Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112721, Chlorpyrifos
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
16159 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chlorpyrifos |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
Aquatic Life Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (04SW3001) data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Chlorpyrifos. |
Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06 |
|
Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Sediment Chemistry Data from Region 3 Harbors, 2004
|
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water quality criteria for diazinon and chlorpyrifos. Administrative Report 00-3. Rancho Cordova, CA: Pesticide Investigations Unit, Office of Spills and Response. CA Department of Fish and Game |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
One hour average maximum concentration 0.025 ug/L as stated in Sipmann and Finlayson (2000). |
Guideline Reference: |
Water quality criteria for diazinon and chlorpyrifos. Administrative Report 00-3. Rancho Cordova, CA: Pesticide Investigations Unit, Office of Spills and Response. CA Department of Fish and Game |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Millers Canal was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305FRA-Miller's Canal at Frazier Lake Road] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 5/3/2006. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring). |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112721, Chlorpyrifos
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
16266 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chlorpyrifos |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
Aquatic Life Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
2 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (04SW3001) data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 2 samples exceed the criterion for Chlorpyrifos. |
Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06 |
|
Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Sediment Chemistry Data from Region 3 Harbors, 2004
|
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water quality criteria for diazinon and chlorpyrifos. Administrative Report 00-3. Rancho Cordova, CA: Pesticide Investigations Unit, Office of Spills and Response. CA Department of Fish and Game |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
One hour average maximum concentration 0.025 ug/L as stated in Sipmann and Finlayson (2000). |
Guideline Reference: |
Water quality criteria for diazinon and chlorpyrifos. Administrative Report 00-3. Rancho Cordova, CA: Pesticide Investigations Unit, Office of Spills and Response. CA Department of Fish and Game |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Millers Canal was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305FRA-Miller's Canal at Frazier Lake Road] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 1/5/2006-5/17/2006. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring). |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112721, Chlorpyrifos
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
16267 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chlorpyrifos |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
Aquatic Life Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
2 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (04SW3001) data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 2 samples exceed the criterion for Chlorpyrifos. |
Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06 |
|
Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Sediment Chemistry Data from Region 3 Harbors, 2004
|
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water quality criteria for diazinon and chlorpyrifos. Administrative Report 00-3. Rancho Cordova, CA: Pesticide Investigations Unit, Office of Spills and Response. CA Department of Fish and Game |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
One hour average maximum concentration 0.025 ug/L as stated in Sipmann and Finlayson (2000). |
Guideline Reference: |
Water quality criteria for diazinon and chlorpyrifos. Administrative Report 00-3. Rancho Cordova, CA: Pesticide Investigations Unit, Office of Spills and Response. CA Department of Fish and Game |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Millers Canal was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305FRA-Miller's Canal at Frazier Lake Road] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 1/5/2006-5/17/2006. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring). |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112721, Chlorpyrifos
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
16187 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chlorpyrifos |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
Aquatic Life Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (04SW3001) data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Chlorpyrifos. |
Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06 |
|
Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Sediment Chemistry Data from Region 3 Harbors, 2004
|
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water quality criteria for diazinon and chlorpyrifos. Administrative Report 00-3. Rancho Cordova, CA: Pesticide Investigations Unit, Office of Spills and Response. CA Department of Fish and Game |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
One hour average maximum concentration 0.025 ug/L as stated in Sipmann and Finlayson (2000). |
Guideline Reference: |
Water quality criteria for diazinon and chlorpyrifos. Administrative Report 00-3. Rancho Cordova, CA: Pesticide Investigations Unit, Office of Spills and Response. CA Department of Fish and Game |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Millers Canal was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305FRA-Miller's Canal at Frazier Lake Road] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 5/3/2006. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring). |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112721, Chlorpyrifos
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
161653 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chlorpyrifos |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
4 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed RWB3 Cooperative Monitoring Program data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 4 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chlorpyrifos. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3.
|
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Basin Plan). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The freshwater criterion continuous concentration to protect aquatic organisms is 0.015 ug/L (Siepmann and Finlayson 2000, with minor corrections to significant figures as described in Beaulaurier et al., 2005). |
Guideline Reference: |
Water quality criteria for diazinon and chlorpyrifos. Administrative Report 00-3. Rancho Cordova, CA: Pesticide Investigations Unit, Office of Spills and Response. CA Department of Fish and Game |
Guideline Reference: |
Water quality criteria for diazinon and chlorpyrifos. Administrative Report 00-3. Rancho Cordova, CA: Pesticide Investigations Unit, Office of Spills and Response. CA Department of Fish and Game (with minor corrections to significant figures as described in Beaulaurier et al., 2005). |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (305FRA) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-09-25 and 2018-09-26 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring for the Region 3 Conditional Ag Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Revision 6. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring for the Region 3 Conditional Ag Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Revision 6 |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112721, Chlorpyrifos
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
161696 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chlorpyrifos |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
4 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed RWB3 Cooperative Monitoring Program data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 4 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Chlorpyrifos. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3.
|
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Basin Plan). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The freshwater criterion continuous concentration to protect aquatic organisms is 0.015 ug/L (Siepmann and Finlayson 2000, with minor corrections to significant figures as described in Beaulaurier et al., 2005). |
Guideline Reference: |
Water quality criteria for diazinon and chlorpyrifos. Administrative Report 00-3. Rancho Cordova, CA: Pesticide Investigations Unit, Office of Spills and Response. CA Department of Fish and Game |
Guideline Reference: |
Water quality criteria for diazinon and chlorpyrifos. Administrative Report 00-3. Rancho Cordova, CA: Pesticide Investigations Unit, Office of Spills and Response. CA Department of Fish and Game (with minor corrections to significant figures as described in Beaulaurier et al., 2005). |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (305FRA) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2017-09-25 and 2018-09-26 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring for the Region 3 Conditional Ag Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Revision 6. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring for the Region 3 Conditional Ag Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Revision 6 |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112721, Chlorpyrifos
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
152015 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chlorpyrifos |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
4 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed RWB3 Cooperative Monitoring Program data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 4 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Chlorpyrifos . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3.
|
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for chlorpyrifos is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 1.77 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample (Amweg and Weston, 2007). |
Guideline Reference: |
Whole-sediment toxicity identification evaluation tools for pyrethroid insecticides: I. piperonyl butoxide addition. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 26:2389-2396. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 305FRA. |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2010-05-26 to 2018-09-26 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring for the Region 3 Conditional Ag Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Revision 6. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring for the Region 3 Conditional Ag Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Revision 6 |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112721, Chlorpyrifos
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
152037 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chlorpyrifos |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Sediment |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
4 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed RWB3 Cooperative Monitoring Program data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 0 of the 4 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Chlorpyrifos . |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3.
|
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The evaluation guideline for chlorpyrifos is the median lethal concentration (LC50) of 1.77 ug/g and is normalized by the percentage of organic carbon in the sediment sample (Amweg and Weston, 2007). |
Guideline Reference: |
Whole-sediment toxicity identification evaluation tools for pyrethroid insecticides: I. piperonyl butoxide addition. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 26:2389-2396. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station(s). Station Code(s): 305FRA. |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected over the date range 2010-05-26 to 2018-09-26 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring for the Region 3 Conditional Ag Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Revision 6. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring for the Region 3 Conditional Ag Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Revision 6 |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112721, Chlorpyrifos
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
161756 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chlorpyrifos |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
0 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB3 CCAMP Pajaro and Santa Cruz Area data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Chlorpyrifos. Although a total of 1 samples were collected, 1 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Basin Plan). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The freshwater criterion continuous concentration to protect aquatic organisms is 0.015 ug/L (Siepmann and Finlayson 2000, with minor corrections to significant figures as described in Beaulaurier et al., 2005). |
Guideline Reference: |
Water quality criteria for diazinon and chlorpyrifos. Administrative Report 00-3. Rancho Cordova, CA: Pesticide Investigations Unit, Office of Spills and Response. CA Department of Fish and Game |
Guideline Reference: |
Water quality criteria for diazinon and chlorpyrifos. Administrative Report 00-3. Rancho Cordova, CA: Pesticide Investigations Unit, Office of Spills and Response. CA Department of Fish and Game (with minor corrections to significant figures as described in Beaulaurier et al., 2005). |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (305FRA). |
Temporal Representation: |
Date for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2011-09-22 to 2011-09-22 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP 2008 |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112721, Chlorpyrifos
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
161651 |
|
Pollutant: |
Chlorpyrifos |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
0 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB3 CCAMP Pajaro and Santa Cruz Area data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support, and the results are as follows: 0 of the 0 samples exceeded the evaluation guideline for Chlorpyrifos. Although a total of 1 samples were collected, 1 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Basin Plan). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The freshwater criterion continuous concentration to protect aquatic organisms is 0.015 ug/L (Siepmann and Finlayson 2000, with minor corrections to significant figures as described in Beaulaurier et al., 2005). |
Guideline Reference: |
Water quality criteria for diazinon and chlorpyrifos. Administrative Report 00-3. Rancho Cordova, CA: Pesticide Investigations Unit, Office of Spills and Response. CA Department of Fish and Game |
Guideline Reference: |
Water quality criteria for diazinon and chlorpyrifos. Administrative Report 00-3. Rancho Cordova, CA: Pesticide Investigations Unit, Office of Spills and Response. CA Department of Fish and Game (with minor corrections to significant figures as described in Beaulaurier et al., 2005). |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (305FRA). |
Temporal Representation: |
Date for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2011-09-22 to 2011-09-22 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP 2008 |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 126210, Temperature, water
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
216623 |
|
Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
24 |
Number of Exceedances: |
8 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB3 CCAMP Pajaro and Santa Cruz Area data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 8 of 24 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Natural receiving water temperature of intrastate waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The optimum range for growth and completion of most life stages of rainbow trout is 13-21 degrees Celsius (Moyle 1976). |
Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (305FRA) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-01-13 and 2017-12-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP 2008 |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 126210, Temperature, water
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
13758 |
|
Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
Aquatic Life Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
5 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCWQP Northern Area Ag-Waiver Monitoring (R3_CMPNorth) data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 5 samples exceed the criterion for Water Temperature. |
Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: Central Coast Water Quality Preservation Inc toxicity data
|
|
Final Data File used for assessment: Central Coast Water Quality Preservation Inc water quality data
|
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Natural receiving water temperature of intrastate waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses (General Objective in Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Inland Fishes of California (Moyle 1976) states that for rainbow trout the optimum range for growth and completion of most life stages is 13-21 degrees C (page 129). |
Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Millers Canal was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305FRA-Miller's Canal at Frazier Lake Road] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/21/2006-9/26/2006. Cooperative Monitoring Program (CMP) staff conduct monitoring for conventional pollutants at all Ag Waiver monitoring sites monthly. CMP staff also conduct water toxicity monitoring quarterly and sediment toxicity monitoring annually (in spring). |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the Cooperative Monitoring Program QAPP, (Clark and Ogle 2006). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 126210, Temperature, water
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
17657 |
|
Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
Aquatic Life Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
237 |
Number of Exceedances: |
66 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed Monterey Area Research Consortium (R3_MARC) data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 66 of 237 samples exceed the criterion for Water Temperature. |
Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: Marc Los Huertos Water Quality Data, file A
|
|
Final Data File used for assessment: Marc Los Huertos Water Quality Data, file B
|
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Natural receiving water temperature of intrastate waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses (General Objective in Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Inland Fishes of California (Moyle 1976) states that for rainbow trout the optimum range for growth and completion of most life stages is 13-21 degrees C (page 129). |
Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Millers Canal was collected at 11 monitoring sites [ MC-FLR - Millers Canal at Frazer Lake Rd., MC-2, MC-3, MC-4, MC-5, MC-6, MC-7, MC-9, MC-10, MC-12, MC-11] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 10/1/2002-2/11/2007. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Regional Board approved QAPP. Multiple errors were identified in data and were flagged or fixed by RB staff (in communication with Project staff) prior to assessment of data. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 126210, Temperature, water
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
11923 |
|
Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
Aquatic Life Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
2 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Diurnal Dissolved Oxygen Sampling (DO) data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceed the criterion for Water Temperature. |
Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1 |
|
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2 |
|
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Natural receiving water temperature of intrastate waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses (General Objective in Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Inland Fishes of California (Moyle 1976) states that for rainbow trout the optimum range for growth and completion of most life stages is 13-21 degrees C (page 129). |
Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Millers Canal was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305FRA-Miller's Canal at Frazier Lake Road] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 9/7/2005-9/8/2005. Diurnal monitoring conducted in summer months at all CCAMP monitoring sites. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 126210, Temperature, water
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
48661 |
|
Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
20 |
Number of Exceedances: |
3 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Water Board Staff assessed public submissions data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 3 of 20 samples exceed the criterion for Water Temperature. |
Data Reference: |
Data from Region 3 Conditional Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Jan. 2007-Jun. 2010 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Natural receiving water temperature of intrastate waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses (Basin Plan). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The optimum range for growth and completion of most life stages of rainbow trout is 13-21 degrees Celsius (Moyle 1976). |
Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Millers Canal was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305FRA - Millers Canal] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/13/2007-6/30/2010. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Central Coast Water Board Staff are not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the Cooperative Monitoring Program QAPP, (Clark and Ogle 2006). All data are flagged as appropriate. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring for the Region 3 Conditional Ag Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Revision 6 |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 126210, Temperature, water
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
216934 |
|
Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB3 CCAMP Dissolved Oxygen Study data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
Data Reference: |
Field data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Natural receiving water temperature of intrastate waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The optimum range for growth and completion of most life stages of rainbow trout is 13-21 degrees Celsius (Moyle 1976). |
Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (305FRA) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-08-31 and 2011-08-31 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP 2008 |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 126210, Temperature, water
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
216910 |
|
Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Not Recorded |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
83 |
Number of Exceedances: |
9 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed RWB3 Cooperative Monitoring Program data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 9 of 83 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Temperature. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3.
|
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Natural receiving water temperature of intrastate waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The optimum range for growth and completion of most life stages of rainbow trout is 13-21 degrees Celsius (Moyle 1976). |
Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (305FRA) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-04-26 and 2018-12-19 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring for the Region 3 Conditional Ag Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Revision 6. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring for the Region 3 Conditional Ag Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Revision 6 |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 126210, Temperature, water
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
11901 |
|
Pollutant: |
Temperature, water |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
Aquatic Life Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
27 |
Number of Exceedances: |
7 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Pajaro (Pajaro) data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 7 of 27 samples exceed the criterion for Water Temperature. |
Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1 |
|
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2 |
|
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Natural receiving water temperature of intrastate waters shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses (General Objective in Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Inland Fishes of California (Moyle 1976) states that for rainbow trout the optimum range for growth and completion of most life stages is 13-21 degrees C (page 129). |
Guideline Reference: |
Inland Fishes of California |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Millers Canal was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305FRA-Miller's Canal at Frazier Lake Road] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/10/1998-3/15/2006. Pajaro watershed is one of five annual rotation areas that are monitored for conventional pollutants by CCAMP staff monthly for one year. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112754, Toxicity
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
79219 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
9 |
Number of Exceedances: |
2 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Nine samples were collected to evaluate water toxicity. Two of the nine samples exhibited significant toxicity. The toxicity tests for the samples included survival and reproduction of Ceriodaphnia dubia, Pimephales promelas survival and growth, Selenastrum capricornutum growth. The two samples exhibited significant toxicity to Ceriodaphnia dubia (9/30/08 and1/27/09). It should be noted that the samples collected in 2006, in the data file associated with this LOE, are not included in this LOE because they were included in the previous assessment cycle. |
Data Reference: |
Data from Region 3 Conditional Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Jan. 2007-Jun. 2010 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Significant effect is defined here using a two-tier approach consistent with the method used by the SWAMP program. The effect must be significant when compared to the control sample based on statistical test alpha level of 0.05 (Probability field in data set) AND the mean must be more than 20 percent different from the control (PercentControl field in data set). |
Guideline Reference: |
Methods for Measuring the Acute Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater and Marine Organisms, Fifth Edition. EPA-821-R-02-012 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 305FRA, Millers Canal. |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between October 2007 and March 2010. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
The data was collected for the CCRWQCB Cooperative Monitoring Program for Agriculture data and provided in SWAMP format. The Project QAPP was provided. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
|
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring for the Region 3 Conditional Ag Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Revision 6 |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112754, Toxicity
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
24033 |
|
Pollutant: |
Vertebrate Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
Aquatic Life Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
3 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCWQP Northern Area Ag-Waiver Monitoring (R3_CMPnorth) data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceed the criterion for Toxicity, Pimephales promelas Survival (%) 7 days. Toxicity is defined by SWAMP (2004) as follows: Significant toxicity in the survival endpoint when compared to the negative control based on a statistical test with alpha of less than 5%, and less than the evaluation threshold (both criteria are met). |
Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: Central Coast Water Quality Preservation Inc toxicity data
|
|
Final Data File used for assessment: Central Coast Water Quality Preservation Inc water quality data
|
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. Compliance with this objective will be determined by use of indicator organisms, analyses of species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, toxicity bioassays of appropriate duration, or other appropriate methods as specified by the Regional Board (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Significant reduction of survival of test organism relative to the control (alpha < 0.05) and test organism survival is 20% less than the control survival. |
Guideline Reference: |
Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
|
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Millers Canal was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305FRA-Miller's Canal at Frazier Lake Road] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/21/2006-9/26/2006. Cooperative Monitoring Program (CMP) staff conduct monitoring for conventional pollutants at all Ag Waiver monitoring sites monthly. CMP staff also conduct water toxicity monitoring quarterly and sediment toxicity monitoring annually (in spring). |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the Cooperative Monitoring Program QAPP, (Clark and Ogle 2006). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112754, Toxicity
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
24044 |
|
Pollutant: |
Vertebrate Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
Aquatic Life Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
2 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (04SW3001) data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceed the criterion for Toxicity, Pimephales promelas Survival (%) 7 days. Toxicity is defined by SWAMP (2004) as follows: Significant toxicity in the survival endpoint when compared to the negative control based on a statistical test with alpha of less than 5%, and less than the evaluation threshold (both criteria are met). |
Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. Compliance with this objective will be determined by use of indicator organisms, analyses of species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, toxicity bioassays of appropriate duration, or other appropriate methods as specified by the Regional Board (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Significant reduction of survival of test organism relative to the control (alpha < 0.05) and test organism survival is 20% less than the control survival. |
Guideline Reference: |
Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
|
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Millers Canal was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305FRA-Miller's Canal at Frazier Lake Road] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 1/5/2006-5/17/2006. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring). |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112754, Toxicity
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
24045 |
|
Pollutant: |
Vertebrate Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
Aquatic Life Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
2 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (04SW3001) data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceed the criterion for Toxicity, Pimephales promelas Survival (%) 7 days. Toxicity is defined by SWAMP (2004) as follows: Significant toxicity in the survival endpoint when compared to the negative control based on a statistical test with alpha of less than 5%, and less than the evaluation threshold (both criteria are met). |
Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. Compliance with this objective will be determined by use of indicator organisms, analyses of species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, toxicity bioassays of appropriate duration, or other appropriate methods as specified by the Regional Board (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Significant reduction of survival of test organism relative to the control (alpha < 0.05) and test organism survival is 20% less than the control survival. |
Guideline Reference: |
Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
|
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Millers Canal was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305FRA-Miller's Canal at Frazier Lake Road] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 1/5/2006-5/17/2006. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring). |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112754, Toxicity
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
24034 |
|
Pollutant: |
Vertebrate Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
Aquatic Life Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
3 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCWQP Northern Area Ag-Waiver Monitoring (R3_CMPnorth) data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceed the criterion for Toxicity, Pimephales promelas Survival (%) 7 days. Toxicity is defined by SWAMP (2004) as follows: Significant toxicity in the survival endpoint when compared to the negative control based on a statistical test with alpha of less than 5%, and less than the evaluation threshold (both criteria are met). |
Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: Central Coast Water Quality Preservation Inc toxicity data
|
|
Final Data File used for assessment: Central Coast Water Quality Preservation Inc water quality data
|
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. Compliance with this objective will be determined by use of indicator organisms, analyses of species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, toxicity bioassays of appropriate duration, or other appropriate methods as specified by the Regional Board (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Significant reduction of survival of test organism relative to the control (alpha < 0.05) and test organism survival is 20% less than the control survival. |
Guideline Reference: |
Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
|
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Millers Canal was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305FRA-Miller's Canal at Frazier Lake Road] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/21/2006-9/26/2006. Cooperative Monitoring Program (CMP) staff conduct monitoring for conventional pollutants at all Ag Waiver monitoring sites monthly. CMP staff also conduct water toxicity monitoring quarterly and sediment toxicity monitoring annually (in spring). |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the Cooperative Monitoring Program QAPP, (Clark and Ogle 2006). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112754, Toxicity
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
148549 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
17 |
Number of Exceedances: |
6 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
6 of the 17 samples collected by RWB3 Cooperative Monitoring Program for Millers Canal exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day, at the same location with the same lab sample ID (if provided). The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Pimephales promelas, for Survival, Thalassiosira pseudonana, for Total Cell Count, Pimephales promelas, for Biomass (wt/orig indiv), Ceriodaphnia dubia, for Young/female, Cyprinodon variegatus, for Survival, Ceriodaphnia dubia, for Survival, Cyprinodon variegatus, for Biomass (wt/orig indiv), Chironomus dilutus, for Survival, Hyalella azteca, for Survival, Selenastrum capricornutum, for Total Cell Count, Americamysis bahia, for Survival, Americamysis bahia, for Biomass (wt/orig indiv) |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3.
|
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. Compliance with this objective will be determined by use of indicator organisms, analyses of species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, toxicity bioassays of appropriate duration, or other appropriate methods as specified by the Regional Board (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Significant reduction of survival of test organism relative to the control (alpha < 0.05) and test organism survival is 20% less than the control survival. |
Guideline Reference: |
Methods for Measuring the Toxicity and Bioaccumulation of Sediment-associated Contaminants with Freshwater Invertebrates, Second Edition. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development, Duluth, MI , U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water, Washington, DC EPA-600/R-99/064 |
Guideline Reference: |
SWAMP_Memo_Toxicity_Data_Intrepretation |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 station. Monitoring site: ( 305FRA ) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2013-03-28 and 2018-04-23. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring for the Region 3 Conditional Ag Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Revision 6. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring for the Region 3 Conditional Ag Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Revision 6 |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112754, Toxicity
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
148702 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
7 |
Number of Exceedances: |
2 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
2 of the 7 samples collected by RWB3 Cooperative Monitoring Program for Millers Canal exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day, at the same location with the same lab sample ID (if provided). The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Hyalella azteca, for Survival, Hyalella azteca, for Growth (wt/surv indiv) |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3.
|
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Central Coastal Basin Plan 2019). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 station. Monitoring site: ( 305FRA ) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2013-05-30 and 2018-04-23. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring for the Region 3 Conditional Ag Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Revision 6. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring for the Region 3 Conditional Ag Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Revision 6 |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112754, Toxicity
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
148979 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
1 of the 1 samples collected by SWAMP RWB3 CCAMP Pajaro and Santa Cruz Area for Millers Canal exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day, at the same location with the same lab sample ID (if provided). The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Ceriodaphnia dubia, for Survival, Selenastrum capricornutum, for Total Cell Count, Pimephales promelas, for Biomass (wt/orig indiv), Ceriodaphnia dubia, for Young/female, Pimephales promelas, for Survival |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. Compliance with this objective will be determined by use of indicator organisms, analyses of species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, toxicity bioassays of appropriate duration, or other appropriate methods as specified by the Regional Board (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Significant reduction of survival of test organism relative to the control (alpha < 0.05) and test organism survival is 20% less than the control survival. |
Guideline Reference: |
Methods for Measuring the Toxicity and Bioaccumulation of Sediment-associated Contaminants with Freshwater Invertebrates, Second Edition. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development, Duluth, MI , U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water, Washington, DC EPA-600/R-99/064 |
Guideline Reference: |
SWAMP_Memo_Toxicity_Data_Intrepretation |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 station. Monitoring site: ( 305FRA ) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-09-22 and 2011-09-22. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP 2008 |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112754, Toxicity
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
148619 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
17 |
Number of Exceedances: |
6 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
6 of the 17 samples collected by RWB3 Cooperative Monitoring Program for Millers Canal exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day, at the same location with the same lab sample ID (if provided). The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Pimephales promelas, for Survival, Thalassiosira pseudonana, for Total Cell Count, Pimephales promelas, for Biomass (wt/orig indiv), Ceriodaphnia dubia, for Young/female, Cyprinodon variegatus, for Survival, Ceriodaphnia dubia, for Survival, Cyprinodon variegatus, for Biomass (wt/orig indiv), Chironomus dilutus, for Survival, Hyalella azteca, for Survival, Selenastrum capricornutum, for Total Cell Count, Americamysis bahia, for Survival, Americamysis bahia, for Biomass (wt/orig indiv) |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3.
|
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. Compliance with this objective will be determined by use of indicator organisms, analyses of species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, toxicity bioassays of appropriate duration, or other appropriate methods as specified by the Regional Board (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Significant reduction of survival of test organism relative to the control (alpha < 0.05) and test organism survival is 20% less than the control survival. |
Guideline Reference: |
Methods for Measuring the Toxicity and Bioaccumulation of Sediment-associated Contaminants with Freshwater Invertebrates, Second Edition. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development, Duluth, MI , U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water, Washington, DC EPA-600/R-99/064 |
Guideline Reference: |
SWAMP_Memo_Toxicity_Data_Intrepretation |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 station. Monitoring site: ( 305FRA ) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2013-03-28 and 2018-04-23. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring for the Region 3 Conditional Ag Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Revision 6. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring for the Region 3 Conditional Ag Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Revision 6 |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112754, Toxicity
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
148749 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
7 |
Number of Exceedances: |
2 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
2 of the 7 samples collected by RWB3 Cooperative Monitoring Program for Millers Canal exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day, at the same location with the same lab sample ID (if provided). The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Hyalella azteca, for Survival, Hyalella azteca, for Growth (wt/surv indiv) |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3.
|
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life (Central Coastal Basin Plan 2019). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 station. Monitoring site: ( 305FRA ) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2013-05-30 and 2018-04-23. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring for the Region 3 Conditional Ag Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Revision 6. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring for the Region 3 Conditional Ag Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Revision 6 |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112754, Toxicity
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
148980 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
1 of the 1 samples collected by SWAMP RWB3 CCAMP Pajaro and Santa Cruz Area for Millers Canal exhibited toxicity. A sample may have multiple toxicity test results, but will only be counted once. A sample is defined as being collected on the same day, at the same location with the same lab sample ID (if provided). The following organisms and parameters were utilized for the toxicity tests: Ceriodaphnia dubia, for Survival, Selenastrum capricornutum, for Total Cell Count, Pimephales promelas, for Biomass (wt/orig indiv), Ceriodaphnia dubia, for Young/female, Pimephales promelas, for Survival |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. Compliance with this objective will be determined by use of indicator organisms, analyses of species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, toxicity bioassays of appropriate duration, or other appropriate methods as specified by the Regional Board (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Significant reduction of survival of test organism relative to the control (alpha < 0.05) and test organism survival is 20% less than the control survival. |
Guideline Reference: |
Methods for Measuring the Toxicity and Bioaccumulation of Sediment-associated Contaminants with Freshwater Invertebrates, Second Edition. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development, Duluth, MI , U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water, Washington, DC EPA-600/R-99/064 |
Guideline Reference: |
SWAMP_Memo_Toxicity_Data_Intrepretation |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 station. Monitoring site: ( 305FRA ) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-09-22 and 2011-09-22. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP 2008 |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112754, Toxicity
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
55219 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
9 |
Number of Exceedances: |
2 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Nine samples were collected to evaluate water toxicity. Two of the nine samples exhibited significant toxicity. The toxicity tests for the samples included survival and reproduction of Ceriodaphnia dubia, Pimephales promelas survival and growth, Selenastrum capricornutum growth. The two samples exhibited significant toxicity to Ceriodaphnia dubia (9/30/08 and1/27/09). It should be noted that the samples collected in 2006, in the data file associated with this LOE, are not included in this LOE because they were included in the previous assessment cycle. |
Data Reference: |
Data from Region 3 Conditional Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Jan. 2007-Jun. 2010 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Significant effect is defined here using a two-tier approach consistent with the method used by the SWAMP program. The effect must be significant when compared to the control sample based on statistical test alpha level of 0.05 (Probability field in data set) AND the mean must be more than 20 percent different from the control (PercentControl field in data set). |
Guideline Reference: |
SWAMP_Memo_Toxicity_Data_Intrepretation |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 305FRA, Millers Canal. |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between October 2007 and March 2010. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
The data was collected for the CCRWQCB Cooperative Monitoring Program for Agriculture data and provided in SWAMP format. The Project QAPP was provided. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
|
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring for the Region 3 Conditional Ag Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Revision 6 |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112754, Toxicity
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
79220 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
3 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Three samples were collected to evaluate sediment toxicity. None of the samples exhibited significant toxicity to Hyalella azteca. The toxicity tests included growth and survival of Hyalella azteca. One sample can have multiple toxicity test results but will be counted only once. One sample is defined as being collected on the same day at the same location. It should be noted that the samples collected in 2006, in the data file associated with this LOE, are not included in this LOE because they were included in the previous assessment cycle. |
Data Reference: |
Data from Region 3 Conditional Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Jan. 2007-Jun. 2010 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Toxicity is defined as a statistically significant effect in the sample exposure compared to the control using EPA-recommended hypothesis testing. The t-test is used to determine if there is a statistically significant decrease in organism response in the sample as compared to the control. |
Guideline Reference: |
Methods for Measuring the Acute Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater and Marine Organisms, Fifth Edition. EPA-821-R-02-012 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 305FRA, Millers Canal. |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected in April 2007, May 2008 and April 2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
The data was collected for the CCRWQCB Cooperative Monitoring Program for Agriculture data and provided in SWAMP format. the Project QAPP was provided. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring for the Region 3 Conditional Ag Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Revision 6 |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112754, Toxicity
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
55224 |
|
Pollutant: |
Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
3 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Three samples were collected to evaluate sediment toxicity. None of the samples exhibited significant toxicity to Hyalella azteca. The toxicity tests included growth and survival of Hyalella azteca. One sample can have multiple toxicity test results but will be counted only once. One sample is defined as being collected on the same day at the same location. It should be noted that the samples collected in 2006, in the data file associated with this LOE, are not included in this LOE because they were included in the previous assessment cycle. |
Data Reference: |
Data from Region 3 Conditional Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Jan. 2007-Jun. 2010 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations that are toxic to, or that produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Toxicity is defined as a statistically significant effect in the sample exposure compared to the control using EPA-recommended hypothesis testing. The t-test is used to determine if there is a statistically significant decrease in organism response in the sample as compared to the control. |
Guideline Reference: |
Methods for Measuring the Toxicity and Bioaccumulation of Sediment-associated Contaminants with Freshwater Invertebrates, Second Edition. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development, Duluth, MI , U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water, Washington, DC EPA-600/R-99/064 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 305FRA, Millers Canal. |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected in April 2007, May 2008 and April 2009. |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
The data was collected for the CCRWQCB Cooperative Monitoring Program for Agriculture data and provided in SWAMP format. the Project QAPP was provided. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring for the Region 3 Conditional Ag Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Revision 6 |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112754, Toxicity
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
24056 |
|
Pollutant: |
Plant Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
Aquatic Life Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
3 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCWQP Northern Area Ag-Waiver Monitoring (R3_CMPnorth) data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceed the criterion for Toxicity, Selenastrum capricornutum Growth (Cell Density) 4 days. Toxicity is defined by SWAMP (2004) as follows: Significant toxicity in the survival endpoint when compared to the negative control based on a statistical test with alpha of less than 5%, and less than the evaluation threshold (both criteria are met). |
Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: Central Coast Water Quality Preservation Inc toxicity data
|
|
Final Data File used for assessment: Central Coast Water Quality Preservation Inc water quality data
|
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. Compliance with this objective will be determined by use of indicator organisms, analyses of species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, toxicity bioassays of appropriate duration, or other appropriate methods as specified by the Regional Board (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Significant reduction in cell count of test organism relative to the control (alpha < 0.05) and cell count <80% of control. |
Guideline Reference: |
Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
|
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Millers Canal was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305FRA-Miller's Canal at Frazier Lake Road] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/21/2006-9/26/2006. Cooperative Monitoring Program (CMP) staff conduct monitoring for conventional pollutants at all Ag Waiver monitoring sites monthly. CMP staff also conduct water toxicity monitoring quarterly and sediment toxicity monitoring annually (in spring). |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the Cooperative Monitoring Program QAPP, (Clark and Ogle 2006). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112754, Toxicity
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
24058 |
|
Pollutant: |
Plant Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
Aquatic Life Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
2 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (04SW3001) data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceed the criterion for Toxicity, Selenastrum capricornutum Growth (Cell Density) 4 days. Toxicity is defined by SWAMP (2004) as follows: Significant toxicity in the survival endpoint when compared to the negative control based on a statistical test with alpha of less than 5%, and less than the evaluation threshold (both criteria are met). |
Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. Compliance with this objective will be determined by use of indicator organisms, analyses of species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, toxicity bioassays of appropriate duration, or other appropriate methods as specified by the Regional Board (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Significant reduction in cell count of test organism relative to the control (alpha < 0.05) and cell count <80% of control. |
Guideline Reference: |
Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
|
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Millers Canal was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305FRA-Miller's Canal at Frazier Lake Road] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 1/5/2006-5/17/2006. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring). |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112754, Toxicity
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
24046 |
|
Pollutant: |
Plant Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
Aquatic Life Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
3 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCWQP Northern Area Ag-Waiver Monitoring (R3_CMPnorth) data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceed the criterion for Toxicity, Selenastrum capricornutum Growth (Cell Density) 4 days. Toxicity is defined by SWAMP (2004) as follows: Significant toxicity in the survival endpoint when compared to the negative control based on a statistical test with alpha of less than 5%, and less than the evaluation threshold (both criteria are met). |
Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: Central Coast Water Quality Preservation Inc toxicity data
|
|
Final Data File used for assessment: Central Coast Water Quality Preservation Inc water quality data
|
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. Compliance with this objective will be determined by use of indicator organisms, analyses of species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, toxicity bioassays of appropriate duration, or other appropriate methods as specified by the Regional Board (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Significant reduction in cell count of test organism relative to the control (alpha < 0.05) and cell count <80% of control. |
Guideline Reference: |
Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
|
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Millers Canal was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305FRA-Miller's Canal at Frazier Lake Road] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/21/2006-9/26/2006. Cooperative Monitoring Program (CMP) staff conduct monitoring for conventional pollutants at all Ag Waiver monitoring sites monthly. CMP staff also conduct water toxicity monitoring quarterly and sediment toxicity monitoring annually (in spring). |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the Cooperative Monitoring Program QAPP, (Clark and Ogle 2006). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112754, Toxicity
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
24057 |
|
Pollutant: |
Plant Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
Aquatic Life Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
2 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (04SW3001) data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceed the criterion for Toxicity, Selenastrum capricornutum Growth (Cell Density) 4 days. Toxicity is defined by SWAMP (2004) as follows: Significant toxicity in the survival endpoint when compared to the negative control based on a statistical test with alpha of less than 5%, and less than the evaluation threshold (both criteria are met). |
Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. Compliance with this objective will be determined by use of indicator organisms, analyses of species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, toxicity bioassays of appropriate duration, or other appropriate methods as specified by the Regional Board (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Significant reduction in cell count of test organism relative to the control (alpha < 0.05) and cell count <80% of control. |
Guideline Reference: |
Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
|
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Millers Canal was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305FRA-Miller's Canal at Frazier Lake Road] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 1/5/2006-5/17/2006. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring). |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112754, Toxicity
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
24042 |
|
Pollutant: |
Invertebrate Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
Aquatic Life Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
3 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCWQP Northern Area Ag-Waiver Monitoring (R3_CMPnorth) data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceed the criterion for Toxicity, Ceriodaphnia dubia Survival (%) 7 days. Toxicity is defined by SWAMP (2004) as follows: Significant toxicity in the survival endpoint when compared to the negative control based on a statistical test with alpha of less than 5%, and less than the evaluation threshold (both criteria are met). |
Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: Central Coast Water Quality Preservation Inc toxicity data
|
|
Final Data File used for assessment: Central Coast Water Quality Preservation Inc water quality data
|
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. Compliance with this objective will be determined by use of indicator organisms, analyses of species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, toxicity bioassays of appropriate duration, or other appropriate methods as specified by the Regional Board (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Significant reduction of survival of test organism relative to the control (alpha < 0.05) and test organism survival is 20% less than the control survival. |
Guideline Reference: |
Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
|
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Millers Canal was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305FRA-Miller's Canal at Frazier Lake Road] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/21/2006-8/22/2006. Cooperative Monitoring Program (CMP) staff conduct monitoring for conventional pollutants at all Ag Waiver monitoring sites monthly. CMP staff also conduct water toxicity monitoring quarterly and sediment toxicity monitoring annually (in spring). |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the Cooperative Monitoring Program QAPP, (Clark and Ogle 2006). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112754, Toxicity
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
24053 |
|
Pollutant: |
Invertebrate Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
Aquatic Life Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
2 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (04SW3001) data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceed the criterion for Toxicity, Ceriodaphnia dubia Survival (%) 7 days. Toxicity is defined by SWAMP (2004) as follows: Significant toxicity in the survival endpoint when compared to the negative control based on a statistical test with alpha of less than 5%, and less than the evaluation threshold (both criteria are met). |
Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. Compliance with this objective will be determined by use of indicator organisms, analyses of species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, toxicity bioassays of appropriate duration, or other appropriate methods as specified by the Regional Board (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Significant reduction of survival of test organism relative to the control (alpha < 0.05) and test organism survival is 20% less than the control survival. |
Guideline Reference: |
Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
|
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Millers Canal was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305FRA-Miller's Canal at Frazier Lake Road] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 1/5/2006-5/17/2006. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring). |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112754, Toxicity
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
24043 |
|
Pollutant: |
Invertebrate Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
Aquatic Life Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
2 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (04SW3001) data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceed the criterion for Toxicity, Ceriodaphnia dubia Survival (%) 7 days. Toxicity is defined by SWAMP (2004) as follows: Significant toxicity in the survival endpoint when compared to the negative control based on a statistical test with alpha of less than 5%, and less than the evaluation threshold (both criteria are met). |
Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. Compliance with this objective will be determined by use of indicator organisms, analyses of species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, toxicity bioassays of appropriate duration, or other appropriate methods as specified by the Regional Board (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Significant reduction of survival of test organism relative to the control (alpha < 0.05) and test organism survival is 20% less than the control survival. |
Guideline Reference: |
Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
|
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Millers Canal was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305FRA-Miller's Canal at Frazier Lake Road] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 1/5/2006-5/17/2006. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring). |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112754, Toxicity
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
24041 |
|
Pollutant: |
Invertebrate Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
Aquatic Life Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
3 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCWQP Northern Area Ag-Waiver Monitoring (R3_CMPnorth) data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceed the criterion for Toxicity, Ceriodaphnia dubia Survival (%) 7 days. Toxicity is defined by SWAMP (2004) as follows: Significant toxicity in the survival endpoint when compared to the negative control based on a statistical test with alpha of less than 5%, and less than the evaluation threshold (both criteria are met). |
Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: Central Coast Water Quality Preservation Inc toxicity data
|
|
Final Data File used for assessment: Central Coast Water Quality Preservation Inc water quality data
|
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. Compliance with this objective will be determined by use of indicator organisms, analyses of species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, toxicity bioassays of appropriate duration, or other appropriate methods as specified by the Regional Board (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Significant reduction of survival of test organism relative to the control (alpha < 0.05) and test organism survival is 20% less than the control survival. |
Guideline Reference: |
Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
|
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Millers Canal was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305FRA-Miller's Canal at Frazier Lake Road] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/21/2006-8/22/2006. Cooperative Monitoring Program (CMP) staff conduct monitoring for conventional pollutants at all Ag Waiver monitoring sites monthly. CMP staff also conduct water toxicity monitoring quarterly and sediment toxicity monitoring annually (in spring). |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the Cooperative Monitoring Program QAPP, (Clark and Ogle 2006). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112754, Toxicity
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
24008 |
|
Pollutant: |
Invertebrate Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
Aquatic Life Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCWQP Northern Area Ag-Waiver Monitoring (R3_CMPnorth) data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Toxicity, Hyalella azteca Survival (%) 10 days. Toxicity is defined by SWAMP (2004) as follows: Significant toxicity in the survival endpoint when compared to the negative control based on a statistical test with alpha of less than 5%, and less than the evaluation threshold (both criteria are met). |
Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: Central Coast Water Quality Preservation Inc toxicity data
|
|
Final Data File used for assessment: Central Coast Water Quality Preservation Inc water quality data
|
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. Compliance with this objective will be determined by use of indicator organisms, analyses of species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, toxicity bioassays of appropriate duration, or other appropriate methods as specified by the Regional Board (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Significant reduction of survival of test organism relative to the control (alpha < 0.05) and test organism survival is 20% less than the control survival. |
Guideline Reference: |
Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
|
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Millers Canal was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305FRA-Miller's Canal at Frazier Lake Road] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 5/18/2006. Cooperative Monitoring Program (CMP) staff conduct monitoring for conventional pollutants at all Ag Waiver monitoring sites monthly. CMP staff also conduct water toxicity monitoring quarterly and sediment toxicity monitoring annually (in spring). |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the Cooperative Monitoring Program QAPP, (Clark and Ogle 2006). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112754, Toxicity
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
24010 |
|
Pollutant: |
Invertebrate Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
Aquatic Life Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (04SW3001) data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Toxicity, Hyalella azteca Survival (%) 10 days. Toxicity is defined by SWAMP (2004) as follows: Significant toxicity in the survival endpoint when compared to the negative control based on a statistical test with alpha of less than 5%, and less than the evaluation threshold (both criteria are met). |
Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. Compliance with this objective will be determined by use of indicator organisms, analyses of species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, toxicity bioassays of appropriate duration, or other appropriate methods as specified by the Regional Board (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Significant reduction of survival of test organism relative to the control (alpha < 0.05) and test organism survival is 20% less than the control survival. |
Guideline Reference: |
Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
|
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Millers Canal was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305FRA-Miller's Canal at Frazier Lake Road] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 5/3/2006. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring). |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112754, Toxicity
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
23878 |
|
Pollutant: |
Invertebrate Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
Aquatic Life Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCWQP Northern Area Ag-Waiver Monitoring (R3_CMPnorth) data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Toxicity, Hyalella azteca Survival (%) 10 days. Toxicity is defined by SWAMP (2004) as follows: Significant toxicity in the survival endpoint when compared to the negative control based on a statistical test with alpha of less than 5%, and less than the evaluation threshold (both criteria are met). |
Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: Central Coast Water Quality Preservation Inc toxicity data
|
|
Final Data File used for assessment: Central Coast Water Quality Preservation Inc water quality data
|
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. Compliance with this objective will be determined by use of indicator organisms, analyses of species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, toxicity bioassays of appropriate duration, or other appropriate methods as specified by the Regional Board (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Significant reduction of survival of test organism relative to the control (alpha < 0.05) and test organism survival is 20% less than the control survival. |
Guideline Reference: |
Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
|
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Millers Canal was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305FRA-Miller's Canal at Frazier Lake Road] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 5/18/2006. Cooperative Monitoring Program (CMP) staff conduct monitoring for conventional pollutants at all Ag Waiver monitoring sites monthly. CMP staff also conduct water toxicity monitoring quarterly and sediment toxicity monitoring annually (in spring). |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the Cooperative Monitoring Program QAPP, (Clark and Ogle 2006). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112754, Toxicity
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
24009 |
|
Pollutant: |
Invertebrate Toxicity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Toxicity |
Matrix: |
Sediment |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
Aquatic Life Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
TOXICITY TESTING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP_SWAMP Monitoring (04SW3001) data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceed the criterion for Toxicity, Hyalella azteca Survival (%) 10 days. Toxicity is defined by SWAMP (2004) as follows: Significant toxicity in the survival endpoint when compared to the negative control based on a statistical test with alpha of less than 5%, and less than the evaluation threshold (both criteria are met). |
Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: SWAMP Toxicity Data 2001-06 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. Compliance with this objective will be determined by use of indicator organisms, analyses of species diversity, population density, growth anomalies, toxicity bioassays of appropriate duration, or other appropriate methods as specified by the Regional Board (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Significant reduction of survival of test organism relative to the control (alpha < 0.05) and test organism survival is 20% less than the control survival. |
Guideline Reference: |
Quality Assurance Management Plan for the State of California's Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program. Sacramento, CA. State Water Resources Control Board. SWAMP. December 2002 (1st version)
|
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Millers Canal was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305FRA-Miller's Canal at Frazier Lake Road] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected on a single day 5/3/2006. SWAMP toxicity monitoring includes both water samples (collected in both winter and summer) and sediment samples (collected in spring). |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112757, Turbidity
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
48649 |
|
Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
20 |
Number of Exceedances: |
17 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Water Board Staff assessed public submissions data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 17 of 20 samples exceed the criterion for Turbidity(NTU). |
Data Reference: |
Data from Region 3 Conditional Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Jan. 2007-Jun. 2010 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Waters shall be free of changes in turbidity that cause nuisance or adversely affect beneficial uses. (Basin Plan) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Turbidities of 25 NTU or greater can cause a reduction in juvenile salmonid growth due to interference with their ability to find food (Sigler et al. 1984). |
Guideline Reference: |
Effects of chronic turbidity on density and growth of steelheads and coho salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:142-150 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Millers Canal was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305FRA - Millers Canal] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/13/2007-6/30/2010. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Central Coast Water Board Staff are not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the Cooperative Monitoring Program QAPP, (Clark and Ogle 2006). All data are flagged as appropriate. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring for the Region 3 Conditional Ag Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Revision 6 |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112757, Turbidity
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
17488 |
|
Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
Aquatic Life Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
62 |
Number of Exceedances: |
61 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed Monterey Area Research Consortium (R3_MARC) data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 61 of 62 samples exceed the criterion for Turbidity(NTU). |
Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: Marc Los Huertos Water Quality Data, file A
|
|
Final Data File used for assessment: Marc Los Huertos Water Quality Data, file B
|
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Waters shall be free of changes in turbidity that cause nuisance or adversely affect beneficial uses. Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Sigler et al. (1984) states that turbidities of 25 NTU's or greater caused reduction in juvenile salmonid growth due to interference with their ability to find food. |
Guideline Reference: |
Effects of chronic turbidity on density and growth of steelheads and coho salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:142-150 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Millers Canal was collected at 9 monitoring sites [ MC-FLR - Millers Canal at Frazer Lake Rd., MC-2, MC-5, MC-6, MC-7, MC-9, MC-10, MC-12, MC-11] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 9/28/2005-2/11/2007. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Regional Board approved QAPP. Multiple errors were identified in data and were flagged or fixed by RB staff (in communication with Project staff) prior to assessment of data. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112757, Turbidity
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
13756 |
|
Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
Aquatic Life Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
5 |
Number of Exceedances: |
4 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCWQP Northern Area Ag-Waiver Monitoring (R3_CMPNorth) data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 4 of 5 samples exceed the criterion for Turbidity(NTU). |
Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: Central Coast Water Quality Preservation Inc toxicity data
|
|
Final Data File used for assessment: Central Coast Water Quality Preservation Inc water quality data
|
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Waters shall be free of changes in turbidity that cause nuisance or adversely affect beneficial uses. Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Sigler et al. (1984) states that turbidities of 25 NTU's or greater caused reduction in juvenile salmonid growth due to interference with their ability to find food. |
Guideline Reference: |
Effects of chronic turbidity on density and growth of steelheads and coho salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:142-150 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Millers Canal was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305FRA-Miller's Canal at Frazier Lake Road] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/21/2006-9/26/2006. Cooperative Monitoring Program (CMP) staff conduct monitoring for conventional pollutants at all Ag Waiver monitoring sites monthly. CMP staff also conduct water toxicity monitoring quarterly and sediment toxicity monitoring annually (in spring). |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the Cooperative Monitoring Program QAPP, (Clark and Ogle 2006). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112757, Turbidity
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
11902 |
|
Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
Aquatic Life Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
19 |
Number of Exceedances: |
19 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Pajaro (Pajaro) data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 19 of 19 samples exceed the criterion for Turbidity(NTU). |
Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1 |
|
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2 |
|
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Waters shall be free of changes in turbidity that cause nuisance or adversely affect beneficial uses. Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Sigler et al. (1984) states that turbidities of 25 NTU's or greater caused reduction in juvenile salmonid growth due to interference with their ability to find food. |
Guideline Reference: |
Effects of chronic turbidity on density and growth of steelheads and coho salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:142-150 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Millers Canal was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305FRA-Miller's Canal at Frazier Lake Road] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/10/1998-3/15/2006. Pajaro watershed is one of five annual rotation areas that are monitored for conventional pollutants by CCAMP staff monthly for one year. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112757, Turbidity
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
17489 |
|
Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
Aquatic Life Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
62 |
Number of Exceedances: |
61 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed Monterey Area Research Consortium (R3_MARC) data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 61 of 62 samples exceed the criterion for Turbidity(NTU). |
Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: Marc Los Huertos Water Quality Data, file A
|
|
Final Data File used for assessment: Marc Los Huertos Water Quality Data, file B
|
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Waters shall be free of changes in turbidity that cause nuisance or adversely affect beneficial uses. Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Sigler et al. (1984) states that turbidities of 25 NTU's or greater caused reduction in juvenile salmonid growth due to interference with their ability to find food. |
Guideline Reference: |
Effects of chronic turbidity on density and growth of steelheads and coho salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:142-150 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Millers Canal was collected at 9 monitoring sites [ MC-FLR - Millers Canal at Frazer Lake Rd., MC-2, MC-5, MC-6, MC-7, MC-9, MC-10, MC-12, MC-11] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 9/28/2005-2/11/2007. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Regional Board approved QAPP. Multiple errors were identified in data and were flagged or fixed by RB staff (in communication with Project staff) prior to assessment of data. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112757, Turbidity
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
182889 |
|
Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
22 |
Number of Exceedances: |
22 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB3 CCAMP Pajaro and Santa Cruz Area data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 22 of 22 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Waters shall be free of changes in turbidity that cause nuisance or adversely affect beneficial uses. (Basin Plan) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Turbidities of 25 NTU or greater can cause a reduction in juvenile salmonid growth due to interference with their ability to find food (Sigler et al. 1984). |
Guideline Reference: |
Effects of chronic turbidity on density and growth of steelheads and coho salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:142-150 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (305FRA) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-01-13 and 2017-11-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP 2008 |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112757, Turbidity
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
11903 |
|
Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
Aquatic Life Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
19 |
Number of Exceedances: |
19 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Pajaro (Pajaro) data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 19 of 19 samples exceed the criterion for Turbidity(NTU). |
Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1 |
|
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2 |
|
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Waters shall be free of changes in turbidity that cause nuisance or adversely affect beneficial uses. Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Sigler et al. (1984) states that turbidities of 25 NTU's or greater caused reduction in juvenile salmonid growth due to interference with their ability to find food. |
Guideline Reference: |
Effects of chronic turbidity on density and growth of steelheads and coho salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:142-150 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Millers Canal was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305FRA-Miller's Canal at Frazier Lake Road] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/10/1998-3/15/2006. Pajaro watershed is one of five annual rotation areas that are monitored for conventional pollutants by CCAMP staff monthly for one year. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112757, Turbidity
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
48650 |
|
Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
20 |
Number of Exceedances: |
16 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Water Board Staff assessed public submissions data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 16 of 20 samples exceed the criterion for Turbidity(NTU). |
Data Reference: |
Data from Region 3 Conditional Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Jan. 2007-Jun. 2010 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Waters shall be free of changes in turbidity that cause nuisance or adversely affect beneficial uses (Basin Plan). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Turbidities of 40 NTU or greater can cause a reduction in piscivorous fish (largemouth bass) growth due to interference with their ability to find food (Shoup, D.E. and Wahl D.H., 2009). |
Guideline Reference: |
The Effects of Turbidity on Prey Selection by Piscivorous Largemouth Bass |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Millers Canal was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305FRA - Millers Canal] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/13/2007-6/30/2010. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Central Coast Water Board Staff are not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the Cooperative Monitoring Program QAPP, (Clark and Ogle 2006). All data are flagged as appropriate. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring for the Region 3 Conditional Ag Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Revision 6 |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112757, Turbidity
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
183030 |
|
Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
78 |
Number of Exceedances: |
48 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed RWB3 Cooperative Monitoring Program data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 48 of 78 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3.
|
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Waters shall be free of changes in turbidity that cause nuisance or adversely affect beneficial uses (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Turbidities of 40 NTU or greater can cause a reduced foraging efficiency and a shift in prey selection in piscivorous fish (largemouth bass) due to interference with their ability to find prey (Shoup, D.E. and Wahl D.H., 2009). |
Guideline Reference: |
The Effects of Turbidity on Prey Selection by Piscivorous Largemouth Bass |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (305FRA) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-04-26 and 2018-12-19 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring for the Region 3 Conditional Ag Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Revision 6. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring for the Region 3 Conditional Ag Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Revision 6 |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112757, Turbidity
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
183057 |
|
Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
78 |
Number of Exceedances: |
60 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed RWB3 Cooperative Monitoring Program data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 60 of 78 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3.
|
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Waters shall be free of changes in turbidity that cause nuisance or adversely affect beneficial uses. (Basin Plan) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Turbidities of 25 NTU or greater can cause a reduction in juvenile salmonid growth due to interference with their ability to find food (Sigler et al. 1984). |
Guideline Reference: |
Effects of chronic turbidity on density and growth of steelheads and coho salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:142-150 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (305FRA) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-04-26 and 2018-12-19 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring for the Region 3 Conditional Ag Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Revision 6. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring for the Region 3 Conditional Ag Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Revision 6 |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112757, Turbidity
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
183054 |
|
Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
22 |
Number of Exceedances: |
18 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB3 CCAMP Pajaro and Santa Cruz Area data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 18 of 22 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Turbidity. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Waters shall be free of changes in turbidity that cause nuisance or adversely affect beneficial uses (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Turbidities of 40 NTU or greater can cause a reduced foraging efficiency and a shift in prey selection in piscivorous fish (largemouth bass) due to interference with their ability to find prey (Shoup, D.E. and Wahl D.H., 2009). |
Guideline Reference: |
The Effects of Turbidity on Prey Selection by Piscivorous Largemouth Bass |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (305FRA) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-01-13 and 2017-11-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP 2008 |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112757, Turbidity
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
13757 |
|
Pollutant: |
Turbidity |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
Aquatic Life Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
5 |
Number of Exceedances: |
4 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCWQP Northern Area Ag-Waiver Monitoring (R3_CMPNorth) data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 4 of 5 samples exceed the criterion for Turbidity(NTU). |
Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: Central Coast Water Quality Preservation Inc toxicity data
|
|
Final Data File used for assessment: Central Coast Water Quality Preservation Inc water quality data
|
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Waters shall be free of changes in turbidity that cause nuisance or adversely affect beneficial uses. Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Sigler et al. (1984) states that turbidities of 25 NTU's or greater caused reduction in juvenile salmonid growth due to interference with their ability to find food. |
Guideline Reference: |
Effects of chronic turbidity on density and growth of steelheads and coho salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:142-150 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Millers Canal was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305FRA-Miller's Canal at Frazier Lake Road] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/21/2006-9/26/2006. Cooperative Monitoring Program (CMP) staff conduct monitoring for conventional pollutants at all Ag Waiver monitoring sites monthly. CMP staff also conduct water toxicity monitoring quarterly and sediment toxicity monitoring annually (in spring). |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the Cooperative Monitoring Program QAPP, (Clark and Ogle 2006). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112747, pH
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
13740 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Water Contact Recreation |
|
Number of Samples: |
5 |
Number of Exceedances: |
4 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCWQP Northern Area Ag-Waiver Monitoring (R3_CMPNorth) data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 4 of 5 samples exceed the criterion for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: Central Coast Water Quality Preservation Inc toxicity data
|
|
Final Data File used for assessment: Central Coast Water Quality Preservation Inc water quality data
|
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin objective for water contact recreation uses (Section II.A.2. Objectives for All Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries, II.A.2.a) states the following: pH value shall neither be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.3. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Millers Canal was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305FRA-Miller's Canal at Frazier Lake Road] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/21/2006-9/26/2006. Cooperative Monitoring Program (CMP) staff conduct monitoring for conventional pollutants at all Ag Waiver monitoring sites monthly. CMP staff also conduct water toxicity monitoring quarterly and sediment toxicity monitoring annually (in spring). |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the Cooperative Monitoring Program QAPP, (Clark and Ogle 2006). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112747, pH
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
17747 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Water Contact Recreation |
|
Number of Samples: |
274 |
Number of Exceedances: |
185 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed Monterey Area Research Consortium (R3_MARC) data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 185 of 274 samples exceed the criterion for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: Marc Los Huertos Water Quality Data, file A
|
|
Final Data File used for assessment: Marc Los Huertos Water Quality Data, file B
|
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin objective for water contact recreation uses (Section II.A.2. Objectives for All Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries, II.A.2.a) states the following: pH value shall neither be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.3. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Millers Canal was collected at 11 monitoring sites [ MC-FLR - Millers Canal at Frazer Lake Rd., MC-2, MC-3, MC-4, MC-5, MC-6, MC-7, MC-9, MC-10, MC-12, MC-11] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 10/1/2002-2/11/2007. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Regional Board approved QAPP. Multiple errors were identified in data and were flagged or fixed by RB staff (in communication with Project staff) prior to assessment of data. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112747, pH
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
10253 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Water Contact Recreation |
|
Number of Samples: |
26 |
Number of Exceedances: |
13 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Pajaro (Pajaro) data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 13 of 26 samples exceed the criterion for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1 |
|
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2 |
|
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin objective for water contact recreation uses (Section II.A.2. Objectives for All Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries, II.A.2.a) states the following: pH value shall neither be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.3. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Millers Canal was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305FRA-Miller's Canal at Frazier Lake Road] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/10/1998-3/15/2006. Pajaro watershed is one of five annual rotation areas that are monitored for conventional pollutants by CCAMP staff monthly for one year. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112747, pH
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
177155 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Non-Contact Recreation |
|
Number of Samples: |
23 |
Number of Exceedances: |
11 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB3 CCAMP Pajaro and Santa Cruz Area data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 11 of 23 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin objective for non-contact water recreation (Section 3.3.2 Objectives for All Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries) states that the pH value shall neither be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.3. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (305FRA) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-01-13 and 2017-11-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP 2008 |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112747, pH
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
177219 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Non-Contact Recreation |
|
Number of Samples: |
81 |
Number of Exceedances: |
37 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed RWB3 Cooperative Monitoring Program data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 37 of 81 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3.
|
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin objective for non-contact water recreation (Section 3.3.2 Objectives for All Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries) states that the pH value shall neither be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.3. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (305FRA) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-04-26 and 2018-12-19 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring for the Region 3 Conditional Ag Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Revision 6. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring for the Region 3 Conditional Ag Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Revision 6 |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112747, pH
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
178749 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
23 |
Number of Exceedances: |
8 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB3 CCAMP Pajaro and Santa Cruz Area data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 8 of 23 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin objective for warm fresh water habitat (Section 3.3.2 Objectives for All Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries) states that the pH value shall neither be depressed below 7.0 nor raised above 8.5. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (305FRA) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-01-13 and 2017-11-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP 2008 |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112747, pH
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
177540 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
81 |
Number of Exceedances: |
37 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed RWB3 Cooperative Monitoring Program data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 37 of 81 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3.
|
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin objective for municipal and domestic supply (Section 3.3.2 Objectives for All Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries) states that the pH value shall neither be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.3. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (305FRA) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-04-26 and 2018-12-19 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring for the Region 3 Conditional Ag Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Revision 6. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring for the Region 3 Conditional Ag Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Revision 6 |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112747, pH
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
177368 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
81 |
Number of Exceedances: |
19 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed RWB3 Cooperative Monitoring Program data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 19 of 81 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3.
|
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin objective for warm fresh water habitat (Section 3.3.2 Objectives for All Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries) states that the pH value shall neither be depressed below 7.0 nor raised above 8.5. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (305FRA) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-04-26 and 2018-12-19 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring for the Region 3 Conditional Ag Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Revision 6. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring for the Region 3 Conditional Ag Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Revision 6 |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112747, pH
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
177543 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Water Contact Recreation |
|
Number of Samples: |
81 |
Number of Exceedances: |
37 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed RWB3 Cooperative Monitoring Program data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 37 of 81 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3.
|
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin objective for water contact recreation (Section 3.3.2 Objectives for All Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries) states that the pH value shall neither be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.3. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (305FRA) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-04-26 and 2018-12-19 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring for the Region 3 Conditional Ag Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Revision 6. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring for the Region 3 Conditional Ag Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Revision 6 |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112747, pH
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
177738 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
23 |
Number of Exceedances: |
8 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB3 CCAMP Pajaro and Santa Cruz Area data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 8 of 23 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin objective for cold fresh water habitat (Section 3.3.2 Objectives for All Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries) states that the pH value shall neither be depressed below 7.0 nor raised above 8.5. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (305FRA) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-01-13 and 2017-11-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP 2008 |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112747, pH
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
177090 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Water Contact Recreation |
|
Number of Samples: |
23 |
Number of Exceedances: |
11 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB3 CCAMP Pajaro and Santa Cruz Area data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 11 of 23 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin objective for water contact recreation (Section 3.3.2 Objectives for All Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries) states that the pH value shall neither be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.3. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (305FRA) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-01-13 and 2017-11-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP 2008 |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112747, pH
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
177196 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Non-Contact Recreation |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB3 CCAMP Dissolved Oxygen Study data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Field data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin objective for non-contact water recreation (Section 3.3.2 Objectives for All Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries) states that the pH value shall neither be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.3. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (305FRA) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-08-31 and 2011-08-31 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP 2008 |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112747, pH
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
178121 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
81 |
Number of Exceedances: |
19 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed RWB3 Cooperative Monitoring Program data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 19 of 81 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3.
|
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin objective for cold fresh water habitat (Section 3.3.2 Objectives for All Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries) states that the pH value shall neither be depressed below 7.0 nor raised above 8.5. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (305FRA) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-04-26 and 2018-12-19 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring for the Region 3 Conditional Ag Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Revision 6. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring for the Region 3 Conditional Ag Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Revision 6 |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112747, pH
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
177670 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB3 CCAMP Dissolved Oxygen Study data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Field data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin objective for cold fresh water habitat (Section 3.3.2 Objectives for All Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries) states that the pH value shall neither be depressed below 7.0 nor raised above 8.5. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (305FRA) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-08-31 and 2011-08-31 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP 2008 |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112747, pH
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
177742 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB3 CCAMP Dissolved Oxygen Study data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Field data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin objective for municipal and domestic supply (Section 3.3.2 Objectives for All Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries) states that the pH value shall neither be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.3. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (305FRA) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-08-31 and 2011-08-31 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP 2008 |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112747, pH
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
179033 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB3 CCAMP Dissolved Oxygen Study data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Field data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin objective for warm fresh water habitat (Section 3.3.2 Objectives for All Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries) states that the pH value shall neither be depressed below 7.0 nor raised above 8.5. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (305FRA) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-08-31 and 2011-08-31 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP 2008 |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112747, pH
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
13738 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
Aquatic Life Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
5 |
Number of Exceedances: |
3 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCWQP Northern Area Ag-Waiver Monitoring (R3_CMPNorth) data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 3 of 5 samples exceed the criterion for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: Central Coast Water Quality Preservation Inc toxicity data
|
|
Final Data File used for assessment: Central Coast Water Quality Preservation Inc water quality data
|
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 General Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries states the following: For waters not mentioned by a specific beneficial use, the pH value shall not be depressed below 7.0 or raised above 8.5. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Millers Canal was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305FRA-Miller's Canal at Frazier Lake Road] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/21/2006-9/26/2006. Cooperative Monitoring Program (CMP) staff conduct monitoring for conventional pollutants at all Ag Waiver monitoring sites monthly. CMP staff also conduct water toxicity monitoring quarterly and sediment toxicity monitoring annually (in spring). |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the Cooperative Monitoring Program QAPP, (Clark and Ogle 2006). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112747, pH
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
10150 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
Aquatic Life Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
2 |
Number of Exceedances: |
2 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Diurnal Dissolved Oxygen Sampling (DO) data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 2 samples exceed the criterion for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1 |
|
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2 |
|
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 General Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries states the following: For waters not mentioned by a specific beneficial use, the pH value shall not be depressed below 7.0 or raised above 8.5. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Millers Canal was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305FRA-Miller's Canal at Frazier Lake Road] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 9/7/2005-9/8/2005. Diurnal monitoring conducted in summer months at all CCAMP monitoring sites. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112747, pH
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
48416 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
19 |
Number of Exceedances: |
9 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Water Board Staff assessed public submissions data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 9 of 19 samples exceed the criterion for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Data from Region 3 Conditional Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Jan. 2007-Jun. 2010 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The pH value shall not be depressed below 7.0 or raised above 8.5 (Basin Plan). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Millers Canal was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305FRA - Millers Canal] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/13/2007-6/30/2010. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Central Coast Water Board Staff are not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the Cooperative Monitoring Program QAPP, (Clark and Ogle 2006). All data are flagged as appropriate. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring for the Region 3 Conditional Ag Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Revision 6 |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112747, pH
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
177565 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Water Contact Recreation |
|
Number of Samples: |
1 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB3 CCAMP Dissolved Oxygen Study data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 1 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Field data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin objective for water contact recreation (Section 3.3.2 Objectives for All Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries) states that the pH value shall neither be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.3. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (305FRA) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-08-31 and 2011-08-31 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP 2008 |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112747, pH
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
177908 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
23 |
Number of Exceedances: |
11 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB3 CCAMP Pajaro and Santa Cruz Area data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 11 of 23 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin objective for municipal and domestic supply (Section 3.3.2 Objectives for All Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries) states that the pH value shall neither be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.3. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (305FRA) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-01-13 and 2017-11-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP 2008 |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112747, pH
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
10237 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
Aquatic Life Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
26 |
Number of Exceedances: |
12 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Pajaro (Pajaro) data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 12 of 26 samples exceed the criterion for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1 |
|
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2 |
|
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 General Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries states the following: For waters not mentioned by a specific beneficial use, the pH value shall not be depressed below 7.0 or raised above 8.5. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Millers Canal was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305FRA-Miller's Canal at Frazier Lake Road] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/10/1998-3/15/2006. Pajaro watershed is one of five annual rotation areas that are monitored for conventional pollutants by CCAMP staff monthly for one year. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112747, pH
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
17789 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
Aquatic Life Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
274 |
Number of Exceedances: |
86 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed Monterey Area Research Consortium (R3_MARC) data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 86 of 274 samples exceed the criterion for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: Marc Los Huertos Water Quality Data, file A
|
|
Final Data File used for assessment: Marc Los Huertos Water Quality Data, file B
|
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 General Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries states the following: For waters not mentioned by a specific beneficial use, the pH value shall not be depressed below 7.0 or raised above 8.5. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Millers Canal was collected at 11 monitoring sites [ MC-FLR - Millers Canal at Frazer Lake Rd., MC-2, MC-3, MC-4, MC-5, MC-6, MC-7, MC-9, MC-10, MC-12, MC-11] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 10/1/2002-2/11/2007. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Regional Board approved QAPP. Multiple errors were identified in data and were flagged or fixed by RB staff (in communication with Project staff) prior to assessment of data. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112747, pH
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
17790 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
274 |
Number of Exceedances: |
185 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed Monterey Area Research Consortium (R3_MARC) data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 185 of 274 samples exceed the criterion for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: Marc Los Huertos Water Quality Data, file A
|
|
Final Data File used for assessment: Marc Los Huertos Water Quality Data, file B
|
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Section II.A.2. Municipal and Domestic Supply Objectives, Section II.A.2.a states the following: The pH value shall neither be depressed below 6.5 or raised above 8.3. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Millers Canal was collected at 11 monitoring sites [ MC-FLR - Millers Canal at Frazer Lake Rd., MC-2, MC-3, MC-4, MC-5, MC-6, MC-7, MC-9, MC-10, MC-12, MC-11] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 10/1/2002-2/11/2007. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Regional Board approved QAPP. Multiple errors were identified in data and were flagged or fixed by RB staff (in communication with Project staff) prior to assessment of data. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112747, pH
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
10255 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
2 |
Number of Exceedances: |
2 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Diurnal Dissolved Oxygen Sampling (DO) data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 2 samples exceed the criterion for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1 |
|
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2 |
|
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Section II.A.2. Municipal and Domestic Supply Objectives, Section II.A.2.a states the following: The pH value shall neither be depressed below 6.5 or raised above 8.3. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Millers Canal was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305FRA-Miller's Canal at Frazier Lake Road] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 9/7/2005-9/8/2005. Diurnal monitoring conducted in summer months at all CCAMP monitoring sites. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112747, pH
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
10238 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
26 |
Number of Exceedances: |
13 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Pajaro (Pajaro) data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 13 of 26 samples exceed the criterion for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1 |
|
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2 |
|
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Section II.A.2. Municipal and Domestic Supply Objectives, Section II.A.2.a states the following: The pH value shall neither be depressed below 6.5 or raised above 8.3. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Millers Canal was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305FRA-Miller's Canal at Frazier Lake Road] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/10/1998-3/15/2006. Pajaro watershed is one of five annual rotation areas that are monitored for conventional pollutants by CCAMP staff monthly for one year. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112747, pH
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
13739 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
5 |
Number of Exceedances: |
4 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCWQP Northern Area Ag-Waiver Monitoring (R3_CMPNorth) data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 4 of 5 samples exceed the criterion for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: Central Coast Water Quality Preservation Inc toxicity data
|
|
Final Data File used for assessment: Central Coast Water Quality Preservation Inc water quality data
|
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Section II.A.2. Municipal and Domestic Supply Objectives, Section II.A.2.a states the following: The pH value shall neither be depressed below 6.5 or raised above 8.3. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Millers Canal was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305FRA-Miller's Canal at Frazier Lake Road] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/21/2006-9/26/2006. Cooperative Monitoring Program (CMP) staff conduct monitoring for conventional pollutants at all Ag Waiver monitoring sites monthly. CMP staff also conduct water toxicity monitoring quarterly and sediment toxicity monitoring annually (in spring). |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the Cooperative Monitoring Program QAPP, (Clark and Ogle 2006). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112747, pH
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
48645 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
19 |
Number of Exceedances: |
14 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Water Board Staff assessed public submissions data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 14 of 19 samples exceed the criterion for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Data from Region 3 Conditional Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Jan. 2007-Jun. 2010 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The pH value shall not be depressed below 6.5 or raised above 8.3 (Basin Plan). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Millers Canal was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305FRA - Millers Canal] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/13/2007-6/30/2010. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Central Coast Water Board Staff are not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the Cooperative Monitoring Program QAPP, (Clark and Ogle 2006). All data are flagged as appropriate. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring for the Region 3 Conditional Ag Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Revision 6 |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112747, pH
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
10257 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Non-Contact Recreation |
|
Number of Samples: |
2 |
Number of Exceedances: |
2 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Diurnal Dissolved Oxygen Sampling (DO) data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 2 samples exceed the criterion for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1 |
|
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2 |
|
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin objective for non-contact water recreation uses (Section II.A.2. Objectives for All Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries, II.A.2.a) states the following: pH value shall neither be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.3. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Millers Canal was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305FRA-Miller's Canal at Frazier Lake Road] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 9/7/2005-9/8/2005. Diurnal monitoring conducted in summer months at all CCAMP monitoring sites. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112747, pH
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
10254 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Non-Contact Recreation |
|
Number of Samples: |
26 |
Number of Exceedances: |
13 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Pajaro (Pajaro) data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 13 of 26 samples exceed the criterion for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1 |
|
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2 |
|
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin objective for non-contact water recreation uses (Section II.A.2. Objectives for All Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries, II.A.2.a) states the following: pH value shall neither be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.3. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Millers Canal was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305FRA-Miller's Canal at Frazier Lake Road] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/10/1998-3/15/2006. Pajaro watershed is one of five annual rotation areas that are monitored for conventional pollutants by CCAMP staff monthly for one year. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112747, pH
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
48647 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Non-Contact Recreation |
|
Number of Samples: |
19 |
Number of Exceedances: |
14 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Water Board Staff assessed public submissions data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 14 of 19 samples exceed the criterion for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Data from Region 3 Conditional Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Jan. 2007-Jun. 2010 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The pH value shall neither be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.3 (Basin Plan). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Millers Canal was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305FRA - Millers Canal] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/13/2007-6/30/2010. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Central Coast Water Board Staff are not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the Cooperative Monitoring Program QAPP, (Clark and Ogle 2006). All data are flagged as appropriate. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring for the Region 3 Conditional Ag Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Revision 6 |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112747, pH
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
17748 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Non-Contact Recreation |
|
Number of Samples: |
274 |
Number of Exceedances: |
185 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed Monterey Area Research Consortium (R3_MARC) data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 185 of 274 samples exceed the criterion for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: Marc Los Huertos Water Quality Data, file A
|
|
Final Data File used for assessment: Marc Los Huertos Water Quality Data, file B
|
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin objective for non-contact water recreation uses (Section II.A.2. Objectives for All Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries, II.A.2.a) states the following: pH value shall neither be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.3. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Millers Canal was collected at 11 monitoring sites [ MC-FLR - Millers Canal at Frazer Lake Rd., MC-2, MC-3, MC-4, MC-5, MC-6, MC-7, MC-9, MC-10, MC-12, MC-11] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 10/1/2002-2/11/2007. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Regional Board approved QAPP. Multiple errors were identified in data and were flagged or fixed by RB staff (in communication with Project staff) prior to assessment of data. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112747, pH
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
13741 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Non-Contact Recreation |
|
Number of Samples: |
5 |
Number of Exceedances: |
4 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCWQP Northern Area Ag-Waiver Monitoring (R3_CMPNorth) data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 4 of 5 samples exceed the criterion for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: Central Coast Water Quality Preservation Inc toxicity data
|
|
Final Data File used for assessment: Central Coast Water Quality Preservation Inc water quality data
|
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin objective for non-contact water recreation uses (Section II.A.2. Objectives for All Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries, II.A.2.a) states the following: pH value shall neither be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.3. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Millers Canal was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305FRA-Miller's Canal at Frazier Lake Road] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/21/2006-9/26/2006. Cooperative Monitoring Program (CMP) staff conduct monitoring for conventional pollutants at all Ag Waiver monitoring sites monthly. CMP staff also conduct water toxicity monitoring quarterly and sediment toxicity monitoring annually (in spring). |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the Cooperative Monitoring Program QAPP, (Clark and Ogle 2006). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112747, pH
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
17749 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
Aquatic Life Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
274 |
Number of Exceedances: |
86 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed Monterey Area Research Consortium (R3_MARC) data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 86 of 274 samples exceed the criterion for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: Marc Los Huertos Water Quality Data, file A
|
|
Final Data File used for assessment: Marc Los Huertos Water Quality Data, file B
|
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 General Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries states the following: For waters not mentioned by a specific beneficial use, the pH value shall not be depressed below 7.0 or raised above 8.5. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Millers Canal was collected at 11 monitoring sites [ MC-FLR - Millers Canal at Frazer Lake Rd., MC-2, MC-3, MC-4, MC-5, MC-6, MC-7, MC-9, MC-10, MC-12, MC-11] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 10/1/2002-2/11/2007. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Regional Board approved QAPP. Multiple errors were identified in data and were flagged or fixed by RB staff (in communication with Project staff) prior to assessment of data. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112747, pH
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
13742 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
Aquatic Life Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
5 |
Number of Exceedances: |
3 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCWQP Northern Area Ag-Waiver Monitoring (R3_CMPNorth) data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 3 of 5 samples exceed the criterion for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: Central Coast Water Quality Preservation Inc toxicity data
|
|
Final Data File used for assessment: Central Coast Water Quality Preservation Inc water quality data
|
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 General Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries states the following: For waters not mentioned by a specific beneficial use, the pH value shall not be depressed below 7.0 or raised above 8.5. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Millers Canal was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305FRA-Miller's Canal at Frazier Lake Road] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/21/2006-9/26/2006. Cooperative Monitoring Program (CMP) staff conduct monitoring for conventional pollutants at all Ag Waiver monitoring sites monthly. CMP staff also conduct water toxicity monitoring quarterly and sediment toxicity monitoring annually (in spring). |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the Cooperative Monitoring Program QAPP, (Clark and Ogle 2006). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112747, pH
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
48648 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
19 |
Number of Exceedances: |
9 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Water Board Staff assessed public submissions data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 9 of 19 samples exceed the criterion for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Data from Region 3 Conditional Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Jan. 2007-Jun. 2010 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The pH value shall not be depressed below 7.0 or raised above 8.5 (Basin Plan). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Millers Canal was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305FRA - Millers Canal] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/13/2007-6/30/2010. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Central Coast Water Board Staff are not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the Cooperative Monitoring Program QAPP, (Clark and Ogle 2006). All data are flagged as appropriate. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring for the Region 3 Conditional Ag Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Revision 6 |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112747, pH
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
10147 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
Aquatic Life Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
26 |
Number of Exceedances: |
12 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Pajaro (Pajaro) data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 12 of 26 samples exceed the criterion for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1 |
|
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2 |
|
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 General Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries states the following: For waters not mentioned by a specific beneficial use, the pH value shall not be depressed below 7.0 or raised above 8.5. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Millers Canal was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305FRA-Miller's Canal at Frazier Lake Road] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/10/1998-3/15/2006. Pajaro watershed is one of five annual rotation areas that are monitored for conventional pollutants by CCAMP staff monthly for one year. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112747, pH
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
10273 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
Aquatic Life Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
2 |
Number of Exceedances: |
2 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Diurnal Dissolved Oxygen Sampling (DO) data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 2 samples exceed the criterion for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1 |
|
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2 |
|
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 General Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries states the following: For waters not mentioned by a specific beneficial use, the pH value shall not be depressed below 7.0 or raised above 8.5. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Millers Canal was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305FRA-Miller's Canal at Frazier Lake Road] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 9/7/2005-9/8/2005. Diurnal monitoring conducted in summer months at all CCAMP monitoring sites. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112747, pH
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
48646 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Water Contact Recreation |
|
Number of Samples: |
19 |
Number of Exceedances: |
14 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Water Board Staff assessed public submissions data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 14 of 19 samples exceed the criterion for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Data from Region 3 Conditional Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Jan. 2007-Jun. 2010 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The pH value shall neither be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.3 (Basin Plan). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Millers Canal was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305FRA - Millers Canal] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/13/2007-6/30/2010. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Central Coast Water Board Staff are not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the Cooperative Monitoring Program QAPP, (Clark and Ogle 2006). All data are flagged as appropriate. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring for the Region 3 Conditional Ag Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Revision 6 |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112747, pH
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
10256 |
|
Pollutant: |
pH |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Water Contact Recreation |
|
Number of Samples: |
2 |
Number of Exceedances: |
2 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Diurnal Dissolved Oxygen Sampling (DO) data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 2 samples exceed the criterion for pH. |
Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1 |
|
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2 |
|
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin objective for water contact recreation uses (Section II.A.2. Objectives for All Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries, II.A.2.a) states the following: pH value shall neither be depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.3. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Millers Canal was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305FRA-Miller's Canal at Frazier Lake Road] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 9/7/2005-9/8/2005. Diurnal monitoring conducted in summer months at all CCAMP monitoring sites. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 126825, Nitrate
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
48411 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrate/Nitrite (Nitrite + Nitrate as N) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
13 |
Number of Exceedances: |
2 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Water Board Staff assessed public submissions data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 13 samples exceed the criterion for Nitrate/Nitrite as N. |
Data Reference: |
Data from Region 3 Conditional Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Jan. 2007-Jun. 2010 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Waters shall not contain biostimulatory substances in concentrations that promote aquatic growths to the extent that such growths cause nuisance or adversely affect beneficial uses (Basin Plan). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Technical approach to develop nutrient numeric endpoints for California, Tetra Tech, June 2006. The Central Coast Region numeric target for maximum nitrate concentration is based on the Tetra Tech NNE (Nutrient Numeric Endpoint) Model and CCAMP data for 193 sites, monitored monthly for at least 1 year between January 1998 and December 2006. The model numeric target for aquatic life habitats in the Central Coast Region is 1.0 mg/L Nitrate as N. |
Guideline Reference: |
Technical Approach to Develop Nutrient Numeric Endpoints for California. U.S. EPA Region IX. State Water Resources Control Board. 68-C-02-108-To-111 |
Guideline Reference: |
Central Coast RegionTechnical Paper: Interpreting Narrative Objectives for Biostimulatory Substances for California Central Coast Waters. This method uses the Technical Approach for Developing California Nutrient Numeric Endpoints. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Millers Canal was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305FRA - Millers Canal] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 4/27/2009-6/30/2010. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Central Coast Water Board Staff are not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the Cooperative Monitoring Program QAPP, (Clark and Ogle 2006). All data are flagged as appropriate. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring for the Region 3 Conditional Ag Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Revision 6 |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 126825, Nitrate
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
48401 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrate/Nitrite (Nitrite + Nitrate as N) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
13 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Water Board Staff assessed public submissions data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 13 samples exceed the criterion for Nitrate/Nitrite as N. |
Data Reference: |
Data from Region 3 Conditional Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Jan. 2007-Jun. 2010 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The California Maximum Contaminant Level for nitrate + nitrite (as N) that is incorporated by reference in the Basin Plan is 10.0 mg/L (Basin Plan). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Millers Canal was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305FRA - Millers Canal] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 4/27/2009-6/30/2010. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Central Coast Water Board Staff are not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the Cooperative Monitoring Program QAPP, (Clark and Ogle 2006). All data are flagged as appropriate. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring for the Region 3 Conditional Ag Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Revision 6 |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 126825, Nitrate
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
171742 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrate/Nitrite (Nitrite + Nitrate as N) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
76 |
Number of Exceedances: |
2 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed RWB3 Cooperative Monitoring Program data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 76 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Nitrate + Nitrite as N. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3.
|
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Waters shall not contain biostimulatory substances in concentrations that promote aquatic growths to the extent that such growths cause nuisance or adversely affect beneficial uses (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Technical approach to develop nutrient numeric endpoints for California, Tetra Tech, June 2006. The Central Coast Region numeric target for maximum nitrate concentration is based on the Tetra Tech NNE (Nutrient Numeric Endpoint) Model and CCAMP data for 193 sites, monitored monthly for at least 1 year between January 1998 and December 2006. The model numeric target for aquatic life habitats in the Central Coast Region is 1.0 mg/L Nitrate as N. |
Guideline Reference: |
Central Coast RegionTechnical Paper: Interpreting Narrative Objectives for Biostimulatory Substances for California Central Coast Waters. This method uses the Technical Approach for Developing California Nutrient Numeric Endpoints. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (305FRA) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-04-26 and 2018-09-26 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring for the Region 3 Conditional Ag Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Revision 6. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring for the Region 3 Conditional Ag Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Revision 6 |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 126825, Nitrate
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
171650 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrate/Nitrite (Nitrite + Nitrate as N) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
76 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed RWB3 Cooperative Monitoring Program data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 76 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Nitrate + Nitrite as N. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3.
|
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All inland surface waters, enclosed bays, and estuaries shall not contain concentrations of inorganic chemicals in excess of the maximum contaminant levels for primary drinking water standards specified in California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 4, Chapter 15, Sections 64431 and 64433.2. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Maximum Contaminant Level for nitrate + nitrite (as N) is 10. mg/L (California Code of Regulations, Title 22). |
Guideline Reference: |
California MCLs - Title 17 and Title 22 documents for 2019 - California Regulations Related to Drinking Water |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (305FRA) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-04-26 and 2018-09-26 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring for the Region 3 Conditional Ag Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Revision 6. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring for the Region 3 Conditional Ag Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Revision 6 |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 126825, Nitrate
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
171647 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrate/Nitrite (Nitrite + Nitrate as N) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
76 |
Number of Exceedances: |
2 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed RWB3 Cooperative Monitoring Program data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 76 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Nitrate + Nitrite as N. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3.
|
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Waters shall not contain biostimulatory substances in concentrations that promote aquatic growths to the extent that such growths cause nuisance or adversely affect beneficial uses (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Technical approach to develop nutrient numeric endpoints for California, Tetra Tech, June 2006. The Central Coast Region numeric target for maximum nitrate concentration is based on the Tetra Tech NNE (Nutrient Numeric Endpoint) Model and CCAMP data for 193 sites, monitored monthly for at least 1 year between January 1998 and December 2006. The model numeric target for aquatic life habitats in the Central Coast Region is 1.0 mg/L Nitrate as N. |
Guideline Reference: |
Central Coast RegionTechnical Paper: Interpreting Narrative Objectives for Biostimulatory Substances for California Central Coast Waters. This method uses the Technical Approach for Developing California Nutrient Numeric Endpoints. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (305FRA) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-04-26 and 2018-09-26 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring for the Region 3 Conditional Ag Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Revision 6. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring for the Region 3 Conditional Ag Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Revision 6 |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 126825, Nitrate
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
171922 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrate/Nitrite (Nitrite + Nitrate as N) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Dissolved |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
12 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB3 CCAMP Pajaro and Santa Cruz Area data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 12 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Nitrate + Nitrite as N. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Waters shall not contain biostimulatory substances in concentrations that promote aquatic growths to the extent that such growths cause nuisance or adversely affect beneficial uses (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Technical approach to develop nutrient numeric endpoints for California, Tetra Tech, June 2006. The Central Coast Region numeric target for maximum nitrate concentration is based on the Tetra Tech NNE (Nutrient Numeric Endpoint) Model and CCAMP data for 193 sites, monitored monthly for at least 1 year between January 1998 and December 2006. The model numeric target for aquatic life habitats in the Central Coast Region is 1.0 mg/L Nitrate as N. |
Guideline Reference: |
Central Coast RegionTechnical Paper: Interpreting Narrative Objectives for Biostimulatory Substances for California Central Coast Waters. This method uses the Technical Approach for Developing California Nutrient Numeric Endpoints. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (305FRA) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-01-13 and 2011-12-13 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP 2008 |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 126825, Nitrate
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
149464 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrate/Nitrite (Nitrite + Nitrate as N) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
3 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Surface Water Monitoring Project data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality standard for Nitrate + Nitrite as N. |
Data Reference: |
CMP water quality data 10/17/2018--12/20/2018. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Waters shall not contain biostimulatory substances in concentrations that promote aquatic growths to the extent that such growths cause nuisance or adversely affect beneficial uses (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Technical approach to develop nutrient numeric endpoints for California, Tetra Tech, June 2006. The Central Coast Region numeric target for maximum nitrate concentration is based on the Tetra Tech NNE (Nutrient Numeric Endpoint) Model and CCAMP data for 193 sites, monitored monthly for at least 1 year between January 1998 and December 2006. The model numeric target for aquatic life habitats in the Central Coast Region is 1.0 mg/L Nitrate as N. |
Guideline Reference: |
Central Coast RegionTechnical Paper: Interpreting Narrative Objectives for Biostimulatory Substances for California Central Coast Waters. This method uses the Technical Approach for Developing California Nutrient Numeric Endpoints. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station. Station Code(s): 305FRA |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected between 2018-10-24 and 2018-12-19 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Data was collected verified in accordance with the Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring for the Region 3 Conditional Ag Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring for the Region 3 Conditional Ag Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Revision 6 |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 126825, Nitrate
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
171957 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrate/Nitrite (Nitrite + Nitrate as N) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Dissolved |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
12 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB3 CCAMP Pajaro and Santa Cruz Area data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 12 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Nitrate + Nitrite as N. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Waters shall not contain biostimulatory substances in concentrations that promote aquatic growths to the extent that such growths cause nuisance or adversely affect beneficial uses (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Technical approach to develop nutrient numeric endpoints for California, Tetra Tech, June 2006. The Central Coast Region numeric target for maximum nitrate concentration is based on the Tetra Tech NNE (Nutrient Numeric Endpoint) Model and CCAMP data for 193 sites, monitored monthly for at least 1 year between January 1998 and December 2006. The model numeric target for aquatic life habitats in the Central Coast Region is 1.0 mg/L Nitrate as N. |
Guideline Reference: |
Central Coast RegionTechnical Paper: Interpreting Narrative Objectives for Biostimulatory Substances for California Central Coast Waters. This method uses the Technical Approach for Developing California Nutrient Numeric Endpoints. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (305FRA) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-01-13 and 2011-12-13 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP 2008 |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 126825, Nitrate
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
171771 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrate/Nitrite (Nitrite + Nitrate as N) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Dissolved |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
12 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB3 CCAMP Pajaro and Santa Cruz Area data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 12 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Nitrate + Nitrite as N. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All inland surface waters, enclosed bays, and estuaries shall not contain concentrations of inorganic chemicals in excess of the maximum contaminant levels for primary drinking water standards specified in California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 4, Chapter 15, Sections 64431 and 64433.2. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Maximum Contaminant Level for nitrate + nitrite (as N) is 10. mg/L (California Code of Regulations, Title 22). |
Guideline Reference: |
California MCLs - Title 17 and Title 22 documents for 2019 - California Regulations Related to Drinking Water |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (305FRA) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-01-13 and 2011-12-13 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP 2008 |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 126825, Nitrate
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
149466 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrate/Nitrite (Nitrite + Nitrate as N) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
3 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Surface Water Monitoring Project data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality standard for Nitrate + Nitrite as N. |
Data Reference: |
CMP water quality data 10/17/2018--12/20/2018. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Waters shall not contain biostimulatory substances in concentrations that promote aquatic growths to the extent that such growths cause nuisance or adversely affect beneficial uses (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Technical approach to develop nutrient numeric endpoints for California, Tetra Tech, June 2006. The Central Coast Region numeric target for maximum nitrate concentration is based on the Tetra Tech NNE (Nutrient Numeric Endpoint) Model and CCAMP data for 193 sites, monitored monthly for at least 1 year between January 1998 and December 2006. The model numeric target for aquatic life habitats in the Central Coast Region is 1.0 mg/L Nitrate as N. |
Guideline Reference: |
Central Coast RegionTechnical Paper: Interpreting Narrative Objectives for Biostimulatory Substances for California Central Coast Waters. This method uses the Technical Approach for Developing California Nutrient Numeric Endpoints. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station. Station Code(s): 305FRA |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected between 2018-10-24 and 2018-12-19 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Data was collected verified in accordance with the Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring for the Region 3 Conditional Ag Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring for the Region 3 Conditional Ag Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Revision 6 |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 126825, Nitrate
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
149465 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrate/Nitrite (Nitrite + Nitrate as N) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
3 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Surface Water Monitoring Project data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality standard for Nitrate + Nitrite as N. |
Data Reference: |
CMP water quality data 10/17/2018--12/20/2018. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All inland surface waters, enclosed bays, and estuaries shall not contain concentrations of inorganic chemicals in excess of the maximum contaminant levels for primary drinking water standards specified in California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 4, Chapter 15, Sections 64431 and 64433.2. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Maximum Contaminant Level for nitrate + nitrite (as N) is 10. mg/L (California Code of Regulations, Title 22). |
Guideline Reference: |
California MCLs - Title 17 and Title 22 documents for 2019 - California Regulations Related to Drinking Water |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station. Station Code(s): 305FRA |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected between 2018-10-24 and 2018-12-19 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Data was collected verified in accordance with the Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring for the Region 3 Conditional Ag Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring for the Region 3 Conditional Ag Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Revision 6 |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 126825, Nitrate
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
172897 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, Nitrate |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Dissolved |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
22 |
Number of Exceedances: |
2 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB3 CCAMP Pajaro and Santa Cruz Area data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 2 of the 22 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Nitrate as N. Although a total of 24 samples were collected, 2 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Waters shall not contain biostimulatory substances in concentrations that promote aquatic growths to the extent that such growths cause nuisance or adversely affect beneficial uses (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Technical approach to develop nutrient numeric endpoints for California, Tetra Tech, June 2006. The Central Coast Region numeric target for maximum nitrate concentration is based on the Tetra Tech NNE (Nutrient Numeric Endpoint) Model and CCAMP data for 193 sites, monitored monthly for at least 1 year between January 1998 and December 2006. The model numeric target for aquatic life habitats in the Central Coast Region is 1.0 mg/L Nitrate as N. |
Guideline Reference: |
Central Coast RegionTechnical Paper: Interpreting Narrative Objectives for Biostimulatory Substances for California Central Coast Waters. This method uses the Technical Approach for Developing California Nutrient Numeric Endpoints. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (305FRA). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2011-01-13 to 2017-12-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP 2008 |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 126825, Nitrate
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
172295 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, Nitrate |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Dissolved |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
22 |
Number of Exceedances: |
2 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB3 CCAMP Pajaro and Santa Cruz Area data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 2 of the 22 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Nitrate as N. Although a total of 24 samples were collected, 2 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Waters shall not contain biostimulatory substances in concentrations that promote aquatic growths to the extent that such growths cause nuisance or adversely affect beneficial uses (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Technical approach to develop nutrient numeric endpoints for California, Tetra Tech, June 2006. The Central Coast Region numeric target for maximum nitrate concentration is based on the Tetra Tech NNE (Nutrient Numeric Endpoint) Model and CCAMP data for 193 sites, monitored monthly for at least 1 year between January 1998 and December 2006. The model numeric target for aquatic life habitats in the Central Coast Region is 1.0 mg/L Nitrate as N. |
Guideline Reference: |
Central Coast RegionTechnical Paper: Interpreting Narrative Objectives for Biostimulatory Substances for California Central Coast Waters. This method uses the Technical Approach for Developing California Nutrient Numeric Endpoints. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (305FRA). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2011-01-13 to 2017-12-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP 2008 |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 126825, Nitrate
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
172986 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, Nitrate |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Dissolved |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
24 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB3 CCAMP Pajaro and Santa Cruz Area data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 24 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Nitrate as N. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All inland surface waters, enclosed bays, and estuaries shall not contain concentrations of inorganic chemicals in excess of the maximum contaminant levels for primary drinking water standards specified in California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 4, Chapter 15, Sections 64431 and 64433.2. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
The California Maximum Contaminant Level for nitrate (as N) 10.0 mg/L (California Code of Regulations, Title 22). |
Guideline Reference: |
California MCLs - Title 17 and Title 22 documents for 2019 - California Regulations Related to Drinking Water |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (305FRA) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-01-13 and 2017-12-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP 2008 |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 126825, Nitrate
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
17674 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrate |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
336 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed Monterey Area Research Consortium (R3_MARC) data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 336 samples exceed the criterion for Nitrate as N. |
Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: Marc Los Huertos Water Quality Data, file A
|
|
Final Data File used for assessment: Marc Los Huertos Water Quality Data, file B
|
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin Objective for municipal and domestic supply uses of inland surface waters (Section II.A.2) states the following: waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in excess of the limits specified in California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Article 4, Chapter 15, Section 64435, Tables 2 and 3 as listed in Table 3-2. The maximum contaminant level listed in Table 3-2 (inorganic and fluoride concentrations not to be exceeded in domestic or municipal supply) for nitrate is 10.0 mg/L (NO3 as N). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Title 22, Division 4, Ch. 15, Article 4, Section 64431, Table 64431-A |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Millers Canal was collected at 11 monitoring sites [ MC-FLR - Millers Canal at Frazer Lake Rd., MC-2, MC-3, MC-4, MC-5, MC-6, MC-7, MC-9, MC-10, MC-12, MC-11] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 10/1/2002-3/13/2007. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Regional Board approved QAPP. Multiple errors were identified in data and were flagged or fixed by RB staff (in communication with Project staff) prior to assessment of data. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 126825, Nitrate
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
48400 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrate/Nitrite (Nitrite + Nitrate as N) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
13 |
Number of Exceedances: |
2 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Water Board Staff assessed public submissions data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 13 samples exceed the criterion for Nitrate/Nitrite as N. |
Data Reference: |
Data from Region 3 Conditional Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Jan. 2007-Jun. 2010 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Waters shall not contain biostimulatory substances in concentrations that promote aquatic growths to the extent that such growths cause nuisance or adversely affect beneficial uses (Basin Plan). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
Technical approach to develop nutrient numeric endpoints for California, Tetra Tech, June 2006. The Central Coast Region numeric target for maximum nitrate concentration is based on the Tetra Tech NNE (Nutrient Numeric Endpoint) Model and CCAMP data for 193 sites, monitored monthly for at least 1 year between January 1998 and December 2006. The model numeric target for aquatic life habitats in the Central Coast Region is 1.0 mg/L Nitrate as N. |
Guideline Reference: |
Technical Approach to Develop Nutrient Numeric Endpoints for California. U.S. EPA Region IX. State Water Resources Control Board. 68-C-02-108-To-111 |
Guideline Reference: |
Central Coast RegionTechnical Paper: Interpreting Narrative Objectives for Biostimulatory Substances for California Central Coast Waters. This method uses the Technical Approach for Developing California Nutrient Numeric Endpoints. |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Millers Canal was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305FRA - Millers Canal] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 4/27/2009-6/30/2010. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Central Coast Water Board Staff are not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the Cooperative Monitoring Program QAPP, (Clark and Ogle 2006). All data are flagged as appropriate. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring for the Region 3 Conditional Ag Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Revision 6 |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 126825, Nitrate
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
9341 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrate |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
26 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Pajaro (Pajaro) data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 26 samples exceed the criterion for Nitrate as N. |
Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1 |
|
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2 |
|
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin Objective for municipal and domestic supply uses of inland surface waters (Section II.A.2) states the following: waters shall not contain concentrations of chemical constituents in excess of the limits specified in California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Article 4, Chapter 15, Section 64435, Tables 2 and 3 as listed in Table 3-2. The maximum contaminant level listed in Table 3-2 (inorganic and fluoride concentrations not to be exceeded in domestic or municipal supply) for nitrate is 10.0 mg/L (NO3 as N). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3) |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Title 22, Division 4, Ch. 15, Article 4, Section 64431, Table 64431-A |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Millers Canal was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305FRA-Miller's Canal at Frazier Lake Road] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/10/1998-3/15/2006. Pajaro watershed is one of five annual rotation areas that are monitored for conventional pollutants by CCAMP staff monthly for one year. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112745, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
13627 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Dissolved |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
Aquatic Life Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
5 |
Number of Exceedances: |
2 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCWQP Northern Area Ag-Waiver Monitoring (R3_CMPNorth) data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 5 samples exceed the criterion for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: Central Coast Water Quality Preservation Inc toxicity data
|
|
Final Data File used for assessment: Central Coast Water Quality Preservation Inc water quality data
|
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Cold Water Habitat Objective, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 General Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries states the following: The dissolved oxygen concentration shall not be reduced below 7.0 mg/l at any time. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Millers Canal was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305FRA-Miller's Canal at Frazier Lake Road] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/21/2006-9/26/2006. Cooperative Monitoring Program (CMP) staff conduct monitoring for conventional pollutants at all Ag Waiver monitoring sites monthly. CMP staff also conduct water toxicity monitoring quarterly and sediment toxicity monitoring annually (in spring). |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the Cooperative Monitoring Program QAPP, (Clark and Ogle 2006). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112745, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
48412 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Dissolved |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
19 |
Number of Exceedances: |
5 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Water Board Staff assessed public submissions data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 5 of 19 samples exceed the criterion for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Data from Region 3 Conditional Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Jan. 2007-Jun. 2010 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved oxygen concentration shall not be reduced below 7.0 mg/l at any time (Basin Plan). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Millers Canal was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305FRA - Millers Canal] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/13/2007-6/30/2010. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Central Coast Water Board Staff are not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the Cooperative Monitoring Program QAPP, (Clark and Ogle 2006). All data are flagged as appropriate. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring for the Region 3 Conditional Ag Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Revision 6 |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112745, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
17821 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Dissolved |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
Aquatic Life Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
226 |
Number of Exceedances: |
84 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed Monterey Area Research Consortium (R3_MARC) data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 84 of 226 samples exceed the criterion for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: Marc Los Huertos Water Quality Data, file A
|
|
Final Data File used for assessment: Marc Los Huertos Water Quality Data, file B
|
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Cold Water Habitat Objective, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 General Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries states the following: The dissolved oxygen concentration shall not be reduced below 7.0 mg/l at any time. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Millers Canal was collected at 11 monitoring sites [ MC-FLR - Millers Canal at Frazer Lake Rd., MC-2, MC-3, MC-4, MC-5, MC-6, MC-7, MC-9, MC-10, MC-12, MC-11] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 10/1/2002-2/11/2007. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Regional Board approved QAPP. Multiple errors were identified in data and were flagged or fixed by RB staff (in communication with Project staff) prior to assessment of data. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112745, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
11904 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Dissolved |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
Aquatic Life Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
2 |
Number of Exceedances: |
2 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Diurnal Dissolved Oxygen Sampling (DO) data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 2 samples exceed the criterion for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1 |
|
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2 |
|
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Cold Water Habitat Objective, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 General Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries states the following: The dissolved oxygen concentration shall not be reduced below 7.0 mg/l at any time. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Millers Canal was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305FRA-Miller's Canal at Frazier Lake Road] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 9/7/2005-9/8/2005. Diurnal monitoring conducted in summer months at all CCAMP monitoring sites. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112745, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
11882 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Dissolved |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
Aquatic Life Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
30 |
Number of Exceedances: |
6 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Pajaro (Pajaro) data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 6 of 30 samples exceed the criterion for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1 |
|
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2 |
|
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, Cold Water Habitat Objective, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 General Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries states the following: The dissolved oxygen concentration shall not be reduced below 7.0 mg/l at any time. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Millers Canal was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305FRA-Miller's Canal at Frazier Lake Road] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/10/1998-3/15/2006. Pajaro watershed is one of five annual rotation areas that are monitored for conventional pollutants by CCAMP staff monthly for one year. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112745, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
48413 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Dissolved |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
19 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Water Board Staff assessed public submissions data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 19 samples exceed the criterion for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Data from Region 3 Conditional Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Jan. 2007-Jun. 2010 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved oxygen concentration shall not be reduced below 5.0 mg/l at any time (Basin Plan). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Millers Canal was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305FRA - Millers Canal] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/13/2007-6/30/2010. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Central Coast Water Board Staff are not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the Cooperative Monitoring Program QAPP, (Clark and Ogle 2006). All data are flagged as appropriate. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring for the Region 3 Conditional Ag Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Revision 6 |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112745, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
11883 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Dissolved |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
Aquatic Life Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
30 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Pajaro (Pajaro) data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 30 samples exceed the criterion for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1 |
|
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2 |
|
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 General Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries states the following: For waters not mentioned by a specific beneficial use, dissolved oxygen concentration shall not be reduced below 5.0 mg/l at any time. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Millers Canal was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305FRA-Miller's Canal at Frazier Lake Road] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/10/1998-3/15/2006. Pajaro watershed is one of five annual rotation areas that are monitored for conventional pollutants by CCAMP staff monthly for one year. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112745, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
17822 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Dissolved |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
Aquatic Life Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
226 |
Number of Exceedances: |
31 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed Monterey Area Research Consortium (R3_MARC) data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 31 of 226 samples exceed the criterion for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: Marc Los Huertos Water Quality Data, file A
|
|
Final Data File used for assessment: Marc Los Huertos Water Quality Data, file B
|
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 General Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries states the following: For waters not mentioned by a specific beneficial use, dissolved oxygen concentration shall not be reduced below 5.0 mg/l at any time. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Millers Canal was collected at 11 monitoring sites [ MC-FLR - Millers Canal at Frazer Lake Rd., MC-2, MC-3, MC-4, MC-5, MC-6, MC-7, MC-9, MC-10, MC-12, MC-11] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 10/1/2002-2/11/2007. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Regional Board approved QAPP. Multiple errors were identified in data and were flagged or fixed by RB staff (in communication with Project staff) prior to assessment of data. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112745, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
13628 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Dissolved |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
Aquatic Life Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
5 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCWQP Northern Area Ag-Waiver Monitoring (R3_CMPNorth) data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 5 samples exceed the criterion for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: Central Coast Water Quality Preservation Inc toxicity data
|
|
Final Data File used for assessment: Central Coast Water Quality Preservation Inc water quality data
|
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 General Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries states the following: For waters not mentioned by a specific beneficial use, dissolved oxygen concentration shall not be reduced below 5.0 mg/l at any time. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Millers Canal was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305FRA-Miller's Canal at Frazier Lake Road] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/21/2006-9/26/2006. Cooperative Monitoring Program (CMP) staff conduct monitoring for conventional pollutants at all Ag Waiver monitoring sites monthly. CMP staff also conduct water toxicity monitoring quarterly and sediment toxicity monitoring annually (in spring). |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the Cooperative Monitoring Program QAPP, (Clark and Ogle 2006). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112745, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
11920 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Dissolved |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
Aquatic Life Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
2 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Diurnal Dissolved Oxygen Sampling (DO) data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 2 samples exceed the criterion for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1 |
|
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2 |
|
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin, General Objective, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 General Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries states the following: For waters not mentioned by a specific beneficial use, dissolved oxygen concentration shall not be reduced below 5.0 mg/l at any time. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Millers Canal was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305FRA-Miller's Canal at Frazier Lake Road] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 9/7/2005-9/8/2005. Diurnal monitoring conducted in summer months at all CCAMP monitoring sites. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112745, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
174616 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Fish Spawning |
|
Number of Samples: |
84 |
Number of Exceedances: |
30 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed RWB3 Cooperative Monitoring Program data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 30 of 84 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3.
|
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved oxygen concentration shall not be reduced below 7.0 mg/l at any time (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (305FRA) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-04-26 and 2018-12-19 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring for the Region 3 Conditional Ag Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Revision 6. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring for the Region 3 Conditional Ag Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Revision 6 |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112745, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
174449 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Fish Spawning |
|
Number of Samples: |
2 |
Number of Exceedances: |
2 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB3 CCAMP Dissolved Oxygen Study data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Field data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved oxygen concentration shall not be reduced below 7.0 mg/l at any time (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (305FRA) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-08-30 and 2011-08-31 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP 2008 |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112745, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
175124 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
84 |
Number of Exceedances: |
30 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed RWB3 Cooperative Monitoring Program data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 30 of 84 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3.
|
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved oxygen concentration shall not be reduced below 7.0 mg/l at any time (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (305FRA) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-04-26 and 2018-12-19 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring for the Region 3 Conditional Ag Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Revision 6. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring for the Region 3 Conditional Ag Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Revision 6 |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112745, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
175096 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
24 |
Number of Exceedances: |
2 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB3 CCAMP Pajaro and Santa Cruz Area data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 24 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved oxygen concentration shall not be reduced below 5.0 mg/l at any time (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (305FRA) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-01-13 and 2017-12-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP 2008 |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112745, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
174769 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
24 |
Number of Exceedances: |
9 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB3 CCAMP Pajaro and Santa Cruz Area data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 9 of 24 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved oxygen concentration shall not be reduced below 7.0 mg/l at any time (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (305FRA) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-01-13 and 2017-12-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP 2008 |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112745, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
174607 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
84 |
Number of Exceedances: |
8 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed RWB3 Cooperative Monitoring Program data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 8 of 84 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3.
|
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved oxygen concentration shall not be reduced below 5.0 mg/l at any time (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (305FRA) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-04-26 and 2018-12-19 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring for the Region 3 Conditional Ag Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Revision 6. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring for the Region 3 Conditional Ag Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Revision 6 |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112745, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
174780 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Fish Spawning |
|
Number of Samples: |
24 |
Number of Exceedances: |
9 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB3 CCAMP Pajaro and Santa Cruz Area data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 9 of 24 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved oxygen concentration shall not be reduced below 7.0 mg/l at any time (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (305FRA) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-01-13 and 2017-12-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP 2008 |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112745, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
175125 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
2 |
Number of Exceedances: |
2 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB3 CCAMP Dissolved Oxygen Study data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 2 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Field data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved oxygen concentration shall not be reduced below 7.0 mg/l at any time (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (305FRA) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-08-30 and 2011-08-31 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP 2008 |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 112745, Oxygen, Dissolved
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
174794 |
|
Pollutant: |
Oxygen, Dissolved |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
2 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB3 CCAMP Dissolved Oxygen Study data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 2 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Oxygen, Dissolved. |
Data Reference: |
Field data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The dissolved oxygen concentration shall not be reduced below 5.0 mg/l at any time (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (305FRA) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-08-30 and 2011-08-31 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP 2008 |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 127484, Ammonia
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
183749 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
12 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB3 CCAMP Pajaro and Santa Cruz Area data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 12 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (305FRA) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-02-10 and 2017-11-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP 2008 |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 127484, Ammonia
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
183704 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
40 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed RWB3 Cooperative Monitoring Program data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 40 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3.
|
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (305FRA) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-05-26 and 2018-09-26 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring for the Region 3 Conditional Ag Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Revision 6. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring for the Region 3 Conditional Ag Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Revision 6 |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 127484, Ammonia
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
183746 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
59 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed RWB3 Cooperative Monitoring Program data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 59 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3.
|
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
EPA's Lifetime Health advisory level for total ammonia is 30.0 mg/L as stated on page 8 of the 2012 edition of the drinking water standards and health advisories. This Advisory Level is defined as 'the concentration of a chemical in drinking water that is not expected to cause any adverse noncarcinogenic effects for a lifetime of exposure.' |
Guideline Reference: |
2018 Edition of the Drinking Water Standards and Health Advisories |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (305FRA) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-04-26 and 2018-09-26 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring for the Region 3 Conditional Ag Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Revision 6. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring for the Region 3 Conditional Ag Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Revision 6 |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 127484, Ammonia
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
183745 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
12 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB3 CCAMP Pajaro and Santa Cruz Area data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 12 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (305FRA) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-02-10 and 2017-11-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP 2008 |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 127484, Ammonia
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
13706 |
|
Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
Aquatic Life Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
3 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCWQP Northern Area Ag-Waiver Monitoring (R3_CMPNorth) data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceed the criterion for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: Central Coast Water Quality Preservation Inc toxicity data
|
|
Final Data File used for assessment: Central Coast Water Quality Preservation Inc water quality data
|
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin General Objective, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 (General Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries) states that the discharge of wastes shall not cause concentrations of unionized ammonia (NH3) to exceed 0.025 mg/l (as N) in receiving waters (page III-4) . |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Millers Canal was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305FRA-Miller's Canal at Frazier Lake Road] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/21/2006-5/18/2006. Cooperative Monitoring Program (CMP) staff conduct monitoring for conventional pollutants at all Ag Waiver monitoring sites monthly. CMP staff also conduct water toxicity monitoring quarterly and sediment toxicity monitoring annually (in spring). |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the Cooperative Monitoring Program QAPP, (Clark and Ogle 2006). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 127484, Ammonia
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
9337 |
|
Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
Aquatic Life Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
25 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Pajaro (Pajaro) data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 25 samples exceed the criterion for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1 |
|
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2 |
|
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin General Objective, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 (General Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries) states that the discharge of wastes shall not cause concentrations of unionized ammonia (NH3) to exceed 0.025 mg/l (as N) in receiving waters (page III-4) . |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Millers Canal was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305FRA-Miller's Canal at Frazier Lake Road] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/10/1998-3/15/2006. Pajaro watershed is one of five annual rotation areas that are monitored for conventional pollutants by CCAMP staff monthly for one year. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 127484, Ammonia
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
48391 |
|
Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
10 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Water Board Staff assessed public submissions data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 10 samples exceed the criterion for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
Data Reference: |
Data from Region 3 Conditional Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Jan. 2007-Jun. 2010 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin General Objective, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 (General Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries) states that the discharge of wastes shall not cause concentrations of unionized ammonia (NH3) to exceed 0.025 mg/l (as N) in receiving waters (page III-4) . |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Millers Canal was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305FRA - Millers Canal] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 4/27/2009-3/31/2010. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Central Coast Water Board Staff are not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the Cooperative Monitoring Program QAPP, (Clark and Ogle 2006). All data are flagged as appropriate. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring for the Region 3 Conditional Ag Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Revision 6 |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 127484, Ammonia
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
9338 |
|
Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
Aquatic Life Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
25 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Pajaro (Pajaro) data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 25 samples exceed the criterion for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1 |
|
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2 |
|
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin General Objective, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 (General Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries) states that the discharge of wastes shall not cause concentrations of unionized ammonia (NH3) to exceed 0.025 mg/l (as N) in receiving waters (page III-4) . |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Millers Canal was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305FRA-Miller's Canal at Frazier Lake Road] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/10/1998-3/15/2006. Pajaro watershed is one of five annual rotation areas that are monitored for conventional pollutants by CCAMP staff monthly for one year. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 127484, Ammonia
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
48392 |
|
Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
10 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Water Board Staff assessed public submissions data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 10 samples exceed the criterion for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
Data Reference: |
Data from Region 3 Conditional Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Jan. 2007-Jun. 2010 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin General Objective, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 (General Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries) states that the discharge of wastes shall not cause concentrations of unionized ammonia (NH3) to exceed 0.025 mg/l (as N) in receiving waters (page III-4). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Millers Canal was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305FRA - Millers Canal] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 4/27/2009-3/31/2010. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Central Coast Water Board Staff are not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the Cooperative Monitoring Program QAPP, (Clark and Ogle 2006). All data are flagged as appropriate. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring for the Region 3 Conditional Ag Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Revision 6 |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 127484, Ammonia
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
13721 |
|
Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
Aquatic Life Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
3 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCWQP Northern Area Ag-Waiver Monitoring (R3_CMPNorth) data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceed the criterion for Ammonia as N, Unionized. |
Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: Central Coast Water Quality Preservation Inc toxicity data
|
|
Final Data File used for assessment: Central Coast Water Quality Preservation Inc water quality data
|
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin General Objective, Chapter III, Section II.A.2 (General Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays and Estuaries) states that the discharge of wastes shall not cause concentrations of unionized ammonia (NH3) to exceed 0.025 mg/l (as N) in receiving waters (page III-4) . |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) - Central Coast Region (Region 3) |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Millers Canal was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305FRA-Miller's Canal at Frazier Lake Road] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/21/2006-5/18/2006. Cooperative Monitoring Program (CMP) staff conduct monitoring for conventional pollutants at all Ag Waiver monitoring sites monthly. CMP staff also conduct water toxicity monitoring quarterly and sediment toxicity monitoring annually (in spring). |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the Cooperative Monitoring Program QAPP, (Clark and Ogle 2006). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 127484, Ammonia
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
48390 |
|
Pollutant: |
Ammonia as Nitrogen |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
10 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Water Board Staff assessed public submissions data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 10 samples exceed the criterion for Ammonia As N, Total. |
Data Reference: |
Data from Region 3 Conditional Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Jan. 2007-Jun. 2010 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Basin Plan). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
EPA's Lifetime Health advisory level for total ammonia is 30.0 mg/L as stated on page 8 of the 2006 edition of the drinking water standards and health advisories. This Advisory Level is defined as "the concentration of a chemical in drinking water that is not expected to cause any adverse noncarcinogenic effects for up to ten days of exposure." |
Guideline Reference: |
2006 edition of the drinking water standards and health advisories. EPA 822-R-03-013 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Millers Canal was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305FRA - Millers Canal] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 4/27/2009-3/31/2010. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Central Coast Water Board Staff are not aware of any special conditions that might affect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the Cooperative Monitoring Program QAPP, (Clark and Ogle 2006). All data are flagged as appropriate. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring for the Region 3 Conditional Ag Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Revision 6 |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 127484, Ammonia
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
149437 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
3 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Surface Water Monitoring Project data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality standard for Ammonia as N. 1 of these samples were estimates. |
Data Reference: |
CMP water quality data 10/17/2018--12/20/2018. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
EPA's Lifetime Health advisory level for total ammonia is 30.0 mg/L as stated on page 8 of the 2012 edition of the drinking water standards and health advisories. This Advisory Level is defined as "the concentration of a chemical in drinking water that is not expected to cause any adverse noncarcinogenic effects for a lifetime of exposure." |
Guideline Reference: |
2018 Edition of the Drinking Water Standards and Health Advisories |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station. Station Code(s): 305FRA |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected between 2018-10-24 and 2018-12-19 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Data was collected verified in accordance with the Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring for the Region 3 Conditional Ag Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring for the Region 3 Conditional Ag Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Revision 6 |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 127484, Ammonia
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
183658 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
23 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB3 CCAMP Pajaro and Santa Cruz Area data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 23 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
All waters shall be maintained free of toxic substances in concentrations which are toxic to, or which produce detrimental physiological responses in, human, plant, animal, or aquatic life. (Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
EPA's Lifetime Health advisory level for total ammonia is 30.0 mg/L as stated on page 8 of the 2012 edition of the drinking water standards and health advisories. This Advisory Level is defined as 'the concentration of a chemical in drinking water that is not expected to cause any adverse noncarcinogenic effects for a lifetime of exposure.' |
Guideline Reference: |
2018 Edition of the Drinking Water Standards and Health Advisories |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (305FRA) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2011-01-13 and 2017-12-05 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP 2008 |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 127484, Ammonia
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
17796 |
|
Pollutant: |
Ammonia as Nitrogen |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
334 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed Monterey Area Research Consortium (R3_MARC) data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 334 samples exceed the criterion for Ammonia As N, Total. |
Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: Marc Los Huertos Water Quality Data, file A
|
|
Final Data File used for assessment: Marc Los Huertos Water Quality Data, file B
|
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
USEPA Health Advisory 2006 Edition of the Drinking Water Standards and Health Advisories (EPA 822-R-06-013, 2006). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
2006 edition of the drinking water standards and health advisories. EPA 822-R-03-013 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
EPA's Lifetime Health advisory level for total ammonia is 30.0 mg/L as stated on page 8 of the 2006 edition of the drinking water standards and health advisories. This Advisory Level is defined as "the concentration of a chemical in drinking water that is not expected to cause any adverse noncarcinogenic effects for up to ten days of exposure." |
Guideline Reference: |
2006 edition of the drinking water standards and health advisories. EPA 822-R-03-013 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Millers Canal was collected at 11 monitoring sites [ MC-FLR - Millers Canal at Frazer Lake Rd., MC-2, MC-3, MC-4, MC-5, MC-6, MC-7, MC-9, MC-10, MC-12, MC-11] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 10/1/2002-3/13/2007. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
Regional Board approved QAPP. Multiple errors were identified in data and were flagged or fixed by RB staff (in communication with Project staff) prior to assessment of data. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 127484, Ammonia
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
183700 |
|
Pollutant: |
Nitrogen, ammonia (Total Ammonia) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
40 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed RWB3 Cooperative Monitoring Program data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 1 of 40 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3.
|
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
The Total Ammonia criterion continuous concentration (expressed as a 30-day average) to protect aquatic life in freshwater is Temperature and pH dependent, and was calculated according to the formula listed in the Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 document. |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Aquatic Life Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia - Freshwater 2013 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (305FRA) |
Temporal Representation: |
The samples were collected between the dates of 2010-05-26 and 2018-09-26 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring for the Region 3 Conditional Ag Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Revision 6. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring for the Region 3 Conditional Ag Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Revision 6 |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 127484, Ammonia
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
219384 |
|
Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
15 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB3 CCAMP Pajaro and Santa Cruz Area data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of the 15 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. Although a total of 24 samples were collected, 9 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin General Objective, Chapter 3, Section 3.3.2 (Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries) states that the discharge of wastes shall not cause concentrations of unionized ammonia (NH3) to exceed 0.025 mg/L (as N) in receiving waters (page 32). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (305FRA). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2011-01-13 to 2017-11-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP 2008 |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 127484, Ammonia
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
219317 |
|
Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
15 |
Number of Exceedances: |
1 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed SWAMP RWB3 CCAMP Pajaro and Santa Cruz Area data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 1 of the 15 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. Although a total of 24 samples were collected, 9 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin General Objective, Chapter 3, Section 3.3.2 (Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries) states that the discharge of wastes shall not cause concentrations of unionized ammonia (NH3) to exceed 0.025 mg/L (as N) in receiving waters (page 32). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (305FRA). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2011-01-13 to 2017-11-07 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
SWAMP 2008 |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Program Plans, Quality Assurance Project Plans, and Standard Operating Procedures for the SWAMP program |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 127484, Ammonia
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
149463 |
|
Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
3 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Surface Water Monitoring Project data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality standard for Ammonia as N, Unionized. 3 of these samples were estimates. |
Data Reference: |
CMP water quality data 10/17/2018--12/20/2018. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin General Objective, Chapter 3, Section 3.3.2 (Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries) states that the discharge of wastes shall not cause concentrations of unionized ammonia (NH3) to exceed 0.025 mg/L (as N) in receiving waters (page 32). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station. Station Code(s): 305FRA |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected between 2018-10-24 and 2018-12-19 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Data was collected verified in accordance with the Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring for the Region 3 Conditional Ag Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring for the Region 3 Conditional Ag Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Revision 6 |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 127484, Ammonia
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
219318 |
|
Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Warm Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
57 |
Number of Exceedances: |
3 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed RWB3 Cooperative Monitoring Program data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 3 of the 57 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. Although a total of 58 samples were collected, 1 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3.
|
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin General Objective, Chapter 3, Section 3.3.2 (Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries) states that the discharge of wastes shall not cause concentrations of unionized ammonia (NH3) to exceed 0.025 mg/L (as N) in receiving waters (page 32). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (305FRA). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2010-04-26 to 2018-09-26 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring for the Region 3 Conditional Ag Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Revision 6. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring for the Region 3 Conditional Ag Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Revision 6 |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 127484, Ammonia
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
149438 |
|
Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
3 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed Surface Water Monitoring Project data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 3 samples exceeded the water quality standard for Ammonia as N, Unionized. 3 of these samples were estimates. |
Data Reference: |
CMP water quality data 10/17/2018--12/20/2018. |
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin General Objective, Chapter 3, Section 3.3.2 (Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries) states that the discharge of wastes shall not cause concentrations of unionized ammonia (NH3) to exceed 0.025 mg/L (as N) in receiving waters (page 32). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data were collected from 1 station. Station Code(s): 305FRA |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody were collected between 2018-10-24 and 2018-12-19 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Data was collected verified in accordance with the Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring for the Region 3 Conditional Ag Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring for the Region 3 Conditional Ag Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Revision 6 |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 127484, Ammonia
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
9287 |
|
Pollutant: |
Ammonia as Nitrogen |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
None |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Municipal & Domestic Supply |
|
Number of Samples: |
26 |
Number of Exceedances: |
0 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Central Coast Regional Board Staff assessed CCAMP Pajaro (Pajaro) data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and results are as follows: 0 of 26 samples exceed the criterion for Ammonia as N, Total. |
Data Reference: |
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file1 |
|
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file2 |
|
Final Data File used for assessment: CCAMP Water Quality Data_file3 |
|
SWAMP Data: |
SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
USEPA Health Advisory 2006 Edition of the Drinking Water Standards and Health Advisories (EPA 822-R-06-013, 2006). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
2006 edition of the drinking water standards and health advisories. EPA 822-R-03-013 |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
EPA's Lifetime Health advisory level for total ammonia is 30.0 mg/L as stated on page 8 of the 2006 edition of the drinking water standards and health advisories. This Advisory Level is defined as "the concentration of a chemical in drinking water that is not expected to cause any adverse noncarcinogenic effects for up to ten days of exposure." |
Guideline Reference: |
2006 edition of the drinking water standards and health advisories. EPA 822-R-03-013 |
|
Spatial Representation: |
Data for this line of evidence for Millers Canal was collected at 1 monitoring site [ 305FRA-Miller's Canal at Frazier Lake Road] |
Temporal Representation: |
Data was collected over the time period 2/10/1998-3/15/2006. Pajaro watershed is one of five annual rotation areas that are monitored for conventional pollutants by CCAMP staff monthly for one year. |
Environmental Conditions: |
Staff is not aware of any special conditions that might effect interpretation of the data. |
QAPP Information: |
All data was collected following the Standard Operating Procedures and Data Quality Objectives outlined in the SWAMP QAMP, (Puckett, 2002). QA data are included in submission. All data are flagged as appropriate. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
|
Line of Evidence (LOE) for Decision ID 127484, Ammonia
|
Region 3 |
Millers Canal |
|
|
LOE ID: |
219673 |
|
Pollutant: |
Ammonia (Unionized) |
LOE Subgroup: |
Pollutant-Water |
Matrix: |
Water |
Fraction: |
Total |
|
Beneficial Use: |
Cold Freshwater Habitat |
|
Number of Samples: |
57 |
Number of Exceedances: |
3 |
|
Data and Information Type: |
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL MONITORING |
Data Used to Assess Water Quality: |
Water Board staff assessed RWB3 Cooperative Monitoring Program data for Millers Canal to determine beneficial use support and the results are as follows: 3 of the 57 samples exceeded the water quality threshold for Ammonia as N, Unionized. Although a total of 58 samples were collected, 1 of these samples were not included in the assessment because the laboratory data reporting limit(s) was above the water quality threshold and therefore the results could not be quantified with the level of certainty required by the Listing Policy Section 6.1.5.5. |
Data Reference: |
Field, Habitat, Sediment, Toxicity, Water data for the 2020/2022 integrated report in Region 3.
|
|
SWAMP Data: |
Non-SWAMP |
|
Water Quality Objective/Criterion: |
Water Quality Control Plan, Central Coast Basin General Objective, Chapter 3, Section 3.3.2 (Objectives for all Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries) states that the discharge of wastes shall not cause concentrations of unionized ammonia (NH3) to exceed 0.025 mg/L (as N) in receiving waters (page 32). |
Objective/Criterion Reference: |
Water Quality Control Plan for the Central Coastal Basin |
|
Evaluation Guideline: |
|
Guideline Reference: |
|
Spatial Representation: |
The samples were collected at 1 monitoring site (305FRA). |
Temporal Representation: |
Data for this waterbody was collected over the date range 2010-04-26 to 2018-09-26 |
Environmental Conditions: |
|
QAPP Information: |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring for the Region 3 Conditional Ag Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Revision 6. |
QAPP Information Reference(s): |
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Monitoring for the Region 3 Conditional Ag Waiver Cooperative Monitoring Program, Revision 6 |
|