
| Data Reference: |
Placeholder reference pre-2006 303(d) |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Unspecified |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Placeholder reference pre-2006 303(d) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
Unspecified |
| Guideline Reference: |
Placeholder reference pre-2006 303(d) |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Unspecified |
| Temporal Representation: |
Unspecified |
| Environmental Conditions: |
Unspecified |
| QAPP Information: |
Unspecified |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 154146, Benthic Community Effects
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
285749 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
2 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as cold water habitat shall be of a 7.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206PET315 (Petaluma River - Just downstream of Corona Rd Bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-11-16 and 2018-11-23 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 154146, Benthic Community Effects
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
306476 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Benthic-Macroinvertebrate Bioassessments |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Population/Community Degradation |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed data for 206CE0023 to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceeded the threshold. CSCI scores were from 0.337387475 to 0.337387475. |
| Data Reference: |
California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) Scores for the 2024 Integrated Report for Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are lethal to or that produce significant alterations in population or community ecology or receiving water biota. In addition, the health and life history characteristics of aquatic organisms in waters affected by controllable water quality factors shall not differ significantly from those for the same waters in areas unaffected by controllable water quality factors. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Stream Condition Index (CSCI) is a biological scoring tool that helps aquatic resource managers translate complex data about benthic macroinvertebrates found living in a stream into an overall measure of stream health. The CSCI score is calculated by comparing the expected condition with actual (observed) results (Rehn, A.C. et al., 2015). CSCI scores range from 0 (highly degraded) to greater than 1 (equivalent to reference). CSCI scoring of biological condition are as follows (per the scientific paper supporting the development of the CSCI scoring tool): greater than or equal to 0.92 = likely intact condition, 0.91 to 0.80 = possibly altered condition, 0.79 to 0.63 = likely altered condition, less than or equal to 0.62 = very likely altered condition. Sites with scores below 0.79 are considered to have exceeded the water quality objective for the aquatic life beneficial use. |
| Guideline Reference: |
Bioassessment in complex environments: designing an
index for consistent meaning in different settings
|
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Samples were collected from station 206CE0023. |
| Temporal Representation: |
Samples were collected from 5/25/2004 to 5/25/2004. |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Data were collected using Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program protocols |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142245, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
285635 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Estuarine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
36 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
7 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 7 of 36 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved oxygen objective for tidal waters in San Francisco Bay upstream of the Carquinez Bridge is 7.0 mg/l minimum, and 5.0 mg/L minimum downstream of the Carquinez Bridge. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206PET205 (Petaluma River - Just upstream of E. Washington St bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-04-23 and 2016-08-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142245, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
285400 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
31 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
11 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 11 of 31 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as warm water habitat shall be of a 5.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206PET350 (Petaluma River - 715m upstream of Petaluma Blvd N bridge. Just downstream of Rainsville Rd bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-04-23 and 2016-07-12 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142245, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
285481 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
31 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
7 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 7 of 31 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as warm water habitat shall be of a 5.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206PET315 (Petaluma River - Just downstream of Corona Rd Bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-01-06 and 2016-08-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142245, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
285398 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Estuarine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved oxygen objective for tidal waters in San Francisco Bay upstream of the Carquinez Bridge is 7.0 mg/l minimum, and 5.0 mg/L minimum downstream of the Carquinez Bridge. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206PET007 (Petaluma River - 7.2 mi upstream of Hwy 37 bridge. Papa's Taverna on Lakeville Hwy). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-04-23 and 2014-04-23 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142245, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
285633 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
5 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
5 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 5 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as cold water habitat shall be of a 7.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206PET316 (Constructed channel adjacent to Petaluma River just south of Corona Rd Bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-04-23 and 2014-05-22 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142245, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
285399 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as warm water habitat shall be of a 5.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206PET315 (Petaluma River - Just downstream of Corona Rd Bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-11-16 and 2018-11-23 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142245, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
285593 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
31 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
12 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 12 of 31 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as cold water habitat shall be of a 7.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206PET315 (Petaluma River - Just downstream of Corona Rd Bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2015-01-06 and 2016-08-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142245, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
285401 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
49 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
26 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 26 of 49 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as warm water habitat shall be of a 5.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206PET310 (Petaluma River - Petaluma Village Premium Outlet Mall, just downstream of bridge leading into mall). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-04-23 and 2018-02-21 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142245, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
286252 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
33 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
2 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 33 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as cold water habitat shall be of a 7.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206PET260 (Petaluma River - 100m upstream of Payran St bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-04-24 and 2016-08-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142245, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
284937 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
33 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 33 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as warm water habitat shall be of a 5.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206PET260 (Petaluma River - 100m upstream of Payran St bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-04-24 and 2016-08-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142245, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
28269 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Low Dissolved Oxygen |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
8 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
5 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water quality assessment was conducted at the Petaluma River watershed as part of SWAMP assessment. Continuous field monitoring of temperature, dissolved oxygen, pH and specific conductance was conducted to determine temporal variability in basic water quality at four locations.
In 5 out of 8 deployments, minimum dissolved oxygen levels fell below the objective of 7 mg/L. The 7-day minimum in the main stem monitoring site and the Adobe Creek and Lynch Creek sites in summer 2003 showed extremely low dissolved oxygen concentrations below 1 mg/L and median percent saturation below 20 percent. |
| Data Reference: |
Water Quality Monitoring and Bioassessment in Four San Francisco Bay Region Watersheds in 2003-2004: Kirker Creek, Mt. Diablo Creek, Petaluma River, and San Mateo Creek. Surface Water Monitoring Program, San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board, Oakland. CA |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The numeric water quality objective for dissolved oxygen is 7.0 mg/L minimum for waters designated as cold water habitat. The median dissolved oxygen concentration for any three consecutive months shall not be less than 80 percent of the dissolved oxygen content at saturation. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - San Francisco Bay Region (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Dissolved oxygen was measured at four sites. One monitoring site is located in the main stem of Petaluma River and 3 other sites represent three east site tributaries: Adobe Creek (most downstream tributary), Lynch Creek and Lichau Creek (most upstream tributary). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Dissolved oxygen was measured at 15 minute intervals over 1 to 2 weeks period during spring (April 2003), summer (July 2003), and winter wet season (January/February 2004). |
| Environmental Conditions: |
The Petaluma River watershed is heavily influenced by historic and current poultry and dairy farming, and has a substantial urban area within the city of Petaluma and adjacent communities. The tidal influences extend many miles up the slough, through highly channelized agricultural areas and tidal marshes. |
| QAPP Information: |
All samples were collected and analyzed using procedures comparable with the SWAMP Quality Assurance Management Plan (SWRCB 2002). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
|
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142245, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
28293 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Low Dissolved Oxygen |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
None |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
8 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
4 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water quality assessment was conducted at the Petaluma River watershed as part of SWAMP assessment. Continuous field monitoring of temperature, dissolved oxygen, pH and specific conductance was conducted to determine temporal variability in basic water quality at four locations.
In 4 out of 8 deployments, minimum dissolved oxygen levels fell below the objective of 5 mg/L. The 7-day minimum in the main stem monitoring site and the Adobe Creek and Lynch Creek sites in summer 2003 showed extremely low dissolved oxygen concentrations below 1 mg/L and median percent saturation below 20 percent. |
| Data Reference: |
Water Quality Monitoring and Bioassessment in Four San Francisco Bay Region Watersheds in 2003-2004: Kirker Creek, Mt. Diablo Creek, Petaluma River, and San Mateo Creek. Surface Water Monitoring Program, San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board, Oakland. CA |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The numeric water quality objective for dissolved oxygen is 5.0 mg/L minimum for waters designated as warm water habitat. The median dissolved oxygen concentration for any three consecutive months shall not be less than 80 percent of the dissolved oxygen content at saturation. |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - San Francisco Bay Region (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
Dissolved oxygen was measured at four sites. One monitoring site is located in the main stem of Petaluma River and 3 other sites represent three east site tributaries: Adobe Creek (most downstream tributary), Lynch Creek and Lichau Creek (most upstream tributary). |
| Temporal Representation: |
Dissolved oxygen was measured at 15 minute intervals over 1 to 2 weeks period during spring (April 2003), summer (July 2003), and winter wet season (January/February 2004). |
| Environmental Conditions: |
The Petaluma River watershed is heavily influenced by historic and current poultry and dairy farming, and has a substantial urban area within the city of Petaluma and adjacent communities. The tidal influences extend many miles up the slough, through highly channelized agricultural areas and tidal marshes. |
| QAPP Information: |
All samples were collected and analyzed using procedures comparable with the SWAMP Quality Assurance Management Plan (SWRCB 2002). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
|
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142245, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
286253 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
49 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
30 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 30 of 49 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as cold water habitat shall be of a 7.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206PET310 (Petaluma River - Petaluma Village Premium Outlet Mall, just downstream of bridge leading into mall). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-04-23 and 2018-02-21 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142245, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
285661 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
5 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
5 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 5 of 5 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as warm water habitat shall be of a 5.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206PET316 (Constructed channel adjacent to Petaluma River just south of Corona Rd Bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-04-23 and 2014-05-22 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142245, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
285634 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Estuarine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
1 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved oxygen objective for tidal waters in San Francisco Bay upstream of the Carquinez Bridge is 7.0 mg/l minimum, and 5.0 mg/L minimum downstream of the Carquinez Bridge. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206PET098 (Petaluma River - 100m downstream of confluence with Adobe Creek). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2018-11-23 and 2018-11-23 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142245, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
285905 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
31 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
13 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 13 of 31 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as cold water habitat shall be of a 7.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206PET350 (Petaluma River - 715m upstream of Petaluma Blvd N bridge. Just downstream of Rainsville Rd bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-04-23 and 2016-07-12 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142245, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
285636 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Estuarine Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
36 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
11 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB2 Monitoring data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 11 of 36 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Tissue, Toxicity, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved oxygen objective for tidal waters in San Francisco Bay upstream of the Carquinez Bridge is 7.0 mg/l minimum, and 5.0 mg/L minimum downstream of the Carquinez Bridge. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206PET098 (Petaluma River - 100m downstream of confluence with Adobe Creek). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2014-04-24 and 2016-08-09 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
SWRCB. 2018. This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements.. |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
This is a placeholder reference for data that was collected after QAPP requirements were developed, but exempt from the requirements. |
| |
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 142245, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 2 |
Petaluma River |
|
| |
| LOE ID: |
285749 |
| |
| Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
| LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
| Matrix: |
Water |
| Fraction: |
Total |
| |
| Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
| |
| Number of Samples: |
2 |
| Number of Exceedances: |
2 |
| |
| Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
| Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Clean Streams in S. SoCo Pathogen Source Detection data for Petaluma River to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
| Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, WQ data from the California Environmental Data Exchange Network assembled for the 2024 Integrated Report in Region 2. |
| |
| SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
| |
| Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Dissolved oxygen objectives for waters designated as cold water habitat shall be of a 7.0 mg/l minimum. (Water Quality Control Plan, San Francisco Bay Basin, Chapter III Water Quality Objectives.) |
| Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) San Francisco Bay Basin (Region 2) |
| |
| Evaluation Guideline: |
|
| Guideline Reference: |
| |
| Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site: 206PET315 (Petaluma River - Just downstream of Corona Rd Bridge). |
| Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-11-16 and 2018-11-23 |
| Environmental Conditions: |
|
| QAPP Information: |
Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department. 2019. Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C). |
| QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Clean Streams in Southern Sonoma County (CS3C) |
| |