Welcome to the State Water Resources Control Board Welcome to the California Environmental Protection Agency
Governor's Website Visit the Water Board Members Page
Agendas
My Water Quality
Performance Report
1516PERFORMANCE REPORT The Water Boards...

State Water Board Logo

The California Water Boards' Annual Performance Report - Fiscal Year  2016-17

State Board | Region 1 | Region 2 | Region 3 | Region 4 | Region 5 | Region 6 | Region 7 | Region 8 | Region 9

TARGETS AND RESOURCES: REGION 5 CENTRAL VALLEY

GROUP:  TARGETS AND RESOURCES - REGION 5 MEASURE: ALL REGIONAL TARGETS
ALL RESOURCES

Targets Achieved:
= Less than 60% of target met
= Target met between 60% and 80%
= Target met at 80% or above

Central Valley Regional Water Board Performance Summary1
Percentage of Targets Met
Area: 59344 square miles Budget: $58,482,518 Staff: 251.7
Permitting 100% Inspections 100% Others 90%
1Regional Board performance summary statistics show the percentage of targets met.
 
Total Maximum Daily Load and Basin Planning
Program Budget: $3,922,050 Program Staff: 19.50
  Target Actual Achieved % of Targets Met
Pollutant/Water Body Combinations Addressed 15 85 567%
Total Maximum Daily Loads Adopted 1 1 100%
Basin Plan Amendments Adopted 2 4 200%
No Regional Board Considerations Provided
Please see Region 5's Fact Sheet for a more detailed overview of the program and accomplishments.
NPDES Wastewater
Program Budget: $5,057,238 Program Staff: 23.20
  Target Actual Achieved % of Targets Met
Major Individual Permits Issued or Renewed 5 5 100%
Major Individual Facilities Inspected 25 23 92%
Minor Individual Permits Issued or Renewed 11 12 109%
Minor Individual Facilities Inspected 16 22 138%
Minor General Facilities Inspected 0 0  
No Regional Board Considerations Provided
Please see Region 5's Fact Sheet for a more detailed overview of the program and accomplishments.
NPDES Stormwater
Program Budget: $1,801,406 Program Staff: 10.80
  Target Actual Achieved % of Targets Met
Municipal (Phase I/II Inspections) 0 1  
Construction Inspections 289 420 145%
Industrial Inspections 195 217 111%
No Regional Board Considerations Provided
Please see Region 5's Fact Sheet for a more detailed overview of the program and accomplishments.
Waste Discharge to Land Wastewater
Program Budget: $6,391,296 Program Staff: 22.70
  Target Actual Achieved % of Targets Met
Waste Discharge to Land Inspections 165 186 113%
Individual Waste Discharge Requirements Updated 20 64 320%
No Regional Board Considerations Provided
Please see Region 5's Fact Sheet for a more detailed overview of the program and accomplishments.
Land Disposal
Program Budget: $3,652,972 Program Staff: 19.40
  Target Actual Achieved % of Targets Met
Landfill Individual Permits Updated 11 12 109%
Landfill Inspections 104 132 127%
All Other Individual Permits Updated 2 3 150%
All Other Inspections 20 43 215%
No Regional Board Considerations Provided
Please see Region 5's Fact Sheet for a more detailed overview of the program and accomplishments.
Confined Animal Facilities (WDR, NPDES, etc.)
Program Budget: $3,156,153 Program Staff: 14.30
  Target Actual Achieved % of Targets Met
Confined Animal Facilities Inspections 280 370 132%
No Regional Board Considerations Provided
Please see Region 5's Fact Sheet for a more detailed overview of the program and accomplishments.
Timber Harvest (Forestry)
Program Budget: $2,581,136 Program Staff: 14.70
  Target Actual Achieved % of Targets Met
Timber Harvest Inspections 166 161 97%
No Regional Board Considerations Provided
Please see Region 5's Fact Sheet for a more detailed overview of the program and accomplishments.
Enforcement
Program Budget: $699,461 Program Staff: 3.60
  Target Actual Achieved % of Targets Met
Class 1 Priority Violations will Result in Formal Enforcement or an Investigative Order Pursuant to Water Code Section 13267 within 18 Months of Discovery 100 100 100%
Facilities with Over $12,000 in MMPs (4 or More Violations) Not Assessed within 18 Months of Accrual 0 2        
No Regional Board Considerations Provided
Please see Region 5's Fact Sheet for a more detailed overview of the program and accomplishments.
Cleanup
Program Budget: $6,394,177 Program Staff: 28.20
  Target Actual Achieved % of Targets Met
New Department of Defense Sites Into Active Remediation 15 17 113%
Cleanup Sites Closed 68 55 81%
New Underground Storage Tank Sites Into Active Remediation 29 38 131%
Underground Storage Tank Sites Projected Closed 80 77 96%
New Cleanup Sites Moved into Active Remediation 84 25 30%
No Regional Board Considerations Provided
Please see Region 5's Fact Sheet for a more detailed overview of the program and accomplishments.

 

 

RESOURCES (INPUTS)

 

 

 

WHAT THE CARD IS SHOWING

Each target card provides a direct comparison of actual outputs for the fiscal year (July 1st to June 30th) to the target estimates established at the outset of the fiscal year. While budgetary and personnel information is not directly aligned with the activities being assessed, it does provide a basis for understanding the relative priority of key programs within each region and across the State. For the actual outputs presented, the Water Boards are continuing to evolve its data bases for improved accuracy. Some of the measurements reported may be different than the measurements tracked by the regions and programs. In addition, there are several targets for which outputs cannot be readily displayed without modification to the databases. This includes the number of permits revised, which should include the number of permits reviewed, revised and/or rescinded.

For the actual outputs presented, the Water Boards are continuing to evolve its data bases for improved accuracy. Some of the measurements reported may be different than the measurements tracked by the regions and programs. Notably, the data portrayed include entries completed before November 4, 2014 and may not reflect data input after that period.

WHY THIS CARD IS IMPORTANT

Beginning with FY 2009-10, performance targets were established for certain output measures. Targets are goals that establish measurable levels of performance to be achieved within a specified time period. This card demonstrates how the resources of the region are being deployed to protect water quality. In establishing the targets, the Regional Water Boards considered the unique differences and needs within their respective watersheds, their work priorities given available resources, external factors such as furloughs, and prior year outputs.

TECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS

  • Target circles: = Less than 60% of target met
    = Target met between 60% and 80%
    = Target met at 80% or above.
  • Other Programs (budget): miscellaneous programs not included in the above.
  • Permits issued: Does not include rescissions, amendments or permit revisions that may have been included in the targets.

REGIONAL CONSIDERATIONS

Regional Considerations provided in tables above under each program section.

( Page last updated:  12/19/17 )

 
 

.
Region 5 (Central Valley) FY  2016-17
Budget ($)
Staff (PY) %Fees/Taxes
Penalties
%Federal %General
Fund/Other
%Bonds