California Water Boards' Annual Performance Report - Fiscal Year  2017-18

State Board | Region 1 | Region 2 | Region 3 | Region 4 | Region 5 | Region 6 | Region 7 | Region 8 | Region 9


TARGETS AND RESOURCES: REGION 5 CENTRAL VALLEY

GROUP: 
TARGETS AND RESOURCES - REGION 5
MEASURE: 
ALL REGIONAL TARGETS
ALL RESOURCES

Targets Achieved:
• = Less than 60% of target met
• = Target met between 60% and 80%
• = Target met at 80% or above

Central Valley Regional Water Board Performance Summary1
Percentage of Targets Met
Area: 59344 square miles Budget: $58,482,518 Staff: 251.7
Permitting 100% • Inspections 100% • Others 44% •
1Regional Board performance summary statistics show the percentage of targets met.
 
Total Maximum Daily Load and Basin Planning
Program Budget: $3,678,013 Program Staff: 19.50
  Target Actual Achieved % of Targets Met
Pollutant/Water Body Combinations Addressed 10 0 0% •
Total Maximum Daily Loads Adopted 0 0  
Basin Plan Amendments Adopted 1 2 200% •
Regional Considerations: Region 5 was originally scheduled to complete an off-cycle Integrated Report during FY 17/18 to address 10 pollutant/water body combinations; however, due to various delays in completing the 2018 Integrated Report, the assessment will be completed by the end of the 18/19 Fiscal Year.
Available Fact Sheets: Basin Planning Fact Sheet and Central Valley Salts.
NPDES Wastewater
Program Budget: $4,824,946 Program Staff: 23.20
  Target Actual Achieved % of Targets Met
Major Individual Permits Issued or Renewed 9 7 78% •
Major Individual Facilities Inspected 27 24 89% •
Minor Individual Permits Issued or Renewed 8 7 88% •
Minor Individual Facilities Inspected 6 15 250% •
Minor General Facilities Inspected 0 1  
Regional Considerations: NPDES Wastewater: No Regional Board Considerations Provided
Available Fact Sheets: NPDES Wastewater.
NPDES Stormwater
Program Budget: $1,851,234 Program Staff: 10.80
  Target Actual Achieved % of Targets Met
Municipal (Phase I/II Inspections) 0 2  
Construction Inspections 385 420 109% •
Industrial Inspections 195 218 112% •
Regional Considerations: No Regional Board Considerations Provided
Available Fact Sheets: NPDES Stormwater.
Waste Discharge to Land Wastewater
Program Budget: $6,254,304 Program Staff: 22.70
  Target Actual Achieved % of Targets Met
Waste Discharge to Land Inspections 170 230 135% •
Individual Waste Discharge Requirements Updated 29 21 72% •
Regional Considerations: No Regional Board Considerations Provided
Available Fact Sheets: Cannabis Cultivation Waste Discharge and WDR.
Land Disposal
Program Budget: $3,723,405 Program Staff: 19.40
  Target Actual Achieved % of Targets Met
Landfill Individual Permits Updated 14 19 136% •
Landfill Inspections 93 169 182% •
All Other Individual Permits Updated 2 7 350% •
All Other Inspections 26 45 173% •
Regional Considerations: No Regional Board Considerations Provided
Available Fact Sheets: Land Disposal.
Confined Animal Facilities (WDR, NPDES, etc.)
Program Budget: $3,114,938 Program Staff: 14.30
  Target Actual Achieved % of Targets Met
Confined Animal Facilities Inspections 325 363 112% •
Regional Considerations: No Regional Board Considerations Provided
Available Fact Sheets: Confined Animal Facilities.
Timber Harvest (Forestry)
Program Budget: $1,937,238 Program Staff: 11.10
  Target Actual Achieved % of Targets Met
Timber Harvest Inspections 166 184 111% •
Regional Considerations: No Regional Board Considerations Provided
Available Fact Sheets: Timber Harvest.
Enforcement
Program Budget: $493,831 Program Staff: 3.60
  Target Actual Achieved % of Targets Met
Class 1 Priority Violations will Result in Formal Enforcement or an Investigative Order Pursuant to Water Code Section 13267 within 18 Months of Discovery 100 50 50% •
Facilities with Over $12,000 in MMPs (4 or More Violations) Not Assessed within 18 Months of Accrual 0 1         •
Regional Considerations: No Regional Board Considerations Provided
Available Fact Sheets: Compliance and Enforcement.
Cleanup
Program Budget: $6,987,614 Program Staff: 28.20
  Target Actual Achieved % of Targets Met
New Department of Defense Sites Into Active Remediation 9 5 56% •
Cleanup Sites Closed 64 55 86% •
New Underground Storage Tank Sites Into Active Remediation 29 35 121% •
Underground Storage Tank Sites Projected Closed 80 78 98% •
New Cleanup Sites Moved into Active Remediation 80 31 39% •
Regional Considerations: No Regional Board Considerations Provided
Available Fact Sheets: Cleanup and UST.

WHAT THE CARD IS SHOWING

Each target card provides a direct comparison of actual outputs for the fiscal year (July 1st to June 30th) to the target estimates established at the outset of the fiscal year. While budgetary and personnel information is not directly aligned with the activities being assessed, it does provide a basis for understanding the relative priority of key programs within each region and across the State. For the actual outputs presented, the Water Boards are continuing to evolve its data bases for improved accuracy. Some of the measurements reported may be different than the measurements tracked by the regions and programs. In addition, there are several targets for which outputs cannot be readily displayed without modification to the databases. This includes the number of permits revised, which should include the number of permits reviewed, revised and/or rescinded.

For the actual outputs presented, the Water Boards are continuing to evolve its data bases for improved accuracy. Some of the measurements reported may be different than the measurements tracked by the regions and programs. Notably, the data portrayed include entries completed before November 4, 2014 and may not reflect data input after that period.

WHY THIS CARD IS IMPORTANT

Beginning with FY 2009-10, performance targets were established for certain output measures. Targets are goals that establish measurable levels of performance to be achieved within a specified time period. This card demonstrates how the resources of the region are being deployed to protect water quality. In establishing the targets, the Regional Water Boards considered the unique differences and needs within their respective watersheds, their work priorities given available resources, external factors such as furloughs, and prior year outputs.

TECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS

  • Target circles: • = Less than 60% of target met
    • = Target met between 60% and 80%
    • = Target met at 80% or above.
  • Other Programs (budget): miscellaneous programs not included in the above.
  • Permits issued: Does not include rescissions, amendments or permit revisions that may have been included in the targets.

REGIONAL CONSIDERATIONS

Regional Considerations provided in tables above under each program section.