Welcome to the State Water Resources Control Board Welcome to the California Environmental Protection Agency
Governor's Website Visit the Water Board Members Page
Agendas
My Water Quality
Performance Report
PERFORMANCE REPORT The Water Boards...

State Water Board Logo

The California Water Boards' Annual Performance Report - Fiscal Year 2011-12

ENFORCE: ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS

GROUP:  ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS ALL PROGRAMS
MEASURE:  PENALTIES ALL PROGRAMS
MESSAGE:  Penalties under the NPDES program represent 55% of actions and 30% of all assessed penalties in FY 11-12.
KEY STATISTICS FOR FY 2011-12

 

MEASUREMENTS  - Data last updated on: 

Program Number
of Penalty
Actions in FY 11-12
Total Liability
Assessed
Cash Liability
Collected
Projects
Completed
Percentage of
Liabilities
Resolved

 

WHAT THE MEASURE IS SHOWING

During fiscal year 2011-2012 a significant number of Administrative Civil Liability actions were issued under all programs in part as the result of the recently created Office of Enforcement. This large number of actions assessed a significant penalty amount in FY 11-12 specially under the NPDES program partially due to the assessment of mandatory minimum penalties. Under the WDR program 5 Administrative Civil Liabilities exceeded $400,000, these include a $1.5M liability assessed in R9 for sanitary sewer overflows to the City of Oceanside and a $1.4M liability to the South San Luis Obispo Sanitation District also for sanitary sewer overflow violations

 

WHY THIS MEASURE IS IMPORTANT

Liabilities imposed by the Water Boards are an important part of the Water Board's enforcement authority. California law and the Water Boards enforcement policy establish the circumstances for which violations must receive a penalty and in what amount. In certain cases, the Water Boards have the discretion of imposing administrative civil liabilities after considering certain factors. For other types of violations, mandatory minimum penalties must be imposed and settlement conditions for those violations are also limited. The Regional Boards must consider whether the discharger should be allowed to satisfy some or all of the monetary assessment by completing or funding one or more compliance or supplemental environmental projects or by depositing the penalty amount in a specified fund. Preparing each case for prosecution requires a significant amount of time and resources. This measure describes a significant workload for the enforcement program.

 

TECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS

GLOSSARY

Administrative Civil Liability (ACL)
Administrative Civil Liabilities means monetary assessments imposed by a RWQCB or the SWRCB. The California Water Code and the Health and Safety Code authorize ACLs in several circumstances. California Water Code sections 13323-13327 describe the process to be used to assess ACLs. Assessments of administrative civil liability can be either negotiated pursuant to a settlement agreement or imposed after an administrative adjudication.

Supplemental Environmental Project
Supplemental environmental projects are defined as environmentally beneficial projects which a defendant/respondent agrees to undertake in settlement of an enforcement action, but which the defendant respondent is not otherwise legally required to perform. Environmentally beneficial means a SEP must improve, protect, or reduce risks to public health, of the environment at large. While in some cases a SEP may provide the alleged violator with certain benefits, there must be no doubt, that the project primarily benefits the public health or the environment.

Compliance Project
A Compliance Project (CP) is a project designed to address problems related to the violation and bring the discharger back into compliance in a timely manner. CPs can only be considered where they are authorized by statute. At this time, CPs are authorized by statute only in connection with MMPs if the POTW serves a small community with a financial hardship.

( Page last updated:  9/14/12 )

 
 

.