Final California 2020 Integrated Report (303(d) List/305(b) Report)

Supporting Information

Regional Board 3 - Central Coast Region

Water Body Name:	Jalama Creek
Water Body ID:	CAR3151005119990304115034
Water Body Type:	River & Stream

DECISION ID	110506	Region 3
Jalama Creek

Pollutant:	Chloride
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not Delist from 303(d) list (being addressed with USEPA approved TMDL)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not Delist from 303(d) list (being addressed with USEPA approved TMDL)(2018)
Revision Status	Revised
Sources:	Natural Sources
TMDL Name:	Jalama Creek Sodium and Chloride TMDL
TMDL Project Code:	1075
Date TMDL Approved by USEPA:	09/04/2013
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for removal on the CWA section 303(d) List under sections 2.2 and section 4.2 of the Listing Policy. Under 4.2 of the Policy, a minimum of one line of evidence is needed to assess listing status. Four lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Fifty of the 55 chloride (dissolved) samples, 53 of the 61 chloride (fraction=none) samples, and 20 of the 25 chloride (total) samples exceed the water quality objective for agricultural uses. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that in accordance with section 2.2 of the Policy there is sufficient justification to place it in the Being Addressed portion of the 303(d) List because a TMDL has been completed and approved by RWQCB and USEPA, and is expected to result in attainment of the standard.. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Fifty of the 55 chloride (dissolved) samples, 53 of the 61 chloride (fraction=none) samples, and 20 of the 25 chloride (total) samples exceed the water quality objective and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 4.2 of the Listing Policy. 4. The Jalama Creek Chloride and Sodium TMDL has been approved by USEPA on September 4, 2013. 5. Pursuant to section 4.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be removed from the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards for the pollutant are being exceeded.
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 110506, Chloride Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	10568
Pollutant:	Chloride
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Agricultural Supply
Number of Samples:	35
Number of Exceedances:	30
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Coastal Confluences (CC) data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 30 of 35 samples exceed the criterion for Chloride.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts which adversely affect the agricultural beneficial use. Interpretation of adverse effect shall be as derived from the University of California Agricultural Extension Service guidelines provided in Table 3-3 (Central Coast Waterboard Basin Plan, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland and Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries). In Table 3-3 of the Basin Plan (page III-8), water quality guidelines state that severe problems may occur when chloride exceeds 106 mg/L in irrigation supply water.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Jalama Creek was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 315JAL-Jalama Creek u/s County Park at Rail Road Trussels]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 2/13/2001-11/1/2006. CCAMP Coastal confluence monitoring is conducted monthly (with the exception of April 2003 - December 2003) and is ongoing.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 110506, Chloride Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	50327
Pollutant:	Chloride
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Agricultural Supply
Number of Samples:	26
Number of Exceedances:	23
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Water Board Staff assessed public submissions data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 23 of 26 samples exceed the criterion for Chloride.
Data Reference:	Coastal Confluences field data 2007-2010
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts which adversely affect the agricultural beneficial use. Interpretation of adverse effect shall be as derived from the University of California Agricultural Extension Service guidelines provided in Table 3-3 (Central Coast Waterboard Basin Plan, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland and Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries). In Table 3-3 of the Basin Plan (page III-8), water quality guidelines state that severe problems may occur when chloride exceeds 106 mg/L in irrigation supply water.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Data for Various Pollutants in Westside San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009.
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Jalama Creek was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 315JAL-Jalama Creek u/s County Park]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 4/16/2007-6/23/2010.
Environmental Conditions:	Central Coast Water Board Staff are not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):	Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 110506, Chloride Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	160903
Pollutant:	Chloride
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Total
Beneficial Use:	Agricultural Supply
Number of Samples:	25
Number of Exceedances:	20
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB3 CCAMP Coastal Confluences data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 20 of 25 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride.
Data Reference:	Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3.
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts which adversely affect the agricultural beneficial use. Interpretation of adverse effect shall be as derived from the University of California Agricultural Extension Service guidelines listed in the Central Coast Basin Plan and identified as the level at which severe problems may occur when chloride exceeds 106 mg/L in irrigation supply water.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (315JAL)
Temporal Representation:	The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-07-15 and 2012-08-23
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	SWAMP 2008, SWAMP 2017
QAPP Information Reference(s):	Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 110506, Chloride Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	160866
Pollutant:	Chloride
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Dissolved
Beneficial Use:	Agricultural Supply
Number of Samples:	55
Number of Exceedances:	50
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB3 CCAMP Coastal Confluences data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 50 of 55 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chloride.
Data Reference:	Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3.
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts which adversely affect the agricultural beneficial use. Interpretation of adverse effect shall be as derived from the University of California Agricultural Extension Service guidelines listed in the Central Coast Basin Plan and identified as the level at which severe problems may occur when chloride exceeds 106 mg/L in irrigation supply water.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (315JAL)
Temporal Representation:	The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-09-25 and 2018-12-13
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	SWAMP 2008, SWAMP 2017
QAPP Information Reference(s):	Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program

DECISION ID	110517	Region 3
Jalama Creek

Pollutant:	Sodium
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not Delist from 303(d) list (being addressed with USEPA approved TMDL)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not Delist from 303(d) list (being addressed with USEPA approved TMDL)(2018)
Revision Status	Revised
Sources:	Natural Sources
TMDL Name:	Jalama Creek Sodium and Chloride TMDL
TMDL Project Code:	1075
Date TMDL Approved by USEPA:	09/04/2013
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for removal from the CWA section 303(d) List under section 4.2 of the Listing Policy. Under this section a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Four lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Twenty of the 25 sodium (dissolved) samples, 56 of the 61 sodium (fraction=none), and 47 of the 56 sodium (total) samples exceed the water quality objective for agricultural uses. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against removing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List. In accordance with section 2.2 of the Policy, there is sufficient justification to place it in the Being Addressed portion of the 303(d) List because a TMDL has been completed and approved by RWQCB and USEPA, and is expected to result in attainment of the standard. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Twenty of the 25 sodium (dissolved) samples, 56 of the 61 sodium (fraction=none), and 47 of the 56 sodium (total) samples exceed the water quality objective and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.2 of the Listing Policy. 4. The Jalama Creek Chloride and Sodium TMDL has been approved by USEPA on September 4, 2013. 5. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be removed from the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards for the pollutant are being exceeded. There is sufficient justification to place it in the Being Addressed portion of the CWA 303(d) List because a TMDL has been completed and approved by RWQCB and USEPA, and is expected to result in attainment of the standard.
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 110517, Sodium Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	50333
Pollutant:	Sodium
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Agricultural Supply
Number of Samples:	26
Number of Exceedances:	24
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Water Board Staff assessed public submissions data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 24 of 26 samples exceed the criterion for Sodium.
Data Reference:	Coastal Confluences field data 2007-2010
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts which adversely affect the agricultural beneficial use. Interpretation of adverse effect shall be as derived from the University of California Agricultural Extension Service guidelines provided in Table 3-3 (Central Coast Waterboard Basin Plan, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland and Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries). In Table 3-3 of the Basin Plan (page III-8), water quality guidelines state that severe problems may occur when sodium exceeds 69 mg/L in irrigation supply water.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Data for Various Pollutants in Westside San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009.
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Jalama Creek was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 315JAL-Jalama Creek u/s County Park]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 4/16/2007-6/23/2010.
Environmental Conditions:	Central Coast Water Board Staff are not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):	Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 110517, Sodium Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	10584
Pollutant:	Sodium
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Agricultural Supply
Number of Samples:	35
Number of Exceedances:	32
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Coastal Confluences (CC) data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 32 of 35 samples exceed the criterion for Sodium.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts which adversely affect the agricultural beneficial use. Interpretation of adverse effect shall be as derived from the University of California Agricultural Extension Service guidelines provided in Table 3-3 (Central Coast Waterboard Basin Plan, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland and Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries). In Table 3-3 of the Basin Plan (page III-8), water quality guidelines state that severe problems may occur when sodium exceeds 69 mg/L in irrigation supply water.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Jalama Creek was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 315JAL-Jalama Creek u/s County Park at Rail Road Trussels]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 2/13/2001-11/1/2006. CCAMP Coastal confluence monitoring is conducted monthly (with the exception of April 2003 - December 2003) and is ongoing.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 110517, Sodium Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	181896
Pollutant:	Sodium
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Dissolved
Beneficial Use:	Agricultural Supply
Number of Samples:	25
Number of Exceedances:	20
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB3 CCAMP Coastal Confluences data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 20 of 25 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Sodium.
Data Reference:	Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3.
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts which adversely affect the agricultural beneficial use. Interpretation of adverse effect shall be as derived from the University of California Agricultural Extension Service guidelines listed in the Central Coast Basin Plan and identified as the level that severe problems may occur when sodium exceeds 69 mg/L in irrigation supply water.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (315JAL)
Temporal Representation:	The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-07-15 and 2012-08-23
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	SWAMP 2008, SWAMP 2017
QAPP Information Reference(s):	Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 110517, Sodium Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	181780
Pollutant:	Sodium
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Total
Beneficial Use:	Agricultural Supply
Number of Samples:	56
Number of Exceedances:	47
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB3 CCAMP Coastal Confluences data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 47 of 56 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Sodium.
Data Reference:	Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3.
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts which adversely affect the agricultural beneficial use. Interpretation of adverse effect shall be as derived from the University of California Agricultural Extension Service guidelines listed in the Central Coast Basin Plan and identified as the level that severe problems may occur when sodium exceeds 69 mg/L in irrigation supply water.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (315JAL)
Temporal Representation:	The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-09-25 and 2018-12-13
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	SWAMP 2008, SWAMP 2017
QAPP Information Reference(s):	Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program

DECISION ID	110522	Region 3
Jalama Creek

Pollutant:	Aluminum
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	New Decision
Revision Status	Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Two lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Zero of the 2 water samples exceed the evaluation guidelines applied to protect aquatic life beneficial uses. Zero of the 2 water samples exceed the water quality objectives for agriculture supply beneficial uses (AGR). This sample size is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. A minimum of 16 samples is needed to determine if a beneficial use is supported and a minimum of five exceedances is needed to determine if beneficial uses are not supported using table 3.1. Therefore, the use support rating is set to 'insufficient information'. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Zero of the water samples exceed the evaluation guidelines and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) List. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 110522, Aluminum Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	232998
Pollutant:	Aluminum
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Total
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	2
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB3 CCAMP Coastal Confluences data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Aluminum.
Data Reference:	Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3.
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Basin Plan).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin
Evaluation Guideline:	The National Recommended Water Quality Criteria for the protection of aquatic life from aluminum, expressed in terms of total recoverable metal in the water column, is the chronic continuous concentration (4-day average) of 87 ug/L.
Guideline Reference:	National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Office of Science and Technology
Spatial Representation:	The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (315JAL)
Temporal Representation:	The samples were collected between the dates of 2013-06-19 and 2016-03-23
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	SWAMP 2008, SWAMP 2017
QAPP Information Reference(s):	Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 110522, Aluminum Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	157260
Pollutant:	Aluminum
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Total
Beneficial Use:	Agricultural Supply
Number of Samples:	2
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB3 CCAMP Coastal Confluences data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Aluminum.
Data Reference:	Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3.
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts which adversely affect the agricultural beneficial use. In addition, waters used for irrigation and livestock watering shall not exceed concentrations for those chemicals listed in the Central Coast Basin Plan and identified as the maximum concentration for aluminum for irrigation supply as 5.0 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (315JAL)
Temporal Representation:	The samples were collected between the dates of 2013-06-19 and 2016-03-23
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	SWAMP 2008, SWAMP 2017
QAPP Information Reference(s):	Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program

DECISION ID	127473	Region 3
Jalama Creek

Pollutant:	Ammonia
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018)
Revision Status	Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Seven lines of evidence (LOEs) are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Sample and exceedance counts for the lines of evidence with the fraction identified as “none” or “not recorded” are grouped together with those having the fraction “total”, based on the analytical method used. The following is a summary of the sample and exceedances for each beneficial use: Based on LOEs summarizing un-ionized ammonia data, zero of the 86 samples exceed the water quality objective (Basin Plan) set to protect aquatic life. Based on LOEs summarizing total ammonia data (‘nitrogen, ammonia’ and ‘nitrogen as ammonia’) zero of the 51 samples exceed the EPA's Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria set to protect aquatic life. Based on LOEs summarizing total ammonia data (‘nitrogen, ammonia’ and ‘nitrogen as ammonia’) zero of the 142 samples exceed the EPA's Lifetime Health advisory level set to protect municipal and domestic supply uses. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Zero of the samples exceed the water quality objectives and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) List because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 127473, Ammonia Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	184011
Pollutant:	Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia)
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Total
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	51
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB3 CCAMP Coastal Confluences data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 51 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N.
Data Reference:	Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3.
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (315JAL)
Temporal Representation:	The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-08-11 and 2018-12-13
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	SWAMP 2008, SWAMP 2017
QAPP Information Reference(s):	Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 127473, Ammonia Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	10565
Pollutant:	Ammonia as Nitrogen
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	35
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Coastal Confluences (CC) data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 35 samples exceed the criterion for Ammonia as N, Total.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	USEPA Health Advisory 2006 Edition of the Drinking Water Standards and Health Advisories (EPA 822-R-06-013, 2006).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	2006 edition of the drinking water standards and health advisories. EPA 822-R-03-013
Evaluation Guideline:	EPA's Lifetime Health advisory level for total ammonia is 30.0 mg/L as stated on page 8 of the 2006 edition of the drinking water standards and health advisories. This Advisory Level is defined as "the concentration of a chemical in drinking water that is not expected to cause any adverse noncarcinogenic effects for up to ten days of exposure."
Guideline Reference:	2006 edition of the drinking water standards and health advisories. EPA 822-R-03-013
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Jalama Creek was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 315JAL-Jalama Creek u/s County Park at Rail Road Trussels]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 2/13/2001-11/1/2006. CCAMP Coastal confluence monitoring is conducted monthly (with the exception of April 2003 - December 2003) and is ongoing.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 127473, Ammonia Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	50355
Pollutant:	Ammonia (Unionized)
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	26
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Water Board Staff assessed public submissions data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 26 samples exceed the criterion for Ammonia as N, Unionized.
Data Reference:	Coastal Confluences field data 2007-2010
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin General Objective, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 (General Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries) states that the discharge of wastes shall not cause concentrations of unionized ammonia (NH3) to exceed 0.025 mg/l (as N) in receiving waters (page III-4).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Data for Various Pollutants in Westside San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009.
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Jalama Creek was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 315JAL-Jalama Creek u/s County Park]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 4/16/2007-6/23/2010.
Environmental Conditions:	Central Coast Water Board Staff are not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):	Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 127473, Ammonia Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	10566
Pollutant:	Ammonia (Unionized)
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	35
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Coastal Confluences (CC) data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 35 samples exceed the criterion for Ammonia as N, Unionized.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin General Objective, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 (General Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries) states that the discharge of wastes shall not cause concentrations of unionized ammonia (NH3) to exceed 0.025 mg/l (as N) in receiving waters (page III-4) .
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Jalama Creek was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 315JAL-Jalama Creek u/s County Park at Rail Road Trussels]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 2/13/2001-11/1/2006. CCAMP Coastal confluence monitoring is conducted monthly (with the exception of April 2003 - December 2003) and is ongoing.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 127473, Ammonia Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	50334
Pollutant:	Ammonia as Nitrogen
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	26
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Water Board Staff assessed public submissions data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 26 samples exceed the criterion for Ammonia As N, Total.
Data Reference:	Coastal Confluences field data 2007-2010
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Basin Plan).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Data for Various Pollutants in Westside San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009.
Evaluation Guideline:	EPA's Lifetime Health advisory level for total ammonia is 30.0 mg/L as stated on page 8 of the 2006 edition of the drinking water standards and health advisories. This Advisory Level is defined as "the concentration of a chemical in drinking water that is not expected to cause any adverse noncarcinogenic effects for up to ten days of exposure."
Guideline Reference:	2006 edition of the drinking water standards and health advisories. EPA 822-R-03-013
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Jalama Creek was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 315JAL-Jalama Creek u/s County Park]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 4/16/2007-6/23/2010.
Environmental Conditions:	Central Coast Water Board Staff are not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):	Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 127473, Ammonia Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	219431
Pollutant:	Ammonia (Unionized)
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Total
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	25
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB3 CCAMP Coastal Confluences data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 25 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. Although a total of 79 samples were collected, 54 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5.
Data Reference:	Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3.
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin General Objective, Chapter 3, Section 3.3.2 (Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries) states that the discharge of wastes shall not cause concentrations of unionized ammonia (NH3) to exceed 0.025 mg/L (as N) in receiving waters (page 32).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (315JAL).
Temporal Representation:	Data for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2010-07-15 to 2018-12-13
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	SWAMP 2008, SWAMP 2017
QAPP Information Reference(s):	Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 127473, Ammonia Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	184010
Pollutant:	Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia)
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Total
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	81
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB3 CCAMP Coastal Confluences data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 81 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N.
Data Reference:	Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3.
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin
Evaluation Guideline:	EPA's Lifetime Health advisory level for total ammonia is 30.0 mg/L as stated on page 8 of the 2012 edition of the drinking water standards and health advisories. This Advisory Level is defined as 'the concentration of a chemical in drinking water that is not expected to cause any adverse noncarcinogenic effects for a lifetime of exposure.'
Guideline Reference:	2018 Edition of the Drinking Water Standards and Health Advisories
Spatial Representation:	The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (315JAL)
Temporal Representation:	The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-07-15 and 2018-12-13
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	SWAMP 2008, SWAMP 2017
QAPP Information Reference(s):	Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program

DECISION ID	110503	Region 3
Jalama Creek

Pollutant:	Arsenic
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018)
Revision Status	Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the Clean Water Act (CWA) section 303(d) List under sections 3.1 and 3.6 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.6 at least two lines of evidence are necessary to assess listing status for pollutants in sediment. The pollutant concentration in sediment must be associated with toxicity to result in addition of the pollutant to the CWA section 303(d) List. A total of three lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. For the water matrix, a total of zero of two samples exceed the water quality objective for the agricultural supply beneficial use and zero of two samples exceed the evaluation guideline for the municipal and domestic supply beneficial use. For the sediment matrix, a total of zero of one sample exceeds the evaluation guideline for the warm freshwater habitat beneficial use. These data are insufficient to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating with the power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. For the water matrix, a total of zero of two samples exceed the water quality objective for the agricultural supply beneficial use and zero of two samples exceed the evaluation guideline for the municipal and domestic supply beneficial use. For the sediment matrix, a total of zero of one sample exceeds the evaluation guideline for the warm freshwater habitat beneficial use. This does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 110503, Arsenic Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	15788
Pollutant:	Arsenic
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Sediment
Matrix:	Sediment
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	1
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (00SW3001) data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Arsenic.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	In fresh water sediments the probable effects level (predictive of sediment toxicity) for arsenic is 33 mg/Kg dry weight (MacDonald et al. 2000).
Guideline Reference:	Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment effect concentrations for polychlorinated biphenyls. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 19(5): 1403-1413
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Jalama Creek was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 315JAL-Jalama Creek u/s County Park at Rail Road Trussels]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected on a single day 3/28/2002. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 110503, Arsenic Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	158297
Pollutant:	Arsenic
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Total
Beneficial Use:	Agricultural Supply
Number of Samples:	2
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB3 CCAMP Coastal Confluences data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Arsenic.
Data Reference:	Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3.
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts which adversely affect the agricultural beneficial use. In addition, waters used for irrigation and livestock watering shall not exceed concentrations for those chemicals listed in the Central Coast Basin Plan and identified as the maximum concentration for arsenic for irrigation supply as 0.1 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (315JAL)
Temporal Representation:	The samples were collected between the dates of 2013-06-19 and 2016-03-23
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	SWAMP 2008, SWAMP 2017
QAPP Information Reference(s):	Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 110503, Arsenic Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	158316
Pollutant:	Arsenic
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Total
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	2
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB3 CCAMP Coastal Confluences data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Arsenic.
Data Reference:	Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3.
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin
Evaluation Guideline:	The California Maximum Contaminant Level for Arsenic is 10 ug/L.
Guideline Reference:	California MCLs - Title 17 and Title 22 documents for 2019 - California Regulations Related to Drinking Water
Spatial Representation:	The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (315JAL)
Temporal Representation:	The samples were collected between the dates of 2013-06-19 and 2016-03-23
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	SWAMP 2008, SWAMP 2017
QAPP Information Reference(s):	Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program

DECISION ID	110504	Region 3
Jalama Creek

Pollutant:	Boron
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018)
Revision Status	Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Four lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Three of the 115 boron (dissolved) samples and 1 of the 56 boron (total) samples exceed the water quality objective for agricultural uses. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Three of the 115 boron (dissolved) samples and 1 of the 56 boron (total) samples exceed the water quality objective and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 110504, Boron Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	159483
Pollutant:	Boron
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Dissolved
Beneficial Use:	Agricultural Supply
Number of Samples:	54
Number of Exceedances:	1
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB3 CCAMP Coastal Confluences data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 54 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Boron.
Data Reference:	Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3.
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts which adversely affect the agricultural beneficial use. In addition, waters used for irrigation and livestock watering shall not exceed concentrations for those chemicals listed in the Central Coast Basin Plan and identified as the maximum concentration for boron for irrigation supply as 0.75 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (315JAL)
Temporal Representation:	The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-07-15 and 2018-12-13
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	SWAMP 2008, SWAMP 2017
QAPP Information Reference(s):	Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 110504, Boron Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	50326
Pollutant:	Boron
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Dissolved
Beneficial Use:	Agricultural Supply
Number of Samples:	26
Number of Exceedances:	2
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Water Board Staff assessed public submissions data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 26 samples exceed the criterion for Boron, dissolved.
Data Reference:	Coastal Confluences field data 2007-2010
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts which adversely affect the agricultural beneficial use. In addition, waters used for irrigation and livestock watering shall not exceed concentrations for those chemicals listed in Table 3-4 (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland and Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries). Table 3-4 (page III-9) lists the maximum concentration for boron for irrigation supply is 0.75 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Data for Various Pollutants in Westside San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009.
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Jalama Creek was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 315JAL-Jalama Creek u/s County Park]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 4/16/2007-6/23/2010.
Environmental Conditions:	Central Coast Water Board Staff are not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):	Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 110504, Boron Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	159251
Pollutant:	Boron
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Total
Beneficial Use:	Agricultural Supply
Number of Samples:	56
Number of Exceedances:	1
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB3 CCAMP Coastal Confluences data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 56 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Boron.
Data Reference:	Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3.
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts which adversely affect the agricultural beneficial use. In addition, waters used for irrigation and livestock watering shall not exceed concentrations for those chemicals listed in the Central Coast Basin Plan and identified as the maximum concentration for boron for irrigation supply as 0.75 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (315JAL)
Temporal Representation:	The samples were collected between the dates of 2012-09-25 and 2018-12-13
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	SWAMP 2008, SWAMP 2017
QAPP Information Reference(s):	Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 110504, Boron Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	10567
Pollutant:	Boron
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Dissolved
Beneficial Use:	Agricultural Supply
Number of Samples:	35
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Coastal Confluences (CC) data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 35 samples exceed the criterion for Boron, dissolved.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts which adversely affect the agricultural beneficial use. In addition, waters used for irrigation and livestock watering shall not exceed concentrations for those chemicals listed in Table 3.4 (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland and Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries). Table 3-4 (page III-9) lists the maximum concentration for boron for irrigation supply is 0.75 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Jalama Creek was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 315JAL-Jalama Creek u/s County Park at Rail Road Trussels]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 2/13/2001-11/1/2006. CCAMP Coastal confluence monitoring is conducted monthly (with the exception of April 2003 - December 2003) and is ongoing.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	110505	Region 3
Jalama Creek

Pollutant:	Cadmium
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018)
Revision Status	Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) list under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Four lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Zero of 2 water samples exceed the evaluation guidelines used to interpret the narrative water quality objective for aquatic life protection, municipal or domestic water supply, or agricultural beneficial uses. Zero of 1 sediment samples exceed the evaluation guidelines used to interpret the narrative water quality objective for aquatic habitat beneficial uses. A minimum of 16 samples is needed to determine if a beneficial use is supported and a minimum of two exceedances is needed to determine if beneficial uses are not supported using table 3.1. Therefore, the use support ratings are set to 'insufficient information'. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) list in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Zero of 2 water samples exceed the evaluation guidelines used to interpret the narrative water quality objective for aquatic life protection, municipal or domestic water supply, or agricultural beneficial uses. Zero of 1 sediment samples exceed the evaluation guidelines used to interpret the narrative water quality objective for aquatic habitat beneficial uses and these sample sizes are insufficient to determine with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy if standards are not met. A minimum of 16 samples is needed for application of table 3.1. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 110505, Cadmium Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	15569
Pollutant:	Cadmium
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Sediment
Matrix:	Sediment
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	1
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (00SW3001) data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Cadmium.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	In fresh water sediments the probable effects level (predictive of sediment toxicity) for cadmium is 4.98 mg/Kg dry weight (MacDonald et al. 2000).
Guideline Reference:	Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment effect concentrations for polychlorinated biphenyls. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 19(5): 1403-1413
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Jalama Creek was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 315JAL-Jalama Creek u/s County Park at Rail Road Trussels]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected on a single day 3/28/2002. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 110505, Cadmium Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	159610
Pollutant:	Cadmium
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Dissolved
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	2
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB3 CCAMP Coastal Confluences data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Cadmium.
Data Reference:	Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3.
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	California Toxics Rule (CTR) lists criterion continuous concentrations to protect aquatic life in freshwater. The criterion in freshwater is hardness dependent for each sample and varies based on the ambient hardness during sampling. Section (b)(1) in CTR contains the hardness dependent formula for the metals criterion.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (315JAL)
Temporal Representation:	The samples were collected between the dates of 2013-06-19 and 2016-03-23
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	SWAMP 2008, SWAMP 2017
QAPP Information Reference(s):	Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 110505, Cadmium Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	160063
Pollutant:	Cadmium
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Total
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	2
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB3 CCAMP Coastal Confluences data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Cadmium.
Data Reference:	Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3.
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin
Evaluation Guideline:	The California Maximum Contaminant Level for cadmium is 0.005 mg/L (California Code of Regulations, Title 22).
Guideline Reference:	California MCLs - Title 17 and Title 22 documents for 2019 - California Regulations Related to Drinking Water
Spatial Representation:	The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (315JAL)
Temporal Representation:	The samples were collected between the dates of 2013-06-19 and 2016-03-23
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	SWAMP 2008, SWAMP 2017
QAPP Information Reference(s):	Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 110505, Cadmium Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	159612
Pollutant:	Cadmium
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Total
Beneficial Use:	Agricultural Supply
Number of Samples:	2
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB3 CCAMP Coastal Confluences data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Cadmium.
Data Reference:	Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3.
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts which adversely affect the agricultural beneficial use. In addition, waters used for irrigation and livestock watering shall not exceed concentrations for those chemicals listed in the Central Coast Basin Plan and identified as the maximum concentration for cadmium for irrigation supply as 0.01 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (315JAL)
Temporal Representation:	The samples were collected between the dates of 2013-06-19 and 2016-03-23
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	SWAMP 2008, SWAMP 2017
QAPP Information Reference(s):	Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program

DECISION ID	130121	Region 3
Jalama Creek

Pollutant:	Chlorpyrifos
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018)
Revision Status	Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under sections 3.1 and 3.6 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Under section 3.6 at least two lines of evidence are necessary to assess listing status for pollutants in sediment. The pollutant concentration in sediment must be associated with toxicity to result in addition of the pollutant to the CWA section 303(d) List. One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. - Note, LOE 47730 was removed from this decision because it summarize data from sediment pore water and the evaluation guideline is not relevant for this matrix. Zero of two water samples exceed the evaluation guideline (Siepmann and Finlayson 2000, with minor corrections to significant figures as described in Beaulaurier et al., 2005) applied to protect for aquatic life beneficial uses. This decision will not use two of the water samples collected because the laboratorys method detection limit and reporting limits were greater than the evaluation guideline and the result was non-detect. Therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy. This sample size is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. A minimum of 16 samples is needed to determine if a beneficial use is supported using table 3.1. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. No samples exceeded the evaluation guideline (Siepmann and Finlayson 2000, with minor corrections to significant figures as described in Beaulaurier et al., 2005) and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 130121, Chlorpyrifos Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	16121
Pollutant:	Chlorpyrifos
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	2
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (00SW3001) data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceed the criterion for Chlorpyrifos.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water quality criteria for diazinon and chlorpyrifos. Administrative Report 00-3. Rancho Cordova, CA: Pesticide Investigations Unit, Office of Spills and Response. CA Department of Fish and Game
Evaluation Guideline:	One hour average maximum concentration 0.025 ug/L as stated in Sipmann and Finlayson (2000).
Guideline Reference:	Water quality criteria for diazinon and chlorpyrifos. Administrative Report 00-3. Rancho Cordova, CA: Pesticide Investigations Unit, Office of Spills and Response. CA Department of Fish and Game
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Jalama Creek was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 315JAL-Jalama Creek u/s County Park at Rail Road Trussels]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 12/12/2001-3/27/2002. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	110521	Region 3
Jalama Creek

Pollutant:	Chromium
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018)
Revision Status	Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Regional Board Conclusion:	Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. This sample size is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. A minimum of 16 samples is needed to determine if a beneficial use is supported using table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available.
Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 110521, Chromium Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	161923
Pollutant:	Chromium
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Total
Beneficial Use:	Agricultural Supply
Number of Samples:	2
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB3 CCAMP Coastal Confluences data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chromium.
Data Reference:	Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3.
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts which adversely affect the agricultural beneficial use. In addition, waters used for irrigation and livestock watering shall not exceed concentrations for those chemicals listed in the Central Coast Basin Plan and identified as the maximum concentration for chromium for irrigation supply is 0.10 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (315JAL)
Temporal Representation:	The samples were collected between the dates of 2013-06-19 and 2016-03-23
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	SWAMP 2008, SWAMP 2017
QAPP Information Reference(s):	Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 110521, Chromium Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	16011
Pollutant:	Chromium (total)
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Sediment
Matrix:	Sediment
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	1
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (00SW3001) data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Chromium.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	In fresh water sediments the probable effects level (predictive of sediment toxicity) for chromium is 111 mg/Kg dry weight (MacDonald et al. 2000).
Guideline Reference:	Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment effect concentrations for polychlorinated biphenyls. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 19(5): 1403-1413
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Jalama Creek was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 315JAL-Jalama Creek u/s County Park at Rail Road Trussels]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected on a single day 3/28/2002. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 110521, Chromium Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	161745
Pollutant:	Chromium
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Total
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	2
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB3 CCAMP Coastal Confluences data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chromium.
Data Reference:	Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3.
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All inland surface waters, enclosed bays, and estuaries shall not contain concentrations of inorganic chemicals in excess of the maximum contaminant levels for primary drinking water standards specified in California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 4, Chapter 15, Sections 64431 and 64433.2.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin
Evaluation Guideline:	The California Maximum Contaminant Level for total chromium is 0.05 mg/L (California Code of Regulations, Title 22).
Guideline Reference:	California MCLs - Title 17 and Title 22 documents for 2019 - California Regulations Related to Drinking Water
Spatial Representation:	The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (315JAL)
Temporal Representation:	The samples were collected between the dates of 2013-06-19 and 2016-03-23
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	SWAMP 2008, SWAMP 2017
QAPP Information Reference(s):	Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program

DECISION ID	110508	Region 3
Jalama Creek

Pollutant:	Copper
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018)
Revision Status	Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the Clean Water Act (CWA) section 303(d) List under section 3.1 and 3.6 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.6 at least two lines of evidence are necessary to assess listing status for pollutants in sediment. The pollutant concentration in sediment must be associated with toxicity to result in addition of the pollutant to the Section 303(d) List. A total of four lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. For the water matrix, a total of zero of 76 samples exceed the water quality objective for the agricultural supply beneficial use, zero of 76 samples exceed the water quality objective for the municipal and domestic supply beneficial use and zero of 56 samples exceed the water quality objective for the warm freshwater habitat beneficial use. For the sediment matrix, a total of zero of one sample exceeds the evaluation guideline for the warm freshwater habitat beneficial use. After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the CWA section 303(d) List. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. For the water matrix, a total of zero of 76 samples exceed the water quality objective for the agricultural supply beneficial use, zero of 76 samples exceed the water quality objective for the municipal and domestic supply beneficial use and zero of 56 samples exceed the water quality objective for the warm freshwater habitat beneficial use. For the sediment matrix, a total of zero of one sample exceeds the evaluation guideline for the warm freshwater habitat beneficial use. This does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 110508, Copper Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	15941
Pollutant:	Copper
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Sediment
Matrix:	Sediment
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	1
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (00SW3001) data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Copper.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	In fresh water sediments the probable effects level (predictive of sediment toxicity) for cooper is 149 mg/Kg dry weight (MacDonald et al. 2000).
Guideline Reference:	Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment effect concentrations for polychlorinated biphenyls. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 19(5): 1403-1413
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Jalama Creek was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 315JAL-Jalama Creek u/s County Park at Rail Road Trussels]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected on a single day 3/28/2002. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 110508, Copper Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	162423
Pollutant:	Copper
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Total
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	76
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB3 CCAMP Coastal Confluences data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 76 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Copper.
Data Reference:	Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3.
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	The Copper criteria for the protection of human health from the consumption of water and organisms is 1.300 mg/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (315JAL)
Temporal Representation:	The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-01-05 and 2018-12-13
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	SWAMP 2008, SWAMP 2017
QAPP Information Reference(s):	Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 110508, Copper Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	162806
Pollutant:	Copper
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Dissolved
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	56
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB3 CCAMP Coastal Confluences data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 56 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Copper. Although a total of 76 samples were collected, 20 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5.
Data Reference:	Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3.
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	California Toxics Rule (CTR) lists criterion continuous concentrations to protect aquatic life in freshwater. The criterion in freshwater is hardness dependent for each sample and varies based on the ambient hardness during sampling. Section (b)(1) in CTR contains the hardness dependent formula for the metals criterion.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (315JAL).
Temporal Representation:	Data for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2011-01-05 to 2018-12-13
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	SWAMP 2008, SWAMP 2017
QAPP Information Reference(s):	Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 110508, Copper Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	163047
Pollutant:	Copper
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Total
Beneficial Use:	Agricultural Supply
Number of Samples:	76
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB3 CCAMP Coastal Confluences data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 76 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Copper.
Data Reference:	Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3.
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts which adversely affect the agricultural beneficial use. In addition, waters used for irrigation and livestock watering shall not exceed concentrations for those chemicals listed in the Central Coast Basin Plan and identified as the maximum concentration for copper for irrigation supply as 0.2 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (315JAL)
Temporal Representation:	The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-01-05 and 2018-12-13
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	SWAMP 2008, SWAMP 2017
QAPP Information Reference(s):	Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program

DECISION ID	130122	Region 3
Jalama Creek

Pollutant:	Diazinon
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018)
Revision Status	Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under sections 3.1 and 3.6 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Under section 3.6 at least two lines of evidence are necessary to assess listing status for pollutants in sediment. The pollutant concentration in sediment must be associated with toxicity to result in addition of the pollutant to the CWA section 303(d) List. Three lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. - Note, LOEs47677 and 47661 were removed from this decision because it summarize data from sediment pore water and the evaluation guideline is not relevant for this matrix. Zero of the 2 samples exceed the evaluation guideline (Finlayson, 2004) applied to protect for aquatic life beneficial uses. This sample size is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. A minimum of 16 samples is needed to determine if a beneficial use is supported using table 3.1. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. No samples exceeded the evaluation guideline (Finlayson, 2004) applied to protect for aquatic life beneficial uses and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 130122, Diazinon Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	16814
Pollutant:	Diazinon
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	2
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (00SW3001) data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceed the criterion for Diazinon.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water quality criteria for diazinon and chlorpyrifos. Administrative Report 00-3. Rancho Cordova, CA: Pesticide Investigations Unit, Office of Spills and Response. CA Department of Fish and Game
Evaluation Guideline:	One hour average maximum concentration 0.16 ug/L as stated in Sipmann and Finlayson (2000).
Guideline Reference:	Water quality criteria for diazinon and chlorpyrifos. Administrative Report 00-3. Rancho Cordova, CA: Pesticide Investigations Unit, Office of Spills and Response. CA Department of Fish and Game
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Jalama Creek was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 315JAL-Jalama Creek u/s County Park at Rail Road Trussels]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 12/12/2001-3/27/2002. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	130196	Region 3
Jalama Creek

Pollutant:	Fecal Coliform
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018)
Revision Status	Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.3 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.3 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. The State Water Boards Water Quality Control Plan for Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries of California (the ISWEBE Plan) contains two bacteria water quality objectives applicable to the REC-1 beneficial use which were adopted on August 7, 2018: where the salinity level of a waterbody is equal to or less than 1 part per thousand 95 percent or more of the time, the E. coli bacteria objective applies; and where the salinity level of a waterbody is greater than 1 part per thousand 95 percent or more of the time, the Enterococci bacteria objective applies. These objectives supersede the fecal coliform water quality objective for water contact recreation uses. Therefore, the fecal coliform objective for water contact recreation is not applicable to this waterbody and those LOEs have been removed from this decision. However, three lines of evidence (LOEs) are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant and the non-contact recreation use. Three of the 139 samples exceed the water quality objective for non-contact recreation. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Three of the 139 samples exceed the water quality objective for non-contact recreation, and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.2 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the CWA section 303(d) List because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 130196, Fecal Coliform Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	50352
Pollutant:	Fecal Coliform
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Non-Contact Recreation
Number of Samples:	26
Number of Exceedances:	1
Data and Information Type:	PATHOGEN MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Water Board Staff assessed public submissions data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 26 samples exceed the criterion for Coliform, Fecal.
Data Reference:	Coastal Confluences field data 2007-2010
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	The Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin objective for non-contact water recreation uses (Section II.A.2. Objectives for All Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries, II.A.2.a) states the following: Fecal coliform concentration, based on a minimum of not less than five samples for any 30-day period, shall not exceed a log mean of 2000/100 ml, nor shall more than ten percent of samples collected during any 30-day period exceed 4000/100 ml.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Data for Various Pollutants in Westside San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009.
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Jalama Creek was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 315JAL-Jalama Creek u/s County Park]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 4/16/2007-6/23/2010.
Environmental Conditions:	Central Coast Water Board Staff are not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):	Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 130196, Fecal Coliform Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	12336
Pollutant:	Fecal Coliform
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Non-Contact Recreation
Number of Samples:	34
Number of Exceedances:	2
Data and Information Type:	PATHOGEN MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Coastal Confluences (CC) data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 34 samples exceed the criterion for Coliform, Fecal.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	The Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin objective for non-contact water recreation uses (Section II.A.2. Objectives for All Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries, II.A.2.a) states the following: Fecal coliform concentration, based on a minimum of not less than five samples for any 30-day period, shall not exceed a log mean of 2000/100 ml, nor shall more than ten percent of samples collected during any 30-day period exceed 4000/100 ml.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Jalama Creek was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 315JAL-Jalama Creek u/s County Park at Rail Road Trussels]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 2/13/2001-11/1/2006. CCAMP Coastal confluence monitoring is conducted monthly (with the exception of April 2003 - December 2003) and is ongoing.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 130196, Fecal Coliform Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	150087
Pollutant:	Fecal Coliform
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Non-Contact Recreation
Number of Samples:	79
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PATHOGEN MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Water Board staff assessed data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 79 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Coliform, Fecal. The water quality threshold is based on a 10% exceedance rate that is calculated for a 30-Day peroid.
Data Reference:	Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3.
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	The Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin objective for non-contact water recreation uses (Section 3.3.2. Objectives for All Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries) states the following: Fecal coliform concentration, based on a minimum of not less than five samples for any 30-day period, shall not exceed a log mean of 2000/100 mL, nor shall more than ten percent of samples collected during any 30-day period exceed 4000/100 mL.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): 315JAL
Temporal Representation:	The samples were collected between the days of 2010-07-15 and 2018-12-13 .
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	SWAMP 2008, SWAMP 2017
QAPP Information Reference(s):	Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program

DECISION ID	110509	Region 3
Jalama Creek

Pollutant:	Lead
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018)
Revision Status	Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under sections 3.1 and 3.6 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 at least one line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status, but under section 3.6 at least two lines of evidence are necessary to assess listing status and the pollutant concentration in sediment must be associated with toxicity to result in addition of the pollutant to the section 303(d) List. Four lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Zero of one sediment samples and zero of two dissolved water samples exceed the evaluation guideline used to interpret the narrative water quality objective for aquatic life protection. Zero of two dissolved lead water samples exceed the evaluation guideline for Agriculture Supply and Municipal & Domestic Supply beneficial uses. This sample size is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. A minimum of 16 samples is needed to determine if a beneficial use is supported and a minimum of two exceedances is needed to determine if beneficial uses are not supported using table 3.1. Therefore, the use support rating is set to 'insufficient information.' Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. No samples exceed the evaluation guidelines and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) List. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 110509, Lead Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	17262
Pollutant:	Lead
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Sediment
Matrix:	Sediment
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	1
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (00SW3001) data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Lead.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	In fresh water sediments the probable effects level (predictive of sediment toxicity) for lead is 128 mg/Kg dry weight (MacDonald et al. 2000).
Guideline Reference:	Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment effect concentrations for polychlorinated biphenyls. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 19(5): 1403-1413
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Jalama Creek was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 315JAL-Jalama Creek u/s County Park at Rail Road Trussels]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected on a single day 3/28/2002. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 110509, Lead Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	233324
Pollutant:	Lead
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Total
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	2
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB3 CCAMP Coastal Confluences data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Lead.
Data Reference:	Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3.
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All inland surface waters, enclosed bays, and estuaries shall not contain concentrations of organic chemicals in excess of the maximum contaminant levels for primary drinking water standards specified in California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 4, Chapter 15, Article 5.5, Section 64444, Table 64444-A.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin
Evaluation Guideline:	The California Maximum Contaminant Level for lead is 15 ug/L (California Code of Regulations, Title 22).
Guideline Reference:	California MCLs - Title 17 and Title 22 documents for 2019 - California Regulations Related to Drinking Water
Spatial Representation:	The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (315JAL)
Temporal Representation:	The samples were collected between the dates of 2013-06-19 and 2016-03-23
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	SWAMP 2008, SWAMP 2017
QAPP Information Reference(s):	Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 110509, Lead Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	168116
Pollutant:	Lead
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Dissolved
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	2
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB3 CCAMP Coastal Confluences data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Lead.
Data Reference:	Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3.
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	California Toxics Rule (CTR) lists criterion continuous concentrations to protect aquatic life in freshwater. The criterion in freshwater is hardness dependent for each sample and varies based on the ambient hardness during sampling. Section (b)(1) in CTR contains the hardness dependent formula for the metals criterion.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (315JAL)
Temporal Representation:	The samples were collected between the dates of 2013-06-19 and 2016-03-23
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	SWAMP 2008, SWAMP 2017
QAPP Information Reference(s):	Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 110509, Lead Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	168028
Pollutant:	Lead
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Total
Beneficial Use:	Agricultural Supply
Number of Samples:	2
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB3 CCAMP Coastal Confluences data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Lead.
Data Reference:	Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3.
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts which adversely affect the agricultural beneficial use. In addition, waters used for irrigation and livestock watering shall not exceed concentrations for those chemicals listed in the Central Coast Basin Plan and identified as the maximum concentration for lead for livestock watering as 0.1 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (315JAL)
Temporal Representation:	The samples were collected between the dates of 2013-06-19 and 2016-03-23
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	SWAMP 2008, SWAMP 2017
QAPP Information Reference(s):	Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program

DECISION ID	110510	Region 3
Jalama Creek

Pollutant:	Manganese
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	New Decision
Revision Status	Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the Clean Water Act (CWA) section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. A total of one line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. A total of zero of two samples exceed the water quality objective for the agricultural supply beneficial use. These data are insufficient to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating with the power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the CWA section 303(d) List. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. A total of zero of two samples exceed the water quality objective for the agricultural supply beneficial use. This does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
State Board Decision Recommendation:

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 110510, Manganese Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	168747
Pollutant:	Manganese
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Total
Beneficial Use:	Agricultural Supply
Number of Samples:	2
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB3 CCAMP Coastal Confluences data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Manganese.
Data Reference:	Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3.
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts which adversely affect the agricultural beneficial use. In addition, waters used for irrigation and livestock watering shall not exceed concentrations for those chemicals listed in the Central Coast Basin Plan identified as the maximum concentration for manganese for irrigation supply as 0.2 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (315JAL)
Temporal Representation:	The samples were collected between the dates of 2013-06-19 and 2016-03-23
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	SWAMP 2008, SWAMP 2017
QAPP Information Reference(s):	Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program

DECISION ID	130725	Region 3
Jalama Creek

Pollutant:	Mercury
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018)
Revision Status	Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) List under section 3.1 and section 3.6 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Under section 3.6 at least two lines of evidence are necessary to assess listing status for pollutants in sediment. The pollutant concentration in sediment must be associated with toxicity to result in addition of the pollutant to the 303(d) List. Five lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Four LOEs summarize water samples: - Zero of one water sample exceeds the mercury evaluation guideline (National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, EPA 2016), set to protect for aquatic life beneficial uses. - Zero of one water sample exceeds the mercury evaluation guideline (California Toxics Rule, 2000), set to protect for the commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms beneficial use. - Zero of one water sample exceeds the mercury water quality objective (Basin Plan), set to protect for agricultural supply beneficial use. - Zero of one water sample exceeds the mercury evaluation guideline (California Toxics Rule, 2000), set to protect for the municipal and domestic supply beneficial use. One LOE summarizes sediment samples. Zero of one sediment samples exceeds the mercury evaluation guideline (MacDonald et al., 2000a) set to protect for aquatic life beneficial uses. After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) List. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. No water or sediment samples exceeded the evaluation guidelines, and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) List. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 130725, Mercury Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	169159
Pollutant:	Mercury
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Total
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	1
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB3 CCAMP Coastal Confluences data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Mercury.
Data Reference:	Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3.
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	The mercury criteria for the protection of human health from the consumption of water and organisms for mercury is 0.050 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (315JAL)
Temporal Representation:	The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-03-23 and 2016-03-23
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	SWAMP 2008, SWAMP 2017
QAPP Information Reference(s):	Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 130725, Mercury Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	169371
Pollutant:	Mercury
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Total
Beneficial Use:	Agricultural Supply
Number of Samples:	1
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB3 CCAMP Coastal Confluences data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Mercury.
Data Reference:	Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3.
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts which adversely affect the agricultural beneficial use. In addition, waters used for irrigation and livestock watering shall not exceed concentrations for those chemicals listed in the Central Coast Basin Plan and identified as the maximum concentration for mercury for livestock watering as 0.01 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (315JAL)
Temporal Representation:	The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-03-23 and 2016-03-23
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	SWAMP 2008, SWAMP 2017
QAPP Information Reference(s):	Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 130725, Mercury Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	169162
Pollutant:	Mercury
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Total
Beneficial Use:	Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms
Number of Samples:	1
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB3 CCAMP Coastal Confluences data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Mercury.
Data Reference:	Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3.
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Human health risk associated with organism consumption is 0.051 ug/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (315JAL)
Temporal Representation:	The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-03-23 and 2016-03-23
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	SWAMP 2008, SWAMP 2017
QAPP Information Reference(s):	Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 130725, Mercury Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	17332
Pollutant:	Mercury
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Sediment
Matrix:	Sediment
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	1
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (00SW3001) data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Mercury.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	In fresh water sediments the probable effects level (predictive of sediment toxicity) for mercury is 1.06 mg/Kg dry weight (MacDonald et al. 2000).
Guideline Reference:	Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment effect concentrations for polychlorinated biphenyls. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 19(5): 1403-1413
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Jalama Creek was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 315JAL-Jalama Creek u/s County Park at Rail Road Trussels]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected on a single day 3/28/2002. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 130725, Mercury Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	169122
Pollutant:	Mercury
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Total
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	1
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB3 CCAMP Coastal Confluences data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Mercury.
Data Reference:	Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3.
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents known to be deleterious to fish or wildlife (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin
Evaluation Guideline:	The Criterion Continuous Concentration for freshwater aquatic life is 0.77 ug/L (National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, EPA 2016)
Guideline Reference:	National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water. Current as of 08/03/2016.
Spatial Representation:	The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (315JAL)
Temporal Representation:	The samples were collected between the dates of 2016-03-23 and 2016-03-23
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	SWAMP 2008, SWAMP 2017
QAPP Information Reference(s):	Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program

DECISION ID	110511	Region 3
Jalama Creek

Pollutant:	Nickel
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018)
Revision Status	Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the Clean Water Act (CWA) section 303(d) List under section 3.1 and 3.6 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.6 at least two lines of evidence are necessary to assess listing status for pollutants in sediment. The pollutant concentration in sediment must be associated with toxicity to result in addition of the pollutant to the Section 303(d) List. A total of five lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. For the water matrix, a total of zero of two samples exceed the water quality objective for the agricultural supply beneficial use, zero of two samples exceed the water quality objective for the commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms beneficial use, zero of two samples exceed the evaluation guideline for the municipal and domestic supply beneficial use and zero of two samples exceed the water quality objective for the warm freshwater habitat beneficial use. For the sediment matrix, a total of zero of one sample exceeds the evaluation guideline for the cold freshwater habitat beneficial use. These data are insufficient to determine the applicable beneficial use support rating with the power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the CWA section 303(d) List. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. For the water matrix, a total of zero of two samples exceed the water quality objective for the agricultural supply beneficial use, zero of two samples exceed the water quality objective for the commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms beneficial use, zero of two samples exceed the evaluation guideline for the municipal and domestic supply beneficial use and zero of two samples exceed the water quality objective for the warm freshwater habitat beneficial use. For the sediment matrix, a total of zero of one sample exceeds the evaluation guideline for the cold freshwater habitat beneficial use. This does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 110511, Nickel Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	170814
Pollutant:	Nickel
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Dissolved
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	2
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB3 CCAMP Coastal Confluences data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Nickel.
Data Reference:	Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3.
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	California Toxics Rule (CTR) lists criterion continuous concentrations to protect aquatic life in freshwater. The criterion in freshwater is hardness dependent for each sample and varies based on the ambient hardness during sampling. Section (b)(1) in CTR contains the hardness dependent formula for the metals criterion.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (315JAL)
Temporal Representation:	The samples were collected between the dates of 2013-06-19 and 2016-03-23
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	SWAMP 2008, SWAMP 2017
QAPP Information Reference(s):	Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 110511, Nickel Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	170879
Pollutant:	Nickel
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Total
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	2
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB3 CCAMP Coastal Confluences data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Nickel.
Data Reference:	Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3.
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall not contain concentrations of inorganic chemicals in excess of the maximum contaminant levels for primary drinking water standards specified in California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 4, Chapter 15, Sections 64431 and 64433.2 (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin)
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin
Evaluation Guideline:	The maximum contaminant level of nickel in public water systems shall be 0.1 mg/L (California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 4, Chapter 15, Sections 64431).
Guideline Reference:	California MCLs - Title 17 and Title 22 documents for 2019 - California Regulations Related to Drinking Water
Spatial Representation:	The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (315JAL)
Temporal Representation:	The samples were collected between the dates of 2013-06-19 and 2016-03-23
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	SWAMP 2008, SWAMP 2017
QAPP Information Reference(s):	Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 110511, Nickel Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	16982
Pollutant:	Nickel
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Sediment
Matrix:	Sediment
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	1
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (00SW3001) data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Nickel.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	In fresh water sediments the probable effects level (predictive of sediment toxicity) for nickel is 48.6 mg/Kg dry weight (MacDonald et al. 2000).
Guideline Reference:	Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment effect concentrations for polychlorinated biphenyls. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 19(5): 1403-1413
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Jalama Creek was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 315JAL-Jalama Creek u/s County Park at Rail Road Trussels]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected on a single day 3/28/2002. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 110511, Nickel Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	170699
Pollutant:	Nickel
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Total
Beneficial Use:	Commercial or recreational collection of fish, shellfish, or organisms
Number of Samples:	2
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB3 CCAMP Coastal Confluences data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Nickel.
Data Reference:	Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3.
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Human health risk associated with organism consumption is 4.6 mg/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (315JAL)
Temporal Representation:	The samples were collected between the dates of 2013-06-19 and 2016-03-23
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	SWAMP 2008, SWAMP 2017
QAPP Information Reference(s):	Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 110511, Nickel Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	170640
Pollutant:	Nickel
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Total
Beneficial Use:	Agricultural Supply
Number of Samples:	2
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB3 CCAMP Coastal Confluences data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Nickel.
Data Reference:	Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3.
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts which adversely affect the agricultural beneficial use. In addition, waters used for irrigation and livestock watering shall not exceed concentrations for those chemicals listed in the Central Coast Basin Plan and identified as the maximum concentration for nickel for irrigation supply as 0.2 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (315JAL)
Temporal Representation:	The samples were collected between the dates of 2013-06-19 and 2016-03-23
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	SWAMP 2008, SWAMP 2017
QAPP Information Reference(s):	Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program

DECISION ID	126799	Region 3
Jalama Creek

Pollutant:	Nitrate
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018)
Revision Status	Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Fourteen lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Lines of evidence for the pollutant name Nitrate and for the pollutant name Nitrogen, Nitrate are combined and sample and exceedance counts are summed for the purpose of making this decision. -Zero of the 137 nitrate samples and zero of the 51 nitrate/nitrite samples exceed the water quality objectives for the Agricultural Supply or the Municipal and Domestic Supply beneficial uses. -One of the 137 nitrate samples and one of the 51 nitrate/nitrite samples exceeds the water quality objective for the Warm Freshwater Habitat beneficial use. The Central Coast Region requires supporting evidence of eutrophication to support a nitrate listing at 1.0 mg/L for Cold and Warm Freshwater Habitat. Insufficient evidence was found to support nitrate as a cause of impairment for Warm Freshwater habitat. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Zero samples exceed the water quality objectives for the Agricultural Supply or the Municipal and Domestic Supply beneficial use. One of the samples exceeds the water quality objective for Warm Freshwater Habitat. These do not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) List because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 126799, Nitrate Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	50336
Pollutant:	Nitrate
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	26
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Water Board Staff assessed public submissions data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 26 samples exceed the criterion for Nitrate as N.
Data Reference:	Coastal Confluences field data 2007-2010
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	The California Maximum Contaminant Level for nitrate (NO3 as N) incorporated by reference in the Basin Plan is 10.0 mg/L (Basin Plan).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Data for Various Pollutants in Westside San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009.
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Jalama Creek was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 315JAL-Jalama Creek u/s County Park]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 4/16/2007-6/23/2010.
Environmental Conditions:	Central Coast Water Board Staff are not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):	Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 126799, Nitrate Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	172754
Pollutant:	Nitrogen, Nitrate
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Dissolved
Beneficial Use:	Agricultural Supply
Number of Samples:	76
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB3 CCAMP Coastal Confluences data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 76 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Nitrate as N.
Data Reference:	Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3.
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts which adversely affect the agricultural beneficial use. Interpretation of adverse effect shall be as derived from the University of California Agricultural Extension Service guidelines listed in the Central Coast Basin Plan and identified as the level that severe problems may occur when nitrate exceeds 30 mg/L (NO3 as N) in irrigation supply water.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (315JAL)
Temporal Representation:	The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-07-15 and 2018-12-13
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	SWAMP 2008, SWAMP 2017
QAPP Information Reference(s):	Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 126799, Nitrate Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	50329
Pollutant:	Nitrate
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Agricultural Supply
Number of Samples:	26
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Water Board Staff assessed public submissions data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 26 samples exceed the criterion for Nitrate as N.
Data Reference:	Coastal Confluences field data 2007-2010
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts which adversely affect the agricultural beneficial use. Interpretation of adverse effect shall be as derived from the University of California Agricultural Extension Service guidelines provided in Table 3-3 (Central Coast Waterboard Basin Plan, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland and Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries). In Table 3-3 of the Basin Plan (page III-8), water quality guidelines state that severe problems may occur when nitrate exceeds 30 mg/L NO3 as N in irrigation supply water.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Data for Various Pollutants in Westside San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009.
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Jalama Creek was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 315JAL-Jalama Creek u/s County Park]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 4/16/2007-6/23/2010.
Environmental Conditions:	Central Coast Water Board Staff are not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):	Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 126799, Nitrate Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	10583
Pollutant:	Nitrate
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	35
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Coastal Confluences (CC) data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 35 samples exceed the criterion for Nitrate as N.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	The Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin Objective for municipal and domestic supply uses of inland surface waters (Section II.A.2) states the following: waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in excess of the limits specified in California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Article 4, Chapter 15, Section 64435, Tables 2 and 3 as listed in Table 3-2. The maximum contaminant level listed in Table 3-2 (inorganic and fluoride concentrations not to be exceeded in domestic or municipal supply) for nitrate is 10.0 mg/L (NO3 as N).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Title 22, Division 4, Ch. 15, Article 4, Section 64431, Table 64431-A
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Jalama Creek was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 315JAL-Jalama Creek u/s County Park at Rail Road Trussels]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 2/13/2001-11/1/2006. CCAMP Coastal confluence monitoring is conducted monthly (with the exception of April 2003 - December 2003) and is ongoing.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 126799, Nitrate Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	172456
Pollutant:	Nitrogen, Nitrate
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Dissolved
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	76
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB3 CCAMP Coastal Confluences data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 76 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Nitrate as N.
Data Reference:	Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3.
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall not contain biostimulatory substances in concentrations that promote aquatic growths to the extent that such growths cause nuisance or adversely affect beneficial uses (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin
Evaluation Guideline:	Technical approach to develop nutrient numeric endpoints for California, Tetra Tech, June 2006. The Central Coast Region numeric target for maximum nitrate concentration is based on the Tetra Tech NNE (Nutrient Numeric Endpoint) Model and CCAMP data for 193 sites, monitored monthly for at least 1 year between January 1998 and December 2006. The model numeric target for aquatic life habitats in the Central Coast Region is 1.0 mg/L Nitrate as N.
Guideline Reference:	Central Coast RegionTechnical Paper: Interpreting Narrative Objectives for Biostimulatory Substances for California Central Coast Waters. This method uses the Technical Approach for Developing California Nutrient Numeric Endpoints.
Spatial Representation:	The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (315JAL)
Temporal Representation:	The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-07-15 and 2018-12-13
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	SWAMP 2008, SWAMP 2017
QAPP Information Reference(s):	Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 126799, Nitrate Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	50367
Pollutant:	Nitrate
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	26
Number of Exceedances:	1
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Water Board Staff assessed public submissions data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 26 samples exceed the criterion for Nitrate as N.
Data Reference:	Coastal Confluences field data 2007-2010
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall not contain biostimulatory substances in concentrations that promote aquatic growths to the extent that such growths cause nuisance or adversely affect beneficial uses (Basin Plan).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Data for Various Pollutants in Westside San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009.
Evaluation Guideline:	Technical approach to develop nutrient numeric endpoints for California, Tetra Tech, June 2006. The Central Coast Region numeric target for maximum nitrate concentration is based on the Tetra Tech NNE (Nutrient Numeric Endpoint) Model and CCAMP data for 193 sites, monitored monthly for at least 1 year between January 1998 and December 2006. The model numeric target for aquatic life habitats in the Central Coast Region is 1.0 mg/L Nitrate as N.
Guideline Reference:	Technical Approach to Develop Nutrient Numeric Endpoints for California. U.S. EPA Region IX. State Water Resources Control Board. 68-C-02-108-To-111
Guideline Reference:	Central Coast RegionTechnical Paper: Interpreting Narrative Objectives for Biostimulatory Substances for California Central Coast Waters. This method uses the Technical Approach for Developing California Nutrient Numeric Endpoints.
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Jalama Creek was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 315JAL-Jalama Creek u/s County Park]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 4/16/2007-6/23/2010.
Environmental Conditions:	Central Coast Water Board Staff are not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):	Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 126799, Nitrate Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	50330
Pollutant:	Nitrate/Nitrite (Nitrite + Nitrate as N)
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Agricultural Supply
Number of Samples:	26
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Water Board Staff assessed public submissions data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 26 samples exceed the criterion for Nitrate/Nitrite as N.
Data Reference:	Coastal Confluences field data 2007-2010
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts which adversely affect the agricultural beneficial use. In addition, waters used for irrigation and livestock watering shall not exceed concentrations for those chemicals listed in Table 3-4 (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland and Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries). Table 3-4 (page III-9) lists the maximum concentration for nitrate + nitrite for livestock watering is 100 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Data for Various Pollutants in Westside San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009.
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Jalama Creek was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 315JAL-Jalama Creek u/s County Park]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 4/16/2007-6/23/2010.
Environmental Conditions:	Central Coast Water Board Staff are not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):	Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 126799, Nitrate Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	50337
Pollutant:	Nitrate/Nitrite (Nitrite + Nitrate as N)
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	26
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Water Board Staff assessed public submissions data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 26 samples exceed the criterion for Nitrate/Nitrite as N.
Data Reference:	Coastal Confluences field data 2007-2010
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	The California Maximum Contaminant Level for nitrate + nitrite (as N) that is incorporated by reference in the Basin Plan is 10.0 mg/L (Basin Plan).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Data for Various Pollutants in Westside San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009.
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Jalama Creek was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 315JAL-Jalama Creek u/s County Park]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 4/16/2007-6/23/2010.
Environmental Conditions:	Central Coast Water Board Staff are not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):	Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 126799, Nitrate Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	50368
Pollutant:	Nitrate/Nitrite (Nitrite + Nitrate as N)
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	26
Number of Exceedances:	1
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Water Board Staff assessed public submissions data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 26 samples exceed the criterion for Nitrate/Nitrite as N.
Data Reference:	Coastal Confluences field data 2007-2010
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall not contain biostimulatory substances in concentrations that promote aquatic growths to the extent that such growths cause nuisance or adversely affect beneficial uses (Basin Plan).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Data for Various Pollutants in Westside San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009.
Evaluation Guideline:	Technical approach to develop nutrient numeric endpoints for California, Tetra Tech, June 2006. The Central Coast Region numeric target for maximum nitrate concentration is based on the Tetra Tech NNE (Nutrient Numeric Endpoint) Model and CCAMP data for 193 sites, monitored monthly for at least 1 year between January 1998 and December 2006. The model numeric target for aquatic life habitats in the Central Coast Region is 1.0 mg/L Nitrate as N.
Guideline Reference:	Technical Approach to Develop Nutrient Numeric Endpoints for California. U.S. EPA Region IX. State Water Resources Control Board. 68-C-02-108-To-111
Guideline Reference:	Central Coast RegionTechnical Paper: Interpreting Narrative Objectives for Biostimulatory Substances for California Central Coast Waters. This method uses the Technical Approach for Developing California Nutrient Numeric Endpoints.
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Jalama Creek was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 315JAL-Jalama Creek u/s County Park]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 4/16/2007-6/23/2010.
Environmental Conditions:	Central Coast Water Board Staff are not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):	Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 126799, Nitrate Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	10582
Pollutant:	Nitrate
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Agricultural Supply
Number of Samples:	35
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Coastal Confluences (CC) data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 35 samples exceed the criterion for Nitrate as N.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts which adversely affect the agricultural beneficial use. Interpretation of adverse effect shall be as derived from the University of California Agricultural Extension Service guidelines provided in Table 3-3 (Central Coast Waterboard Basin Plan, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland and Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries). In Table 3-3 of the Basin Plan (page III-8), water quality guidelines state that severe problems may occur when nitrate exceeds 30 mg/L NO3 as N in irrigation supply water.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Jalama Creek was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 315JAL-Jalama Creek u/s County Park at Rail Road Trussels]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 2/13/2001-11/1/2006. CCAMP Coastal confluence monitoring is conducted monthly (with the exception of April 2003 - December 2003) and is ongoing.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 126799, Nitrate Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	171377
Pollutant:	Nitrate/Nitrite (Nitrite + Nitrate as N)
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Dissolved
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	25
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB3 CCAMP Coastal Confluences data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 25 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Nitrate + Nitrite as N.
Data Reference:	Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3.
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All inland surface waters, enclosed bays, and estuaries shall not contain concentrations of inorganic chemicals in excess of the maximum contaminant levels for primary drinking water standards specified in California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 4, Chapter 15, Sections 64431 and 64433.2.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin
Evaluation Guideline:	The California Maximum Contaminant Level for nitrate + nitrite (as N) is 10. mg/L (California Code of Regulations, Title 22).
Guideline Reference:	California MCLs - Title 17 and Title 22 documents for 2019 - California Regulations Related to Drinking Water
Spatial Representation:	The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (315JAL)
Temporal Representation:	The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-07-15 and 2012-08-23
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	SWAMP 2008, SWAMP 2017
QAPP Information Reference(s):	Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 126799, Nitrate Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	171378
Pollutant:	Nitrate/Nitrite (Nitrite + Nitrate as N)
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Dissolved
Beneficial Use:	Agricultural Supply
Number of Samples:	25
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB3 CCAMP Coastal Confluences data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 25 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Nitrate + Nitrite as N.
Data Reference:	Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3.
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts which adversely affect the agricultural beneficial use. In addition, waters used for irrigation and livestock watering shall not exceed concentrations for those chemicals listed in the Central Coast Basin Plan and identified as the maximum concentration for nitrate + nitrite for livestock watering as 100 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (315JAL)
Temporal Representation:	The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-07-15 and 2012-08-23
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	SWAMP 2008, SWAMP 2017
QAPP Information Reference(s):	Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 126799, Nitrate Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	171846
Pollutant:	Nitrate/Nitrite (Nitrite + Nitrate as N)
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Dissolved
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	25
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB3 CCAMP Coastal Confluences data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 25 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Nitrate + Nitrite as N.
Data Reference:	Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3.
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall not contain biostimulatory substances in concentrations that promote aquatic growths to the extent that such growths cause nuisance or adversely affect beneficial uses (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin
Evaluation Guideline:	Technical approach to develop nutrient numeric endpoints for California, Tetra Tech, June 2006. The Central Coast Region numeric target for maximum nitrate concentration is based on the Tetra Tech NNE (Nutrient Numeric Endpoint) Model and CCAMP data for 193 sites, monitored monthly for at least 1 year between January 1998 and December 2006. The model numeric target for aquatic life habitats in the Central Coast Region is 1.0 mg/L Nitrate as N.
Guideline Reference:	Central Coast RegionTechnical Paper: Interpreting Narrative Objectives for Biostimulatory Substances for California Central Coast Waters. This method uses the Technical Approach for Developing California Nutrient Numeric Endpoints.
Spatial Representation:	The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (315JAL)
Temporal Representation:	The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-07-15 and 2012-08-23
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	SWAMP 2008, SWAMP 2017
QAPP Information Reference(s):	Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 126799, Nitrate Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	172925
Pollutant:	Nitrogen, Nitrate
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Dissolved
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	76
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB3 CCAMP Coastal Confluences data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 76 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Nitrate as N.
Data Reference:	Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3.
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All inland surface waters, enclosed bays, and estuaries shall not contain concentrations of inorganic chemicals in excess of the maximum contaminant levels for primary drinking water standards specified in California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 4, Chapter 15, Sections 64431 and 64433.2.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin
Evaluation Guideline:	The California Maximum Contaminant Level for nitrate (as N) 10.0 mg/L (California Code of Regulations, Title 22).
Guideline Reference:	California MCLs - Title 17 and Title 22 documents for 2019 - California Regulations Related to Drinking Water
Spatial Representation:	The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (315JAL)
Temporal Representation:	The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-07-15 and 2018-12-13
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	SWAMP 2008, SWAMP 2017
QAPP Information Reference(s):	Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program

DECISION ID	130479	Region 3
Jalama Creek

Pollutant:	Nitrogen, Nitrite
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018)
Revision Status	Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the Clean Water Act (CWA) section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. A total of two lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Sample and exceedance counts for the lines of evidence with the fraction identified as “dissolved” are grouped together with those having the fraction “total”, based on the analytical method used. A total of zero of 105 samples exceed the water quality objective for the agricultural supply beneficial use. After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the CWA section 303(d) List. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. A total of zero of 105 samples exceed the water quality objective for the agricultural supply beneficial use. This does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 130479, Nitrogen, Nitrite Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	50331
Pollutant:	Nitrogen, Nitrite
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Agricultural Supply
Number of Samples:	26
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Water Board Staff assessed public submissions data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 26 samples exceed the criterion for Nitrite as N.
Data Reference:	Coastal Confluences field data 2007-2010
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts which adversely affect the agricultural beneficial use. In addition, waters used for irrigation and livestock watering shall not exceed concentrations for those chemicals listed in Table 3-4 (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland and Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries). Table 3-4 (page III-9) lists the maximum concentration for nitrite for livestock watering is 10 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Data for Various Pollutants in Westside San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009.
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Jalama Creek was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 315JAL-Jalama Creek u/s County Park]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 4/16/2007-6/23/2010.
Environmental Conditions:	Central Coast Water Board Staff are not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):	Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 130479, Nitrogen, Nitrite Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	173570
Pollutant:	Nitrogen, Nitrite
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Dissolved
Beneficial Use:	Agricultural Supply
Number of Samples:	79
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB3 CCAMP Coastal Confluences data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 79 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Nitrite as N.
Data Reference:	Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3.
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts which adversely affect the agricultural beneficial use. In addition, waters used for irrigation and livestock watering shall not exceed concentrations for those chemicalslisted in the Central Coast Basin Plan and identified as the maximum concentration for nitrite for livestock watering as 10 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (315JAL)
Temporal Representation:	The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-07-15 and 2018-12-13
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	SWAMP 2008, SWAMP 2017
QAPP Information Reference(s):	Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program

DECISION ID	110513	Region 3
Jalama Creek

Pollutant:	Oxygen, Dissolved
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018)
Revision Status	Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) List under section 3.2 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.2 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Six lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. One of 109 samples exceed the water quality objective for fish spawning (Basin Plan). One of 150 samples exceed the water quality objective for warm freshwater habitat (Basin Plan). Note that there is no difference between samples fractions ‘dissolved’ and ‘total,’ therefore sample and exceedance counts will be summed for the purpose of this decision. Previous decisions (pre-2020) included dissolved oxygen saturation LOEs as ancillary evidence. This decision will no longer include dissolved oxygen saturation and these LOEs will be retired next cycle. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) List in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. The data support the conclusion that the aquatic life and fish spawning beneficial uses are fully supported. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. One of 109 samples exceed the objective for fish spawning, and one of the 150 samples exceed the objective for warm freshwater habitat. These do not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.2 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) List because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 110513, Oxygen, Dissolved Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	50354
Pollutant:	Oxygen, Dissolved
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Dissolved
Beneficial Use:	Fish Spawning
Number of Samples:	26
Number of Exceedances:	1
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Water Board Staff assessed public submissions data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 26 samples exceed the criterion for Oxygen, Dissolved.
Data Reference:	Coastal Confluences field data 2007-2010
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	The dissolved oxygen concentration shall not be reduced below 7.0 mg/l at any time (Basin Plan).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Data for Various Pollutants in Westside San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009.
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Jalama Creek was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 315JAL-Jalama Creek u/s County Park]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 4/16/2007-6/23/2010.
Environmental Conditions:	Central Coast Water Board Staff are not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):	Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 110513, Oxygen, Dissolved Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	50369
Pollutant:	Oxygen, Dissolved
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Dissolved
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	26
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Water Board Staff assessed public submissions data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 26 samples exceed the criterion for Oxygen, Dissolved.
Data Reference:	Coastal Confluences field data 2007-2010
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	The dissolved oxygen concentration shall not be reduced below 5.0 mg/l at any time (Basin Plan).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Data for Various Pollutants in Westside San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009.
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Jalama Creek was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 315JAL-Jalama Creek u/s County Park]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 4/16/2007-6/23/2010.
Environmental Conditions:	Central Coast Water Board Staff are not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):	Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 110513, Oxygen, Dissolved Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	174647
Pollutant:	Oxygen, Dissolved
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Total
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	83
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB3 CCAMP Coastal Confluences data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 83 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved.
Data Reference:	Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3.
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	The dissolved oxygen concentration shall not be reduced below 5.0 mg/l at any time (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (315JAL)
Temporal Representation:	The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-07-15 and 2019-03-13
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	SWAMP 2008, SWAMP 2017
QAPP Information Reference(s):	Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 110513, Oxygen, Dissolved Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	14177
Pollutant:	Oxygen, Dissolved
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Dissolved
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	35
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Coastal Confluences (CC) data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 35 samples exceed the criterion for Oxygen, Dissolved.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 General Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries states the following: For waters not mentioned by a specific beneficial use, dissolved oxygen concentration shall not be reduced below 5.0 mg/l at any time.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Jalama Creek was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 315JAL-Jalama Creek u/s County Park at Rail Road Trussels]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 2/13/2001-11/1/2006. CCAMP Coastal confluence monitoring is conducted monthly (with the exception of April 2003 - December 2003) and is ongoing.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 110513, Oxygen, Dissolved Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	174969
Pollutant:	Oxygen, Dissolved
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Total
Beneficial Use:	Fish Spawning
Number of Samples:	83
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB3 CCAMP Coastal Confluences data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 83 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved.
Data Reference:	Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3.
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	The dissolved oxygen concentration shall not be reduced below 7.0 mg/l at any time (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (315JAL)
Temporal Representation:	The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-07-15 and 2019-03-13
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	SWAMP 2008, SWAMP 2017
QAPP Information Reference(s):	Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 110513, Oxygen, Dissolved Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	14198
Pollutant:	Oxygen, Dissolved
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Dissolved
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	6
Number of Exceedances:	1
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Diurnal Dissolved Oxygen Sampling (DO) data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 6 samples exceed the criterion for Oxygen, Dissolved.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 General Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries states the following: For waters not mentioned by a specific beneficial use, dissolved oxygen concentration shall not be reduced below 5.0 mg/l at any time.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Jalama Creek was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 315JAL-Jalama Creek u/s County Park at Rail Road Trussels]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 8/10/2004-8/11/2006. Diurnal monitoring conducted in summer months at all CCAMP monitoring sites.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	110515	Region 3
Jalama Creek

Pollutant:	Selenium
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	New Decision
Revision Status	Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Regional Board Conclusion:	Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available.
Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	This decision was made by SWRCB staff.
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 110515, Selenium Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	181102
Pollutant:	Selenium
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Total
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	2
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB3 CCAMP Coastal Confluences data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Selenium.
Data Reference:	Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3.
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	The criterion continuous concentration to protect aquatic life in freshwater is 0.005 mg/L (California Toxics Rule, 2000).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (315JAL)
Temporal Representation:	The samples were collected between the dates of 2013-06-19 and 2016-03-23
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	SWAMP 2008, SWAMP 2017
QAPP Information Reference(s):	Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 110515, Selenium Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	180886
Pollutant:	Selenium
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Total
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	2
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB3 CCAMP Coastal Confluences data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Selenium.
Data Reference:	Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3.
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All inland surface waters, enclosed bays, and estuaries shall not contain concentrations of inorganic chemicals in excess of the maximum contaminant levels for primary drinking water standards specified in California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 4, Chapter 15, Sections 64431 and 64433.2.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin
Evaluation Guideline:	The California Maximum Contaminant Level for selenium is 0.05 mg/L (California Code of Regulations, Title 22).
Guideline Reference:	California MCLs - Title 17 and Title 22 documents for 2019 - California Regulations Related to Drinking Water
Spatial Representation:	The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (315JAL)
Temporal Representation:	The samples were collected between the dates of 2013-06-19 and 2016-03-23
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	SWAMP 2008, SWAMP 2017
QAPP Information Reference(s):	Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 110515, Selenium Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	181051
Pollutant:	Selenium
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Total
Beneficial Use:	Agricultural Supply
Number of Samples:	2
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB3 CCAMP Coastal Confluences data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Selenium.
Data Reference:	Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3.
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts which adversely affect the agricultural beneficial use. In addition, waters used for irrigation and livestock watering shall not exceed concentrations for those chemicals listed in the Central Coast Basin Plan and identified as the maximum concentration for selenium for irrigation supply as 0.02 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (315JAL)
Temporal Representation:	The samples were collected between the dates of 2013-06-19 and 2016-03-23
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	SWAMP 2008, SWAMP 2017
QAPP Information Reference(s):	Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program

DECISION ID	110516	Region 3
Jalama Creek

Pollutant:	Silver
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	New Decision
Revision Status	Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Regional Board Conclusion:	Insufficient information is available to determine beneficial use support for this waterbody-pollutant combination with the statistical power and confidence required by the Listing Policy. Beneficial use support will be reassessed in a future cycle, if more data are available.
Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	This decision was made by SWRCB staff.
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, SWRCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because it cannot be determined if applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 110516, Silver Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	181254
Pollutant:	Silver
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Dissolved
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	2
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB3 CCAMP Coastal Confluences data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Silver.
Data Reference:	Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3.
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	California Toxics Rule (CTR) lists criterion maximum concentrations to protect aquatic life in freshwater. The criterion in freshwater is hardness dependent for each sample and varies based on the ambient hardness during sampling. Section (b)(1) in CTR contains the hardness dependent formula for the metals criterion.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (315JAL)
Temporal Representation:	The samples were collected between the dates of 2013-06-19 and 2016-03-23
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	SWAMP 2008, SWAMP 2017
QAPP Information Reference(s):	Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program

DECISION ID	126323	Region 3
Jalama Creek

Pollutant:	Specific Conductivity
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018)
Revision Status	Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the Clean Water Act (CWA) section 303(d) List under section 3.2 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.2 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. A total of four lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Sample and exceedance counts for the lines of evidence with the fraction identified as “none” or “not recorded” are grouped together with those having the fraction “total”, based on the analytical method used. Once summed, a total of zero of 139 samples exceed the water quality objective for agricultural supply. Note that the pollutant name for the older LOEs is electrical conductivity. This was an error and the pollutant name should have always been specific conductivity. For this reason, all four of the LOEs are combined into this assessment for specific conductivity. After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) List. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. A total of zero of 139 samples exceed the water quality objective for agricultural supply and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.2 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 126323, Specific Conductivity Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	182577
Pollutant:	Specific Conductivity
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Total
Beneficial Use:	Agricultural Supply
Number of Samples:	74
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB3 CCAMP Coastal Confluences data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 74 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for SpecificConductivity.
Data Reference:	Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3.
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts which adversely affect the agricultural beneficial use. Interpretation of adverse effect shall be as derived from the University of California Agricultural Extension Service guidelines listed in the Central Coast Basin Plan and identified as the level at which severe problems may occur when EC exceeds 3.0 mmho/cm in irrigation supply water (meaurements reported at 25 degrees C). EC measured, at 25 degrees C , is referred to as specific conductivity. Also note that 1 mmho/cm = 1000 uS/cm.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (315JAL)
Temporal Representation:	The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-07-15 and 2019-03-13
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	SWAMP 2008, SWAMP 2017
QAPP Information Reference(s):	Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 126323, Specific Conductivity Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	12337
Pollutant:	Electrical Conductivity
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Agricultural Supply
Number of Samples:	35
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Coastal Confluences (CC) data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 35 samples exceed the criterion for Conductivity(Us).
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts which adversely affect the agricultural beneficial use. Interpretation of adverse effect shall be as derived from the University of California Agricultural Extension Service guidelines provided in Table 3-3 (Central Coast Waterboard Basin Plan, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland and Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries). In Table 3-3 of the Basin Plan (page III-8), water quality guidelines state that severe problems may occur when conductivity exceeds 3.0 mS/cm in irrigation supply water.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Jalama Creek was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 315JAL-Jalama Creek u/s County Park at Rail Road Trussels]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 2/13/2001-11/1/2006. CCAMP Coastal confluence monitoring is conducted monthly (with the exception of April 2003 - December 2003) and is ongoing.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 126323, Specific Conductivity Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	50328
Pollutant:	Specific Conductivity
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Agricultural Supply
Number of Samples:	26
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Water Board Staff assessed public submissions data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 26 samples exceed the criterion for Conductivity(Us).
Data Reference:	Coastal Confluences field data 2007-2010
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts which adversely affect the agricultural beneficial use. Interpretation of adverse effect shall be as derived from the University of California Agricultural Extension Service guidelines provided in Table 3-3 (Central Coast Waterboard Basin Plan, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland and Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries). In Table 3-3 of the Basin Plan (page III-8), water quality guidelines state that severe problems may occur when conductivity exceeds 3000 uS/cm in irrigation supply water.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Data for Various Pollutants in Westside San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009.
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Jalama Creek was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 315JAL-Jalama Creek u/s County Park]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 4/16/2007-6/23/2010.
Environmental Conditions:	Central Coast Water Board Staff are not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):	Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 126323, Specific Conductivity Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	12375
Pollutant:	Electrical Conductivity
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Agricultural Supply
Number of Samples:	4
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Diurnal Dissolved Oxygen Sampling (DO) data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 4 samples exceed the criterion for Conductivity(Us).
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts which adversely affect the agricultural beneficial use. Interpretation of adverse effect shall be as derived from the University of California Agricultural Extension Service guidelines provided in Table 3-3 (Central Coast Waterboard Basin Plan, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland and Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries). In Table 3-3 of the Basin Plan (page III-8), water quality guidelines state that severe problems may occur when conductivity exceeds 3.0 mS/cm in irrigation supply water.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Jalama Creek was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 315JAL-Jalama Creek u/s County Park at Rail Road Trussels]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 8/4/2005-8/11/2006. Diurnal monitoring conducted in summer months at all CCAMP monitoring sites.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	110518	Region 3
Jalama Creek

Pollutant:	Total Dissolved Solids
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	New Decision
Revision Status	Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.2 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.2 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Zero of the 79 total dissolved solids samples exceed the water quality objective for agricultural uses. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Zero of the 79 total dissolved solids samples exceed the exceed the water quality objective for agricultural uses and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.2 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
State Board Decision Recommendation:

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 110518, Total Dissolved Solids Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	156161
Pollutant:	Total Dissolved Solids
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Dissolved
Beneficial Use:	Agricultural Supply
Number of Samples:	79
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB3 CCAMP Coastal Confluences data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 79 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Total Dissolved Solids.
Data Reference:	Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3.
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts which adversely affect the agricultural beneficial use. Interpretation of adverse effect shall be as derived from the University of California Agricultural Extension Service guidelines provided listed in the Central Coast Basin Plan where water quality guidelines state that severe problems may occur when EC exceeds 3.0 mmho/cm in irrigation supply water (meaurements reported at 25 degrees C). EC measured, at 25 degrees C , is referred to as specific conductivity. Also note that 1 mmho/cm = 1000 uS/cm. In footnote b of Table 3-1, the mmho/cm x 640 = approximate total dissolved solids (TDS) in mg/L or ppm. Therefore, 3.0 mmho/cm x 640 = 1920 with rounding to one significant figure equals 2,000 mg/L TDS.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (315JAL)
Temporal Representation:	The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-07-15 and 2018-12-13
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	SWAMP 2008, SWAMP 2017
QAPP Information Reference(s):	Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program

DECISION ID	110519	Region 3
Jalama Creek

Pollutant:	Turbidity
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018)
Revision Status	Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the Clean Water Act (CWA) section 303(d) List under section 3.2 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.2 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. A total of three lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Sample and exceedance counts for the lines of evidence with the fraction identified as “none” or “not recorded” are grouped together with those having the fraction “total”, based on the analytical method used. Once summed, a total of four of 134 samples exceed the evaluation guideline for warm freshwater habitat (Shoup, D.E. and Wahl D.H., 2009) used to interpret the water quality objectives for the aquatic life beneficial use. After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) List. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. A total of four of 134 samples exceed the evaluation guideline for warm freshwater habitat and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.2 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 110519, Turbidity Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	50382
Pollutant:	Turbidity
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	25
Number of Exceedances:	2
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Water Board Staff assessed public submissions data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 25 samples exceed the criterion for Turbidity(NTU).
Data Reference:	Coastal Confluences field data 2007-2010
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall be free of changes in turbidity that cause nuisance or adversely affect beneficial uses (Basin Plan).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Data for Various Pollutants in Westside San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009.
Evaluation Guideline:	Turbidities of 40 NTU or greater can cause a reduction in piscivorous fish (largemouth bass) growth due to interference with their ability to find food (Shoup, D.E. and Wahl D.H., 2009).
Guideline Reference:	The Effects of Turbidity on Prey Selection by Piscivorous Largemouth Bass
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Jalama Creek was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 315JAL-Jalama Creek u/s County Park]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 4/16/2007-6/23/2010.
Environmental Conditions:	Central Coast Water Board Staff are not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):	Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 110519, Turbidity Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	182214
Pollutant:	Turbidity
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Total
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	83
Number of Exceedances:	1
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB3 CCAMP Coastal Confluences data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 83 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity.
Data Reference:	Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3.
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall be free of changes in turbidity that cause nuisance or adversely affect beneficial uses (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin
Evaluation Guideline:	Turbidities of 40 NTU or greater can cause a reduced foraging efficiency and a shift in prey selection in piscivorous fish (largemouth bass) due to interference with their ability to find prey (Shoup, D.E. and Wahl D.H., 2009).
Guideline Reference:	The Effects of Turbidity on Prey Selection by Piscivorous Largemouth Bass
Spatial Representation:	The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (315JAL)
Temporal Representation:	The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-07-15 and 2019-03-13
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	SWAMP 2008, SWAMP 2017
QAPP Information Reference(s):	Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 110519, Turbidity Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	14180
Pollutant:	Turbidity
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	26
Number of Exceedances:	1
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Coastal Confluences (CC) data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 26 samples exceed the criterion for Turbidity(NTU).
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall be free of changes in turbidity that cause nuisance or adversely affect beneficial uses. Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	Sigler et al. (1984) states that turbidities of 25 NTU's or greater caused reduction in juvenile salmonid growth due to interference with their ability to find food.
Guideline Reference:	Effects of chronic turbidity on density and growth of steelheads and coho salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:142-150
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Jalama Creek was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 315JAL-Jalama Creek u/s County Park at Rail Road Trussels]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 2/13/2001-11/1/2006. CCAMP Coastal confluence monitoring is conducted monthly (with the exception of April 2003 - December 2003) and is ongoing.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	110502	Region 3
Jalama Creek

Pollutant:	Urea
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	New Decision
Revision Status	Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Two of the sixty-two water samples exceed the evaluation guideline applied to protect for aquatic life beneficial uses. After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the CWA section 303(d) List. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Two of the sixty-two water samples exceed the evaluation guideline applied to protect for aquatic life beneficial uses and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to Section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
State Board Decision Recommendation:

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 110502, Urea Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	183157
Pollutant:	Urea
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Total
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	62
Number of Exceedances:	2
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB3 CCAMP Coastal Confluences data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 62 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Urea.
Data Reference:	Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3.
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin
Evaluation Guideline:	The evaluation guideline for Urea is the USEPA Aquatic Life Benchmark of 11,500 ug/L for a nonvascular plant (acute) for Urea sulfate.
Guideline Reference:	OPP Aquatic Life Benchmarks
Spatial Representation:	The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (315JAL)
Temporal Representation:	The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-11-01 and 2018-12-13
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	SWAMP 2008, SWAMP 2017
QAPP Information Reference(s):	Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program

DECISION ID	110520	Region 3
Jalama Creek

Pollutant:	Zinc
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018)
Revision Status	Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the Clean Water Act (CWA) section 303(d) List under section 3.1 and 3.6 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.6 at least two lines of evidence are necessary to assess listing status for pollutants in sediment. The pollutant concentration in sediment must be associated with toxicity to result in addition of the pollutant to the Section 303(d) List. A total of three lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. For the water matrix, a total of zero of 73 samples exceed the water quality objective for the agricultural supply beneficial use and zero of 73 samples exceed the water quality objective for the warm freshwater habitat beneficial use. For the sediment matrix, a total of zero of one sample exceeds the evaluation guideline for the warm freshwater habitat beneficial use. After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the CWA section 303(d) List. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. For the water matrix, a total of zero of 73 samples exceed the water quality objective for the agricultural supply beneficial use and zero of 73 samples exceed the water quality objective for the warm freshwater habitat beneficial use. For the sediment matrix, a total of zero of one sample exceeds the evaluation guideline for the warm freshwater habitat beneficial use. This does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 110520, Zinc Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	17848
Pollutant:	Zinc
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Sediment
Matrix:	Sediment
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	1
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (00SW3001) data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Zinc.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	In fresh water sediments the probable effects level (predictive of sediment toxicity) for zinc is 459 mg/Kg dry weight (MacDonald et al. 2000).
Guideline Reference:	Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment effect concentrations for polychlorinated biphenyls. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 19(5): 1403-1413
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Jalama Creek was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 315JAL-Jalama Creek u/s County Park at Rail Road Trussels]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected on a single day 3/28/2002. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 110520, Zinc Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	156342
Pollutant:	Zinc
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Dissolved
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	73
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB3 CCAMP Coastal Confluences data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 73 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Zinc.
Data Reference:	Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3.
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	California Toxics Rule (CTR) lists criterion continuous concentrations to protect aquatic life in freshwater. The criterion in freshwater is hardness dependent for each sample and varies based on the ambient hardness during sampling. Section (b)(1) in CTR contains the hardness dependent formula for the metals criterion.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Standards 2000. Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the State of California: Rules and regulations. Federal Register Vol. 65, No. 97. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (315JAL)
Temporal Representation:	The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-01-05 and 2018-12-13
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	SWAMP 2008, SWAMP 2017
QAPP Information Reference(s):	Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 110520, Zinc Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	156605
Pollutant:	Zinc
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	Total
Beneficial Use:	Agricultural Supply
Number of Samples:	73
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB3 CCAMP Coastal Confluences data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 73 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Zinc.
Data Reference:	Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3.
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts which adversely affect the agricultural beneficial use. In addition, waters used for irrigation and livestock watering shall not exceed concentrations for those chemicals listed in the Central Coast Basin Plan and identified as the maximum concentration for zinc for irrigation supply as 2.0 mg/L.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (315JAL)
Temporal Representation:	The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-01-05 and 2018-12-13
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	SWAMP 2008, SWAMP 2017
QAPP Information Reference(s):	Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program

DECISION ID	110514	Region 3
Jalama Creek

Pollutant:	pH
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018)
Revision Status	Revised
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the section 303(d) List under section 3.2 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.2 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Twenty lines of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. Twenty of the 146 samples exceed the maximum pH water quality objective for Municipal and Domestic Supply, Contact and Non-contact Recreation beneficial uses. Five of the 146 samples exceed the maximum pH water quality objective for Warm Freshwater Habitat and 8 of 146 samples exceeded the Agriculture Supply objective. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) List in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Twenty of the 146 samples exceed the maximum pH water quality objective for Municipal and Domestic Supply, Contact and Non-contact Recreation beneficial uses, 5 of the 146 samples exceed the maximum pH water quality objective for Warm Freshwater Habitat, 8 of 146 samples exceeded the Agriculture Supply objective and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.2 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) List because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 110514, pH Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	12394
Pollutant:	pH
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Non-Contact Recreation
Number of Samples:	4
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Diurnal Dissolved Oxygen Sampling (DO) data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 4 samples exceed the criterion for pH.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	The Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin objective for non-contact water recreation uses (Section II.A.2. Objectives for All Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries, II.A.2.a) states the following: pH value shall neither be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.3.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Jalama Creek was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 315JAL-Jalama Creek u/s County Park at Rail Road Trussels]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 8/4/2005-8/11/2006. Diurnal monitoring conducted in summer months at all CCAMP monitoring sites.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 110514, pH Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	12356
Pollutant:	pH
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Non-Contact Recreation
Number of Samples:	35
Number of Exceedances:	4
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Coastal Confluences (CC) data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 4 of 35 samples exceed the criterion for pH.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	The Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin objective for non-contact water recreation uses (Section II.A.2. Objectives for All Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries, II.A.2.a) states the following: pH value shall neither be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.3.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Jalama Creek was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 315JAL-Jalama Creek u/s County Park at Rail Road Trussels]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 2/13/2001-11/1/2006. CCAMP Coastal confluence monitoring is conducted monthly (with the exception of April 2003 - December 2003) and is ongoing.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 110514, pH Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	50353
Pollutant:	pH
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Non-Contact Recreation
Number of Samples:	26
Number of Exceedances:	3
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Water Board Staff assessed public submissions data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 3 of 26 samples exceed the criterion for pH.
Data Reference:	Coastal Confluences field data 2007-2010
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	The pH value shall neither be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.3 (Basin Plan).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Data for Various Pollutants in Westside San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009.
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Jalama Creek was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 315JAL-Jalama Creek u/s County Park]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 4/16/2007-6/23/2010.
Environmental Conditions:	Central Coast Water Board Staff are not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):	Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 110514, pH Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	12395
Pollutant:	pH
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	4
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Diurnal Dissolved Oxygen Sampling (DO) data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 4 samples exceed the criterion for pH.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 General Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries states the following: For waters not mentioned by a specific beneficial use, the pH value shall not be depressed below 7.0 or raised above 8.5.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Jalama Creek was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 315JAL-Jalama Creek u/s County Park at Rail Road Trussels]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 8/4/2005-8/11/2006. Diurnal monitoring conducted in summer months at all CCAMP monitoring sites.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 110514, pH Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	50371
Pollutant:	pH
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	26
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Water Board Staff assessed public submissions data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 26 samples exceed the criterion for pH.
Data Reference:	Coastal Confluences field data 2007-2010
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	The pH value shall not be depressed below 7.0 or raised above 8.5 (Basin Plan).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Data for Various Pollutants in Westside San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009.
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Jalama Creek was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 315JAL-Jalama Creek u/s County Park]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 4/16/2007-6/23/2010.
Environmental Conditions:	Central Coast Water Board Staff are not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):	Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 110514, pH Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	12357
Pollutant:	pH
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	35
Number of Exceedances:	1
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Coastal Confluences (CC) data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 35 samples exceed the criterion for pH.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 General Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries states the following: For waters not mentioned by a specific beneficial use, the pH value shall not be depressed below 7.0 or raised above 8.5.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Jalama Creek was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 315JAL-Jalama Creek u/s County Park at Rail Road Trussels]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 2/13/2001-11/1/2006. CCAMP Coastal confluence monitoring is conducted monthly (with the exception of April 2003 - December 2003) and is ongoing.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 110514, pH Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	12393
Pollutant:	pH
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Water Contact Recreation
Number of Samples:	4
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Diurnal Dissolved Oxygen Sampling (DO) data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 4 samples exceed the criterion for pH.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	The Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin objective for water contact recreation uses (Section II.A.2. Objectives for All Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries, II.A.2.a) states the following: pH value shall neither be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.3.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Jalama Creek was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 315JAL-Jalama Creek u/s County Park at Rail Road Trussels]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 8/4/2005-8/11/2006. Diurnal monitoring conducted in summer months at all CCAMP monitoring sites.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 110514, pH Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	50341
Pollutant:	pH
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Water Contact Recreation
Number of Samples:	26
Number of Exceedances:	3
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Water Board Staff assessed public submissions data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 3 of 26 samples exceed the criterion for pH.
Data Reference:	Coastal Confluences field data 2007-2010
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	The pH value shall neither be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.3 (Basin Plan).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Data for Various Pollutants in Westside San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009.
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Jalama Creek was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 315JAL-Jalama Creek u/s County Park]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 4/16/2007-6/23/2010.
Environmental Conditions:	Central Coast Water Board Staff are not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):	Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 110514, pH Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	12355
Pollutant:	pH
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Water Contact Recreation
Number of Samples:	35
Number of Exceedances:	4
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Coastal Confluences (CC) data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 4 of 35 samples exceed the criterion for pH.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	The Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin objective for water contact recreation uses (Section II.A.2. Objectives for All Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries, II.A.2.a) states the following: pH value shall neither be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.3.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Jalama Creek was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 315JAL-Jalama Creek u/s County Park at Rail Road Trussels]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 2/13/2001-11/1/2006. CCAMP Coastal confluence monitoring is conducted monthly (with the exception of April 2003 - December 2003) and is ongoing.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 110514, pH Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	178597
Pollutant:	pH
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Non-Contact Recreation
Number of Samples:	81
Number of Exceedances:	13
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB3 CCAMP Coastal Confluences data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 13 of 81 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH.
Data Reference:	Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3.
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	The Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin objective for non-contact water recreation (Section 3.3.2 Objectives for All Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries) states that the pH value shall neither be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.3.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (315JAL)
Temporal Representation:	The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-07-15 and 2019-03-13
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	SWAMP 2008, SWAMP 2017
QAPP Information Reference(s):	Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 110514, pH Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	177746
Pollutant:	pH
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Water Contact Recreation
Number of Samples:	81
Number of Exceedances:	13
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB3 CCAMP Coastal Confluences data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 13 of 81 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH.
Data Reference:	Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3.
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	The Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin objective for water contact recreation (Section 3.3.2 Objectives for All Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries) states that the pH value shall neither be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.3.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (315JAL)
Temporal Representation:	The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-07-15 and 2019-03-13
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	SWAMP 2008, SWAMP 2017
QAPP Information Reference(s):	Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 110514, pH Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	178873
Pollutant:	pH
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	81
Number of Exceedances:	4
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB3 CCAMP Coastal Confluences data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 4 of 81 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH.
Data Reference:	Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3.
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	The Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin objective for warm fresh water habitat (Section 3.3.2 Objectives for All Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries) states that the pH value shall neither be depressed below 7.0 nor raised above 8.5.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (315JAL)
Temporal Representation:	The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-07-15 and 2019-03-13
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	SWAMP 2008, SWAMP 2017
QAPP Information Reference(s):	Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 110514, pH Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	178593
Pollutant:	pH
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Agricultural Supply
Number of Samples:	81
Number of Exceedances:	6
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB3 CCAMP Coastal Confluences data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 6 of 81 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH.
Data Reference:	Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3.
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts which adversely affect the agricultural beneficial use. Interpretation of adverse effect shall be as derived from the University of California Agricultural Extension Service guidelines listed in the Central Coast Basin Plan and identified as the level that severe problems may occur when pH is greater than 8.4 or less than 6.5 in irrigation supply water.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (315JAL)
Temporal Representation:	The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-07-15 and 2019-03-13
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	SWAMP 2008, SWAMP 2017
QAPP Information Reference(s):	Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 110514, pH Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	178594
Pollutant:	pH
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	81
Number of Exceedances:	13
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB3 CCAMP Coastal Confluences data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 13 of 81 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH.
Data Reference:	Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3.
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	The Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin objective for municipal and domestic supply (Section 3.3.2 Objectives for All Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries) states that the pH value shall neither be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.3.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (315JAL)
Temporal Representation:	The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-07-15 and 2019-03-13
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	SWAMP 2008, SWAMP 2017
QAPP Information Reference(s):	Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 110514, pH Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	12376
Pollutant:	pH
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Agricultural Supply
Number of Samples:	4
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Diurnal Dissolved Oxygen Sampling (DO) data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 4 samples exceed the criterion for pH.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts which adversely affect the agricultural beneficial use. Interpretation of adverse effect shall be as derived from the University of California Agricultural Extension Service guidelines provided in Table 3-3 (Central Coast Waterboard Basin Plan, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland and Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries). In Table 3-3 of the Basin Plan (page III-8), water quality guidelines state that severe problems may occur when pH is greater than 8.4 or less than 6.5 in irrigation supply water.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Jalama Creek was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 315JAL-Jalama Creek u/s County Park at Rail Road Trussels]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 8/4/2005-8/11/2006. Diurnal monitoring conducted in summer months at all CCAMP monitoring sites.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 110514, pH Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	12353
Pollutant:	pH
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Agricultural Supply
Number of Samples:	35
Number of Exceedances:	1
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Coastal Confluences (CC) data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 35 samples exceed the criterion for pH.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts which adversely affect the agricultural beneficial use. Interpretation of adverse effect shall be as derived from the University of California Agricultural Extension Service guidelines provided in Table 3-3 (Central Coast Waterboard Basin Plan, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland and Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries). In Table 3-3 of the Basin Plan (page III-8), water quality guidelines state that severe problems may occur when pH is greater than 8.4 or less than 6.5 in irrigation supply water.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Jalama Creek was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 315JAL-Jalama Creek u/s County Park at Rail Road Trussels]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 2/13/2001-11/1/2006. CCAMP Coastal confluence monitoring is conducted monthly (with the exception of April 2003 - December 2003) and is ongoing.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 110514, pH Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	50332
Pollutant:	pH
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Agricultural Supply
Number of Samples:	26
Number of Exceedances:	1
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Water Board Staff assessed public submissions data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 26 samples exceed the criterion for pH.
Data Reference:	Coastal Confluences field data 2007-2010
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in amounts which adversely affect the agricultural beneficial use. Interpretation of adverse effect shall be as derived from the University of California Agricultural Extension Service guidelines provided in Table 3-3 (Central Coast Region Basin Plan, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland and Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries). In Table 3-3 of the Basin Plan (page III-8), water quality guidelines state that severe problems may occur when pH is greater than 8.4 or less than 6.5 in irrigation supply water.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Data for Various Pollutants in Westside San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009.
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Jalama Creek was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 315JAL-Jalama Creek u/s County Park]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 4/16/2007-6/23/2010.
Environmental Conditions:	Central Coast Water Board Staff are not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):	Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 110514, pH Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	12377
Pollutant:	pH
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	4
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Diurnal Dissolved Oxygen Sampling (DO) data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 4 samples exceed the criterion for pH.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	The Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Section II.A.2. Municipal and Domestic Supply Objectives, Section II.A.2.a states the following: The pH value shall neither be depressed below 6.5 or raised above 8.3.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Jalama Creek was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 315JAL-Jalama Creek u/s County Park at Rail Road Trussels]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 8/4/2005-8/11/2006. Diurnal monitoring conducted in summer months at all CCAMP monitoring sites.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 110514, pH Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	50338
Pollutant:	pH
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	26
Number of Exceedances:	3
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Water Board Staff assessed public submissions data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 3 of 26 samples exceed the criterion for pH.
Data Reference:	Coastal Confluences field data 2007-2010
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	The pH value shall not be depressed below 6.5 or raised above 8.3 (Basin Plan).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Data for Various Pollutants in Westside San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009.
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Jalama Creek was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 315JAL-Jalama Creek u/s County Park]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 4/16/2007-6/23/2010.
Environmental Conditions:	Central Coast Water Board Staff are not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):	Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 110514, pH Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	12354
Pollutant:	pH
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Municipal & Domestic Supply
Number of Samples:	35
Number of Exceedances:	4
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Coastal Confluences (CC) data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 4 of 35 samples exceed the criterion for pH.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	The Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Section II.A.2. Municipal and Domestic Supply Objectives, Section II.A.2.a states the following: The pH value shall neither be depressed below 6.5 or raised above 8.3.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Jalama Creek was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 315JAL-Jalama Creek u/s County Park at Rail Road Trussels]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 2/13/2001-11/1/2006. CCAMP Coastal confluence monitoring is conducted monthly (with the exception of April 2003 - December 2003) and is ongoing.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	125774	Region 3
Jalama Creek

Pollutant:	Escherichia coli (E. coli)
Final Listing Decision:	List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018)
Revision Status	Revised
Sources:	No Source Analysis Available
Expected TMDL Completion Date:	2035
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Regional Board Conclusion:	The State Water Board’s Water Quality Control Plan for Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries of California (the ISWEBE Plan) contains two bacteria water quality objectives applicable to the REC-1 beneficial use, which were adopted on August 7, 2018. Because the salinity level of this waterbody is equal to or less than 1 part per thousand 95 percent or more of the time, the E. coli bacteria objective applies. Therefore, this waterbody is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.3 of the Listing Policy, as applicable, using the E. coli objective. In accordance with section 6.1.5.3 of the Listing Policy, data should be representative of the critical timing that the pollutant is expected to impact the waterbody. E. coli populations may fluctuate substantially on a daily, seasonal, or yearly basis. Lacking constant inputs, indicator bacteria do not persist in the environment for a long period and effects are of relatively short duration. As a result, the historic levels of E. coli in the waterbody may be a poor indicator of current risks to human health, particularly when more recent data are available to sufficiently assess the water quality standard. Additionally, water quality conditions in waterbodies may change as a result of management actions that have been implemented to address E. coli. Unrepresentative data may result in incorrectly placing or not placing a water body segment on the CWA section 303(d) List, which could result in the unnecessary expenditure of public resources or missing a human health problem. Historic lines of evidence for data collected prior to 2010 were evaluated pursuant to these considerations and were not used to assess water quality standards attainment because they do not meet the temporal representation requirements of section 6.1.5.3 of the Listing Policy. All samples are evaluated using the statistical threshold value (STV) water quality objective for water contact recreation (ISWEBE, SWRCB 2019). The water quality objective states that the STV shall not be exceeded by more than 10 percent of the samples collected in a calendar month. Where there are more than one samples collected within any six-week period, a geomean of those samples is calculated and evaluated using the geomean water quality objective for water contact recreation (ISWEBE, SWRCB 2019). Although five lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant, this decision is based upon evaluation of the E. coli data collected since 2010 which are most representative of existing conditions in the waterbody. A total of twenty of 80 samples collected since 2010 exceed the STV water quality objective (see LOEs 150278 and 148268) and this exceeds the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.2 of the Listing Policy. Note one of the two geomeans exceed the geomean water quality objective (see LOE 148267) and this sample count is insufficient to make a beneficial use support determination. The data were collected between 2010 and 2018 and represent a range of hydrologic conditions (both wet and dry years). This sample count of data collected since 2010 is adequate to determine that this beneficial use is not supported in accordance with the Listing Policy. Note, two lines of evidence summarizing historic data (data collected prior to 2010) compared to the USEPA’s Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Bacteria (USEPA, 1986). Seven of the 44 historic samples exceed the USEPA criteria set to protect for water contact recreation (see LOEs 26704, 26663, and 49741). These data are not used for making this decision nor are they used in the final beneficial use determination. After review of the available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification for placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) List in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. A total of 20 of 80 samples collected since 2010 exceed the STV water quality objective and this exceeds the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.2 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are met.
Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should be placed on the section 303(d) List because applicable water quality standards are exceeded and a pollutant contributes to or causes the problem.
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:	Although five lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant, this decision is based upon evaluation of the E. coli data collected since 2010 which are most representative of existing conditions in the waterbody. A total of twenty of 80 samples collected since 2010 exceed the STV water quality objective (see LOEs 150278 and 148268) and this exceeds the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.2 of the Listing Policy. Note one of the two geomeans exceed the geomean water quality objective (see LOE 148267) and this sample count is insufficient to make a beneficial use support determination. The data were collected between 2010 and 2018 and represent a range of hydrologic conditions (both wet and dry years). This sample count of data collected since 2010 is adequate to determine that this beneficial use is not supported in accordance with the Listing Policy. Note, two lines of evidence summarizing historic data (data collected prior to 2010) compared to the USEPA’s Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Bacteria (USEPA, 1986). Seven of the 44 historic samples exceed the USEPA criteria set to protect for water contact recreation (see LOEs 26704, 26663, and 49741). These data are not used for making this decision nor are they used in the final beneficial use determination. After review of the available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification for placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the section 303(d) List in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. A total of 20 of 80 samples collected since 2010 exceed the STV water quality objective and this exceeds the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.2 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are met.
State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 125774, Escherichia coli (E. coli) Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	12373
Pollutant:	Escherichia coli (E. coli)
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Water Contact Recreation
Number of Samples:	18
Number of Exceedances:	2
Data and Information Type:	PATHOGEN MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Coastal Confluences (CC) data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 18 samples exceed the criterion for Escherichia coli.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	USEPA Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Bacteria -1986.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Bacteria - 1986. EPA440/5-84-002
Evaluation Guideline:	Single sample maximum allowable density for E. coli in freshwater is 235 MPN/100mL (as stated in Table 4, page 15)
Guideline Reference:	Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Bacteria - 1986. EPA440/5-84-002
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Jalama Creek was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 315JAL-Jalama Creek u/s County Park at Rail Road Trussels]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 1/5/2005-11/1/2006. CCAMP Coastal confluence monitoring is conducted monthly (with the exception of April 2003 - December 2003) and is ongoing.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 125774, Escherichia coli (E. coli) Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	148268
Pollutant:	Escherichia coli (E. coli)
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Water Contact Recreation
Number of Samples:	2
Number of Exceedances:	1
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Water Board Staff assessed public submissions data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 2 samples exceed the criterion for Escherichia coli.
Data Reference:	SWAMP FIB data: 1/4/2018--4/16/2018.
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	The bacteria water quality objective applicable to all non-saline waters, is a Statistical Threshold Value (STV) of 320 cfu/100 mL. The applicable STV shall not be exceeded by more than 10 percent of the samples collected in a calendar month, calculated in a static manner (ISWEBE 2018).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Jalama Creek was collected at 1 monitoring site [315JAL]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected on 2 sampling date(s): 04/10/2018 and 01/16/2018. CCAMP data is collected monthly and other samples associated with this project are included in another LOE for this site
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAPrP. QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):	Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 125774, Escherichia coli (E. coli) Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	50340
Pollutant:	Escherichia coli (E. coli)
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Water Contact Recreation
Number of Samples:	26
Number of Exceedances:	5
Data and Information Type:	PATHOGEN MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Water Board Staff assessed public submissions data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 5 of 26 samples exceed the criterion for Escherichia coli.
Data Reference:	Coastal Confluences field data 2007-2010
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	USEPA Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Bacteria -1986.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Bacteria - 1986. EPA440/5-84-002
Evaluation Guideline:	Single sample maximum allowable density for E. coli in freshwater is 235 MPN/100mL (as stated in Table 4, page 15 of the USEPA Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Bacteria -1986).
Guideline Reference:	Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Bacteria - 1986. EPA440/5-84-002
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Jalama Creek was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 315JAL-Jalama Creek u/s County Park]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 4/16/2007-6/23/2010.
Environmental Conditions:	Central Coast Water Board Staff are not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):	Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 125774, Escherichia coli (E. coli) Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	150278
Pollutant:	Escherichia coli (E. coli)
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Water Contact Recreation
Number of Samples:	78
Number of Exceedances:	19
Data and Information Type:	PATHOGEN MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Water Board staff assessed data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 19 of the 78 samples exceeded the Statistical Threshold Value (STV) water quality threshold for E. coli. The STV is based on a 10% exceedance rate that is calculated monthly.
Data Reference:	Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3.
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	The bacteria water quality objective applicable to all non-saline waters, is a Statistical Threshold Value (STV) of 320 cfu/100 mL. The applicable STV shall not be exceeded by more than 10 percent of the samples collected in a calendar month, calculated in a static manner (ISWEBE 2018).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site(s), station(s): 315JAL
Temporal Representation:	The samples were collected between the days of 2010-07-15 and 2018-12-13 .
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	SWAMP 2008, SWAMP 2017
QAPP Information Reference(s):	Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 125774, Escherichia coli (E. coli) Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	148267
Pollutant:	Escherichia coli (E. coli)
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Water Contact Recreation
Number of Samples:	2
Number of Exceedances:	1
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Water Board Staff assessed public submissions data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 2 samples exceed the criterion for Escherichia coli.
Data Reference:	SWAMP FIB data: 1/4/2018--4/16/2018.
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	The bacteria water quality objective applicable to all non-saline waters, is a geometric mean (GM) of E. coli not to exceed 100 cfu/100 mL. The waterbody GM shall not be greater than the applicable GM magnitude in any six-week interval, calculated weekly (ISWEBE 2018).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries Plan. Part 1: Trash Provisions; Part 2: Tribal Subsistence Beneficial Uses and Mercury Provisions; Part 3: Bacteria Provisions and Variance Policy
Evaluation Guideline:
Guideline Reference:
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Jalama Creek was collected at 1 monitoring site [315JAL]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected on 2 sampling date(s): 04/10/2018 and 01/16/2018. CCAMP data is collected monthly and other samples associated with this project are included in another LOE for this site
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAPrP. QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):	Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program

DECISION ID	74405	Region 3
Jalama Creek

Pollutant:	Anthracene
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.6 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.6 at least two lines of evidence are necessary to assess listing status for pollutants in sediment, and pollutant concentrations in sediment must be associated with sediment toxicity to justify adding that pollutant to the CWA section 303(d) List. One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. The single sample does not exceed the Evaluation Guideline (MacDonald et al. 2000) as it applies to aquatic life beneficial uses. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. The single sample does not exceed the Evaluation Guideline (MacDonald et al. 2000) as it applies to aquatic life beneficial uses. The sample size is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. A minimum of 16 samples is needed to determine if a beneficial use is fully supported using Table 3.1. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	This is a decision previously approved by the State Water Resources Control Board and the USEPA. No new data were assessed by the Regional Board for the current cycle. The decision has not changed.
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 74405, Anthracene Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	15701
Pollutant:	Anthracene
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Sediment
Matrix:	Sediment
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	1
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (00SW3001) data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Anthracene.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	In fresh water sediments the probable effects level (predictive of sediment toxicity) for anthracene is 845 ug/Kg dry weight (MacDonald et al. 2000).
Guideline Reference:	Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment effect concentrations for polychlorinated biphenyls. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 19(5): 1403-1413
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Jalama Creek was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 315JAL-Jalama Creek u/s County Park at Rail Road Trussels]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected on a single day 3/28/2002. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	76784	Region 3
Jalama Creek

Pollutant:	Benthic Community Effects
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Regional Board Conclusion:	Benthic Community Effects is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under sections 3.9 and 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.9, an additional line of evidence associating Benthic Community Effects with a water or sediment concentration of pollutant(s) is necessary to assess listing status. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence provides sufficient justification for not placing Benthic Community Effects in this water segment on the CWA section 303(d) List. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Pursuant to section 3.9 of the Listing Policy, one of the 3 samples exhibit significant degradation in biological populations and/or communities as compared to reference site(s) using the SoCal IBI. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not being met.
Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list. The readily available data and information is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating.
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 76784, Benthic Community Effects Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	54536
Pollutant:	Benthic-Macroinvertebrate Bioassessments
LOE Subgroup:	Population/Community Degradation
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	3
Number of Exceedances:	1
Data and Information Type:	Benthic macroinvertebrate surveys
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	One of the three of the IBI scores is 39 or below and are therefore are below the impairment threshold of the Southern California IBI. In 2007, a methods comparison study was conducted in this waterbody resulting in the collection of more than one sample at the Jalama Creek station and more than one IBI score was reported. These samples are not spatially or temporally independent as defined in the Listing Policy. For the purposes of this assessment, staff will use the IBI score from the 2007 sample that was collected following the SWAMP Reach Wide Benthos method, or RWB. The three RWB samples included in this assessment have the following IBI scores: The 2005 sample IBI score was 34, the 2007 sample IBI score was 40 and the 2008 sample IBI score was 50.
Data Reference:	Coastal Confluences 2008 2009
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	The IBI is a multi-metric assessment that employs biological metrics that respond to a habitat or water quality impairment. Each of the biological metrics measured at a site are converted to an IBI score then summed. These cumulative scores are then ranked. For the Southern California IBI, sites with scores of 39 or less are considered to have impaired conditions.
Guideline Reference:	A Quantitative Tool for Assessing the Integrity of Southern Coastal California Streams. Environmental Management. Volume 35, number 1 (2005): pp. 1-13
Spatial Representation:	Surveys done at the following station: 315JALxxx-Jalama Creek at County Park at RR trussels.
Temporal Representation:	Surveys done on April 27, 2005; April 12, 2007; and May 6, 2008.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	Data were collected following SWAMP QA Protocols for the Central Coast Ambient Monitoring Program.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	80636	Region 3
Jalama Creek

Pollutant:	Benzo(a)anthracene
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.6 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.6 at least two lines of evidence are necessary to assess listing status for pollutants in sediment, and pollutant concentrations in sediment must be associated with sediment toxicity to justify adding that pollutant to the CWA section 303(d) List. One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. The single sample does not exceed the Evaluation Guideline (MacDonald et al. 2000) as it applies to aquatic life beneficial uses. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. The single sample does not exceed the Evaluation Guideline (MacDonald et al. 2000) as it applies to aquatic life beneficial uses. The sample size is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. A minimum of 16 samples is needed to determine if a beneficial use is fully supported using Table 3.1. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	This is a decision previously approved by the State Water Resources Control Board and the USEPA. No new data were assessed by the Regional Board for the current cycle. The decision has not changed.
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 80636, Benzo(a)anthracene Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	15842
Pollutant:	Benzo(a)anthracene
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Sediment
Matrix:	Sediment
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	1
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (00SW3001) data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Benzo(a)anthracene.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	In fresh water sediments the probable effects level (predictive of sediment toxicity) for Benzo(a)anthracene is 1050 ug/Kg dry weight (MacDonald et al. 2000).
Guideline Reference:	Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment effect concentrations for polychlorinated biphenyls. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 19(5): 1403-1413
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Jalama Creek was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 315JAL-Jalama Creek u/s County Park at Rail Road Trussels]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected on a single day 3/28/2002. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	74736	Region 3
Jalama Creek

Pollutant:	Benzo(a)pyrene
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.6 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.6 at least two lines of evidence are necessary to assess listing status for pollutants in sediment, and pollutant concentrations in sediment must be associated with sediment toxicity to justify adding that pollutant to the CWA section 303(d) List. One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. The single sample does not exceed the Evaluation Guideline (MacDonald et al. 2000) as it applies to aquatic life beneficial uses. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. The single sample does not exceed the Evaluation Guideline (MacDonald et al. 2000) as it applies to aquatic life beneficial uses. The sample size is insufficient to determine with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy if water quality standards are being met. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	This is a decision previously approved by the State Water Resources Control Board and the USEPA. No new data were assessed by the Regional Board for the current cycle. The decision has not changed.
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 74736, Benzo(a)pyrene Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	15468
Pollutant:	Benzo(a)pyrene
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Sediment
Matrix:	Sediment
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	1
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (00SW3001) data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Benzo(a)pyrene.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	In fresh water sediments the probable effects level (predictive of sediment toxicity) for Benzo(a)Pyrene is 1450 ug/Kg dry weight (Macdonald et al. 2000)
Guideline Reference:	Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment effect concentrations for polychlorinated biphenyls. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 19(5): 1403-1413
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Jalama Creek was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 315JAL-Jalama Creek u/s County Park at Rail Road Trussels]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected on a single day 3/28/2002. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	110507	Region 3
Jalama Creek

Pollutant:	Chlorophyll-a
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2018)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Regional Board Conclusion:	No new data were assessed for the 2020 listing cycle. This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.2 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.2 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Two lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. One of the 58 samples exceed the evaluation guideline (North Carolina Administrative code, Title 15A) used to interpret the narrative water quality objective for bio-stimulation risk and aquatic life beneficial uses. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. One of the 58 samples exceed the evaluation guideline and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.2 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	This is a decision previously approved by the State Water Resources Control Board and the USEPA. No new data were assessed by the Regional Board for the current cycle. The decision has not changed.
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 110507, Chlorophyll-a Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	50356
Pollutant:	Chlorophyll-a
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	25
Number of Exceedances:	1
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Water Board Staff assessed public submissions data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 25 samples exceed the criterion for Chlorophyll a.
Data Reference:	Coastal Confluences field data 2007-2010
SWAMP Data:	Non-SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall not contain biostimulatory substances in concentrations that promote aquatic growths to the extent that such growths cause nuisance or adversely affect beneficial uses (general objective for biostimulatory substances, Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Data for Various Pollutants in Westside San Joaquin Water Quality Coalition, 2004-2009.
Evaluation Guideline:	North Carolina Administrative code (NCAC), Title 15A - Environmental and Natural Resources, Subchapter 2B-Surface water and wetland standards, Rule 0211-Fresh surface water quality standards for class C waters (Class C is defined as freshwaters protected for secondary recreation, fishing, aquatic life including propagation and survival, and wildlife). Section 3(a) of Rule 0211 applies to all fresh surface waters and states that chlorophyll a is not to exceed 40 ug/L.
Guideline Reference:	North Carolina standards, criteria, or toxic concentrations. Adopted per title 15A North Carolina Administrative Code subchapter 2B - Surface water and wetland standards
Guideline Reference:	Water quality standards table
Guideline Reference:	North Carolina standards, criteria, or toxic concentrations. Adopted per title 15A North Carolina Administrative Code subchapter 2B - Surface water and wetland standards
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Jalama Creek was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 315JAL-Jalama Creek u/s County Park]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 4/16/2007-6/23/2010.
Environmental Conditions:	Central Coast Water Board Staff are not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):	Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 110507, Chlorophyll-a Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	10585
Pollutant:	Chlorophyll-a
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Water
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	33
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Coastal Confluences (CC) data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 33 samples exceed the criterion for Chlorophyll a.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2
	Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	Waters shall not contain biostimulatory substances in concentrations that promote aquatic growths to the extent that such growths cause nuisance or adversely affect beneficial uses (general objective for biostimulatory substances, Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Objective/Criterion Reference:	North Carolina standards, criteria, or toxic concentrations. Adopted per title 15A North Carolina Administrative Code subchapter 2B - Surface water and wetland standards
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water quality standards table
Evaluation Guideline:	North Carolina Administrative code (NCAC), Title 15A - Environmental and Natural Resources, Subchapter 2B-Surface water and wetland standards, Rule 0211-Fresh surface water quality standards for class C waters (Class C is defined as freshwaters protected for secondary recreation, fishing, aquatic life including propagation and survival, and wildlife). Section 3(a) of Rule 0211 applies to all fresh surface waters and states that chlorophyll a is not to exceed 40 ug/L.
Guideline Reference:	North Carolina standards, criteria, or toxic concentrations. Adopted per title 15A North Carolina Administrative Code subchapter 2B - Surface water and wetland standards
Guideline Reference:	North Carolina standards, criteria, or toxic concentrations. Adopted per title 15A North Carolina Administrative Code subchapter 2B - Surface water and wetland standards
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Jalama Creek was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 315JAL-Jalama Creek u/s County Park at Rail Road Trussels]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 5/8/2001-11/1/2006. CCAMP Coastal confluence monitoring is conducted monthly (with the exception of April 2003 - December 2003) and is ongoing.
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	80687	Region 3
Jalama Creek

Pollutant:	Chrysene (C1-C4)
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.6 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.6 at least two lines of evidence are necessary to assess listing status for pollutants in sediment, and pollutant concentrations in sediment must be associated with sediment toxicity to justify adding that pollutant to the CWA section 303(d) List. One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. The single sample does not exceed the Evaluation Guideline (MacDonald et al. 2000) as it applies to aquatic life beneficial uses. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. The single sample does not exceed the Evaluation Guideline (MacDonald et al. 2000) as it applies to aquatic life beneficial uses. The sample size is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. A minimum of 16 samples is needed to determine if a beneficial use is fully supported using Table 3.1. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	This is a decision previously approved by the State Water Resources Control Board and the USEPA. No new data were assessed by the Regional Board for the current cycle. The decision has not changed.
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 80687, Chrysene (C1-C4) Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	15856
Pollutant:	Chrysene (C1-C4)
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Sediment
Matrix:	Sediment
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	1
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (00SW3001) data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Chrysene.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	In fresh water sediments the probable effects level (predictive of sediment toxicity) for Chrysene is 1290 ug/Kg dry weight (Macdonald et al. 2000)
Guideline Reference:	Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment effect concentrations for polychlorinated biphenyls. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 19(5): 1403-1413
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Jalama Creek was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 315JAL-Jalama Creek u/s County Park at Rail Road Trussels]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected on a single day 3/28/2002. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	74786	Region 3
Jalama Creek

Pollutant:	Dieldrin
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.6 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.6 at least two lines of evidence are necessary to assess listing status for pollutants in sediment, and pollutant concentrations in sediment must be associated with sediment toxicity to justify adding that pollutant to the CWA section 303(d) List. One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. The single sample does not exceed the Evaluation Guideline (MacDonald et al. 2000) as it applies to aquatic life beneficial uses. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. The single sample does not exceed the Evaluation Guideline (MacDonald et al. 2000) as it applies to aquatic life beneficial uses. The sample size is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. A minimum of 16 samples is needed to determine if a beneficial use is fully supported using Table 3.1. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	This is a decision previously approved by the State Water Resources Control Board and the USEPA. No new data were assessed by the Regional Board for the current cycle. The decision has not changed.
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 74786, Dieldrin Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	16632
Pollutant:	Dieldrin
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Sediment
Matrix:	Sediment
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	1
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (00SW3001) data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Dieldrin.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	In fresh water sediments the probable effects level (predictive of sediment toxicity) for dieldrin is 61.8 ug/Kg dry weight (MacDonald et al. 2000).
Guideline Reference:	Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment effect concentrations for polychlorinated biphenyls. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 19(5): 1403-1413
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Jalama Creek was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 315JAL-Jalama Creek u/s County Park at Rail Road Trussels]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected on a single day 3/28/2002. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	80833	Region 3
Jalama Creek

Pollutant:	Endrin
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.6 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.6 at least two lines of evidence are necessary to assess listing status for pollutants in sediment, and pollutant concentrations in sediment must be associated with sediment toxicity to justify adding that pollutant to the CWA section 303(d) List. One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. The single sample does not exceed the Evaluation Guideline (MacDonald et al. 2000) as it applies to aquatic life beneficial uses. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. The single sample does not exceed the Evaluation Guideline (MacDonald et al. 2000) as it applies to aquatic life beneficial uses. The sample size is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. A minimum of 16 samples is needed to determine if a beneficial use is fully supported using Table 3.1. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	This is a decision previously approved by the State Water Resources Control Board and the USEPA. No new data were assessed by the Regional Board for the current cycle. The decision has not changed.
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 80833, Endrin Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	16465
Pollutant:	Endrin
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Sediment
Matrix:	Sediment
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	1
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (00SW3001) data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Endrin.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	In fresh water sediments the probable effects level (predictive of sediment toxicity) for endrin is 207 ug/Kg dry weight (MacDonald et al. 2000).
Guideline Reference:	Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment effect concentrations for polychlorinated biphenyls. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 19(5): 1403-1413
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Jalama Creek was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 315JAL-Jalama Creek u/s County Park at Rail Road Trussels]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected on a single day 3/28/2002. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	74738	Region 3
Jalama Creek

Pollutant:	Fluoranthene
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.6 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.6 at least two lines of evidence are necessary to assess listing status for pollutants in sediment, and pollutant concentrations in sediment must be associated with sediment toxicity to justify adding that pollutant to the CWA section 303(d) List. One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. The single sample does not exceed the Evaluation Guideline (MacDonald et al. 2000) as it applies to aquatic life beneficial uses. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. The single sample does not exceed the Evaluation Guideline (MacDonald et al. 2000) as it applies to aquatic life beneficial uses. The sample size is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. A minimum of 16 samples is needed to determine if a beneficial use is fully supported using Table 3.1. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	This is a decision previously approved by the State Water Resources Control Board and the USEPA. No new data were assessed by the Regional Board for the current cycle. The decision has not changed.
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 74738, Fluoranthene Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	16550
Pollutant:	Fluoranthene
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Sediment
Matrix:	Sediment
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	1
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (00SW3001) data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Fluoranthene.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	In fresh water sediments the probable effects level (predictive of sediment toxicity) for Fluoranthene is 2,230 ug/Kg dry weight (Macdonald et al. 2000)
Guideline Reference:	Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment effect concentrations for polychlorinated biphenyls. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 19(5): 1403-1413
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Jalama Creek was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 315JAL-Jalama Creek u/s County Park at Rail Road Trussels]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected on a single day 3/28/2002. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	80881	Region 3
Jalama Creek

Pollutant:	Fluorene
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.6 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.6 at least two lines of evidence are necessary to assess listing status for pollutants in sediment, and pollutant concentrations in sediment must be associated with sediment toxicity to justify adding that pollutant to the CWA section 303(d) List. One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. The single sample does not exceed the Evaluation Guideline (MacDonald et al. 2000) as it applies to aquatic life beneficial uses. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. The single sample does not exceed the Evaluation Guideline (MacDonald et al. 2000) as it applies to aquatic life beneficial uses. The sample size is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. A minimum of 16 samples is needed to determine if a beneficial use is fully supported using Table 3.1. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	This is a decision previously approved by the State Water Resources Control Board and the USEPA. No new data were assessed by the Regional Board for the current cycle. The decision has not changed.
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 80881, Fluorene Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	16415
Pollutant:	Fluorene
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Sediment
Matrix:	Sediment
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	1
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (00SW3001) data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Fluorene.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	In fresh water sediments the probable effects level (predictive of sediment toxicity) for fluorene is 536 ug/Kg dry weight (MacDonald et al. 2000).
Guideline Reference:	Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment effect concentrations for polychlorinated biphenyls. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 19(5): 1403-1413
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Jalama Creek was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 315JAL-Jalama Creek u/s County Park at Rail Road Trussels]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected on a single day 3/28/2002. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	75767	Region 3
Jalama Creek

Pollutant:	Naphthalene
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.6 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.6 at least two lines of evidence are necessary to assess listing status for pollutants in sediment, and pollutant concentrations in sediment must be associated with sediment toxicity to justify adding that pollutant to the CWA section 303(d) List. One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. The single sample does not exceed the Evaluation Guideline (MacDonald et al. 2000) as it applies to aquatic life beneficial uses. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. The single sample does not exceed the Evaluation Guideline (MacDonald et al. 2000) as it applies to aquatic life beneficial uses. The sample size is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. A minimum of 16 samples is needed to determine if a beneficial use is fully supported using Table 3.1. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	This is a decision previously approved by the State Water Resources Control Board and the USEPA. No new data were assessed by the Regional Board for the current cycle. The decision has not changed.
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 75767, Naphthalene Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	17149
Pollutant:	Naphthalene
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Sediment
Matrix:	Sediment
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	1
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (00SW3001) data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Naphthalene.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	In fresh water sediments the probable effects level (predictive of sediment toxicity) for naphthalene is 561 ug/Kg dry weight (MacDonald et al. 2000).
Guideline Reference:	Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment effect concentrations for polychlorinated biphenyls. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 19(5): 1403-1413
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Jalama Creek was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 315JAL-Jalama Creek u/s County Park at Rail Road Trussels]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected on a single day 3/28/2002. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	75577	Region 3
Jalama Creek

Pollutant:	Phenanthrene
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.6 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.6 at least two lines of evidence are necessary to assess listing status for pollutants in sediment, and pollutant concentrations in sediment must be associated with sediment toxicity to justify adding that pollutant to the CWA section 303(d) List. One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. The single sample does not exceed the Evaluation Guideline (MacDonald et al. 2000) as it applies to aquatic life beneficial uses. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. The single sample does not exceed the Evaluation Guideline (MacDonald et al. 2000) as it applies to aquatic life beneficial uses. The sample size is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. A minimum of 16 samples is needed to determine if a beneficial use is fully supported using Table 3.1. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	This is a decision previously approved by the State Water Resources Control Board and the USEPA. No new data were assessed by the Regional Board for the current cycle. The decision has not changed.
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 75577, Phenanthrene Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	17069
Pollutant:	Phenanthrene
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Sediment
Matrix:	Sediment
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	1
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (00SW3001) data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Phenanthrene.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	In fresh water sediments the probable effects level (predictive of sediment toxicity) for Phenanthrene is 1170 ug/Kg dry weight (Macdonald et al. 2000)
Guideline Reference:	Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment effect concentrations for polychlorinated biphenyls. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 19(5): 1403-1413
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Jalama Creek was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 315JAL-Jalama Creek u/s County Park at Rail Road Trussels]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected on a single day 3/28/2002. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	75620	Region 3
Jalama Creek

Pollutant:	Pyrene
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.6 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.6 at least two lines of evidence are necessary to assess listing status for pollutants in sediment, and pollutant concentrations in sediment must be associated with sediment toxicity to justify adding that pollutant to the CWA section 303(d) List. One line of evidence is available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. The single sample does not exceed the Evaluation Guideline (MacDonald et al. 2000) as it applies to aquatic life beneficial uses. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. The single sample does not exceed the Evaluation Guideline (MacDonald et al. 2000) as it applies to aquatic life beneficial uses. The sample size is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. A minimum of 16 samples is needed to determine if a beneficial use is fully supported using Table 3.1. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	This is a decision previously approved by the State Water Resources Control Board and the USEPA. No new data were assessed by the Regional Board for the current cycle. The decision has not changed.
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 75620, Pyrene Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	16963
Pollutant:	Pyrene
LOE Subgroup:	Pollutant-Sediment
Matrix:	Sediment
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	1
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (00SW3001) data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Pyrene.
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	In fresh water sediments the probable effects level (predictive of sediment toxicity) for Pyrene is 1520 ug/Kg dry weight (Macdonald et al. 2000)
Guideline Reference:	Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment effect concentrations for polychlorinated biphenyls. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 19(5): 1403-1413
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Jalama Creek was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 315JAL-Jalama Creek u/s County Park at Rail Road Trussels]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected on a single day 3/28/2002. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):

DECISION ID	76210	Region 3
Jalama Creek

Pollutant:	Toxicity
Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)
Last Listing Cycle's Final Listing Decision:	Do Not List on 303(d) list (TMDL required list)(2016)
Revision Status	Original
Impairment from Pollutant or Pollution:	Pollutant
Regional Board Conclusion:	This pollutant is being considered for placement on the CWA section 303(d) List under section 3.1 of the Listing Policy. Under section 3.1 a single line of evidence is necessary to assess listing status. Four lines of evidence are available in the administrative record to assess this pollutant. One sample can have multiple toxicity test results but will be counted only once. One sample is defined as being collected on the same day and time at the same location. One LOE summarizes sediment samples. Zero sediment samples are summarized in LOEs using the test organism as the pollutant (i.e. invertebrate toxicity) and one additional sediment sample is summarized in LOEs using the pollutant name ¿toxicity¿. Therefore, one total sample is available to assess toxic effects in sediment samples. Zero of the one sediment samples resulted in a significant toxic effect to one or more test organisms. Three LOEs summarize water samples. Two water samples are summarized in LOEs using each of the test organisms as the pollutant name (i.e. plant toxicity, invertebrate toxicity or vertebrate toxicity) and two additional water samples are summarized in LOEs using the pollutant name ¿toxicity¿. Therefore, four total samples are available to assess toxic effects in water samples. One of the four water samples resulted in a significant toxic effect to one or more test organisms and therefore exceeds the water quality objective for aquatic life protection. This sample size is insufficient to determine, with the power and confidence of the Listing Policy, the applicable beneficial use support rating. A minimum of 16 samples is needed to determine if a beneficial use is supported and a minimum of two exceedances is needed to determine if beneficial uses are not supported using table 3.1. Therefore, the use support rating is set to 'insufficient information'. Based on the readily available data and information, the weight of evidence indicates that there is sufficient justification against placing this water segment-pollutant combination on the CWA section 303(d) List in the Water Quality Limited Segments category. This conclusion is based on the staff findings that: 1. The data used satisfies the data quality requirements of section 6.1.4 of the Policy. 2. The data used satisfies the data quantity requirements of section 6.1.5 of the Policy. 3. Zero of one sediment sample and one of the four water samples resulted in a significant toxic effect to one or more test organisms and this does not exceed the allowable frequency listed in Table 3.1 of the Listing Policy. 4. Pursuant to section 3.11 of the Listing Policy, no additional data and information are available indicating that standards are not met.
Regional Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of the available data and information, RWQCB staff concludes that the water body-pollutant combination should not be placed on the section 303(d) list because applicable water quality standards are not being exceeded.
State Board Review of Regional Board Conclusion and Recommendation:
State Board Decision Recommendation:	After review of this Regional Board decision, SWRCB staff recommend the decision be approved by the State Board.

Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 76210, Toxicity Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	24122
Pollutant:	Vertebrate Toxicity
LOE Subgroup:	Toxicity
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	2
Number of Exceedances:	1
Data and Information Type:	TOXICITY TESTING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (00SW3001) data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 2 samples exceed the criterion for Toxicity, Pimephales promelas Survival (%) 7 days. Toxicity is defined by SWAMP (2004) as follows: Significant toxicity in the survival endpoint when compared to the negative control based on a statistical test with alpha of less than 5%, and less than the evaluation threshold (both criteria are met).
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. Compliance with this objective will be determined by use of indicator organisms, analyses of species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, toxicity bioassays of appropriate duration, or other appropriate methods as specified by the Regional Board (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	Significant reduction of survival of test organism relative to the control (alpha < 0.05) and test organism survival is 20% less than the control survival.
Guideline Reference:	Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Jalama Creek was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 315JAL-Jalama Creek u/s County Park at Rail Road Trussels]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 12/12/2001-3/27/2002. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 76210, Toxicity Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	24114
Pollutant:	Invertebrate Toxicity
LOE Subgroup:	Toxicity
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Aquatic Life Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	2
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	TOXICITY TESTING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (00SW3001) data for Jalama Creek to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceed the criterion for Toxicity, Ceriodaphnia dubia Survival (%) 7 days. Toxicity is defined by SWAMP (2004) as follows: Significant toxicity in the survival endpoint when compared to the negative control based on a statistical test with alpha of less than 5%, and less than the evaluation threshold (both criteria are met).
Data Reference:	Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. Compliance with this objective will be determined by use of indicator organisms, analyses of species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, toxicity bioassays of appropriate duration, or other appropriate methods as specified by the Regional Board (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries).
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	Significant reduction of survival of test organism relative to the control (alpha < 0.05) and test organism survival is 20% less than the control survival.
Guideline Reference:	Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
Spatial Representation:	Data for this line of evidence for Jalama Creek was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 315JAL-Jalama Creek u/s County Park at Rail Road Trussels]
Temporal Representation:	Data was collected over the time period 12/12/2001-3/27/2002. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring).
Environmental Conditions:	Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data.
QAPP Information:	All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 76210, Toxicity Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	54537
Pollutant:	Toxicity
LOE Subgroup:	Toxicity
Matrix:	Sediment
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	1
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	TOXICITY TESTING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	One sample was collected to evaluate sediment toxicity. None of the samples exhibited significant toxicity. The toxicity tests included survival and growth of Hyalella azteca. One sample can have multiple toxicity test results but will be counted only once. One sample is defined as being collected on the same day at the same location with the same lab sample id (if provided).
Data Reference:	Coastal Confluences 2008 2009
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. Region 3 Basin Plan.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	Toxicity is defined as a statistically significant effect in the sample exposure compared to the control using EPA-recommended hypothesis testing. For SWAMP data exceedances are counted with the significant effect code SL. SL is defined as the result being significant compared to the negative control based on a statistical test, less than stated the alpha level, AND less than the evaluation threshold.
Guideline Reference:	Methods for Measuring the Toxicity and Bioaccumulation of Sediment-associated Contaminants with Freshwater Invertebrates, Second Edition. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development, Duluth, MI , U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water, Washington, DC EPA-600/R-99/064
Guideline Reference:	SWAMP_Memo_Toxicity_Data_Intrepretation
Spatial Representation:	The samples were collected at station 315JALxxx.
Temporal Representation:	The samples were collected in May 2009.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	The SWAMP QAPP (2002) was followed.
QAPP Information Reference(s):
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 76210, Toxicity Region 3      Jalama Creek
LOE ID:	54538
Pollutant:	Toxicity
LOE Subgroup:	Toxicity
Matrix:	Water
Fraction:	None
Beneficial Use:	Warm Freshwater Habitat
Number of Samples:	2
Number of Exceedances:	0
Data and Information Type:	TOXICITY TESTING
Data Used to Assess Water Quality:	Two samples were collected to evaluate water toxicity. The toxicity tests included total cell count of Selenastrum capricornutum, survival and growth of Ceriodaphnia dubia, and survival and biomass of Pimephales promelas. One sample can have multiple toxicity test results but will be counted only once. One sample is defined as being collected on the same day at the same location with the same lab sample id (if provided). Although both of the samples exhibited significant toxicity to Selenastrum capricornutum total cell count when compared to the control, these samples¿s conductivity was greater than 1500 uS/cm, the threshold at which a high salinity control sample should be used to calculate the test statistics. SWAMP guidance (July 2013) for Selenastrum capricornutum toxicity testing is twofold; 1) inclusion of appropriate salinity controls when sample conductivities exceed 1500 uS/cm and 2) if conductivity exceeds 3000 uS/cm, use alternate species or forgo testing. Because the conductivity of the sample water is greater than 1500 uS/cm and the high salinity control was not used to determine toxic effects, these samples are not counted as exceedances.
Data Reference:	Coastal Confluences 2008 2009
SWAMP Data:	SWAMP
Water Quality Objective/Criterion:	All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. Region 3 Basin Plan.
Objective/Criterion Reference:	Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3)
Evaluation Guideline:	Toxicity is defined as a statistically significant effect in the sample exposure compared to the control using EPA-recommended hypothesis testing. . For SWAMP data exceedances are counted with the significant effect code SL. SL is defined as the result being significant compared to the negative control based on a statistical test, less than stated the alpha level, AND less than the evaluation threshold.
Guideline Reference:	Methods for Measuring the Toxicity and Bioaccumulation of Sediment-associated Contaminants with Freshwater Invertebrates, Second Edition. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development, Duluth, MI , U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water, Washington, DC EPA-600/R-99/064
Guideline Reference:	SWAMP_Memo_Toxicity_Data_Intrepretation
Spatial Representation:	The samples were collected at station 315JALxxx.
Temporal Representation:	The samples were collected in August 2008 and January 2009.
Environmental Conditions:
QAPP Information:	The SWAMP QAPP (2002) was followed.
QAPP Information Reference(s):