Welcome to the State Water Resources Control Board Welcome to the California Environmental Protection Agency
Governor's Website Visit the Water Board Members Page
Agendas
My Water Quality
Performance Report
PERFORMANCE REPORT The Water Boards...

State Water Board Logo

The California Water Boards' Annual Performance Report - Fiscal Year 2012-13

TARGETS AND RESOURCES: REGION 3 CENTRAL COAST


Targets Achieved
GROUP:  TARGETS AND RESOURCES - REGION 3 MEASURE: ALL REGIONAL TARGETS
ALL RESOURCES
Target arrows: = Less than 80% of target met
= Target met between 80% and 90%
= Target met at 90% or above

 

INSPECTIONS AND PERMITS  - Data last updated on: 

Region 3 (Central Coast)
Regional Considerations
Facilities
Regulated
Facilities
Inspected
Permits Issued, Revised and Renewed Enforcement (Compliance & Penalty Actions) Budget Staff (PY)
Program Actual Target % Target Actual Target  % Target 
NPDES Major Individual 22 15 4 375% 2 3 67% 4 $383,319 2.9
NPDES Minor Individual 16 3 5 60% 2 2 100% 1
NPDES Minor General Enrollees 77 1 2 50% 7 0 NA 0
Stormwater Construction 406 30 10 300% 167 0 NA 0 $581,736 5.0
Stormwater Industrial 400 22 5 440% 24 0 NA 0
Stormwater Municipal 45 14 17 82% 0 0 NA 0
Waste Discharge to Land, Municipal Waste 173 9 10 90% 3 22 23% 1 $953,816 7.8
Waste Discharge to Land, Industrial Waste 195 15 5 300% 1 0
Waste Discharge to Land, All Other Facilities 261 3 0 NA 1 0
Land Disposal Landfills 44 24 23 104% 1 2 50% 0 $410,983 3.0
Land Disposal All Other 10 2 1 200% 0 0 NA 0 $0 0.0
Timber Harvest 89 1 6 17% 4 0 NA 0 $0 0.0
Confined Animal Facilities 11 0 0 NA 0 0 NA 0 $0 0.0
All Other Programs 245 5 3 7 $1,278,062 10.9
TOTAL 1,994 144 215 13 $3,607,916 29.6

 

OTHER TARGETS

Region 3 (Central Coast) Actual
FY 12-13
Target
FY 12-13
%
Target
Plan and Assess

 

RESOURCES (INPUTS)

 

 

WHAT THE CARD IS SHOWING

Each target card provides a direct comparison of actual outputs for FY 2012-13 to the target estimates established at the outset of the fiscal year. While budgetary and personnel information is not directly aligned with the activities being assessed, it does provide a basis for understanding the relative priority of key programs within each region and across the State. For the actual outputs presented, the Water Boards are continuing to evolve its data bases for improved accuracy. Some of the measurements reported may be different than the measurements tracked by the regions and programs. In addition, there are several targets for which outputs cannot be readily displayed without modification to the databases. This includes the number of permits revised, which should include the number of permits reviewed, revised and/or rescinded.

For the actual outputs presented, the Water Boards are continuing to evolve its data bases for improved accuracy. Some of the measurements reported may be different than the measurements tracked by the regions and programs. Notably, the data portrayed include entries completed through July 27, 2011 and do not reflect data input after that period. In addition, there are several targets for which outputs cannot be readily displayed without modification to the databases. This includes the number of permits revised, which should include the number of permits reviewed, revised and/or rescinded.

 

WHY THIS CARD IS IMPORTANT

Beginning with FY 2009-10, performance targets were established for certain output measures. Targets are goals that establish measurable levels of performance to be achieved within a specified time period. This card demonstrates how the resources of the region are being deployed to protect water quality. In establishing the targets, the Regional Water Boards considered the unique differences and needs within their respective watersheds, their work priorities given available resources, external factors such as furloughs, and prior year outputs.

 

TECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS

  • Target arrows: = Less than 80% of target met
    = Target met between 80% and 90%
    = Target met at 90% or above.
  • All other programs include: Timber Harvest, Non point Source, 401 Certification, Tanks, Pretreatment, Recycling and miscellaneous programs (for budget information).
  • Other Programs (budget): miscellaneous programs not included in the above.
  • Permits issued: Does not include rescissions or permit revisions that may have been included in the targets.
  • Target Definitions FY 2011-2012

REGIONAL CONSIDERATIONS

Land Disposal Program
Region 3ís Land Disposal staff did not meet the anticipated target for the number of Permits Issued, Revised and Renewed for Land Disposal Landfills. The target was not met because there was an unexpected requirement for a new Waste Discharge Requirements (WDR) for a Class II Surface Impoundments which fits under the Permit Issued, Revised and Renewed for Land Disposal All Other category. Region 3 did not have the staff resources to complete the planned renewal of the Land Disposal Landfill WDR and the unexpected new Land Disposal All Other WDR. Therefore, R3 needed to exchange our staff time to complete the new WDR versus the planned update to an existing WDR.

Site Cleanup and Underground Storage Program
 
R3ís site cleanup program staff did not meet four out of ten anticipated Cleanup Program Sites projected closures. However, these four sites no longer pose a threat to the environment and we are in the process of finalizing these closures after we receive either well abandonment activity completion reports or finalized deed restrictions.

Region 3 experienced a reduction in staff in January of 2012 which resulted in fewer UST cases moved into remediation than originally anticipated. Moving forward targets will be adjusted to reflect available resources.

 

REGIONAL CONSIDERATIONS

No Regional Considerations Provided.

( Page last updated:  9/17/13 )

 
 

.
Region 3 (Central Coast) FY 12-13
Budget ($)
Staff (PY) %Fees/Taxes
Penalties
%Federal %General
Fund/Other
%Bonds