The California Water Boards' Annual Performance Report - Fiscal Year 2016-17

State Board | Region 1 | Region 2 | Region 3 | Region 4 | Region 5 | Region 6 | Region 7 | Region 8 | Region 9

TARGETS AND RESOURCES: REGION 5 CENTRAL VALLEY

GROUP: TARGETS AND RESOURCES - REGION 5

MEASURE: ALL REGIONAL TARGETS
ALL RESOURCES

Targets Achieved:
• = Less than 60% of target met
• = Target met between 60% and 80%
• = Target met at 80% or above

Central Valley Regional Water Board Performance Summary¹	Your Page Does not Support iFrames Percentage of Targets Met
Area: 59344 square miles	Budget: $58,482,518	Staff: 251.7
Permitting 100% •	Inspections 100% •	Others 90% •
¹Regional Board performance summary statistics show the percentage of targets met.

Total Maximum Daily Load and Basin Planning
Program Budget: $3,922,050	Program Staff: 19.50
	Target	Actual Achieved	% of Targets Met
Pollutant/Water Body Combinations Addressed	15	85	567% •
Total Maximum Daily Loads Adopted	1	1	100% •
Basin Plan Amendments Adopted	2	4	200% •
No Regional Board Considerations Provided

Please see Region 5's Fact Sheet for a more detailed overview of the program and accomplishments.

NPDES Wastewater
Program Budget: $5,057,238	Program Staff: 23.20
	Target	Actual Achieved	% of Targets Met
Major Individual Permits Issued or Renewed	5	5	100% •
Major Individual Facilities Inspected	25	23	92% •
Minor Individual Permits Issued or Renewed	11	12	109% •
Minor Individual Facilities Inspected	16	22	138% •
Minor General Facilities Inspected	0	0
No Regional Board Considerations Provided

Please see Region 5's Fact Sheet for a more detailed overview of the program and accomplishments.

NPDES Stormwater
Program Budget: $1,801,406	Program Staff: 10.80
	Target	Actual Achieved	% of Targets Met
Municipal (Phase I/II Inspections)	0	1
Construction Inspections	289	420	145% •
Industrial Inspections	195	217	111% •
No Regional Board Considerations Provided

Please see Region 5's Fact Sheet for a more detailed overview of the program and accomplishments.

Waste Discharge to Land Wastewater
Program Budget: $6,391,296	Program Staff: 22.70
	Target	Actual Achieved	% of Targets Met
Waste Discharge to Land Inspections	165	186	113% •
Individual Waste Discharge Requirements Updated	20	64	320% •
No Regional Board Considerations Provided

Please see Region 5's Fact Sheet for a more detailed overview of the program and accomplishments.

Land Disposal
Program Budget: $3,652,972	Program Staff: 19.40
	Target	Actual Achieved	% of Targets Met
Landfill Individual Permits Updated	11	12	109% •
Landfill Inspections	104	132	127% •
All Other Individual Permits Updated	2	3	150% •
All Other Inspections	20	43	215% •
No Regional Board Considerations Provided

Please see Region 5's Fact Sheet for a more detailed overview of the program and accomplishments.

Confined Animal Facilities (WDR, NPDES, etc.)
Program Budget: $3,156,153	Program Staff: 14.30
	Target	Actual Achieved	% of Targets Met
Confined Animal Facilities Inspections	280	370	132% •
No Regional Board Considerations Provided

Please see Region 5's Fact Sheet for a more detailed overview of the program and accomplishments.

Timber Harvest (Forestry)
Program Budget: $2,581,136	Program Staff: 14.70
	Target	Actual Achieved	% of Targets Met
Timber Harvest Inspections	166	161	97% •
No Regional Board Considerations Provided

Please see Region 5's Fact Sheet for a more detailed overview of the program and accomplishments.

Enforcement
Program Budget: $699,461	Program Staff: 3.60
	Target	Actual Achieved	% of Targets Met
Class 1 Priority Violations will Result in Formal Enforcement or an Investigative Order Pursuant to Water Code Section 13267 within 18 Months of Discovery	100	100	100% •
Facilities with Over $12,000 in MMPs (4 or More Violations) Not Assessed within 18 Months of Accrual	0	2	•
No Regional Board Considerations Provided

Please see Region 5's Fact Sheet for a more detailed overview of the program and accomplishments.

Cleanup
Program Budget: $6,394,177	Program Staff: 28.20
	Target	Actual Achieved	% of Targets Met
New Department of Defense Sites Into Active Remediation	15	17	113% •
Cleanup Sites Closed	68	55	81% •
New Underground Storage Tank Sites Into Active Remediation	29	38	131% •
Underground Storage Tank Sites Projected Closed	80	77	96% •
New Cleanup Sites Moved into Active Remediation	84	25	30% •
No Regional Board Considerations Provided

Please see Region 5's Fact Sheet for a more detailed overview of the program and accomplishments.

RESOURCES (INPUTS)

WHAT THE CARD IS SHOWING

Each target card provides a direct comparison of actual outputs for the fiscal year (July 1st to June 30th) to the target estimates established at the outset of the fiscal year. While budgetary and personnel information is not directly aligned with the activities being assessed, it does provide a basis for understanding the relative priority of key programs within each region and across the State. For the actual outputs presented, the Water Boards are continuing to evolve its data bases for improved accuracy. Some of the measurements reported may be different than the measurements tracked by the regions and programs. In addition, there are several targets for which outputs cannot be readily displayed without modification to the databases. This includes the number of permits revised, which should include the number of permits reviewed, revised and/or rescinded.

For the actual outputs presented, the Water Boards are continuing to evolve its data bases for improved accuracy. Some of the measurements reported may be different than the measurements tracked by the regions and programs. Notably, the data portrayed include entries completed before November 4, 2014 and may not reflect data input after that period.

WHY THIS CARD IS IMPORTANT

Beginning with FY 2009-10, performance targets were established for certain output measures. Targets are goals that establish measurable levels of performance to be achieved within a specified time period. This card demonstrates how the resources of the region are being deployed to protect water quality. In establishing the targets, the Regional Water Boards considered the unique differences and needs within their respective watersheds, their work priorities given available resources, external factors such as furloughs, and prior year outputs.

TECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS

Target circles: • = Less than 60% of target met
• = Target met between 60% and 80%
• = Target met at 80% or above.
Other Programs (budget): miscellaneous programs not included in the above.
Permits issued: Does not include rescissions, amendments or permit revisions that may have been included in the targets.

REGIONAL CONSIDERATIONS

Regional Considerations provided in tables above under each program section.

( Page last updated: 12/19/17 )

Region 5 (Central Valley)	FY 2016-17 Budget ($)	Staff (PY)	%Fees/Taxes Penalties	%Federal	%General Fund/Other	%Bonds